Author |
Message |
bluebus86 Banned
Joined: September 02, 2010 Posts: 11075
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbath Samba Member
Joined: March 02, 2014 Posts: 22 Location: United States
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ahh, I see. well I have two oil sump sending units which wont fit that thread. I do have a lathe and am pretty good at cutting threads. Have you ever heard of anyone making a 14mm-18mm threaded insert adapter so they could use the drain plug sender in the relief valve spot.
I suppose it is worth a shot, whats the worst that could happen, if I scrap one of my spare senders, no big deal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbath Samba Member
Joined: March 02, 2014 Posts: 22 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
any tricks for removing the relief valve plug? that sucker is in there tight and its just one of those crappy flat head slots. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbath Samba Member
Joined: March 02, 2014 Posts: 22 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone out there think this adapter I made to make my oil sump sender fit the oil relief valve opening will work. The tolerances were pretty tight so I am just a little worried about snapping it off if I over tighten the bolt.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbath Samba Member
Joined: March 02, 2014 Posts: 22 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was also thinking of maybe soldering the two pieces together since I have room on the topside to do so. I don't know enough about how the senders are made to know if this could damage the sender though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbath Samba Member
Joined: March 02, 2014 Posts: 22 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just wanted to follow up on this thread and let you know how things worked out.
The adapter I made to install the oil pump sender in the oil relief valve location works perfectly, there are no leaks and I was able to maintain the the same depth of thread so the spring tension on the relief valve spring should be exactly the same.
As for how it works? It is reading much better now. It is reading about 25 degrees higher under the same driving conditions as when it was in the sump, which I believe to be a much more accurate reading.
Makes me wonder why they continue to sell the oil sump senders when it really does seem to be a poor location for the sensor.
anyway, thanks for all the help, problem solved. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wayne S. Johnson Samba Member
Joined: April 12, 2006 Posts: 1265 Location: GILROY, CA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joel wrote: |
An AJ was just a fuel injected bug motor.
Buses never got fuel injected type 1 engines.
The pressure relief sender is a good spot and also much more protected than hanging down in the sump plug.
I cringe when I hear people say they have them in the pressure sender port.
Not only is it not an accurate place either the weight of the christmas trees of fittings people have swinging off them is a recipe for a cracked case. |
Joel, I agree with you.
The placement of the sensor will not allow the measurement of the oil temperature. The thermal conductivity of Magnesium is 1,000 times higher than oil. Which means the temperature gauge will display the temperature of the Magnesium case not the oil.
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/thermal-conductivity-d_429.html _________________ Additional products https://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/search.php?username=Wayne+S.+Johnson
Additional products with Bluetooth http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=2097231 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbath Samba Member
Joined: March 02, 2014 Posts: 22 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wayne, are you saying that placing the sender in the pressure relief valve location reads higher simply because it is actually threaded into the case, which is warmer in general due to its proximity to the cylinders.
That is apposed to the oil sump cover plate which tends to be a much cooler spot on the engine because it is both farthest from the cylinders and is also made of less heat conductive steel?
Anyone who does machine work knows oil make for a terrible coolant,but I I guess even if true, non of these factors really matters so long as the temperature being conveyed through the sender provides some sort of accurate corollary to the actual oil temperature, even if it is a little off due to other factors. The question is which one is more accurate.
I actually have both of my senders installed at the moment, the new one in the pressure relief valve, and the old one in the oil sump plug (mostly because I don't have a replacement plug at the moment) I can actually just switch the wire on the fly to measure the difference between the two, so when I get some time, I can do a thermometer down the dipstick, as well as take a read off of both locations to see what looks best. I will have to check that out very soon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wayne S. Johnson Samba Member
Joined: April 12, 2006 Posts: 1265 Location: GILROY, CA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cbath wrote: |
Wayne, are you saying that placing the sender in the pressure relief valve location reads higher simply because it is actually threaded into the case, which is warmer in general due to its proximity to the cylinders.
That is apposed to the oil sump cover plate which tends to be a much cooler spot on the engine because it is both farthest from the cylinders and is also made of less heat conductive steel?
Anyone who does machine work knows oil make for a terrible coolant,but I I guess even if true, non of these factors really matters so long as the temperature being conveyed through the sender provides some sort of accurate corollary to the actual oil temperature, even if it is a little off due to other factors. The question is which one is more accurate.
I actually have both of my senders installed at the moment, the new one in the pressure relief valve, and the old one in the oil sump plug (mostly because I don't have a replacement plug at the moment) I can actually just switch the wire on the fly to measure the difference between the two, so when I get some time, I can do a thermometer down the dipstick, as well as take a read off of both locations to see what looks best. I will have to check that out very soon. |
The sump cover plate sender would be closer to the oil temp, but the dip stick type sender would be the best location. Measuring the difference between the two senders is an excellent idea. Keep in mind the sensors will not be matched, but the comparison is still a great test.
You can check the accuracy of each sensor in boiling water and determine the accuracy at other temperatures using a test thermometer. I use an HP 2802A Thermometer with an Accuracy of ± (0.5°C ± 0.25% of reading), which is ± 0.75 °C at 100°C or ±1.35°F. These sold for over $2,000 new.
_________________ Additional products https://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/search.php?username=Wayne+S.+Johnson
Additional products with Bluetooth http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=2097231 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrKeck Samba Member
Joined: November 10, 2013 Posts: 309 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wanted to revive this thread to ask some questions in order to better understand what these people are talking about. I was thinking about installing both an oil temp and pressure gauge in a couple month after i finish more important things on my daily driver. I had a question about why people recommend the oil relief value location over the sump location for temp?
- Is it simple because this is the most accurate location? Could you just put one on the sump and use the the oil dip stick to see how far off you gauge is and just note the correction? What i mean is say, your sump is 40 degrees off from the dip stick temp, so just note this when you see it change, just add 40 degrees to the gauge? Or is the sump temp just completely inaccurate all together and you really would have no idea what the temp is because of its location and the fact that it will vary with the ambient air as mentioned in this post?
-seconds is, if i install a VDO oil pressure sender (SO i can see the pressure and still use my dumb light) in place of the oil pressure switch, will it give me an accurate reading for pressure or is this also false data, i was confused about that subject in this post as well?
- lastly, While i know there will always be variations in accuracy in the Temp gauges, if you did have the gauges installed and ACTUALLY monitored it daily. If you noticed a large change in either temp or pressure it would clue you into what was going on, wouldn't it? even if they are not the exact temp or pressure they should still be at a constant for those gauges dependent on driving conditions and the constant would make it easy to see changes?
what i mean is, say you gauges read 30 PSI and a temp of 170F, and you verified that the temp of your engine is within limited according to your manual through the dipstick method. couldn't you used the gauges this way and if you see the pressure rise to 50 PSI on a random day when it shouldn't change that much for the condition, then you know there is a problem with your pressure of conversely, if you noticed you temp rise to 240 F one day then you know its over heating the oil? while the values of the gauges wouldn't be accurate the change itself would mean a problem? of am i way off base with what I'm talking about?
Sorry for the long post but i have been reading a bunch of posts about this topic lately an I'm just trying iron down what I'm thinking so i revived this post to ask my questions? _________________ 1966 Beetle
1600cc 50bhp
Daily Driver |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbath Samba Member
Joined: March 02, 2014 Posts: 22 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
After testing both locations on my car, I felt like the relief valve location was more accurate, although nothing is perfect.
The sender in the sump was problematic for a couple reasons. Not only did it read low, but the sensor was long enough that it actually rammed up into the oil screen rivet, so much so that I had to shim the sensor out with washers and bend the screen, which was not very desirable.
As far as your question on accuracy, I think close is the best you will ever do, so yes, figuring out what is normal for your car and looking for changes is the smartest approach in my book.
My oil pressure sender is T'd off of my dumby light like a lot of folks do, and it seems to work very well while keeping the dumby light intact.
Good luck. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrKeck Samba Member
Joined: November 10, 2013 Posts: 309 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
cbath wrote: |
After testing both locations on my car, I felt like the relief valve location was more accurate, although nothing is perfect.
The sender in the sump was problematic for a couple reasons. Not only did it read low, but the sensor was long enough that it actually rammed up into the oil screen rivet, so much so that I had to shim the sensor out with washers and bend the screen, which was not very desirable.
As far as your question on accuracy, I think close is the best you will ever do, so yes, figuring out what is normal for your car and looking for changes is the smartest approach in my book.
My oil pressure sender is T'd off of my dumby light like a lot of folks do, and it seems to work very well while keeping the dumby light intact.
Good luck. |
cbath, im glad you responded as being someone in the original post. when you say you "T'd off the dumpy light" do you mean that you just T'd off the Spade (electrical connection) off the actually sending unit of somewhere else or your did something different? do you have a picture of what you are talking about in reference to the oil pressure sending T'd, as you mentioned? thanks cbath, for the information it has really helped.
i was considering doing something like this but if you are saying i can just T off the spade t, than i think that might be a better idea!
http://www.jbugs.com/store/merchant.mvc?Session_ID...de=V360009 _________________ 1966 Beetle
1600cc 50bhp
Daily Driver |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eric&Barb Samba Member
Joined: September 19, 2004 Posts: 24733 Location: Olympia Wash Rinse & Repeat
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pretty sure cbath means T fitting for both senders.
For us, have tested temp sender machined in same T-fitting, so can run all three senders in one. Verified with a dipstick temp sender to read same temp.
Dual oil pressure gauge sender that has idiot light sender built in seem to have lots of reports of slow to light up if pressure drops off too much. _________________ In Stereo, Where Available! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrKeck Samba Member
Joined: November 10, 2013 Posts: 309 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for the information, i never would never have thought about that type of splitting. i will keep it in mind when i order the parts for my pressure gauge. thanks for all the input on this discussion. _________________ 1966 Beetle
1600cc 50bhp
Daily Driver |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eric&Barb Samba Member
Joined: September 19, 2004 Posts: 24733 Location: Olympia Wash Rinse & Repeat
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
No problem. Next engine will probably go with a sender in the oil filter pump and see how that does.
Have used this vintage 70s type that has the plug on the left side.
_________________ In Stereo, Where Available! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbath Samba Member
Joined: March 02, 2014 Posts: 22 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, what Eric&Barb posted is my set up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|