| Maddward |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:32 pm |
|
I finally had the chance to get her on the chassis dyno today! Thought I'd give you guys a chance to post your estimates before I post the results. Please use the Orange County correction factor when calculating :D
Here are my specs again:
92x74 balanced
.070" deck height
Heads
40 mm intake
32 mm exhaust
55cc chambers
Dual hi rev springs
Engle 110 cam
1.1 rockers on solid shafts
HD alum push rods
1.5 merged header, hideaway
40 DRLA's
34mm venturies with 55/135/200 jetting
Petronix SVDA |
|
| Pizza Eater |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:37 pm |
|
| 110 HP? |
|
| vwinnovator |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:05 pm |
|
| 87-92hp |
|
| slalombuggy |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:15 pm |
|
97 hp
brad |
|
| thechief86 |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:18 pm |
|
| I'm gonna guess lower, 85-95 hp, 110 ft lbs. |
|
| ALB |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:20 pm |
|
| 102 |
|
| gringoloco2000 |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:23 pm |
|
| 94.7254 |
|
| MURZI |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:35 pm |
|
| 91 hp |
|
| Dale M. |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:37 pm |
|
100.78 hp.
Dale |
|
| richparker |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:00 pm |
|
| What type of dyno? |
|
| Maddward |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:55 pm |
|
| It's a Dynocom AWD and you guys are good! I'll post it soon! |
|
| Maddward |
Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:57 pm |
|
102.2 hp and 135 lb ft. I just wanted to break 100 at the tires and barely did! |
|
| mark tucker |
Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:22 am |
|
| well on a good day and good dyno 85~90 and a bad day with the corection factor....103 |
|
| Glenn |
Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:27 am |
|
mark tucker wrote: well on a good day and good dyno 85~90 and a bad day with the corection factor....103
Don't forget the Orange County correction factor. RWHP x 1.25 = OC RWHP |
|
| richparker |
Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:39 am |
|
Glenn wrote: mark tucker wrote: well on a good day and good dyno 85~90 and a bad day with the corection factor....103
Don't forget the Orange County correction factor. RWHP x 1.25 = OC RWHP
:) |
|
| Maddward |
Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:47 am |
|
| I'll take a bad day with the OC correction factor! Haha |
|
| thechief86 |
Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:57 am |
|
Lol it sounds like I need to move to OC to get this 25% gain!
Where the hell did that even come from? I was familiar with corrections for altitude with land speed racing, but OC is at sea level? Lol crazy commie bastard in Kalifornia makin up their own rules and shit... |
|
| slalombuggy |
Sun Apr 03, 2016 10:40 am |
|
thechief86 wrote: Lol it sounds like I need to move to OC to get this 25% gain!
Where the hell did that even come from? I was familiar with corrections for altitude with land speed racing, but OC is at sea level? Lol crazy commie bastard in Kalifornia makin up their own rules and shit...
It's a long standing joke and a jibe at the OC engine builders who's engines always seem to make more power on the dyno than anyone else can reproduce. :lol:
brad |
|
| mcmscott |
Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:22 pm |
|
slalombuggy wrote: thechief86 wrote: Lol it sounds like I need to move to OC to get this 25% gain!
Where the hell did that even come from? I was familiar with corrections for altitude with land speed racing, but OC is at sea level? Lol crazy commie bastard in Kalifornia makin up their own rules and shit...
It's a long standing joke and a jibe at the OC engine builders who's engines always seem to make more power on the dyno than anyone else can reproduce. :lol:
brad
Exactly! and if you put thier 150 hp engine on my dyno it will only make 100 hp! And I am only 150ish miles north of OC |
|
| Alstrup |
Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:51 pm |
|
Hehe!
But the numbers dont really say anything as long as we do not know which calibration it was produced under. From a general experience I´d say that it is most likely SAE J1349, which is what most US guys are using today, Mustang dyno´s excempt. I have NO idea what they are using.
T |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|