Author |
Message |
StevieC Samba Member
Joined: January 01, 2014 Posts: 412 Location: Anza Borrego
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 12:42 pm Post subject: I need to move my transaxle reward a few inches |
|
|
I'm getting an ecotec motor and it's going to hit the back wall of the fiberglass body
How can I move the trans/motor back a few inches?
It's a, 002 trans, the axles already angle back with 3x3 arms, 930 CV's
Is there an easy way to do it so I don't have the motor sitting inside the car?
thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dr OnHolliday Samba Member
Joined: May 11, 2012 Posts: 1215 Location: was Escondido now San Berdoo
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How about a pan that's, oh...14" longer than the one you have? _________________ 1965 Type 1 sunroof Baja / about 70k miles on self-rebuilt '74 1600 and counting / SP heads and aftermarket valve keepers / non-doghouse shroud with external cooler and filter / 1.5 qt extended sump / Weber 32/36 DFAV progressive carb / 009 dist with Pertronix / 1.25 ratio rockers and ball adjusters / 1.5" stainless steel J-pipes and carbon steel baja exhaust |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StevieC Samba Member
Joined: January 01, 2014 Posts: 412 Location: Anza Borrego
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr OnHolliday wrote: |
How about a pan that's, oh...14" longer than the one you have? |
Why 14" longer than I have?
[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wythac Samba Member
Joined: August 02, 2004 Posts: 2791
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What is "easy" is relative.
I've done a fair amount of body and frame fab, but nothing as you describe, so put anything I say through that filter;
If you havent done so already, take a look at how much space you will need. I would guess that unless you were planning to remove the body to do this motor swap, the "easiest" thing to do would be to remove the rear bulkhead of your package tray to do the install, and when you are done and no longer need that access, glass it back into place a few inches farther forward. As much work as that sounds, it is much less work than any scenario I can think of anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MacLeod Willy Samba Member
Joined: February 18, 2014 Posts: 933 Location: Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
4x4 3/8 thick aluminum angle and make up a set of rear solid mounts then you will know the thickness you need to add to the front mount.
Extend your clutch cable and shifter, your good to go.
or let the rear passengers straddle the air cleaner |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MacLeod Willy Samba Member
Joined: February 18, 2014 Posts: 933 Location: Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A picture is worth a thousand replies.
It may not be to scale, did it up fast in CDRAW
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
StevieC Samba Member
Joined: January 01, 2014 Posts: 412 Location: Anza Borrego
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MacLeod Willy wrote: |
A picture is worth a thousand replies.
It may not be to scale, did it up fast in CDRAW
|
Nice, thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dr OnHolliday Samba Member
Joined: May 11, 2012 Posts: 1215 Location: was Escondido now San Berdoo
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
14"?? I merely guessed that a stock pan had been shortened to install the body, and now you are essentially looking to lengthen a shortened pan. In the back of my mind 14" (or 14.5") was floating around. If so, a stock pan might solve your problem. If I'm all #/^&ed up just ignore me. _________________ 1965 Type 1 sunroof Baja / about 70k miles on self-rebuilt '74 1600 and counting / SP heads and aftermarket valve keepers / non-doghouse shroud with external cooler and filter / 1.5 qt extended sump / Weber 32/36 DFAV progressive carb / 009 dist with Pertronix / 1.25 ratio rockers and ball adjusters / 1.5" stainless steel J-pipes and carbon steel baja exhaust |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BL3Manx Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2006 Posts: 6767 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You'd also have to fabricate longer trailing arms as well as the odd transmission mounts, lines and linkages.
Your back seats are already mounted well forward of the rear wall of the fiberglass body. It would be a lot easier to make the clearance you need in the fiberglass. Cut out the back wall, move it as far forward as you need to, glass it back in and respray the back seat. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
weasel_ugs Samba Member
Joined: March 16, 2012 Posts: 721 Location: Prescott Valley,Az.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you taken the adapter plate into consideration? it will move the eng back a little. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MacLeod Willy Samba Member
Joined: February 18, 2014 Posts: 933 Location: Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr OnHolliday wrote: |
If I'm all #/^&ed up just ignore me. |
Your ok, but I think he needs to move the engine back to gain the clearance in the rear seat. That 14" is just ahead of the torsion tube so that might not help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joescoolcustoms Samba Member
Joined: August 08, 2006 Posts: 9054 Location: West By God Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have seen them done with the chassis extended right behind the rear mounting flange. Basically making the wheel base about 3 inches longer by pulling the torsion housing rearward about 3 inches. This keeps all of your geometry of the suspension in place AND keeps the centerline of the rear weight overhang to a minimum. If you just move transaxle rearward, the weight also moves to the rear further out the back past the wheel centerline which changes the handling of the buggy making it more rear bias. _________________ Bad News Racing 2018 NORRA 1000 3rd in Class
Best Day Ever Racing 2022 NORRA 1000 2nd in Class and first All Female team to complete the race
Everyone is gifted. Some just do not open the package.
Looks like it was painted with a live chicken,polished with a brick and buffed with a pine cone |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roys_Big_Toys Samba Member
Joined: April 30, 2011 Posts: 225 Location: Richmond, VA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have one that Turn Key Manx did for me. I am running an 091, 6rib trans with a 2.2L Ecotec. They cut 14.5 inches out of the pan area to put a "Classic" Manx body on it. You need about 3" added behind the pan to clear the rear package area. They also put a 3" lift on the body to clear the rear of the body, where the top of the motor is. If you don't mind cutting the body and having it right down on the trans, you could reduce that amount. I have a bunch of pictures that I can email you. PM me your email address or your phone number and I can text them to you. If you are on the east coast, you are welcome to come by and check it out. I am still in the building process. _________________ I'd rather be an hour early than 5 minutes late. (Mine)
"It's not a hobby, it's an addiction" (My wife)
"Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it." -Ronald Reagan
Original Meyers Manx
Berrien LKD Warrior Ecotec 2.2 w/ Bus 091 Trans
Original 2 sided Meyers Manx Dealership sign
Meyers Manx Surf Board #1 0f #100
Custom Meyers Manx Cornhole game |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joescoolcustoms Samba Member
Joined: August 08, 2006 Posts: 9054 Location: West By God Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This might help explain my comment a little better from above. Notice the additional distance between the torsion and body mount flange.
_________________ Bad News Racing 2018 NORRA 1000 3rd in Class
Best Day Ever Racing 2022 NORRA 1000 2nd in Class and first All Female team to complete the race
Everyone is gifted. Some just do not open the package.
Looks like it was painted with a live chicken,polished with a brick and buffed with a pine cone |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MacLeod Willy Samba Member
Joined: February 18, 2014 Posts: 933 Location: Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its going to be light on the front with moving the engine and transaxle back, but dam is it going to get impressive wheelstands |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StevieC Samba Member
Joined: January 01, 2014 Posts: 412 Location: Anza Borrego
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr OnHolliday wrote: |
14"?? I merely guessed that a stock pan had been shortened to install the body, and now you are essentially looking to lengthen a shortened pan. In the back of my mind 14" (or 14.5") was floating around. If so, a stock pan might solve your problem. If I'm all #/^&ed up just ignore me. |
I see where you were going with that, mines already a full length chassis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StevieC Samba Member
Joined: January 01, 2014 Posts: 412 Location: Anza Borrego
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
joescoolcustoms wrote: |
I have seen them done with the chassis extended right behind the rear mounting flange. Basically making the wheel base about 3 inches longer by pulling the torsion housing rearward about 3 inches. This keeps all of your geometry of the suspension in place AND keeps the centerline of the rear weight overhang to a minimum. If you just move transaxle rearward, the weight also moves to the rear further out the back past the wheel centerline which changes the handling of the buggy making it more rear bias. |
I have 3x3 trailing arms already so 3" wider and 3" longer, so moving the trans/engine back a few inches might actually even it out a bit... the axles are angled rearward right now and it limits travel a bit because the compounding angle |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StevieC Samba Member
Joined: January 01, 2014 Posts: 412 Location: Anza Borrego
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Roys_Big_Toys wrote: |
I have one that Turn Key Manx did for me. I am running an 091, 6rib trans with a 2.2L Ecotec. They cut 14.5 inches out of the pan area to put a "Classic" Manx body on it. You need about 3" added behind the pan to clear the rear package area. They also put a 3" lift on the body to clear the rear of the body, where the top of the motor is. If you don't mind cutting the body and having it right down on the trans, you could reduce that amount. I have a bunch of pictures that I can email you. PM me your email address or your phone number and I can text them to you. If you are on the east coast, you are welcome to come by and check it out. I am still in the building process. |
Hey I'd really appreciate that!
I have a three inch body lift now
The engine builder sent me pics of the setup in rail but for me the problem is actually the body clearance
I was going with a honda V6 setup, 300hp for the same money as the ecotec but saw there was no way it was going to be even close to working
I know the ecotec is going to be really close but I'm already committed |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StevieC Samba Member
Joined: January 01, 2014 Posts: 412 Location: Anza Borrego
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a pic, it's dirty, I just had it out in the mud over the weekend
It looks with the adapter plate, the motor should just clear that cross bar
I'm not sure if the head will hit at top of the back wall
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
joescoolcustoms Samba Member
Joined: August 08, 2006 Posts: 9054 Location: West By God Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
StevieC wrote: |
joescoolcustoms wrote: |
I have seen them done with the chassis extended right behind the rear mounting flange. Basically making the wheel base about 3 inches longer by pulling the torsion housing rearward about 3 inches. This keeps all of your geometry of the suspension in place AND keeps the centerline of the rear weight overhang to a minimum. If you just move transaxle rearward, the weight also moves to the rear further out the back past the wheel centerline which changes the handling of the buggy making it more rear bias. |
I have 3x3 trailing arms already so 3" wider and 3" longer, so moving the trans/engine back a few inches might actually even it out a bit... the axles are angled rearward right now and it limits travel a bit because the compounding angle |
As you move the engine/trans further to the rear and leave the axle where it is, the more over hang weight you create. This takes weight away from the front axle changing the weight bias more to the rear. Buggy's are already light in the front, taking more off the front can make them dangerous on the highway and push more off road. In addition to longer travel, that is one of the reasons for going with 3 inch longer arms is to place more weight bias on the front axle to help it turn better in the loose dirt.
The picture I posted above is Roy's buggy. _________________ Bad News Racing 2018 NORRA 1000 3rd in Class
Best Day Ever Racing 2022 NORRA 1000 2nd in Class and first All Female team to complete the race
Everyone is gifted. Some just do not open the package.
Looks like it was painted with a live chicken,polished with a brick and buffed with a pine cone |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|