Author |
Message |
cheeseisgood Samba Member
Joined: October 18, 2004 Posts: 566
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 12:57 pm Post subject: Should I be afraid of an automatic transmission?? |
|
|
I've always prefered manual, but have recently seen some vanagons(88-92) that I liked that were automatics. Should this be a deciding factor? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
r39o Samba Polizei
Joined: May 18, 2005 Posts: 9800 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aside from the occasional leak or a bad trans cooler, they are fine. They need service just like anything else. Change the cooler when you get it. Change the fluids. Make sure no leaks. It will be fine. Go read at GoWesty about them. They are tough. Be aware that the automatic to final drive seal can leak which is common problem with the 3 speed autos from that vintage. A good shop will be able to tell, if it is "intermixing." There are few real bad problems with them. Then again, they are still just 3 speed autos. You learn to live with that.
Mind you the 4 speed has a problem part in it too, that breaks. Go read at GoWesty about that too.
I usually will favor a 5 speed above all. But, most have 4 speeds. I got my 85 Westy with an automatic and it makes driving less of a chore. The manuals give better fuel economy and tax the engine less.
It is a toss up. The autos are just fine and are no more or less bother than the manual.
-W _________________ "Use the SEARCH, Luke" But first visit the Vanagon FAQ!
1990 Multivan EJ 22, Rancho trans 0.82 4th, Small Car front AC, CLKs w/ 215/65-16, homemade big brakes 303mm, Konis, Recaros, etc....
Click to see my ads for Cup holders, Subaru clutch fix and CLK wheels (no wheels currently) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levi Samba Member
Joined: February 11, 2005 Posts: 5522 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've had both and prefer the manual.....but the automatic is a strong tranny.
My mpg difference:
17 average automatic
23 average manual
big difference! More than 30 %.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sc-surfer Samba Member
Joined: May 16, 2005 Posts: 865 Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My '79 bus had an automatic, and I loved it. I have always been a manual trans. guy, but the automatic was easy to drive and super reliable. The above mentioned gas milage issue is the main downside. _________________ '89 Syncro Westy
Catalog of Vans at SDM 2010
Westfalia, Syncro & Tristar Reproduction decals here.
* * * Coming Soon: Washable seat covers for westy bench seat...keep the pets off the upholstery! * * * |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seanj Samba Member
Joined: June 11, 2005 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a buddy of mine has an auto westy, 91 i think. at about 200k miles of road trips all over the country the engine finally went but the tranny still works like it did the first day he bought it. also i have an 82 vanagon auto that i was worried about at first but after driving it for a year i no longer have concerns. works dependably all the time although the loss in mileage is kind of a drag. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big B Samba Member
Joined: June 24, 2003 Posts: 467 Location: long beach,cal
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Am I doing something right?
I have an auto and on flat roads, I am getting artound 21 mpg, once I got 23mpg, but the wind was behind me.
I always keep my tires inflated to top pressure, the drag from four tires running low can add up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ianstone Samba Member
Joined: September 14, 2005 Posts: 195 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big B wrote: |
Am I doing something right?
I have an auto and on flat roads, I am getting artound 21 mpg, once I got 23mpg, but the wind was behind me.
I always keep my tires inflated to top pressure, the drag from four tires running low can add up. |
you keep them to the top pressure rating on the tire? or the top mfr reccomended (VW) pressure settings for the tires (diff for front & back)
that's how i have mine set and i'm getting about 16mpg
(87vanagon, 2.1L) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big B Samba Member
Joined: June 24, 2003 Posts: 467 Location: long beach,cal
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Top man rec, I also just put on a new cat and tune up, mabye you need a tune. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levi Samba Member
Joined: February 11, 2005 Posts: 5522 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Low tire pressure can really cost you........
When I first got the 1.9 I couldn't understand why I was only getting 17 mpg.
Bumped tire pressure up to max, and now I average 23, and it handles a hell of a lot better.
BTW, I havent had a tune-up in 5 years, havent changed the plugs, the rotor looks like crap, and my last emissions test ( last month ) only barely passed, and I'm STILL averaging 23.....go figure. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikegoode Samba Member
Joined: November 06, 2005 Posts: 139 Location: Central Arizona
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My 88 Wolfsburg Vanagon had an automatic trans in it-and was still shifting smooth when I sold it with almost 140K on it. On a 6,000 mile trip from Chicago to CA and back with 4 people and luggage aboard, we averaged 23mpg by keeping the cruise set at 65-68mph. Above 70mph, the drop in fuel mileage was very noticeable. That is one thing I do not understand-especially in the mid 80s when higher end cars started seeing 4 speed automatics a lot-was that VW had the Vanagon, obviously a great vehicle for long distance trips, and of course the Vanagon was expensive then too, and they cheaped out and left a 3 speed automatic in it.
But the automatic was fine, shifted real nice etc. I have since driven a manual Vanagon camper, and while more work, it made much better use of the engine's available torque. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
supplicationjam Samba Member
Joined: September 14, 2004 Posts: 114 Location: I-25?
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have an automatic and only get 14 mpg around town, about 17 on the highway and about 19 with a good tailwind . And that is tuned with new cat, o2 sensor tuneup and new injectors. I haven't a clue how come everyone else gets better mileage. Maybe I'm totin' around too much stuff in my westy. _________________ 87 Westy, DiscoII
Gunny, CO. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ianstone Samba Member
Joined: September 14, 2005 Posts: 195 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
supplicationjam wrote: |
I have an automatic and only get 14 mpg around town, about 17 on the highway and about 19 with a good tailwind . And that is tuned with new cat, o2 sensor tuneup and new injectors. I haven't a clue how come everyone else gets better mileage. Maybe I'm totin' around too much stuff in my westy. |
things that make you go HMMMMMMMMM
but really - why would the manuf. reccomend different pressure settings for front and rear...
is it more wear/tear on the tires itself to have them fully pressurized like that? I wonder why this makes such a significant change in riding |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big B Samba Member
Joined: June 24, 2003 Posts: 467 Location: long beach,cal
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ianstone
I should have been more specific; when I say manyfacturers top inflation specifications, I am referring to the tire manufacturers, not the Vehicle specs. The difference in vehicle specs, is to reflect the difference in vehicle weight distribution, you have more weight in the rear on a Westy, thus the higher pressure in the rear tires.
Yeahbaby |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|