| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BampaBus Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2009 Posts: 175 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:09 am Post subject: One More Torsion Bar Setting Question |
|
|
I've researched this on Samba pretty thoroughly, and come away without a clear consensus. So I thought I'd throw it out for one more round to see if we can land somewhere on solid ground.
I've a '73 Campmobile with a pretty bad case of rear end sag and camber issues on the rear wheels. Yesterday I tackled the torsion bars. Took a while, but with the help of the Samba community I completed the job. Previous readings on the spring plates were around 19 deg. I set the both at 21 deg. Bentley says 20 deg, 50 min. I installed new donuts.
Results: my camber issue is resolved on the passenger side. There is still a little showing on the drivers side. However, the sag did not improve. I've been using a floor measurement from the front jack point on the pinch seams and comparing that to the rear jack point. Drivers side front is 15 1/4" off the ground, rear is 14 1/2", 3/4" lower rear compared to front. Passenger side front is 15" off the ground, rear is 14 1/4", again 3/4" lower rear compared to front.
Rereading every post I could find, I see two schools of thought. One says the old torsion bars get fatigued with age, and to overcompensate on the spring plate angle through trial and error until you get the bus level. The other says that the bus came from the factory with rear end sag, and to set your spring plates per Bentley and live with the sag. Passenger weight will help offset.
Does anyone actually know for certain if the bus came from the factory with built-in sag?
Should I leave as is, or bump it up a few degrees and closer to level? If so, how far? As usual, all feedback is appreciated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VDubTech Samba Member

Joined: December 29, 2002 Posts: 8551 Location: Syracuse, NY
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
With no one in the Bus, the front end should sit a little higher, and yes it's designed that way.....so when you have people in the front seats, the Bus sits level as it goes down the road. _________________ First Trip in the RustyBus:
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=279077&highlight=
| borninabus wrote: | | a measurement of your rod would be extremely useful. |
| notchboy wrote: | | my dad wasnt a belittling cock when he tought me how to wrench on cars. |
| EverettB wrote: | One photo = good for reference.
10 photos = douchebaggery |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dansvans Samba Member

Joined: October 25, 2003 Posts: 5159 Location: NY
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| put two people in the front while you remain outside; take measurements and adjust from there as needed. in other words, adjust by final results, not by theory- because yes, the front sits higher than the back empty, and yes, the bars and diagonal arms sag with age- but for all these factors, how much is the question you cannot answer with theory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fusername Samba Member

Joined: March 15, 2006 Posts: 2836 Location: Boston MA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
and are the jack points on the same horizontal plane? I would check on something like body lines, trim under the windows, the drip guard, or somethign like that. If the trailing arms aren't bent, the camber should be perfect once the torsions are adjusted properly, according to bently. _________________ [email protected]
Need something custom bent up? shoot me an email, maybe we can make it work!
FORSALE: Thrust cut T4 and 1.9 main bearings
| obnoxiousblue wrote: | | Maybe Ben Pon's ghost comes and vomits NOS stampings for your bus, but not mine! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kkirwin Samba Member

Joined: September 05, 2005 Posts: 562 Location: Billings, MT
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Before I did the torsion bar adjustment on my bus I took it to an alignment shop and had the tech do some initial measurements on my bus. He said he was able to find the correct camber angle by jacking up the rear end, he said the height of the rear end should be where the fender lip is just at the level of the tread on the tire (185 R14C's). I got it adjusted as close as I could to that height and he still had to do to quite a bit of adjusting when I brought it back for the alignment even though I had my bars up to 25 degrees. To the eye I would say it looks level front to back even with it unloaded in the front. _________________ 1978 Riviera FI Auto Trans
1973 Super Beetle
1998 Mazda B3000 4x4
1993 Suzuki DR650s
2001 Suzuki DR200se |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMazier Samba Member

Joined: February 20, 2006 Posts: 902 Location: In my garage, Georgetown, Ontario, Canada...
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I raised my bus to the stock level with the torsion bars and I was still not happy with the height however at the stock degree setting, and with me sitting in it, the front and rear were very close in height. That said, I have recently added a set of coil-over shocks in the rear and now I measure 16” right next to the rear jack point and 15 ¼” next to the front jack point with nobody in the bus. Not sure where you measured from, bottom of the jack point or the body seam next to it however the key is that currently I am ¾” higher in the back now which is wrong. I need to be at least 1 ½” higher in the front to allow for driver weight drop. I am now waiting for a set of coil-overs for the front to get it back up in relation to the rear. Try and get a friend to measure with you in the front to see what the different is then. _________________ Cheers!
Jérôme
’79 Cali Westy 2.0 F.I.
'74 Honda CB 350 Four
'78 Honda CB 750 K
'12 Golf GTI
'11 Ural Patrol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
busman78 Samba Member

Joined: August 17, 2004 Posts: 3255 Location: ALbuquerque, NM
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How can it be wrong to see out the rear view mirror to the horizon, instead of VW's setting getting you a few hundred yards, unless your are short. I set the rear torsion to 28 degrees, that makes the rear a couple inches higher than the front. In my bus the loads will be in the back half, also having a little more ground clearance is often a blessing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dwill49965 Samba Member

Joined: August 08, 2005 Posts: 1279 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe it has to do with the angle the CV joints will make with the wheel. Too big an angle will put a lot of added stress on the joint, greatly shortening its life, and also affecting tire wear.
However, that is basically what I've read and gleaned from reading other threads over the years, and reading up at Ratwell.com. I am actually going to adjust mine tomorow for the first time, with 56ovalbug's help. _________________ Darryl
--------------
'78 Westy, Boston Bob built 2.0 L, FI, Pertronix, MSD 6
| Meyer wrote: | | Lastly, you just referred to US citizens as 'Americans'. Exactly what kind of Canadian are you? From what continent? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMazier Samba Member

Joined: February 20, 2006 Posts: 902 Location: In my garage, Georgetown, Ontario, Canada...
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Darryl,
Take some before and after pics for us to see the change. _________________ Cheers!
Jérôme
’79 Cali Westy 2.0 F.I.
'74 Honda CB 350 Four
'78 Honda CB 750 K
'12 Golf GTI
'11 Ural Patrol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BampaBus Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2009 Posts: 175 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks to all for the feedback. In reading your comments then running a search on "camber" I'm still amazed at how far apart some folks are on this issue. I'm seeing spring plate settings of 27 deg when the book calls out roughly 21 deg. That's a huge difference.
I'd just as soon keep it at stock. I figure VW had some idea as to what was best. As mentioned above, when you add a driver it recovers to almost perfectly level. Still very slightly nose up, but I have nearly a full tank of gas. If I get excessive free time at some point maybe I'll bump it up a degree, but that will be as far as I'm willing to go.
Still have some negative camber at unladen rest. But it's not as extreme, and as a number of threads point out this is appropriate. Odd part though is that the both front tires have "positive" camber. The tops lean out from the vehicle. I need to look that one up in Bentley. Maybe it's correct. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
busman78 Samba Member

Joined: August 17, 2004 Posts: 3255 Location: ALbuquerque, NM
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 21 degrees was the setting when your spring plates were new, so after 36 years of road fatigue suspending a thousand pounds of dead weight the factory setting really is obsolete. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kkirwin Samba Member

Joined: September 05, 2005 Posts: 562 Location: Billings, MT
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| busman78 wrote: | | 21 degrees was the setting when your spring plates were new, so after 36 years of road fatigue suspending a thousand pounds of dead weight the factory setting really is obsolete. |
I agree, as I stated earlier it is less the amount of degrees you set them to as these are not new bars but it is more the height of the rear end that will determine if you have it back to spec. _________________ 1978 Riviera FI Auto Trans
1973 Super Beetle
1998 Mazda B3000 4x4
1993 Suzuki DR650s
2001 Suzuki DR200se |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BampaBus Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2009 Posts: 175 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with you both. Lots of years, lots of wear and tear. The original numbers no longer apply.
Which leads us in a big circle back to the original inquiry: What was the intent of the original design? The concensus seems to be that a new bus had a factory sag, which, when properly weighted with driver and possibly one passenger in the front, caused the front end to drop and the bus to be level. I was hoping to set a baseline like this as a goal.
If level under load is the target, then in my case I am nearly there, and the Bentley recommendations are darn close to being appropriate, even after 36 years. Bumping up a degree to compensate for torsion bar or spring plate aging should offset the loss due to metal fatigue.
I'll try to get to it next weekend and see if it works. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fusername Samba Member

Joined: March 15, 2006 Posts: 2836 Location: Boston MA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the headlights are set in the bently when the tank is half full and there is a certain weight (180#?) in the front seat, whcih I assume would have been their idea of the 'normal' or most common loading, hence setting things at this position.
VW gives a spec on spring plate angle which corresponds to :
thier idea of a normal lading
all new and stock equip (torsion bars, tires, loading)
your bus is deffinatly worn, may not be totaly stock in weight, and you may often have your bus much more or less laden than VW made thier "average" one-size-fits-all setting for. the torsion bars can be adjusted for one purpose"
setting camber
so I say load up your car in what you think is average loading, check your rear camber, and see houw much higher or lower you need to adjust the bars to get proper camber, set it there and have a bus with suspension tuned to YOUR riding habits.
*yes you can set ride height with them , but you are not .supposed. to _________________ [email protected]
Need something custom bent up? shoot me an email, maybe we can make it work!
FORSALE: Thrust cut T4 and 1.9 main bearings
| obnoxiousblue wrote: | | Maybe Ben Pon's ghost comes and vomits NOS stampings for your bus, but not mine! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amskeptic Samba Member

Joined: October 18, 2002 Posts: 7130 Location: All Across The Country
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BampaBus wrote: | I agree with you both. Lots of years, lots of wear and tear. The original numbers no longer apply.
Which leads us in a big circle back to the original inquiry: What was the intent of the original design? The concensus seems to be that a new bus had a factory sag, which, when properly weighted with driver and possibly one passenger in the front, caused the front end to drop and the bus to be level. I was hoping to set a baseline like this as a goal.
If level under load is the target, then in my case I am nearly there, and the Bentley recommendations are darn close to being appropriate, even after 36 years. Bumping up a degree to compensate for torsion bar or spring plate aging should offset the loss due to metal fatigue.
I'll try to get to it next weekend and see if it works. |
There is a lot of silly second-guessing here. Set it at factory (23* for the usual late model bus). There is no "spring plate aging" going on here. The torsion bars do develop a set over the first 100k or so, one adjustment and you are pretty much good to go. If you look at the inside rear view mirror of the '68 and '69 buses, they are corrected for the horizon. It was for better forward visibility that VW shortened the later mirror stalks so that we could not get a view of the horizon.
The most important reasons for correct torsion bar adjustments, other than CV joint life, is the handling of the bus. You really really want the engine and transaxle hanging as low as possible between the rear wheels. VW went to excruciating lengths to have the engine/transaxle as low as possible. If you look at the architecture of the Type 4 engine, they designed that thing with a 3* drop towards the front (see lower right of below illustration). If you set the front of the sump level with the floor, you will see the drop in the crank and cam center lines, you will see it in the heat exchangers, the lower tins, even the carburetors have a 3* off vertical through the throats while the float bowls are dead-horizontal. Same with the transaxle This all gives the lowly VW bus safer emergency performance over the RollOver Explorers and Club Wagons and Blazers and C-10s and Rangers when you end up doing a broadslide down the freeway due to a blow-out.
Colin
 _________________ www.itinerant-air-cooled.com
Helping You Keep It Alive For Ten Years Now |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BampaBus Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2009 Posts: 175 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fusername writes:
| Quote: | torsion bars can be adjusted for one purpose,
setting camber. |
In that case I am way off still. Looking at it this morning with my trusty inclinometer, I'm at about 3 deg on both rear wheels. Bentley says -50' +/- 30' with a variance of 30' between wheels. Looks like I definately need to bump up the torsion bars, then if necessary, fine tune with the diagonal arms. I assume this camber measurement is done with full weight on the rear tires.
Amskeptic: Your comments and chart support the bus having some rear end sag. You also write:
| Quote: | | 23* for the usual late model bus. |
I've seen this number quoted over and over in related threads. But per Bentley that only applies to station wagons. My Campmobile calls out 20 deg, 50'. I'll bet I end up at 23 deg though when it's all done.
Again, I appreciate the input. My target is to get this close to what the factory intended without adding any wear and tear to the CV's or other driveline components by jacking up the rear end too high. I'm also not concerned about not seeing the horizon out of the inside rear view. I have side mirrors and know how to use them.
Oh, and I looked up the front wheel settings. They have positive camber, and they should, so I'm good there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jure-slo Samba Member

Joined: November 06, 2009 Posts: 219 Location: Slovenia (Europe)
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can someone please describe the terms "camber" and "rear end sag"?
My bus is pretty low in the back. I'm not finished with my restoration yet, but should i settle that before i take it to wheel alignment? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fusername Samba Member

Joined: March 15, 2006 Posts: 2836 Location: Boston MA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
don't worry about cv wear, that is only an issue if you jack it up an inch or three aboce stock for the ground clearence, they will be fine in your situation.
there are two specs listed for torsion bar settings, depending on if you have a truck camper or panel etc. also there is a HD and light duty torsion bar. yours being a camper should have the beefy ones. I think the spec on HD is 23 deg, and they list like 21 deg 50 min for the std van. this is from memory however.
camber is how much the top of the tire tilts in or out, when viewed from behind. rear end sag is when the back of the bus is lower then the front. bays develop a saggy bum over time, HOWEVER due to the shape of the wheel wells, even when sittting dead level bays appear to be leaning back even when they aren't. so dont let your eyes fool you. _________________ [email protected]
Need something custom bent up? shoot me an email, maybe we can make it work!
FORSALE: Thrust cut T4 and 1.9 main bearings
| obnoxiousblue wrote: | | Maybe Ben Pon's ghost comes and vomits NOS stampings for your bus, but not mine! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dansvans Samba Member

Joined: October 25, 2003 Posts: 5159 Location: NY
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fusername wrote: | | HOWEVER due to the shape of the wheel wells, even when sittting dead level bays appear to be leaning back even when they aren't. so dont let your eyes fool you. |
i might just be nitpicking here Cy, but isnt the frame rail in the front higher up than the rear when there are no passengers in the bus? In other words, isnt it more than just a wheel well illusion? sorry- its 16F and the ennui has set in  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SGKent Samba Member

Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 17550 Location: State Capitol CA (Sacramento)
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if your car was born as a Westy set it to the camper specs because it has a heavier torsion bar. If it was born as a station wagon set it as a station wagon. Put the rear up on jack stands on a level surface. Put the front on jack stands as close to level as you can but a tad bit lower than the back. Then when you get ready to set it, use your floor jack to raise the nose to where the frame rails and the floor sills are levelest. Then set the torsion bar and the numbers will be dead on and not need any + or -. Be sure to follow Bentley and mark the parts before you begin. We put ours at Bentley and not only does the bus look level but the camber is near perfect and then ground to trans height is dead on. It handles and rides better too. Make sure you dust the new bushings with real talcum powder and not the corn starch stuff. _________________ Steve aka Merlin the Wrench
formerly Steve's Racing and Engine Blueprinting. Wrenching since 1967.
bdamico on GF wrote | Quote: | | "When I was your age I'd plan out all sorts of stuff for the future and almost none of them came true. Just wonder if it's worth trying to be a crystal ball. " |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|