| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SojournersWesty Samba Member

Joined: June 29, 2009 Posts: 33 Location: Atlanta GA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 5:45 pm Post subject: Re: Want to hear from Aircooled the pros and cons/ Go Water |
|
|
| vairken wrote: | Hi All,
I have searched alot of posts about air versus water. I have a 71 bay so love the vintage aircooled Type 1. Looking for a Westy 80-86 and am told stay away from the 80-83 air. Even by mechanics. Looking at an 84 water now but still sort of drawn to the aircooled 80-83. Does it really just boil down to speed or is it much more than that. Any aircooled lovers want to chime in. Anyone had both and prefer air ? Or should I take heed and go water. |
I have a 1982 AC Westy, had it since 1994. Been coast to coast and back again and no problems with the engine. And that was before I even had it running top notch. I threw a belt, once, other than that no core engine issues, just wear and tear on other things. I love the simplicity of it, and the few less things to worry about. Am I cold in the winter? You betcha! Would I like air-conditioning in the summer? Sure! But having lived in south FL for while and driving it everyday it wasn't that bad since all the heat was in the back....2x55 Air Conditioning worked great. But I can see that if you had some women folk and some younglings, real heat and A/C might be required to keep the troops from mutiny. But since you're going camping or just riding, a little sweat is expected. No different than riding a motorcycle.
Before I bought another aircooled (or watercooled for that matter) I would look at who owned it last and how it was taken care of.....somebody who loved it and kept good records. Beware of anybody who is quick to part with theirs, that to me is suspect. A compression check, test drive, oil levels, etc are all needed to asses your purchase.
As for parts, pfft I find it easier to get stuff now than when I bought mine. As for a mechanic who said stay away from them, I'd stay away from him. Find a trained VW mechanic you can trust for the major stuff and do the minor stuff yourself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vanagonjr Samba Member

Joined: October 07, 2010 Posts: 910 Location: Dartmouth, Mass.
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 5:58 pm Post subject: Re: Want to hear from Aircooled the pros and cons/ Go Water |
|
|
| SojournersWesty wrote: | | Am I cold in the winter? You betcha! . |
How about insulating the center cardboard air tube with "Insulated Duct for Air" from McMaster Carr.
McMaster.com Search for Page 224 or the description above. _________________ John
LiMBO (late model bus club) www.limbobus.org
LiMBO is on Facebook too! https://www.facebook.com/groups/limbobus/
86 Wolfsburg Westfalia "Weekender" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RCB Samba Member
Joined: September 05, 2005 Posts: 3522 Location: San Francisco-Bay Area
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:01 pm Post subject: Re: Want to hear from Aircooled the pros and cons/ Go Water |
|
|
| SojournersWesty wrote: | | vairken wrote: | Hi All,
I have searched alot of posts about air versus water. I have a 71 bay so love the vintage aircooled Type 1. Looking for a Westy 80-86 and am told stay away from the 80-83 air. Even by mechanics. Looking at an 84 water now but still sort of drawn to the aircooled 80-83. Does it really just boil down to speed or is it much more than that. Any aircooled lovers want to chime in. Anyone had both and prefer air ? Or should I take heed and go water. |
I have a 1982 AC Westy, had it since 1994. Been coast to coast and back again and no problems with the engine. And that was before I even had it running top notch. I threw a belt, once, other than that no core engine issues, just wear and tear on other things. I love the simplicity of it, and the few less things to worry about. Am I cold in the winter? You betcha! Would I like air-conditioning in the summer? Sure! But having lived in south FL for while and driving it everyday it wasn't that bad since all the heat was in the back....2x55 Air Conditioning worked great. But I can see that if you had some women folk and some younglings, real heat and A/C might be required to keep the troops from mutiny. But since you're going camping or just riding, a little sweat is expected. No different than riding a motorcycle.
Before I bought another aircooled (or watercooled for that matter) I would look at who owned it last and how it was taken care of.....somebody who loved it and kept good records. Beware of anybody who is quick to part with theirs, that to me is suspect. A compression check, test drive, oil levels, etc are all needed to asses your purchase.
As for parts, pfft I find it easier to get stuff now than when I bought mine. As for a mechanic who said stay away from them, I'd stay away from him. Find a trained VW mechanic you can trust for the major stuff and do the minor stuff yourself. |
************************* ************************** |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew A. Libby Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2006 Posts: 3496 Location: Flagstaff, AZ
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vanagonjr wrote: | Oh the #3 is indeed the one that will fail most often on a Type IV. Right next to the oil cooler. On California models, the Cat sits right under there are well. Also, when the oil cooler leaks, it the #3 cylinder area that get's gunked up with more stuff limiting air flow and the gunk will also lessen the heat transfer rate of the fins. |
The type 4 oil cooler is right next to cylinder #4, not #3. #3 is to the front of the vehicle.
(front of car)
3 ------------------- 1
4 ------------------- 2
(oil cooler)
(rear of car) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fredn Samba Member
Joined: May 27, 2010 Posts: 315 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have an Air Cooled and I love it. It gets me where I want to go and not much more than that. It does have a bit more pep thanks to a cam upgrade. I have a fresh motor that I built for it when I bought the van a couple of years ago. Mine is a tintop with a weekender interior. I might feel differently with a westy (and the extra weight).
My plans don't include an engine conversion, rather my next step will be to put bigger valves in the heads (42x36mm). Cost will be approx 350 a side. _________________ 1982 Air Cooled Vanagon Carat Weekender Interior
| tencentlife wrote: | | ...most are doing what most auto forum participants do, parroting things they've heard |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dennis Perusse Samba Member
Joined: June 03, 2006 Posts: 152 Location: amesbury, mass
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my humble opinion it boils down to your needs and what you decide to purchase, so you need to figure out your needs. How much are you going to be driving it? Will you be doing camping year round, or only during certain seasons? Is it something that you're gonna just be enjoying as either a hauler or just wanting to go to a few vw shows?
Then their is also mechanical ability? It is true that the water cooled ones can have modifications done to it to improve speed, and other areas of comfort and reliability. Do you have the ability to either maintain that or is your wallet wide enough to pay someone to handle that?
Then their are the creature comforts that you may expect. Part of that entails speed, or having complete temperature control (i.e. Air Conditioning) or power locks or windows and most of the stuff that some people, like me, are rather lukewarm to. Plus things like larger tires, tow hitches, massive audio systems, etc.
So the bottom line is this. If you used to driving your 71 and like the speed and are comfortable with its performance (I realize the term "performance" is subjective) than an air cooled is fine. Plus you can put in a Raby camper special engine should you have the dough and you desire a more powerful option. Do a search on 82Westyman who went with that option and ask him his feelings about that.
With a water cooled you have a lot of other options in terms of performance (again subjective in many ways) in areas of engine, braking, tire size, etc. Plenty of ways to spend your money for what you want, but, as the old adage says to "think before you spend".
Just as an example I have an 81 air cooled that I am trying to restore as funds allow. I knew what I wanted, knew that it wouldn't be fast, and knew that some things I would be limited with. I wouldn't change a thing. I knew that I wouldn't be happy with a water cooled engine. Where I have a lead foot sometimes and a penchant for hair brained ideas the air-cooled version of this bus appeals to me. Your mileage may vary as you need to asses your personal needs and what you want out of it.
Plus, unless you are handy mechanically or with deep pockets you also want to purchase the most reasonable one that just calls out to you to bring home and make it a part of your life.
Best of luck in your decision and purchase. Don't forget though, if you really like a slow water cooled bus their is always the diesel version that's 47 hp.
Dennis |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chazz79 Samba Member

Joined: August 15, 2008 Posts: 1845 Location: ohio
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The air cooled vanagon is a joke. Even in decent tune the pile won't get out of its own way. It reminded me of my bay when it still had the 1700 in it but only worse. Steer way clear unless you plan in swapping everything out. _________________ One day as a lion, or a lifetime as lamb
The green monster in bits and peices: http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=332556&highlight=green+monster |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TDI_VT Samba Member

Joined: June 12, 2011 Posts: 77 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only thing worse than an aircooled Vanagon is the pathetic excuse for an engine that is called the 1.6 NA diesel. Just not enough power for daily use...maybe around town only. I don't like the idea of not being able to climb a hill above 60 mph...but that's just me I guess. _________________ 1986 Vanagon GL white, 118K original miles. TDI Diesel swap 75% complete!
2007 BMW R1200S More HP then 1.5 vanagons...
1998 VW Jetta TDi RiP, it was an organ donor though.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vanagonjr Samba Member

Joined: October 07, 2010 Posts: 910 Location: Dartmouth, Mass.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Andrew A. Libby wrote: | | vanagonjr wrote: | Oh the #3 is indeed the one that will fail most often on a Type IV. Right next to the oil cooler. On California models, the Cat sits right under there are well. Also, when the oil cooler leaks, it the #3 cylinder area that get's gunked up with more stuff limiting air flow and the gunk will also lessen the heat transfer rate of the fins. |
The type 4 oil cooler is right next to cylinder #4, not #3. #3 is to the front of the vehicle.
(front of car)
3 ------------------- 1
4 ------------------- 2
(oil cooler)
(rear of car) |
You are indeed correct! I was sure it was the one under the Cat, remembering a discussion with a local Air-cooled VW Mechanic/engine builder- Obviously I remember the discussion wrongly.
I edited the that post to remove the wrong info for future search readers. But, searching on google and switching on #3 to #1 still shows #3 as the far more prevalent.
You would think after rebuilding this down to the main bearings, I would remember. I really enjoyed the rebuild process of the type IV, someday again perhaps I'll do it again. _________________ John
LiMBO (late model bus club) www.limbobus.org
LiMBO is on Facebook too! https://www.facebook.com/groups/limbobus/
86 Wolfsburg Westfalia "Weekender" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
netcruzer Samba Member
Joined: July 27, 2010 Posts: 61 Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was looking for a 2.1 water boxer last year as my first Westy, but I found a sweet 82 air cooled and I couldn't say no to it.
I've been very happy with it. Mine is stock Canadian spec, had it tuned by an air cooled specialist, and is completely adequate for power. Going up steep hills is only when I notice the lack of overall ponies in the rear. If you keep the weight down for all your extra camp gear and don't live in the mountains, hilly areas, an air cooled is great.
Extra vintage, better looks without a front rad, a sound that turns heads and gives you thumbs up/peace waves wherever I go.
Very happy with my air cooled! _________________ '82 Air-Cooled Vanagon Westfalia
Last edited by netcruzer on Mon Apr 09, 2012 8:39 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jake Raby Samba Member

Joined: August 23, 2003 Posts: 6925 Location: Aircooled Heaven USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Air or water, we have all the bases covered  _________________ Jake Raby
Raby Engine Development
www.rabyenginedevelopment.com
"I've never given anyone Hell, I just told them the truth and they thought it was Hell" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kuleinc Samba Member

Joined: August 10, 2007 Posts: 1411 Location: East Bay Area, California
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just because you have a 2.1L water cooled engine, doesn't mean you won't be doing 25 MPH up the grade to tahoe... Ask me how I know?
That being said, I didn't have to worry about head temps or oil temps, which is nice. _________________ 1987 Wolfram Gray 2WD Vanagon GL Westy (1.8T Powered!)
2001 ALH Jetta TDi (Hers)
1998 ALH New Beetle (His)
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=496946 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bercilak Samba Member

Joined: August 17, 2009 Posts: 370 Location: Irvine
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've had both ~ an 82 air-cooled, and an 85 with a 2.1 transplant. Differences:
Speed ~ the water cooled is better if you want to drive modern highway/traffic speeds. This NOT a flaw in the air-cooled. At the time the early vanagons were designed and sold, the maximum speed limit in the US was 55 mph, a speed that my air-cooled vanagon easily exceeded for short periods with no meaningful problems.
Power ~ With the air-cooled you may find yourself being passed by everything (even semis!) on a long grade on a hot day (I drove to LA to Vegas on an August day, just to see how it would do). The water cooled runs up the steep hill I live on at 55mph, and can keep up in LA traffic, though I stay to the right and drive 65-70 most of the time.
Heat ~ For LA, the air-cooled heat was adequate to the task. For colder areas (I lived in Oregon for many years) I suspect you'll feel the heat is less-than-satisfactory on cold days. If you are driving in to P-town on the freeway from West Linn, you'll probably find it heats up OK.
The water-cooled heats for real. That thing is a heat machine. Caveat: I had to replace the coolant lines and both heater cores to get there.
A/C ~ You can get A/C in air-cooleds, but I've never heard of anyone thinking that it was worthwhile. I haven't fixed the A/C in my vanagon (we live close to the beach, so rarely need it), but will before I take the wife/child on long trips.
*****************************
If you want modern power & speed, then look to the water-cooled, and maybe start looking at conversion (conversion = money and/or knowledge; do you have either/both?)
SojournerWesty's advice is by far the most important; the previous owner, and the detail level of work will determine what you spend most of your time doing in your van. I went into my water-cooled knowing it was a project, and still get sick of not being able to use it much from time to time. I would rather have a well-cared for air-cooled than a black-box water-cooled any day.
Best of luck,
B. _________________ 85 Vanagon GL ~ aka "Desert Rat"
2.1 case, 1.9 external systems |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
delibessleep Samba Member

Joined: January 09, 2005 Posts: 671 Location: Woodinville, WA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've owned a 77 bus, test drove an 81 vanagon, and own an 87 Westy.
The 2.0L in the bay was just fine (I miss that bus). But it wasn't a camper and not nearly as heavy.
The 81 was a dog. I live in the mountains and just couldn't picture getting out on the highway with no ability to stay with the flow of uphill traffic.
The 87 isn't a speed machine by any measure. But it is much more powerful than the AC, and provides greater options to improve the power than the AC unit (when that day comes).
Converting the AC to a WC sounds like a money pit to me. A big AC motor might be a better option. _________________ 63 Single Cab
63 Beetle sedan
69 Karmann Ghia
87 Westy
Biology is destiny...choose your mutations carefully |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fredn Samba Member
Joined: May 27, 2010 Posts: 315 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dennis Perusse wrote: | | Plus you can put in a Raby camper special engine should you have the dough and you desire a more powerful option. |
Raby is not selling DYI kits any more. He will put a camper special in for you and you won't believe how much that costs. _________________ 1982 Air Cooled Vanagon Carat Weekender Interior
| tencentlife wrote: | | ...most are doing what most auto forum participants do, parroting things they've heard |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dennis Perusse Samba Member
Joined: June 03, 2006 Posts: 152 Location: amesbury, mass
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually no more that what most people are gonna have to spend to get their water cooled or diesel model up to what their expectations seem to be. I've heard people say that they've spent 12 g's on their ride, and some far less. It's all what you're willing to spend, and what your needs are.
How fast do you really need to go? Sure you're getting past by everyone and everything but it all depends on terrain. Where I live on the eastern seaboard most things are between 55 and 65. Personally I'm quite comfortable between those speeds, others are not. Hell, where I'm a jeep owner I drive at the speed limit and do quite well that way. If driving like an Aztec sacrifice on the highway is the ideal you'll never stay ahead since people drive today like a ferret hooked on angel dust. Enjoy the ride, you'll get where you want to go...and if you can get do it enjoyably, better still. Plan ahead, their is nothing wrong with that mindset.
These are wonderful machines, born in a time that we will never see again in terms of quality and longevity. Again, assess your needs and whatever you purchase will clearly be perfect for you. Best of luck in your process, and to everyone who owns one of these. We are truly lucky in this sense and even though people will disagree from time to time that isn't bad either.
Dennis |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jake Raby Samba Member

Joined: August 23, 2003 Posts: 6925 Location: Aircooled Heaven USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fredn wrote: | | Dennis Perusse wrote: | | Plus you can put in a Raby camper special engine should you have the dough and you desire a more powerful option. |
He will put a camper special in for you and you won't believe how much that costs. |
12,500.00 and getting more expensive with every cost analysis we carry out. _________________ Jake Raby
Raby Engine Development
www.rabyenginedevelopment.com
"I've never given anyone Hell, I just told them the truth and they thought it was Hell" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rsxsr Samba Member

Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 4780 Location: Loxahatchee, Florida
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TDI_VT wrote: | | The only thing worse than an aircooled Vanagon is the pathetic excuse for an engine that is called the 1.6 NA diesel. Just not enough power for daily use...maybe around town only. I don't like the idea of not being able to climb a hill above 60 mph...but that's just me I guess. |
Ouch. The only engine better than an aircooled 2.0 is the diesel 1.6. Both flavors of the WBX come in at a close 3rd. So there you have another useless point of view. _________________ 1982 Diesel Vanagon Camper with ALH TDI.
1987 Syncro Tin Top. Organ Donor
2011 TDI Jetta Sportwagen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
noganav Samba Member

Joined: January 06, 2006 Posts: 784 Location: San Diego CA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Notice a pattern anyone?
Lots of haters who have driven one once, or have been told they're slow or blah blah blah. Folks who've owned them for a while, like them just fine. If they're properly maintained they will do 70mph all day and a little more than 20mpg. Slow on the hills, but my Syncro is not really much better. I'll definitely have another Aircooled van when I live somewhere with some space.
Don't count them out without actually driving one and listening to people *who can document that they actually have some experience with them*. Aircooled vans are the best value for money right now. They camp just like the watercooled ones, and the come with a super awesome ski lodge interior.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
delibessleep Samba Member

Joined: January 09, 2005 Posts: 671 Location: Woodinville, WA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Lots of haters who have driven one once, or have been told they're slow or blah blah blah. |
I don't hate them. They are fine in their own right. But I'd still recommend the WC over the AC to someone looking for their first Westy.
Any Westy is better than no Westy. _________________ 63 Single Cab
63 Beetle sedan
69 Karmann Ghia
87 Westy
Biology is destiny...choose your mutations carefully |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|