TheSamba.com :: View topic

Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:18 pm

My aluminum pipes are in.

Testing...testing...testing....

Stay tuned...

Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:49 pm

RJES wrote:
In reality, how many of us will still have the same bus in 10 - 15 years time? That's all that modern cars are designed to last for.

Umm, most of us? Not everyone is a flipper.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:16 am

The most recent posting of the anti stainless pipe theory was closed, so here's the follow up to what I mentioned I would do.

I made the phone call to the VC yesterday.

Simple question;
How many engine failure's have you experienced / seen / heard of due to massive & detructive electroletical corrosion caused by the use of the stainless coolant pipes ??

Answer;
None.

So with this in mind, plus the amount of pipes I've manufactured and have sold over the years, and compounded by the amount that the VC has sold, I'll have to say that the allegid story about the engine melting while driving the Vanagon's is another story right up there with the Y-2K story--
Somebody cried Wolf, and the herd all jumped in and ran.

Until I see all of this allegid engine destruction caused by the stainless pipes, I'll stand by;--It's all nothing more than all hog wash, and if the aluminum pipes, or green striped gates hose allow's you to sleep better at night--go for it.

And just thinking;
Allistair Bell did a dunk tank test a while back--
What ever happend to the laboratory test on that?
Haven't heard another word.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:19 am

My big problem is what the heck am I to do about the steel cylinder liners that are right next to the aluminum heads! Maybe some one can make some aluminum or plastic cylinder liners for us worried about corrosion?

Paniced and worried, rust never sleeps.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:32 am

Your right on top of the situtation.

Remember & think about the high speed spinning water pump impeller & shaft causing direct drive cavitation right on the back of the block.

I'm quite proud of Mike at RMW for jumping in there and supplying the herd with what they talked themselves into.

Self inflicted marketing campaign.

And I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the aluminum pipes.
They just aren't required, and might be a bit of overkill that's all.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:43 am

Terry Kay wrote: I'm quite proud of Mike at RMW.

And I'm proud of you for saying so TK.

I have installed both yours and RMWs pipes.

Both top notch, both will last the life of the van.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:43 am

That was my original intent anyway---

Making them a bullet proof & long lasting fix.

I've always had the Mack Truck repair mentality--
Do it right the first time or it'll come back & bite you.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:57 am

I don't have a dog in this fight, but spent many years as a master tech, and basic line tech in my own shops, and dealerships. So take this with whatever grain of salt you wish.
Not that long ago Ford had heater cores, radiators, and press fit tubes rotting away, bursting ,and allowing all kinds of problems. The initial fix was to replace intakes that had stainless tubes press fit into them, but even cars without the tubes were experiencing the problem. Turns out the solution was to make a good ground lug from the radiator to the chassis, and to use a hose clamp to secure a wire to the heater core tube, and properly grounding it to the chassis as well. Thus grounding the system on the two storage ends. After that was done. Heater core, and radiator replacements went the way of the DoDo bird

Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:03 pm

I also have no dog in this fight.

I never once said that if you install stainless pipes, you're going to have a catastrophic failure due to corrosion on the engine. A phone call to RMW to ask the question proves nothing.

The point is...dissimilar metals promotes corrosion. The more dissimilar metals, the higher chance of a problem.

There's always talks about how the WBX is a waterleaker and that it's a bad engine, yet nobody wants to take the proper steps to analyze the situation and come up with solutions to problems.

Minimizing dissimilar metals, proper sealing of the heads, and frequent coolant changes are all good things to do.

I know why TK wants to fight this subject. Because he sells stainless pipes. If he didn't I'm sure he would agree, being the perfectionist that he is.

Scott

Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:43 pm

oem plastic pipes, 250k on the heads and they were corroded to the point of not being reusable.

I think corrosion is directly related to maintainance.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:09 pm

SL12572 wrote:
I know why TK wants to fight this subject. Because he sells stainless pipes.

Nailed it. :lol:

Or maybe he's pissed because they sell their "overkill" pipes for $20 bucks less than his? Sounds like a deal to me. Yes sir, RMW pipes TK approved. Hoo da thunk it?

Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:06 pm

There is no need to bait TK.
Com'on grow up.
That will just lock another aging and far too lengthy thread.
As stated previously...I have experience with both TK's & RMW's pipes....and a few others.
There are differences between some of them, not just price.
I could throw out all sorts of comments, but I won't.
TK's and RMW's are the top two IMHO.
Lets call it a draw.
Buy whatcha want, from who ya want.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:07 pm

I don't care who's pipes you use.
Makes no to me.

I don't care what kind of pipes you use.
Plastic, Gold, Silver, or recycled McDonald's soda straws.
Make no to me.

And furthermore I don't care if you ever service your engine or not.
It's your problem not mine at all.

However, in line with the original thought---

And I do want you guys to pack this one away in your hats---
The mecanical nightmares were pissing on the dealership floors--with zero miles on them.
They were junk when they were built & the heads leaked.

And I'll say this again.
it doesn't make one iota of a difference what you have running for coolant pipes, or how many miles you have on the engine --or don't.

The VW flat four, 1.9, 2.1, or whatever displacement engine you might have paid for to have re-manned, WILL LEAK at the head seals--IF you don't take care of the coolant on a regular basis.
Period.

The pipes will not cause any harm to the coolant on thier own.
Period.

Now--

Mr.FOMOCO.

What is the service bulletin number on that heater core & radiator problem, and for what specific vehicle?
I would like to see that--
Most new Fords are running plastic tanked radiators--as well as at the heater cores.
Notice I said "Most" and you were not very specific on a year or model or bulletin number.

Perhap's it's time for somebody to start a Ceramic coolant pipe thread, that was discovered written on the internet so that the rest of the small herd of sheep can follow along---

To be perfectly honest gentlemen, I don't give a damn what you do.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:14 pm

Everyone has had "change your fuel lines" beaten into there heads ](*,)

How about adding, "flush your cooling system" :!:

Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:35 pm

Yea--

But that is very similar to Ray Charles leading Stevie Wonder down the maintainence road.

They'll bump off a few walls & curbs on their way--

Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:36 pm

Wow... Nice hostile response to a constructive comment there TK.......especially since my response BACKED your assertion that it had nothing to do with the use of stainless, and was caused by poorly grounded cooling systems where electrolysis could run rampant. Those plastic tanks were most likely the issue; as they isolated the cooling system components like the radiator better then the metal tanks.. Mustangs and Taurus vehicles could go through a heater core in less then a year@ 7 hours labor a pop.
The deal with Ford was back in the late 90's and early 2K time frame, and at the time I owned a shop. Most of my info came by way of distributors such as Zexel; so I have no TSB numbers to give you, and with the warm fuzzy feeling you gave me. I doubt I would produce it for you; if it was right at my finger tips.

BTW if you want to be condescending. You need to get the basics right. It's
FOMOCO AND NOT FOMCO

Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:48 pm

Typo.

I wasn't slamming you, I was just interested to see what the vehicle was and what the service bulletin was all about.
Just curious.

That's All.

Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:52 pm

Terry Kay wrote: Typo.

I wasn't slamming you, I was just interested to see what the vehicle was and what the service bulletin was all about.
Just curious.

That's All.

My apologies then. Damn lack of inflection across the web can make things seem what they are not

Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:55 pm

You were't supposed to be inflected upon on that one---

Maybe, perhaps it was the TK (Rhett Butler) last line that made you feel that way--- :roll:

No bumps , no grinds on that post to you---

Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:06 pm

ahh the basic corrosion theory. always good to come back to. but instead of that just simple it down to getting a list of ferrous and non ferrous metals and dont let them touch each other. they used to put a shim between the transmission and bridge of the h-60 that caused the mount tounge on the magnesium transmission to corrode pretty rapidly because if its dissimilarity. if i'm not mistaken the engine case in vanagons is magnesium too right?
or you could put two dissimilar metals together in a cup of salt water and use them to light a light bulb. what fun! :P