| MDKG |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:31 am |
|
Thought some of you might want to see this:
http://suchen.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/showDetails.html...geNumber=1
This must be a record price for a 46 split!? :shock: |
|
| Slow 1200 |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:08 am |
|
| :shock: |
|
| zwitter53 |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:20 am |
|
I´ll translate the ad:
1.131 cm³, restored, for over 40 years in private posession, chassis constructed 1940, 1946 the car was constructed from leftovers, original color was olivegreen, Motor Nr.1-179989, very rare, the beetle was delivered to the Englisch Army - Police. LPD. Stgt.Nr.0396-post-war beetle (with one of the first) chassis-no.: 0082
Tomas |
|
| RichOakley |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:52 am |
|
| Would be good to see some detailed pics of the car. I wonder if it really is a '40 chassis. |
|
| mrsherbie |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:44 am |
|
| Thats an awful lot of cash to get 60's wings and post 53 bumpers even from that 1 pic! But it could be an illusion? as the wheels and tyres are very cool and MASSIVE! :D |
|
| usariemen |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:10 am |
|
It is possible that they builded it up in 1946 on a ´40 chassis but that would have to be prooved at the car.
Well what ever chassis, what I see on the pic seems not to be worth half way that price. |
|
| johnshenry |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:20 am |
|
mrsherbie wrote: Thats an awful lot of cash to get 60's wings and post 53 bumpers even from that 1 pic! But it could be an illusion? as the wheels and tyres are very cool and MASSIVE! :D
You beat me too it. Usual crap, someone posts a split for sale for an eye popping prince, and it has obvious wrong parts on it. Makes you wonder what else is incorrect on this $87,000 split. |
|
| Yustrn |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:20 am |
|
johnshenry wrote: mrsherbie wrote: Thats an awful lot of cash to get 60's wings and post 53 bumpers even from that 1 pic! But it could be an illusion? as the wheels and tyres are very cool and MASSIVE! :D
You beat me too it. Usual crap, someone posts a split for sale for an eye popping prince, and it has obvious wrong parts on it. Makes you wonder what else is incorrect on this $87,000 split.
Probably a welded up radio hole and some repop bumpers...lmao. |
|
| ZwitterND |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:26 am |
|
| phew !! good thing I read this thread ! Just cancelled my check :lol: |
|
| kdf38@netzero.net |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:14 pm |
|
Do you have a thing for - the arteest formally known as "prince"? Seems like "it" might have some wrong parts on "it" too. "It" is kind of "eye-popping" tho' :lol:
johnshenry wrote: mrsherbie wrote: Thats an awful lot of cash to get 60's wings and post 53 bumpers even from that 1 pic! But it could be an illusion? as the wheels and tyres are very cool and MASSIVE! :D
You beat me too it. Usual crap, someone posts a split for sale for an eye popping prince, and it has obvious wrong parts on it. Makes you wonder what else is incorrect on this $87,000 split. |
|
| johnshenry |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:48 pm |
|
kdf38@netzero.net wrote: Do you have a thing for - the arteest formally known as "prince"? Seems like "it" might have some wrong parts on "it" too. "It" is kind of "eye-popping" tho' :lol:
johnshenry wrote: mrsherbie wrote: Thats an awful lot of cash to get 60's wings and post 53 bumpers even from that 1 pic! But it could be an illusion? as the wheels and tyres are very cool and MASSIVE! :D
You beat me too it. Usual crap, someone posts a split for sale for an eye popping prince, and it has obvious wrong parts on it. Makes you wonder what else is incorrect on this $87,000 split.
You lost me. |
|
| ZwitterND |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:01 pm |
|
| think typo John...eye popping "prince" ... Don't wrory Jhon I hvae been knwon to mkae a few mistkaes myslef. Tehy say lcak of sex cuases tpyo's. :shock: |
|
| johnshenry |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:28 pm |
|
| Oh duh. Firefox spell checker didn't catch that one. Maybe because it didn't know how to suggest a symbol as an alternate spelling.... |
|
| Blue Baron |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:05 pm |
|
MDKG wrote: This must be a record price for a 46 split!? :shock: It's only a record price if somebody pays it.
Hey, I have an idea! Let's throw up a picture of a random car for sale so we can all tear it to shreds for sport.
Oops ... too late ... 8) |
|
| RichOakley |
Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:37 pm |
|
| Has anybody spoken to the owner or requested more pics? |
|
| MDKG |
Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:01 am |
|
Blue Baron wrote: MDKG wrote: This must be a record price for a 46 split!? :shock: It's only a record price if somebody pays it.
Hey, I have an idea! Let's throw up a picture of a random car for sale so we can all tear it to shreds for sport.
Oops ... too late ... 8)
MDKG wrote: Thought some of you might want to see this:
You don't have to look. :D
Oh, and '46 random? |
|
| Björn Schewe |
Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:15 am |
|
The car belongs to a Volkswagen dealer in Göttingen before. who hat a small collection of interesting cars. The company was sold and most of the collection went to a professional dealer next to Göttingen. The car is everything else, but not as old as the seller exapt. The Chassis with the early number is a regular split one, the body is a mid 1949 with small gastank and papered glove-boxes. You can think and talk about the car what you want - but you can't say that the car has the wrong taillights as most of the "restored" cars of these years...
I have pute some pictures of the car a got last summer into the gallery... |
|
| franklinunes |
Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:27 am |
|
:shock: I saw the gallery...71k??? this???
Sorry to the seller but until now this is the most absurd price! there is lots of wrong parts on this...
Regards
Frank |
|
| mrsherbie |
Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:34 am |
|
Björn Schewe wrote: You can think and talk about the car what you want - but you can't say that the car has the wrong taillights as most of the "restored" cars of these
:shock: Well that is one solution to the difficult 49 taillight problem! :lol: |
|
| johnshenry |
Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:01 am |
|
Blue Baron wrote: MDKG wrote: This must be a record price for a 46 split!? :shock: It's only a record price if somebody pays it.
Hey, I have an idea! Let's throw up a picture of a random car for sale so we can all tear it to shreds for sport.
Oops ... too late ... 8)
There is no "sport" in this one. Its like shooting a chained Moose.
$87k and you don't get matching bumpers or any taillights. Takes "crack smoking" to a new level IMO.
So if the pan is a "regular" split, and the body a '49, what exactly makes this guy think that this car is a '46?? Maybe he just has a title like the guy building the "'48 Rat Rod" ?? |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|