| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mbwesty Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2007 Posts: 138
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bite the bullet and ordered a clutch kit. Rice and bean for the whole family next month.
Too much trouble. The clutch slave cylinder bolt (the back one) was way loose (I could wiggle the cylinder) when I was removing it who knows for how long and for what kind of damage it may have done (god knows I hope some of the howling sound I heard from the tranny wasn't from that). At least I now know everythings are new from the tranny up to the engine...hopefully, it will purr when I put everything back together.
That was the reason I started working on the van myself as everytimes it came back from the shop I would find some bolts loose or over tightened. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 19924
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Never had any idea that you could disassemble a bearing and grease it. New info for me. I guess if you did it before the mileage got too high then it might give a significant amount of extra life, but once the bearing has been damaged by wear, regreasing it would not undo the wear and could only extend the life marginally.
I would think the amount of grease would be critical as well. Add too much and it might get thrown out possibly harming the fiction surfaces.
Seems like T1 engines and some T4 engines get pulled pretty often so there would be lot of opportunities to regrease a TOB before the wear became significant, but on a WBXer that may only get pulled once every 150,000 miles or so, I would think a new bearing would almost always be in order. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mbwesty Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2007 Posts: 138
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wildthings wrote: | Never had any idea that you could disassemble a bearing and grease it. New info for me. I guess if you did it before the mileage got too high then it might give a significant amount of extra life, but once the bearing has been damaged by wear, regreasing it would not undo the wear and could only extend the life marginally.
I would think the amount of grease would be critical as well. Add too much and it might get thrown out possibly harming the fiction surfaces.
Seems like T1 engines and some T4 engines get pulled pretty often so there would be lot of opportunities to regrease a TOB before the wear became significant, but on a WBXer that may only get pulled once every 150,000 miles or so, I would think a new bearing would almost always be in order. |
Would that be kinda like repacking a CV joint?
Can a clutch lasted 150k miles in a WBXer? If so something is wrong with mine or my driving... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 19924
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mbwesty wrote: | | Wildthings wrote: | Never had any idea that you could disassemble a bearing and grease it. New info for me. I guess if you did it before the mileage got too high then it might give a significant amount of extra life, but once the bearing has been damaged by wear, regreasing it would not undo the wear and could only extend the life marginally.
I would think the amount of grease would be critical as well. Add too much and it might get thrown out possibly harming the fiction surfaces.
Seems like T1 engines and some T4 engines get pulled pretty often so there would be lot of opportunities to regrease a TOB before the wear became significant, but on a WBXer that may only get pulled once every 150,000 miles or so, I would think a new bearing would almost always be in order. |
Would that be kinda like repacking a CV joint?
Can a clutch lasted 150k miles in a WBXer? If so something is wrong with mine or my driving... |
The clutch in my Syncro had just shy of 150K on it when the engine started giving problems. Suspect it could have gone a good bit longer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mbwesty Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2007 Posts: 138
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tried that grease hydraulic hammer method no go. I don't think the pilot bearing cavity is big enough like in that video. It didn't take much to fill it with grease. I image the hydraulic power is a function of volume and velocity. I really didn't feel like banging the crap out of the crankshaft even after L.A. rush hour traffic.
Desperate, had to give the slide hammer loaner tool from Pepboys a try and guess what? I was able to fit it under the van and gave it couple good whacks and off the bearing it came...the worst part was the tool barely fit into the bearing...safe! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 19924
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mbwesty wrote: | Tried that grease hydraulic hammer method no go. I don't think the pilot bearing cavity is big enough like in that video. It didn't take much to fill it with grease. I image the hydraulic power is a function of volume and velocity. I really didn't feel like banging the crap out of the crankshaft even after L.A. rush hour traffic.
Desperate, had to give the slide hammer loaner tool from Pepboys a try and guess what? I was able to fit it under the van and gave it couple good whacks and off the bearing it came...the worst part was the tool barely fit into the bearing...safe! |
To get the grease trick to work you have to have a rod or dowel that fits tight in the bearing. An old input shaft is the best. The VW bearing also has very little surface area so the required force is magnified over removing the much larger Toyota bearing in the video. Also if the bearing has failed which is common it probably can not be removed using hydraulic pressure. Sometimes a hammer and chisel will work, while sometimes you must cut the bearing into pieces using a die grinder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mbwesty Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2007 Posts: 138
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Wildthings wrote: |
To get the grease trick to work you have to have a rod or dowel that fits tight in the bearing. An old input shaft is the best. The VW bearing also has very little surface area so the required force is magnified over removing the much larger Toyota bearing in the video. Also if the bearing has failed which is common it probably can not be removed using hydraulic pressure. Sometimes a hammer and chisel will work, while sometimes you must cut the bearing into pieces using a die grinder. |
I have an old input shaft but I think the spine was in the way to pop out the bearing (spine going in and bearing coming out). I am glad I was able to use a funky tool to pop that thing out.
So the felt ring came in and it looks flimsy. Is that thing supposed to last the lifetime of a clutch? It doesn't sit inside the flywheel and I think the spacer is inside the flywheel? No contact between the felt ring and spacer, and basically the feltring would be sqeezed together between the flywheel and crankshaft flange.
May be the diesel sealed bearing is a better idea. I am taking the flywheel in monday to a machine shop may be I should tell them to bore that thing out for me...what do you all think? Thanks!
Oh, do you have the specific diesel bearing (year, make, model) I should be buying? Thanks again! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 19924
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Diesel bearing was used for years, can't say the exact range though. It is what they give me when I ask for one, don't remember ever having to give a year or application. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crazyvwvanman Samba Member
Joined: January 28, 2008 Posts: 3330 Location: Orbiting San Diego
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is an Audi bearing but easiest to get by asking for the clutch pilot bearing for an 82/83 diesel Vanagon 1.6 CS code engine.
VW # 056 105 313C
Diesel Vanagons were built from 1981-1992 in "germany" so asking for 82/83 is for USA/CA folks.
Mark
| mbwesty wrote: |
Oh, do you have the specific diesel bearing (year, make, model) I should be buying? Thanks again! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 19924
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crazyvwvanman wrote: | It is an Audi bearing but easiest to get by asking for the clutch pilot bearing for an 82/83 diesel Vanagon 1.6 CS code engine.
VW # 056 105 313C
Diesel Vanagons were built from 1981-1992 in "germany" so asking for 82/83 is for USA/CA folks.
Mark
| mbwesty wrote: |
Oh, do you have the specific diesel bearing (year, make, model) I should be buying? Thanks again! |
|
It has been in use for a long time, early 70's Type 4 industrial engines used and there may have been earlier uses as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mbwesty Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2007 Posts: 138
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the info.! So the idea would be to bore the fly wheel with the depth equal to the difference of the diesel and regular bearings? Should I give a + something tolorence to make sure that the bearing isn't being compressed? Anyone have a spec I can tell the machine shop in what to do?
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 19924
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mbwesty wrote: | Thanks for the info.! So the idea would be to bore the fly wheel with the depth equal to the difference of the diesel and regular bearings? Should I give a + something tolorence to make sure that the bearing isn't being compressed? Anyone have a spec I can tell the machine shop in what to do?
Thanks! |
Yes give it both some extra depth and some extra diameter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mbwesty Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2007 Posts: 138
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wildthings wrote: | The shims set your end play, so the idea is to verify that the end play is correct, not that the shims are physically there. On WBXer engines the end play doesn't typically change much over time so this isn't much of an issue, unlike with earlier engines. It is easy enough to check though just to make sure something hasn't gone wrong in there. With the seal out, reinstall the flywheel and snug the bolts down to at least 1/2 of the recommended torque. Now using a bar pry the flywheel away from the engine and then carefully use your hands to push it forward again. You should feel no or only the tiniest movement. If the movement seems excessive only then set up a system to measure it more carefully.
The distributor drive and the distributor itself should be installed when checking the end play.
A bit of grease on the lip of the seal is all you need. Oil will work as well, you just don't want it to be dry. |
Just getting ready for this portion of the endeavor and finished watching Boston Bob's video on installing flywheel.
So all the original shims should be in place for this test?
Why even bother testing if I don't have a dial indicator?
I don't imagine all shops do this test, I bet most of them just torque up the flywheel.
What's the ramification if I say it was good enough for before and good enough now? Anyone know how often a 2.1L watercool engie would need to have its freeplay adjusted afte removal of the flywheel? Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rsxsr Samba Member

Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 4780 Location: Loxahatchee, Florida
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Without a dial indicator, it is sort of futile for someone that has not setup the end play on a engine before. Once you have done a dozen or so, you get a feel for what is too tight or too loose.
No movement, you are too tight. If you can barely feel some movement, that is pretty close. If you can see it move or it clunks, you have too much. It is always best to start with the shims you have. I realize this is not much help.
Too tight is probably worse than too loose within reason.
edit: The endplay should always be checked and set. If a shop is not doing it, they are cutting corners. This is true for all engines. Endplay must be set. VW was nice to have a shim package. Most other engines require surfacing the thrust bearing during the assembly to get the proper endplay.
If the endplay was set correctly before, unless the thrust bearing or flywheel has worn, it should not change. If you are using new main bearings, case, or flywheel, you need to set the endplay. If all the original parts, probably ok to just put it back togehter.
When I built aircooled engines, I would actually check the endplay with the crank out of the engine and a feeler blade. I would recheck once I had it all together with a dial indicator. _________________ 1982 Diesel Vanagon Camper with ALH TDI.
1987 Syncro Tin Top. Organ Donor
2011 TDI Jetta Sportwagen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Christopher Schimke  Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2005 Posts: 3314 Location: PNW
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
And just to clarify, setting the endplay of the crankshaft is setting up how much the crankshaft can move forward and backward within the crankcase. Too much or too little and you will have more to worry about than just your clutch....you will eventually have your engine to rebuild. _________________ Christopher
*Custom wheel hardware for Audi/VW and Mercedes wheels - Urethane Suspension Bushings*
T3Technique.com or contact me at [email protected] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mbwesty Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2007 Posts: 138
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
The real problem is I can't imagine one can feel a 0.005" movement. I bet if you can feel it then it is already OTC. Then couple with variables that could contribute to errors (like the dial setup for instance) it becomes why bother?! Moreover, I read somewhere that reshimming may not be a good idea as damaged bearing is just going to go.
My guess is since I don't know what happened before I owned the van 10 years ago. I have to assume the endplay initially was setup correctly. Then if my endplay is now OTC, I probably shouldn't reshim it and perhaps start another piggy bank and get ready for the other rebuild (I just finished the tranny)? The thrustbearing is gonna go, right?
I'll get a dial from HF so I'll have an idea about the endplay for my van...thx! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mbwesty Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2007 Posts: 138
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I was wrong. I guess one can see/feel a 0.005" movement.
So I setup the dail and took several measurements. One time it averaged 0.005" endplay, and the other time 0.006" endplay. Given the uncertainty of how vertical the dial was would anyone recommend adding a thicker shim or just go with what I have.
I have never done his before and your input is greatly appreciated. Thanks! Tim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 19924
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| .006 is the wear limit so you could just leave it. If it is going to keep you up at night then tighten it up by a couple of thousandths. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mbwesty Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2007 Posts: 138
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wildthings wrote: | | .006 is the wear limit so you could just leave it. If it is going to keep you up at night then tighten it up by a couple of thousandths. |
Wildthings: Thanks! I called up a local shop and was trying to buy a 0.34mm shim and I was told I did not carry out the FW push/pull step correctly.
The 0.005-0.006" was the entire endplay (forced in and out). Apparently, I was supposed to push the FW in and let go, allow the dial to settle, take first reading, then pull the FW out to take the second reading.
The endplay would be the secod reading minus the first. And when I did that, the endplay turns out to be 0.004-0.005".
Does this sound right? Thanks so much for your help!
Tim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|