Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Forum Index -> 411/412 Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jeremiah Berger
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2018
Posts: 103
Location: MAINE
Jeremiah Berger is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 3:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

Getting these heads out and planning what I need to do still.before assembly and had a couple questions.
For clarification I got the deluxe kit from the type 4 store and will be using swivel feet and HD rocker shaft kit.

1. Do you know how much material I need to take off of the rockers to accept the swivel feet?

2. Can I just take them down flat or do I need to make them dished like I have seen, or a combination of both?

3.Should I use locktite on the new HD rocker studs into the heads?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Pepperbilly
Samba Member


Joined: April 08, 2017
Posts: 1058
Location: Seattle, Wa
Pepperbilly is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

Others will chime in on this subject. I can only tell you about my experience with these elephant feet swivel adjusters on my Type 1 engine in my '67 Westy.

I recently installed these a couple of months ago and these I purchased from Gene Berg Ent. So far I like them. The engine runs beautifully with lots of power and is quieter. Berg did mention that with my completely stock engine, [down to the original HO case], there needed to be no modifications other than adding shims included in their kit under the rocker stands. I actually had to add more shims than they included in their kit. I dialed everything in with .106" shim thickness at the stands. It got kind of close at the length of the rocker studs but it was just enough. The rocker to valve stem geometry worked out just fine with this thickness so I went with it. I did not have to change my pushrods or make any cuts to my rocker arms. Left that all stock. Need to put more miles on this modification and I will report back after more time.

Wish I could help you out on the type 4 engine but I left that stock on my 412. Not going to change a thing on mine... it runs too good. I'm sure Ray and others will give you some great advice. I like the way your project is going.

Bill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22462
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 1:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

Jeremiah Berger wrote:
Getting these heads out and planning what I need to do still.before assembly and had a couple questions.
For clarification I got the deluxe kit from the type 4 store and will be using swivel feet and HD rocker shaft kit.

1. Do you know how much material I need to take off of the rockers to accept the swivel feet?

2. Can I just take them down flat or do I need to make them dished like I have seen, or a combination of both?

3.Should I use locktite on the new HD rocker studs into the heads?


I would NOT use loctite on the studs. I would torque them in properly, then put a shaft on with no rockers, torque the nut properly with its lock washer and then remove the outer nuts. If the studs do not unscrew you are fine.

If somehow the stud threads seem to be a loose fit, use loctite.

For the swivel feet.....the whole object here is that generally when all is installed and adjusted properly ....if the swivel feet fit at all without removing material.....you will notice that it probably only has about 1 thread showing under the head of the rocker. You will also notice that this is not enough room to allow the foot of the swivel screw to rotate fully without touching and jamming against the underside of the rocker.

The object is to remove enough material to have about three complete threads under the rocker when the the valves are properly adjusted and have the correct geometry.

It makes not difference which way you remove the material. Whichever way is cleanest and easiest. The nice thing about using a 45° cutter or wider.....is that it will not blue or overheating the rocker arm metal like grinding can if you are not careful. Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Jeremiah Berger
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2018
Posts: 103
Location: MAINE
Jeremiah Berger is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:16 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Jeremiah Berger
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2018
Posts: 103
Location: MAINE
Jeremiah Berger is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

For some reason I'm having a hard time posting this, I had to go have dinner and come back and try again

I decided to take a little meat off the top and then dish the rockers with a 1/2" carbide burr.worked good and plenty of clearance

I also finished up this Type 4 syndrome modification that takes Rays original idea and uses some different hardware to make it not need to be welded.Not that I can't weld but because I had the idea and had to try it ..

It uses a 1/4" fpt X 1/4" mpt elbow and 10mx1.00 bolts and nuts which have the same or very close thread pitch as the 1/4" pipe thread.

Bolts have been cut and ground down to length and square 6mm end

Oil screen fits perfectly in between the nuts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22462
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

Very nice work!

Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Jeremiah Berger
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2018
Posts: 103
Location: MAINE
Jeremiah Berger is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 2:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

I have spent the last couple days dealing with main bearing clearances and geez what a nightmare.between the two sets of siverlines and the three sets of mahles they are all over the place and the silver line worse then the mahle. My best set is with the mahles which I'm not excited about because they are not steel backed and the quality seams low.
Even still the best set I can come up with is .003 clearance on 1&3 wich are also the closest to perfecty round which is under .0005". This was all over the place with other ones that had less, or more? crush
The best I can get on the split bearing is .0045 with some out of round as well at about 0005 but way better and close to round then all the other combinations... Are these measurements crazy off? Should I be happy with this?

Are aluminum split bearings crap? They certainly seam low quality and scratch easy .

Just seems crazy that the amount of money other parts cost and all these builders do what exactly about bearings?

Everyone says to buy a whole bunch of sets and mix and match but how are we gonna do that when everyone sends you already opened gone through sets? And the mahles are better but no steel back.
Seams like lots of people dealing with this but no one has any solution.
It was a lot easier being an engine assembler.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22462
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 4:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

Jeremiah Berger wrote:
I have spent the last couple days dealing with main bearing clearances and geez what a nightmare.between the two sets of siverlines and the three sets of mahles they are all over the place and the silver line worse then the mahle. My best set is with the mahles which I'm not excited about because they are not steel backed and the quality seams low.
Even still the best set I can come up with is .003 clearance on 1&3 wich are also the closest to perfecty round which is under .0005". This was all over the place with other ones that had less, or more? crush
The best I can get on the split bearing is .0045 with some out of round as well at about 0005 but way better and close to round then all the other combinations... Are these measurements crazy off? Should I be happy with this?

Are aluminum split bearings crap? They certainly seam low quality and scratch easy .

Just seems crazy that the amount of money other parts cost and all these builders do what exactly about bearings?

Everyone says to buy a whole bunch of sets and mix and match but how are we gonna do that when everyone sends you already opened gone through sets? And the mahles are better but no steel back.
Seams like lots of people dealing with this but no one has any solution.
It was a lot easier being an engine assembler.


Was the case align bored?

Was the crank machined?

I am asking because if these are still the way there were when they came out, maybe even Std/Std.....what do the original bearings look like?

Or if they are just first under or over, you may do better have the case and crank machined to fit the bearings.

How correct are the crankshaft main journal diameters?

Yes, the bearings have had issues for quite a while now.

The book tolerance is 0.002" to 0.004" maximum. I like to keep them at about 0.0025" maximum but have run them fine at 0.003". Anything above that...while allowed and it will run...is too much because it can lose a lot of oil pressure.

Steel backed are better but the alumium bearings can be just fine. Millions of engine built with them.

Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Jeremiah Berger
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2018
Posts: 103
Location: MAINE
Jeremiah Berger is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

raygreenwood wrote:
Jeremiah Berger wrote:
I have spent the last couple days dealing with main bearing clearances and geez what a nightmare.between the two sets of siverlines and the three sets of mahles they are all over the place and the silver line worse then the mahle. My best set is with the mahles which I'm not excited about because they are not steel backed and the quality seams low.
Even still the best set I can come up with is .003 clearance on 1&3 wich are also the closest to perfecty round which is under .0005". This was all over the place with other ones that had less, or more? crush
The best I can get on the split bearing is .0045 with some out of round as well at about 0005 but way better and close to round then all the other combinations... Are these measurements crazy off? Should I be happy with this?

Are aluminum split bearings crap? They certainly seam low quality and scratch easy .

Just seems crazy that the amount of money other parts cost and all these builders do what exactly about bearings?

Everyone says to buy a whole bunch of sets and mix and match but how are we gonna do that when everyone sends you already opened gone through sets? And the mahles are better but no steel back.
Seams like lots of people dealing with this but no one has any solution.
It was a lot easier being an engine assembler.


Was the case align bored?

Was the crank machined?

I am asking because if these are still the way there were when they came out, maybe even Std/Std.....what do the original bearings look like?

Or if they are just first under or over, you may do better have the case and crank machined to fit the bearings.

How correct are the crankshaft main journal diameters?

Yes, the bearings have had issues for quite a while now.

The book tolerance is 0.002" to 0.004" maximum. I like to keep them at about 0.0025" maximum but have run them fine at 0.003". Anything above that...while allowed and it will run...is too much because it can lose a lot of oil pressure.

Steel backed are better but the alumium bearings can be just fine. Millions of engine built with them.

Ray


No case align bore or crank machining.
Actually the the original std/std bearings look really good besides a deeper scratch on the #1 and some weird imperfections in the split bearing.I actually torqued them in out of curiosity and they are all at about .004 on 1&3 and .005 on the split #2. The crank journals are all consistent and well within tolerances I think it was 2.3612"going off memory...so the new ones are about .001 tighter then the old, but consistent in the split being a bit bigger.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22462
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2024 5:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

Jeremiah Berger wrote:
raygreenwood wrote:
Jeremiah Berger wrote:
I have spent the last couple days dealing with main bearing clearances and geez what a nightmare.between the two sets of siverlines and the three sets of mahles they are all over the place and the silver line worse then the mahle. My best set is with the mahles which I'm not excited about because they are not steel backed and the quality seams low.
Even still the best set I can come up with is .003 clearance on 1&3 wich are also the closest to perfecty round which is under .0005". This was all over the place with other ones that had less, or more? crush
The best I can get on the split bearing is .0045 with some out of round as well at about 0005 but way better and close to round then all the other combinations... Are these measurements crazy off? Should I be happy with this?

Are aluminum split bearings crap? They certainly seam low quality and scratch easy .

Just seems crazy that the amount of money other parts cost and all these builders do what exactly about bearings?

Everyone says to buy a whole bunch of sets and mix and match but how are we gonna do that when everyone sends you already opened gone through sets? And the mahles are better but no steel back.
Seams like lots of people dealing with this but no one has any solution.
It was a lot easier being an engine assembler.


Was the case align bored?

Was the crank machined?

I am asking because if these are still the way there were when they came out, maybe even Std/Std.....what do the original bearings look like?

Or if they are just first under or over, you may do better have the case and crank machined to fit the bearings.

How correct are the crankshaft main journal diameters?

Yes, the bearings have had issues for quite a while now.

The book tolerance is 0.002" to 0.004" maximum. I like to keep them at about 0.0025" maximum but have run them fine at 0.003". Anything above that...while allowed and it will run...is too much because it can lose a lot of oil pressure.

Steel backed are better but the alumium bearings can be just fine. Millions of engine built with them.

Ray


No case align bore or crank machining.
Actually the the original std/std bearings look really good besides a deeper scratch on the #1 and some weird imperfections in the split bearing.I actually torqued them in out of curiosity and they are all at about .004 on 1&3 and .005 on the split #2. The crank journals are all consistent and well within tolerances I think it was 2.3612"going off memory...so the new ones are about .001 tighter then the old, but consistent in the split being a bit bigger.


What tool are you measuring with...not that I doubt you but sometimes there are some issues.

Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Jeremiah Berger
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2018
Posts: 103
Location: MAINE
Jeremiah Berger is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2024 6:01 am    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

I am using a dial bore gauge that I am zeroing to my micrometer.I have a matityu micrometer and a Chinese ISP dial bore gauge.The quage is not super high quality but it seems ok, if anything it has a spring that is too strong.I was curious if a spring strong enough to leave scratches the way it can if your not careful(especially on the aluminum split bearing that is much softer)id maybe that could cause a loss in your measurements?

I am learning to use these tools so I have no doubt there could be something I am looking over or doing wrong. I am just now getting to the point that I am getting consistent measurements that I am confident with. I have watched a few videos showing how to rock the gauge back and forth and find the high spot. I feel like I am getting the hang of it.

One thing is that no matter what combination what brand wether I am measuring on the higher side or not, is that my split bearing is always bigger then the rest. It seems like that may be normal according to others but the book says that bearing should have the least clearance of them all?

I have the option to take it to the machine shop. He offered to help me measure it all upfor me if I got it torqued up and brought it and the crank in. So my plan was to get the best set I can come up with and have him double check it.. unfortunately he's over an hour away.


.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
heimlich Premium Member
VWNOS.com


Joined: November 20, 2016
Posts: 7247
Location: Houston, Texas
heimlich is online now 

PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2024 7:24 am    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

An hour away is a normal drive around Houston. Up by ya'll it's the next state or two states over.
_________________
www.vwnos.com [email protected]
Classic Brands. Classic Quality.
Not all parts are made the same. NOS OE/OEM parts made mainly in West Germany, Early Germany, and Early Brazil are where VW produced the best quality parts and best fitting products.
5% Off your order with coupon code: 5%OFF
Restored Distributors Available (<--Click here)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Jeremiah Berger
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2018
Posts: 103
Location: MAINE
Jeremiah Berger is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2024 7:59 am    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

heimlich wrote:
An hour away is a normal drive around Houston. Up by ya'll it's the next state or two states over.


Haha. I know, I do try to remember that. It's really not that bad. Where I'm from in Florida is the same way takes an hour to get from one side of the city to the other...it's much more enjoyable to go the distance too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 22462
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2024 9:26 am    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

Jeremiah Berger wrote:
I am using a dial bore gauge that I am zeroing to my micrometer.I have a matityu micrometer and a Chinese ISP dial bore gauge.The quage is not super high quality but it seems ok, if anything it has a spring that is too strong.I was curious if a spring strong enough to leave scratches the way it can if your not careful(especially on the aluminum split bearing that is much softer)id maybe that could cause a loss in your measurements?

I am learning to use these tools so I have no doubt there could be something I am looking over or doing wrong. I am just now getting to the point that I am getting consistent measurements that I am confident with. I have watched a few videos showing how to rock the gauge back and forth and find the high spot. I feel like I am getting the hang of it.

One thing is that no matter what combination what brand wether I am measuring on the higher side or not, is that my split bearing is always bigger then the rest. It seems like that may be normal according to others but the book says that bearing should have the least clearance of them all?

I have the option to take it to the machine shop. He offered to help me measure it all upfor me if I got it torqued up and brought it and the crank in. So my plan was to get the best set I can come up with and have him double check it.. unfortunately he's over an hour away.


.


Actually the Chinese dial bore gauges are fine in most respects. The spring tension is a bit too high on them which is part of what I was getting at. Virtually all of the Chinese gauges are identical in the red, blue and black blow molded case. Overall, the shims and anvil fit tight.....it's all about having a decent gauge and pretty much any standard dial indicator will fit in it.

The problem with them is that yes, the contact point is hard and small in diameter and risky for scratching.....but the big problem that sets them apart is that the internal spring inside of the handle is too stiff.

High end dial bore gauges use no internal spring and only use the spring force in the indicator. You can unscrew the barrel and remove the spring and put your gauge back I'm, recalibrate and then try again. Huge difference.

Is is a thread on that.

https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=693760&start=0

Also bear in mind, the dial indicators like any gauge have a best accuracy range and its usually in the middle. Its not supposed to be this way but unless you are using the best very short throw gauge....it can happen. Sometimes when certain gauges are very nearly all the way out or all the way in....they can read off.

What that really has to do with is that over the longest length of the indicator rod travel....at either end they are not supported by side guides in the cheaper gauges so the gauge rod tilts a little.

Just for some sanity sake.....try some telescoping gauges with your micrometer. Yes I know those are their own bag of tricks. But, if you see a reading that is way out on say a smaller bearing with the dial bore gauge....and then start using the telescopic gauges....and practice until you get a consistent reading.....and if that reading is more normal that what the dial bore gauge is giving you....then it's probably the indicator on the dial bore gauge.

Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Jeremiah Berger
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2018
Posts: 103
Location: MAINE
Jeremiah Berger is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2024 11:31 am    Post subject: Re: Jeremiah's 73 412 restoration project Reply with quote

raygreenwood wrote:
Jeremiah Berger wrote:
I am using a dial bore gauge that I am zeroing to my micrometer.I have a matityu micrometer and a Chinese ISP dial bore gauge.The quage is not super high quality but it seems ok, if anything it has a spring that is too strong.I was curious if a spring strong enough to leave scratches the way it can if your not careful(especially on the aluminum split bearing that is much softer)id maybe that could cause a loss in your measurements?

I am learning to use these tools so I have no doubt there could be something I am looking over or doing wrong. I am just now getting to the point that I am getting consistent measurements that I am confident with. I have watched a few videos showing how to rock the gauge back and forth and find the high spot. I feel like I am getting the hang of it.

One thing is that no matter what combination what brand wether I am measuring on the higher side or not, is that my split bearing is always bigger then the rest. It seems like that may be normal according to others but the book says that bearing should have the least clearance of them all?

I have the option to take it to the machine shop. He offered to help me measure it all upfor me if I got it torqued up and brought it and the crank in. So my plan was to get the best set I can come up with and have him double check it.. unfortunately he's over an hour away.


.


Actually the Chinese dial bore gauges are fine in most respects. The spring tension is a bit too high on them which is part of what I was getting at. Virtually all of the Chinese gauges are identical in the red, blue and black blow molded case. Overall, the shims and anvil fit tight.....it's all about having a decent gauge and pretty much any standard dial indicator will fit in it.

The problem with them is that yes, the contact point is hard and small in diameter and risky for scratching.....but the big problem that sets them apart is that the internal spring inside of the handle is too stiff.

High end dial bore gauges use no internal spring and only use the spring force in the indicator. You can unscrew the barrel and remove the spring and put your gauge back I'm, recalibrate and then try again. Huge difference.

Is is a thread on that.

https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=693760&start=0

Also bear in mind, the dial indicators like any gauge have a best accuracy range and its usually in the middle. Its not supposed to be this way but unless you are using the best very short throw gauge....it can happen. Sometimes when certain gauges are very nearly all the way out or all the way in....they can read off.

What that really has to do with is that over the longest length of the indicator rod travel....at either end they are not supported by side guides in the cheaper gauges so the gauge rod tilts a little.

Just for some sanity sake.....try some telescoping gauges with your micrometer. Yes I know those are their own bag of tricks. But, if you see a reading that is way out on say a smaller bearing with the dial bore gauge....and then start using the telescopic gauges....and practice until you get a consistent reading.....and if that reading is more normal that what the dial bore gauge is giving you....then it's probably the indicator on the dial bore gauge.

Ray


Thanks for the info I will try that and see if there is any difference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> 411/412 All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Page 9 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2024, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.