Author |
Message |
bigedd08 Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2004 Posts: 183 Location: Nashville ,TN
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:02 pm Post subject: What's the biggest you can go without machining? |
|
|
I have a stock 1600DP with Dual Weber 34 ICTs. What is the biggest I can go without machining the heads. 1641, 1776... I thought it was 1641, but I'm not sure.
I am getting ready to order a rebuild kit withe everything except the heads. I've seen a 1641 kit in cip1 catalog I am thinking of pairing with an Engle 110 cam.
Your input is welcome......
-Ed _________________ 69 Fastback Automatic |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blankmange Type 3 Darksider
Joined: July 17, 2004 Posts: 11498 Location: Bloßer Stahl-preapocalyptic MidCoast
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:07 pm Post subject: Re: What's the biggest you can go without machining? |
|
|
bigedd08 wrote: |
I have a stock 1600DP with Dual Weber 34 ICTs. What is the biggest I can go without machining the heads. 1641, 1776... I thought it was 1641, but I'm not sure.
I am getting ready to order a rebuild kit withe everything except the heads. I've seen a 1641 kit in cip1 catalog I am thinking of pairing with an Engle 110 cam.
Your input is welcome......
-Ed |
1641 i s the biggest drop in... beyond that, break out the machine shop... _________________ póg mo thóin
Certified DHS Technician
Samba Member # 24517 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SquareTone Samba Member
Joined: July 10, 2003 Posts: 1204 Location: Jenks, Oklahoma
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you don't want to machine then I'd stick with the 1600's. I had the 1641 for a while, and couldn't tell any difference. I've heard that the smallest stroker crank will go with no modification. Might be worth considering. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karfer67 Samba Member
Joined: January 05, 2005 Posts: 713
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
i think the largest stroker you could use would be a 74mm vs the stock 69mm. personally i would not use the "slip in" big bore pistons as the reason they are able to do this is the cylinder walls are machined thiner. this makes them run hotter and over time can warp. where as a stock bore has thick barels and runs much much cooler. it really comes down to if you want an engine that will last 100,000 miles or an engine that will last 50,000 and have maybe 5 more hp. _________________ aircooled for life (1972 squareback cal look) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
quattlebum Samba Member
Joined: February 06, 2005 Posts: 585 Location: Sacramento,CA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would bore if you're going to do a 1641 like Karfer said the walls are thinner... i've driven one, I don't notice that much of a diff between the 1600 and 1641... there's a good difference between a 1600 and 1776... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
localboy Samba Longboarder
Joined: December 06, 2003 Posts: 5153 Location: "Mainland", PNW
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
1776...nuff said. _________________ One man's "patina" is another man's cancer...
Black '65 Resto-Custom S Notch 2110 cc powered
original paint Pearl White '66 Westy SO-42
Allstate single-wheel trailer project |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FASTBACKDON The other insensitive jerk like Neil
Joined: October 08, 2004 Posts: 3592 Location: TORRANCE CALIF
|
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with kafer and mark there is a big differance between my stock 1600 and my mild 1776 ha ha the carbs i switched to help a little good luck |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|