| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't have the pins or new gland nut yet but does anyone know the torque spec for the gland nut & the pressure plate bolts? I have read differing amounts ranging from 250 all the way to 425 ft lbs. for the gland nut. That's a big difference. It is a 200mm clutch if that makes a difference. 616/39 case & looks to be a regular crank.
As far as hardness I don't have access to anyone with a rockwell tester but I to would be curious. Who knows how old these pins are. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Glenn  Mr. 010

Joined: December 25, 2001 Posts: 55660 Location: Long Island, New York, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
For VWs the the torque range depends on the glad nut. Stock is around 250-275, but if you have a forged gland nut you can increase it to 400+. _________________ Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"
HBB/RW
www.DasVolks.com
Long Island's Aircooled Club |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Found a chart in the registry site that has the gland nut at 350 ft. pds. & the pressure plate bolts at 15-18 ft. pds. Now it seems I may have ordered the wrong seal. Everyone is saying to use the viton seal & trim the secondary lip. I ordered the regular seal so it looks like I'm going reorder to get the viton one as that seems to be what was in there without the lip trimmed. My parts should be in any day so I'll see what comes & compare it to what I took out. All thanks for the help I have gotten. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mtwrench540 Samba Member
Joined: October 25, 2009 Posts: 352 Location: monterey,va
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:41 pm Post subject: cranky |
|
|
r39o is right on,crank out machine shop with vast 356 experience!!try vic skirmits! or the guy in new cumberland,pa,closer to you,can never rember his name! got it it's dennis frick!!!! | r39o wrote: | Long long long time 356 experience tells me you gonna be best served by taking the crank out.
Take it to the machine shop.
Loose gland nut may be bad threads too.
This is not a pleasant situation.
Do yourself a favor.
Do NOT fool around.
It can get worse later...... |
_________________ 87 wolfsberg,74 181w/1915 and lots of patina! learned to fix vw's from hot vw mag in 1964,VWOA instructor,DSM,69 to73,service mgr at different porsche-audi dealers etc,etc,now retired!!! first vw new 64,transplanted 356 eng in 65,400characters are not enough space!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Install questions. How far do the dowel pins go in? Bottom them out or leave them stick out a specified amount? Green loctite on the pins? Red loctite on the gland nut? Special grease in the gland nut bushing? Just waiting for my viton oil seal & then I'm good to assemble.
My Elfrinks book can't arrive soon enough. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone know how far the dowel pins are supposed to go in? I got all my parts but not sure if the dowel pins go in the crank until bottoming out or have a measured stick out? I don't have a book yet & I searched long & hard for this answer but can't find anybody mentioning dowel pin installation. I don't want to install them only to find out there is some measurement. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MoPor Samba Member
Joined: December 03, 2010 Posts: 208 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know but in the absence of a proper spec I would take some measurements of the bore depths and make sure the dowels are in the crank 50-60 per cent of the dowel pin length. The dowels need to be deep enough that they dont move around. My 0.02 cents and probably overpriced.  _________________ Matt
'58 356A coupe
'95 993 coupe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll mic them later tonight but the pin is about 7/16" long & the old ones were in about just shy of 5/16" which leaves about a fat 1/8" sticking out. I believe they were bottomed but not positive. It just seems they should be longer? They were only in the flywheel about half the thickness of the flange. I'll get some real measurements later. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jacks Samba Member
Joined: July 15, 2006 Posts: 843 Location: San Clemente, Ca.
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If the dowel pins are recessed below the surface of the flywheel when all is installed, all is good. _________________ Jack Staggs
Actual name |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
New pins are in. Went in nicely with no play until they bottomed out in the crank.. Had to tap them in. Pins are .472" long & went in the crank .332" leaving .140" sticking out. My flywheel is .250" thick & the crush washer is .005" where it mates to the crank so no issues with them hitting the gland nut. The new gland nut from Stoddard says right on the box torque to 400-450 ft. pds. Hopefully get the clutch & flywheel back on tonight. I'll check endplay first, hopefully no issue there.
Why the difference in the gland nuts? The one that came out has a bearing in it & the new one from Stoddard has a bushing? How does the bushing get lubed after the initial assembly? _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disregard all my measurements in this post. I don't know where I went wrong but will go through it again. Found my problem as I was using the wrong conversion. This is why I hate doing stuff at night when I'm tired. To easy to make a simple mistake. I will leave this post alone so people can see how easy it is to look stupid.
(((This thing is driving me nuts. Go to check the end play just for kicks & realize I have four shims two @ .009" & two @ .011" which = .040". All is good with end play at .005" but I see that Porsche & others only recommend using one shim. I can't find one shim at .040 (1.575mm.) The best I can come up with is using two shims @ .0203 (.8mm). If I go with two shims I would still be with in tolerence. Stoddard has shims up to about .029" (1.15mm) & then they jump to .071" (2.8mm) with nothing in between. I am inclined to leave the current set of shims in. Any thoughts?))))
So i just read all I care to on this. Jack Staggs says it's a no-no to use stacked shims & Al Zim says it is o/k. I guess I'll have to choose myself but please feel free to weigh in on this.
Sorry for misspelling your name. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it?
Last edited by MMW on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:02 am; edited 7 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jacks Samba Member
Joined: July 15, 2006 Posts: 843 Location: San Clemente, Ca.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
So in my previous post last night as Jack pointed out my "calculations don't jive". Of course they didn't as I was using the wrong conversion off the top of my head, just stupid for not looking it up. 1mm is = to .03937". So since my end play is fine with a .040" shim stack I will order a 1mm (.03937") & a 1.1 (.04330) shim. One of these should put me within spec of .005" to .0065".
Thank you to Jack & others for all your help with not only me but to everyone on this forum. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Finally got the motor bolted back in last night. Still have to finish hooking up everything though. So far so good. Everything fit nicely as it should. Cut the outer lip off the Viton seal. Gland nut torqued to 425 ft. pds. & pressure plate bolts to 18 ft. pds. I also greased the bushing in the gland nut with moly grease & put a new starter bushing in. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it?
Last edited by MMW on Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:40 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Before I put it in I adjusted the valves to .005" intakes & .007" exhausts. All were very close & none were on the tight side. The worst one was an exhaust at .010". Set the points to .016" & the timing statically to 5* before tdc. I found the points were closed up to .009". I wish I checked the timing before I adjusted the points because the timimg was way advanved. Not sure if it all came from the point adjustment or not. Saying my prayers that it will fire up & have no issues. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
savaden Samba Member
Joined: May 03, 2012 Posts: 61 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The published torque in the 356 manual was 350 lbs plus or minus. The published torque in the 912 manual was 250 lbs plus or minus. Since nothing changed, it has been assumed that the 250 lb value was an error. The torque value for the "super" gland nuts is in the 425 lb range. Nowadays, I would always replace the original gland nut with one of the new "super" gland nuts, whether it needed it or not.
SV |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMW Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2012 Posts: 360 Location: northern NJ
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Got it running today! Still on the lift I let it run for a few minutes. No weird noises. Shut it down, gave it a look over, then cleaned up & got it back on the ground. Fired it again & let it run for 5 minutes. All looked & sounded good so took it for a short ride that turned into a 30 minute ride. Seems fine. Wow I missed driving it. Good timing as a thunder storm is rolling through now & it's back in the garage.
Thank you all who replied with suggestions & info. It was much appreciated. _________________ Mic McWilliams
1959 356 coupe
Missing the original engine 72488
Anybody have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MoPor Samba Member
Joined: December 03, 2010 Posts: 208 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great news Mic! _________________ Matt
'58 356A coupe
'95 993 coupe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjjjack  Samba Member

Joined: August 08, 2005 Posts: 395 Location: Gainesville, FL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|