TheSamba.com Forums
 
  View original topic: stock rocker assembly
mattg6o Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:02 pm

How sturdy are the stock rocker assemblies? I wanna put 1.25:1 rocker arms on. The rocker shaft seems fine. Wanted to save some money. CB wants $160 for the assembly, only $80 for the arms...
BTW engine is 1776 turbo build, not anymore than 6k rpm if that helps with a decision...

while I am here i might as well ask what the opinion on SCAT quality is? Im looking at the 1776 kit.

bugninva Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:17 pm

mattg6o wrote: How sturdy are the stock rocker assemblies? I wanna put 1.25:1 rocker arms on. The rocker shaft seems fine. Wanted to save some money. CB wants $160 for the assembly, only $80 for the arms...
BTW engine is 1776 turbo build, not anymore than 6k rpm if that helps with a decision...



I've got a pretty good rule that I live by... I don't skimp on a part that can take out a bunch of others if it dies... the stock assemblies are fine for a stock engine. I have stock rockers on my little turbo engine and used to rev it much higher than I should.. no problems, *but* I knew the risks and didn't mind the gamble... My current build(turbo also) will have solid shafts(already purchased), and I would not run it without them.

Cusser Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:06 am

I've run stock rocker assemblies on my 1835 since 1976.

drscope Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:16 am

If it is indeed a turbo, there is no need for the high ratio rockers. Thats what the turbo is all about.

The installation in that case wouldn't give you any noticable improvement.

mattg6o Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:28 am

drscope wrote: If it is indeed a turbo, there is no need for the high ratio rockers. Thats what the turbo is all about.


I was laying in bed trying to sleep and wondering that myself. Thanks.

bugninva Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:07 pm

drscope wrote: If it is indeed a turbo, there is no need for the high ratio rockers. Thats what the turbo is all about.

The installation in that case wouldn't give you any noticable improvement.

I don't agree. too many folks feel that because the turbo can force feed the engine, that basic engine principals are not needed.

To the OP, build a good engine, keep the cam duration within reason and you will have a nice engine off boost with good driveability. Then the turbo can add the *fun* to the engine when you do mat it.



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group