Author |
Message |
francoangellini Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2012 Posts: 223 Location: Chile-South America
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:23 am Post subject: type1 connecting rod internal diameter question?? |
|
|
Hi Guys,
I´m rebuilt a stock 1600cc, but I need internal diameter measure for check my rods, this information not appear in my vw manual......
Really apreciate your help.....
Regards. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jason Samba Member
Joined: August 07, 2002 Posts: 3444 Location: Garage
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rods are 2.1644-2.1653 on crank with .010 each undersize
actual rods are .0012 out of round tolerance |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francoangellini Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2012 Posts: 223 Location: Chile-South America
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jason wrote: |
rods are 2.1644-2.1653 on crank with .010 each undersize
actual rods are .0012 out of round tolerance |
Thanks, but I need internal diameter of the rod...not crankshaft rod....before install the bearings....... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Northof49 Samba Member
Joined: July 22, 2013 Posts: 1759 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I looked in the Chilton Manual, How to Rebuild your VW, and the Bentley and they don't have that specification. _________________ 1958 Karmann Ghia owner |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francoangellini Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2012 Posts: 223 Location: Chile-South America
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uffff, any ideas?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Northof49 Samba Member
Joined: July 22, 2013 Posts: 1759 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like the assumption is that you will install bearings and measure them in that state. _________________ 1958 Karmann Ghia owner |
|
Back to top |
|
|
modok Samba Member
Joined: October 30, 2009 Posts: 26785 Location: Colorado Springs
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mad Manx Samba Member
Joined: September 30, 2004 Posts: 304 Location: Redondo Beach California
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks modox, I have been looking for these for a long time. Good info. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francoangellini Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2012 Posts: 223 Location: Chile-South America
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you Modok..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francoangellini Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2012 Posts: 223 Location: Chile-South America
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok, but this information also appear in this manual?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
earthquake Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2008 Posts: 3984 Location: SANDY VALLEY, NEVADA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Whats the ID of the big end on a Chevy rod for those of us that don't know?
Casey _________________ 74 CLASS 11 LOOK-A-LIKE
69 DUNE BUGGY
79 INTERNATIONAL SCOUT II
05 SCION XB SERIES RELEASE 2[#437]
95 Chevy C3500 dually
98 Ford E150
Link to Kelly J. Nolte 3/20/53 - 11/6/08
https://time-zonelabs.blogspot.com/p/about-kelly.html
DEATH TO CHINGERS!
[From a military recruitment poster in the novel "The Stainless Steel Rat" By Harry Harrison] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mark tucker Samba Member
Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23937 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
some books have it most dont. bearing manuls are best.I wish i had kept more of them over the years. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
modok Samba Member
Joined: October 30, 2009 Posts: 26785 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chevy 2": 2.1247-2.1252
Those are all memorized. Don't ask for porsche size I'll have to open a book |
|
Back to top |
|
|
modok Samba Member
Joined: October 30, 2009 Posts: 26785 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francoangellini wrote: |
ok, but this information also appear in this manual?? |
He's right!! Rod housing size is left out of without guesswork.
sorry, I thought it did. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|