Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Rear springs type?
Page: Previous  1, 2
Forum Index -> 411/412 Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Hawker
Samba Member


Joined: October 03, 2012
Posts: 125

Hawker is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 5:00 am    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Ray,

Is there an alternative to changing the strut top on the 70-73 cars and removing material from the body tower pressing for the strut mounting. I would prefer not to hack away at the body. Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22458
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 2:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Hawker wrote:
Ray,

Is there an alternative to changing the strut top on the 70-73 cars and removing material from the body tower pressing for the strut mounting. I would prefer not to hack away at the body. Rob


Nothing needs to be changed on the body. There are some very early cars...1968 through probably early 1970 that used the friction type bearing that ma have had s smaller opening in the body and cannot use the late asymmetrical ball bearing of about 1971 to early 1973. But those also have parts that d not wear out. You can simply replace a bushing tube

The problem is that there are not to my knowledge any new symmetrical bolt pattern ball bearing strut bushing and bearing assemblies available. Only the late 1973-1974 asymmetrical assemblies.

If you car uses teh symmetrical bolt pattern ball bearing bushing assembly... the only mods to the body you will need to use this....

https://www.wolfsburgwest.com/cart/DetailsList.cfm?ID=133412345

....is to drill two different holes for the studs.

The very earlist ...like one year///of super beetle used the same middle years strut bushing/mount assembly as the 411 and 412.

There is nothing that needs to be done to any other part of the strut or suspension to use the Audi strut modification. That is the whole point of the mod....to take another strut cartridge and make all of the stock parts work with it.

Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Hawker
Samba Member


Joined: October 03, 2012
Posts: 125

Hawker is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2020 7:50 am    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Hello Ray,

Thank you for the reply. You mean these then? Rob.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22458
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2020 9:27 am    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Those are bonded rubber bushings. They are technically for the middle years super beetle.

Let me explain that:

One would generally say that super beetle only had an early and late.....most people calling those bonded rubber bushings with the much higher quapity ball bearing.....in your picture....early.....and the ones with the replaceable bearing/bushing cartridge or.....sperate bushing and bearing cartridges depending in what company made them......as "late".

What the middle and late units had in common with LATE 412.....is the mounting plate having an "assymetrical" bolt pattern like the one in your picture.

The difference being that all 411 and the early 412's had a strut mount that was just like that one in your picture.....same bushing and bearing......except that the mounting plate was completely round.....and the 3 bolts were exactly 120° apart. This is also what I call early super beetle.

There were a very few of the earliest super beetles.....that had the round plate, bonded bushing strut mount with bolts 120° apart.....I have only seen two complete cars in person.....but actually found a pile of about 5 cars worth of struts....about 30 years ago.....in a MASSIVE VW salvage yard in Oklahoma called lexington auto salvage.

I was thrilled....because at first glance I thought they were 411/412 and I needed the bushings. I quickly found....because some of the struts were still attached to ball joints and control arms.....that they were type 1. But.....the bushing/mount assembly was the same so I got four of them and it kept me going for about 3 years.

But.....that is the total extent in my lifetime of seeing super beetles having the same round symmetrical, bonded bushing/bearing assembly as the 411 and early 412.

I can only surmise....that these were from first year, early production....1970.....super beetles. Since the idler arm bushing was also from 411....it would not be out of the question that starting off an existing part # for strut mount was used on some supers as well.

In the two super beetle cars I saw with the round strut mount.....the mount fit the holes perfectly and the hole pattern was symmetrical....so there is no chance these were supers using the earlier bushings by being modified.

So if you have a 411....and need the early bonded rubber bushing....the assymetrical bonded bushing in your picture.....from what others have noted....can fit inside of your strut tower. Personally.....I found that the mounting plate needed a little grinding on the corners.....and of course you will have to drill perhaps two holes at a different spacing.....to use that bushing.

The later super beetle strut bushing.....with the replaceable insert bushing and bearing assembly......has a slightly shorter plate....so will fit inside of the strut tower with no grinding to the corners of the bushing plate.....but the center hump of the metal plate is larger in diameter.....IIRC.........and that is when you need to trim the center hole metal a little. I will have to look that up though to be sure.

At this link:

https://www.mtmfg.com/vw/3289/Volkswagen-Beetle-Struts-Strut-Parts

You can see the bonded bushing you are showing is for super beetle 71-73

Below that you can see the later one for August of 73 to 79. The difference in the mounting plate size is small. But IIRC....the difference in the center hub is the issue. Its not a huge difference either way.

If you are looking at my front strut "book".....do not be confused by what you see done to mine. There was a long train of mods done to the strut mounts over ahout 200k miles.

1. The first thing I did was slot the mounting bolt holes for the original round, bonded, symmetrical bushings. This was an attempt to get more castor angle into the front suspension.
I drove daily in high cross winds at 70 mph for many miles and the lack of castor was killing me. It only had about 0.9° from the factory.

Finding that was not enough....it got me to about 1.2°.....which WAS an improvement and pointed out that I was on the right track.....but I could not get much more.

2. As I was starting to develop the Audi strut cartridge mod around this time.....I also was running out of bonded strut bushings. This was pre-internet....and bonded, symmetrical 411/412 bushings were unobtanium.

But I could get late 412 bushings easily. However the fit required a little grinding.

So since I was going make modifed struts anyway....and was looking to get just,short of an inch of lowering.....and try be able to use the late 412/super beetle assymetrical mount.....and did not like how high the late platd rose up or the fact that I would be grinding AND drilling holes.....and the fact that the nifty plastic strut top covers my 412 had....would no longer fit.......

I just decided to make the hybrid welded version that installed the dome from the late 412/super strut mount onto the early, round symmetrical strut mount.

Not being very good at welding yet.... Laughing .....the hybrid strut mount ended up a little fatter than I planned so ....I had to grind out more of the center of the strut tower than I planned. However it all came together well.

So there are several ways you can go.

Personally.....even though bonded bushings are now readily available....I would never go back to a bonded bushing. Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Hawker
Samba Member


Joined: October 03, 2012
Posts: 125

Hawker is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:04 am    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Hello Ray,

Thank you for your comprehensive reply. I get it now. I think I was getting confused reading your book. Ideally any modification should be safe, but future proof, (AUDI shock absorber inserts and non bonded bushings), look the same as the original set up and use as many of the visible original non wearing parts, as possible; to look right.

The confusion set in as I am trying to separate the experimental parts of your “book” with what I currently have (1972 411) set up and the fitting and modifications required to install the KYB 365008 Gas/Oil shock absorber inserts.

I like to keep things looking as original as possible with all my cars, but I know that modernising improvements are a worthwhile route to take with safety critical components as any new/original replacement parts are either unobtainable or NOS parts degraded by age.

Thank you for sharing your research results. It is much appreciated. Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22458
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:31 am    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Hawker wrote:
Hello Ray,

Thank you for your comprehensive reply. I get it now. I think I was getting confused reading your book. Ideally any modification should be safe, but future proof, (AUDI shock absorber inserts and non bonded bushings), look the same as the original set up and use as many of the visible original non wearing parts, as possible; to look right.

The confusion set in as I am trying to separate the experimental parts of your “book” with what I currently have (1972 411) set up and the fitting and modifications required to install the KYB 365008 Gas/Oil shock absorber inserts.

I like to keep things looking as original as possible with all my cars, but I know that modernising improvements are a worthwhile route to take with safety critical components as any new/original replacement parts are either unobtainable or NOS parts degraded by age.

Thank you for sharing your research results. It is much appreciated. Rob


Yes.

Actually that how to book has a few parts that need to be clarified.....and it has been on my desktop (actuallg in my jump drive) for sbout a month.. I am cleaning it up an res8z8ng pictures and will upload it to the samba in a mucj smaller, easier to download file.

With a 1972 411.....I would say it would be worthwhile to go to a junkyard and get one of the bushing mount steel shells.....from a LATE.....through 1979 super beetle......and see what little it may take to fit it into your strut tower.

Bear in mind that so much work I did was so long ago.....a lot of what went into my document was from my notebooks. Lots of little things change shape in new parts.

Or measure the hole in the body where the top of the strut mount comes through....and I think I have measurements of the diameter of the 1973-79 part in my document.

If the late super strut mount will fit the center hole.....it may be as simple as drilling the extra stud hole(s). Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Hawker
Samba Member


Joined: October 03, 2012
Posts: 125

Hawker is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Ray,

That will be just great. With clarification even I should be able to follow the revised edition of your suspension book. Thank you!

Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Hawker
Samba Member


Joined: October 03, 2012
Posts: 125

Hawker is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:54 am    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Hello Guys,

Just to keep this thread going on the original topic of rear springs. I thought I would add to it.

About 15 years ago I discovered a broken rear spring. The possibility of obtaining new or any from a scrap yard seemed remote. The car is a 411LE 4 door saloon. So, I replaced them both with rear springs from the Variant. The variant was always more popular because of its load carrying capacity here in the U.K. and South Africa.

Variant rear springs with the standard oil rear shock absorbers are still in the car, although it has sagged a little at the rear. I haven’t run the car for over 10 years now, but this 411 and 412 section of thesamba.com has reawakened my enthusiasm for these cars.

Thanks to Ray and his soon to be revised suspension book, I will be upgrading the front suspension to use the Audi inserts, once this Covid19 nonsense is over. I may even go further and start using the car regularly. Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22458
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2020 12:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Hawker wrote:
Hello Guys,

Just to keep this thread going on the original topic of rear springs. I thought I would add to it.

About 15 years ago I discovered a broken rear spring. The possibility of obtaining new or any from a scrap yard seemed remote. The car is a 411LE 4 door saloon. So, I replaced them both with rear springs from the Variant. The variant was always more popular because of its load carrying capacity here in the U.K. and South Africa.

Variant rear springs with the standard oil rear shock absorbers are still in the car, although it has sagged a little at the rear. I haven’t run the car for over 10 years now, but this 411 and 412 section of thesamba.com has reawakened my enthusiasm for these cars.

Thanks to Ray and his soon to be revised suspension book, I will be upgrading the front suspension to use the Audi inserts, once this Covid19 nonsense is over. I may even go further and start using the car regularly. Rob


The rear coils are slightly different on the wagon/variant. They are a little thicker at,16.4mm versus the sedans at 15.1mm for 411 up to 8-72 and 15.4mm from 8-72.
And the sedans have 8.5 total coils with 7 active coils and the wqgon has 9 coils with 7.5 active coils......but....the sedan coils are 135mm in diameter and the wagon coils are 139mm diameter.

And early sedan coils are 382mm unloaded length, late sedans are 380mm unloaded length and wagons are 362mm unloaded length.

The late sedans have conical springs...meaning they are tapered....133mm diameter at top and 138mm at bottom....mean diameter being the 135mm listed above.

So.... the wagons have higher load capacity and already sit a little lower....but sag a little less. But.....the wagons all came with gas shocks from the factory. That prevents a chunk of the small amount of sag.

So if you have the stock oil shocks still on there...replace them with KYB gas-a-just and you 2ill notice a difference in stance and handling. Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Hawker
Samba Member


Joined: October 03, 2012
Posts: 125

Hawker is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Hello Ray,

Thanks for your reply.

That will be the KYB KG5410 Gas adjust, I guess? When I get the old girl running again I think I will treat her to a pair! 👍🏻

Many thanks, Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Hawker
Samba Member


Joined: October 03, 2012
Posts: 125

Hawker is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Dec 08, 2024 5:24 am    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Hello Ray,

I am just looking at your data on rear spring, lengths and diameter measurements and noticed a possible error. What is the uncompressed height of the early sedan cars? You have it down as 135mm where the others are in the late 300mm range.

BR,

Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22458
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Dec 08, 2024 12:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Rear springs type? Reply with quote

Hawker wrote:
Hello Ray,

I am just looking at your data on rear spring, lengths and diameter measurements and noticed a possible error. What is the uncompressed height of the early sedan cars? You have it down as 135mm where the others are in the late 300mm range.

BR,

Rob


Thank you! I will look it up when I get home and post the correction here. It MUST be a typo.

EDIT: This is a correction to a typographic error in the chart below which is copied from page one of this thread. The measurement that is INCORRECT will be highlighted in red and the correct one placed next to it in GREEN.

Quote:
Sedans 1968-July of 1972
Total # of coils: 8.5
Total coils in operation: 7.....what this means is the lower 1.5 coils in contact with the trailing wishbone are very close together and make contact under load. They are the load support coils.
Mean coil diameter: 135mm
Coil wire diameter: 15.1mm
Unloaded length: 135mm 382mm is the correct number

Sedans from August of 1972 (meaning 1973 and 1974)
Total # of coils: 8.5
Total coils in operation: 7
Mean coil diameter: this is a conical top progressive coil set with a 133mm diameter top and a 138mm diameter bottom.
Coil wire diameter: 15.4mm....so they have 0.3mm fatter coil wire than early sedans
Unloaded length: 380mm....so when they are free from the car they are slightly shorter than the earlier spring.....but that does not mean they sit lower when installed.

Wagon (all years)
Total # of coils: 9
Total coils in operation: 7.5
Mean coil diameter: 139mm so they are 4mm wider than tbe early coils and 1mm wider than the late coils of the sedan.
Coil wire diameter: 16.4mm
Unloaded length: 362mm


Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> 411/412 All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2024, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.