| Author |
Message |
MikeAdams Samba Member

Joined: April 18, 2005 Posts: 170 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 6:11 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
| QRP wrote: |
Finally got the type 3 brakes on and off my to do plate.
Pretty un eventful until it came time to bleed em, I've used the same brand of wheel cylinders for a while but this set was just funky and was a pain getting them to seal up properly.
Also had to re torque the axle nuts a few times until they finally settled in.
|
I've used that tool... is it accurate? When I double checked the torque it wasn't even close and went back to using the old beat on a plate thing _________________ Trip Report #1:
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=222632&highlight=fonts
Trip Report #2: http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=248234 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:30 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
| DesertSasquatchXploration wrote: |
| Brake fluid ate the paint away bummer. What's the deal with wheel studs? I've been looking and cant find them being grade rated. Is it safe to assume they are minimum 10.9? Arp has the best no doubt but what about the other known brands? |
The studs are dorman # 610-509
Normally I just use the standard 14mm empi studs but at the time I was planning to use a spacer and needed longer ones, but that plan left the chat about 6 months ago. LOL
I just shortened these and trimmed the head to be flush inside the drum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:38 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
| MikeAdams wrote: |
| QRP wrote: |
Finally got the type 3 brakes on and off my to do plate.
Pretty un eventful until it came time to bleed em, I've used the same brand of wheel cylinders for a while but this set was just funky and was a pain getting them to seal up properly.
Also had to re torque the axle nuts a few times until they finally settled in.
|
I've used that tool... is it accurate? When I double checked the torque it wasn't even close and went back to using the old beat on a plate thing |
Hey Mike.
I've been wondering about the accuracy of the tool.
Printed on it is 25 lbs = 225 lbs and 30 lbs = 270 lbs
This last round I went 270 and kept going until the next hole lined up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:05 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
I think I've got everything I'm gonna need before starting.
Just waiting on a tapered reamer and a left hand tap.
Rarely do I find exactly what I'm looking for in the IMS rem pile but I got this 7 foot bar of 1" OD 1/5" ID 6061 for 20 bucks! . . . Sweeeeet
Late model backing plates were donated...thanks Manny
I had an early pitman arm in my stash so was able to get it ready before the teardown. Just waiting for the reamer.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:18 pm Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
Looks like I'm out of excuses now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:32 pm Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
2 small notes about the spindles.
There was a high spot here that wouldn't allow the inner bearing to slide on smoothly.
I hit it with some fine sand paper and it good to go.
I only did this to help when it's time to remove the drum for maintenance.
Also this area was keeping the backing plate from sitting flat so had to clearance a little bit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:45 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
A funky setup but this cheap reamer worked just fine.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dustymojave Samba Member

Joined: January 07, 2007 Posts: 5846 Location: Lake LA, Mojave Desert, SoCal
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2025 1:07 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
| QRP wrote: |
I think I've got everything I'm gonna need before starting.
Just waiting on a tapered reamer and a left hand tap.
Rarely do I find exactly what I'm looking for in the IMS rem pile but I got this 7 foot bar of 1" OD 1/5" ID 6061 for 20 bucks! . . . Sweeeeet
|
I'm jealous...
| QRP wrote: |
Late model backing plates were donated...thanks Manny
I had an early pitman arm in my stash so was able to get it ready before the teardown. Just waiting for the reamer.
|
The pitman arm for my 58 Baja Bug. The later steering box is a little different. But the reinforcement is similar. I would have to do some deep digging in my garage stash to find the one that used to be on my Hi Jumper to share pictures of that.
I STRONGLY recommend reaming the pinch bolt hole to 1/2" and using a 1/2-20 Grade 8 or better bolt and Grade 8 self locking nut as shown. I learned that the hard way.
Yeah, mine is TIG welded, but that's not really necessary. MIG like Rick's will do fine. _________________ Richard
Offroading VW based cars since 1965
Tech Inspection 1963 - 2012 SCCA/SCORE/HDRA/MORE/MDR +
Retired from building Bajas, Fiberglass Buggies and Rails in the Mojave Desert. Also Sprints & Midgets, Dry Lakes, Road Race cars. All types New and Vintage
SoCalBajas Member
Kicked Cancer's A$$...1st and 2nd round...Fight ain't over yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2025 12:46 pm Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
Got started Monday evening, got it all apart then Tuesday morning figured out my shim stacks.
Pre greasing the kingpins. These take a lotta grease to fill up the void in the kingpins.
And got the pitman arm replaced.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2025 9:24 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
Finished up the tie rods yesterday, my lathe spindle is only a .870 diameter so I gotta do some funky stuff to ream and thread these things.
But I can't really complain, some guys don't even have a lathe.
And finish taping by hand.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2025 9:28 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
After making sure the length was right I put in some flats for a 7/8 wrench.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Safety Ed Samba Member
Joined: July 10, 2023 Posts: 10 Location: San Pedro CA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2025 1:33 pm Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
Nice! I wish I had some cool tools to be able to do some custom machining. Looks great!
Ed |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2025 4:46 pm Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
| Safety Ed wrote: |
Nice! I wish I had some cool tools to be able to do some custom machining. Looks great!
Ed |
Thanks Ed.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2025 9:56 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
I know a lotta you guys already know this but I'll post this up for the new kids.
On a link pin front end when relocating the stock suspension stops to get more you run into a problem with the passenger side tie rod hitting the frame head.
It will need a little rework to allow the suspension to fully cycle.
So here is how I did it, it ain't super pretty but with a cheap hobo freight flux welder, grinder and hammers it's pretty simple.
After test fitting the tie rod mark where it is at full turn left and right.
Then did some relief cuts with a part off wheel.
Then it's weld, hammer, weld, hammer, test fit, hammer, weld hammer, weld, test fit . . . You get the idea.
By time it was clearanced enough I had a good size gap on the front end so I patched it up with a piece of flat bar.
When I was satisfied I hit the area with some rust neutralizer because why not.
Lighting kinda sucks but here are the results after about 4 hours.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 7:36 pm Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
Hello again dirt people.
Well my plan last weekend was to get the 61 back on it's wheels again but that isn't how it went.
Had the drums all cleaned up and ready to roll on Saturday morning, pressed in the outer bearing race then flip over and do the inside and that's where it went wrong.
The inner races just dropped into the drum without any press fit what so ever. WTF??
UGH!!!
get out the micrometer to check things out.
New bearings O.D. are 2.438 . . . . yes china
Old ones I knocked out are 2.441 . . . Japan
a full .003 undersize
Not much I can do at that point until Monday morning.
The one thing you don't check ahead of time will always come back to haunt you.
Used the down time to clean up and organize the garage back to normal so at least I got that
Monday morning I make coffee and call Kartec and explain my situation to Mike in the buggy department.
Mike explained to me that yes the China bearings do run a little undersize compared to the old style.
So over the phone he got out his calipers to check the Timken bearings they have and those he said are 2.440
So I had to spend the extra cash and step up to the better quality bearings.
I do wanna say that Mike was really helpful on the phone and said he would send out the Timkens and include a return slip in the box and he wouldn't charge the account until the returned bearings are credited back to me. . Awesome!
Tuesday the bearings showed up and measured out at 2.441 . . BRAVO, I'm back in action.
She's back on the ground on all fours.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DesertSasquatchXploration Samba Member

Joined: April 16, 2021 Posts: 1058
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2025 12:23 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
You inspired me to convert from ball joint to link pin. Those spindles are beefy. I'm going in the morning to look at a couple used beams. I want the beam pushed out 3-4 inches and a little caster built in to the adapter. I'm thinking steel 2 inch thick wall tubing and a steel plate that has the tube buggy beam clamps welded on the accept the link pin beam spacing. _________________ Key is to have downward travel Preload keep both wheels on the ground at all times once you lift a tire your DONE. Guys worry about clearance instead think of the opposite you want the suspension to drop that tire in the hole and keep you going. A spider for example they keep their body low but their legs can reach pretty far so they don't (bottom out) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2025 9:44 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
| DesertSasquatchXploration wrote: |
| You inspired me to convert from ball joint to link pin. Those spindles are beefy. I'm going in the morning to look at a couple used beams. I want the beam pushed out 3-4 inches and a little caster built in to the adapter. I'm thinking steel 2 inch thick wall tubing and a steel plate that has the tube buggy beam clamps welded on the accept the link pin beam spacing. |
LOL . . yeah they're definitely beefy.
I'll admit these spindles are 100% overkill for this car but I wasn't really happy with the welded up stock ones.
The actual spindle itself was still the weak point and I have broken stock spindles before.
This way It'll be one thing I won't have to worry about.
Cost wise it was the best choice I think. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeAdams Samba Member

Joined: April 18, 2005 Posts: 170 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 6:45 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
| QRP wrote: |
| DesertSasquatchXploration wrote: |
| You inspired me to convert from ball joint to link pin. Those spindles are beefy. I'm going in the morning to look at a couple used beams. I want the beam pushed out 3-4 inches and a little caster built in to the adapter. I'm thinking steel 2 inch thick wall tubing and a steel plate that has the tube buggy beam clamps welded on the accept the link pin beam spacing. |
LOL . . yeah they're definitely beefy.
I'll admit these spindles are 100% overkill for this car but I wasn't really happy with the welded up stock ones.
The actual spindle itself was still the weak point and I have broken stock spindles before.
This way It'll be one thing I won't have to worry about.
Cost wise it was the best choice I think. |
By the time you buy new link pins, king pins, and bushings you are almost there just to get those spindles. I was hesitant on getting a set and have already broke a spindle on the little sand car. Hopefully they will give you years of service, I’m planning on getting them next time _________________ Trip Report #1:
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=222632&highlight=fonts
Trip Report #2: http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=248234 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dustymojave Samba Member

Joined: January 07, 2007 Posts: 5846 Location: Lake LA, Mojave Desert, SoCal
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2025 12:29 am Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
It's looking great Rick. Coming together.
To deal with tie rod clearance and 10.25" of wheel travel in my 58 Bug still using the original beam and steering box with 1" aluminum tie rods like what you made for yours, I used a rosebud tip on my acetylene torch to heat up the top of the tunnel, then a 4lb hand sledge hammer to beat it down. Worked out about the same, but a lot less grinding.
I still have reinforced stock spindles (also original to the car). Longer wheel travel helps prevent spindle bending and breakage.
Our Chenowth with a stock linkpin beam and the same spindles you just put on with 2.5" over arms, and Fox 10" coilovers, bent and broke a couple of pairs of spindles. But the droop in that setup was restricted by the lower frame rails in the way of the tie rods. It had less than 8" of travel. After a crash broke a couple of arms (the LR Combos held up just fine!) and the builder of the arms is no longer around, new arms have been fabricated and awaiting heats treat, but my son decided that they should be 4" arms. I don't know how he (builder of hundreds of Crumco Bajas, lauded by Brent King for suspension setup) thinks the 4" arms will serve any better than stock arms, I really don't know. Maybe building F35s now has twisted his sense about beam front ends.
I think that short of completely replacing the front frame structure, stock arms would provide all the wheel travel the frame will allow. _________________ Richard
Offroading VW based cars since 1965
Tech Inspection 1963 - 2012 SCCA/SCORE/HDRA/MORE/MDR +
Retired from building Bajas, Fiberglass Buggies and Rails in the Mojave Desert. Also Sprints & Midgets, Dry Lakes, Road Race cars. All types New and Vintage
SoCalBajas Member
Kicked Cancer's A$$...1st and 2nd round...Fight ain't over yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1973 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2025 1:04 pm Post subject: Re: Old school 61 baja project |
|
|
| dustymojave wrote: |
It's looking great Rick. Coming together.
To deal with tie rod clearance and 10.25" of wheel travel in my 58 Bug still using the original beam and steering box with 1" aluminum tie rods like what you made for yours, I used a rosebud tip on my acetylene torch to heat up the top of the tunnel, then a 4lb hand sledge hammer to beat it down. Worked out about the same, but a lot less grinding.
I still have reinforced stock spindles (also original to the car). Longer wheel travel helps prevent spindle bending and breakage.
Our Chenowth with a stock linkpin beam and the same spindles you just put on with 2.5" over arms, and Fox 10" coilovers, bent and broke a couple of pairs of spindles. But the droop in that setup was restricted by the lower frame rails in the way of the tie rods. It had less than 8" of travel. After a crash broke a couple of arms (the LR Combos held up just fine!) and the builder of the arms is no longer around, new arms have been fabricated and awaiting heats treat, but my son decided that they should be 4" arms. I don't know how he (builder of hundreds of Crumco Bajas, lauded by Brent King for suspension setup) thinks the 4" arms will serve any better than stock arms, I really don't know. Maybe building F35s now has twisted his sense about beam front ends.
I think that short of completely replacing the front frame structure, stock arms would provide all the wheel travel the frame will allow. |
Thanks Dusty.
In my defense I would've used an acetylene torch but unfortunately I don't have one.
and yes short of cutting off the front end and starting from scratch this is about as for as I can go without major surgery and that is not in my future.
A proper shock package is the only thing I might do next. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|