| Author |
Message |
Elrick Samba Member
Joined: June 16, 2005 Posts: 70 Location: Bellingham, Washington State
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2025 5:40 pm Post subject: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
This popped up on my uTube thought it was interesting. You can pull up English translation for subtitles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaabOwxCHcw _________________ '63 Ghia, '75 BMW 2002 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rome Samba Member
Joined: June 02, 2004 Posts: 10756 Location: Pearl River, NY
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2025 3:29 pm Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
I took this screen shot in my gallery from that video.
I'm glad that US-version 411's (by then, model year '71 & '72) had the quad headlamps instead of those original large single-piece "fish eye" ones- they look so much better, though the final style headlamps with the 412 were so much sleeker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23471 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2025 1:42 pm Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
This is a really interesting review video! Thank you for posting it!
It is kind of strikes me (style wise) like an episode of Secret Agent man or a Hitchcock movie in its black and white Euro “Film Noir” style!
Its been a busy week but I wanted to comment a little. My “review of the review”!
First, the kind of slightly to moderately negative review this car got here….I kind of agree with. But the comments in the YouTube video are worth reading as well.
I would bet that with close to 500,000+ miles spanning five 411 and 412 cars (1972 Alaska blue 411 four door automatic, 1972 Alaska blue 411 wagon auto swapped to 4 speed, 1972 primer painted 411 wagon auto swapped to 4 speed, 1973 gold four door 412 auto swapped to 4 peed and 1973 two door coupe 412 with 4 speed)…..that I have as much experience as any with the handling, ride characteristics, the differences in middle years 411 to 412 cars and the few mods that can make a difference.
The problems he is outlining (there are strengths and weaknesses) are partly due to the fact that the test car was a 1969 (pretty much the same as a 1968) and not quite as worked out from details I can see as even the 1971 model we first got here.
1. I like that he noted that the “heating problem” has been boldly addressed! That’s no lie!
2. The comment about the instrumentation not being fully resolved….yes. While the speedometer is great (I like the font and legibility of the middle years 411 and 412 a little better) there really should have been at minimum a tachometer instead of a clock and there could have been a small 2” clock in the dash down near the glove box or in the glove box lid. Kienzle and VDO both made such clocks for numerous Mercedes in the same years.
3. Yes….the issues with the clutch and brake pedal spacing I have noticed. I will be installing a clutch rest “dead pedal” of some kind for mind at some point but the issue is that they are a little high off the floor for classic “heel to toe” work.
I was thinking about the pedal height a little more and I am betting that looking at the pedal cluster, it would not be that hard to slot a few holes, add a few spacers and bring the pedal cluster down maybe an inch or so.
Not mentioned in the review but a fact, the early cars like that had the 22.25mm clutch slave cylinder. I have never driven one of those but by all of my calculations its should have almost exactly 2X the clutch pedal tension as the later models like mine with the 44.5mm clutch slave.
In the later cars with the larger 44.5mm slave cylinder, the clutch pedal effort is stupidly light. It has little to no “break point” feel. You get used to it….but the closest similarity to it I ever experienced and it was before I got into a 412 with a manual transmission….was in an early 1980’s Datsun/Nissan 280ZX. I was a Valet while I was in college and I parked and played in quite a few of these (great cars). They had feather light clutches just like the later 411 and 412 cars and until you got used to them, it was very easy to stall taking off from a standing start.
I “think” VW was doing the same thing that Datsun/Nissan was doing. The 411and 412 were supposed to be “upscale”, more luxurious, read that as softer. The word “creampuff” comes to mind!
I would bet that the clutch slave was reengineered to be far softer so ANYONE could drive one and have it feel effortless. Nissan did the same thing with the 280ZX as you can see from this passage stolen from its Wikipedia page:
| Quote: |
| “Compared to the more overtly sporting earlier models, the 280ZX was a much softer, heavier car, with less focus on driving and more on driver comfort and refinement.[1] Softer suspension, better sound insulation, more comfortable seats, and ample equipment including high-end audio systems defined the new ZX.” |
After complaining to myself for decades about the overly soft clutch pedal, I realized not long ago that I can probably rig/install an extension or compression spring up under the dash to stiffen the feel and give a positive break point very easily.
It’s interesting that he notes that the front strut towers restrict passenger footwell movement. Yeah…kind of….. but unless you move to a much wider car, pretty much all strut vehicles did that and still do to a degree. People just rarely notice it these days because cars are wider and most are automatic. No clutch pedal means no issue.
4. The horsepower issue. Keep in mind that in Europe when the 411 first came out, they were twin carbs with 68 HP and lower compression than anything we got here except the California version.
Now, one of the problems with this is…. let’s look at reality. Unless one is driving in perfect weather and with perfect engine tune, excellent gasoline and no real wear items happening with your engine, I do not care what horsepower its rated at.
At any given time, you can probably subtract about 8-10hp from its best rating. That’s what its probably giving you.
So, compared to what we had by the time the 411 arrived in 1971 in the USA…you get the effect on what this guy was testing…of about 58hp equivalent with the lower compression and “carbs vs injection” throttle response loss, versus about 70-72 hp equivalent (80 to 82 hp rated) with fuel injection and higher compression here in the US.
So, it probably had the power output of a beetle or type 3 in a larger body. Yes….it was easy to be seen as weak/inadequate in this test.
I think the 1.7L with 8.2:1 here in the US, with a four speed and well-tuned was fairly adequate. If you can dig another 8-10hp out of your 1.7 (tuning, better fuel pressure, maybe a better cam, slightly higher compression, slightly better exhaust) I can tell you it makes a world of difference. That can net you about 90hp.
For comparison, My 2008 Jetta Mk5 with a full tank and my fat ass in it with 150 hp is right at 22 pounds per hp and it was quite adequate with a manual 5 speed.
For a 1973 two door with 4 speed (2250 lbs) with those mods I mentioned, 90hp would be right at 25 lbs per horsepower.
The 1968/69 like in this review would be four door and is right at 50 lbs heavier than my 2 door 412 (2300 lbs.). That gives about 33 lbs per horsepower with only a 68 horsepower engine…and remember, reality is probably closer to 58-60 hp.
That is also only 3-4 more HP than a fuel injected type 3 (54 hp). With right at 2000 lbs weight the type 3 is about 37 lbs per HP.
The 411 being tested in this video is a little too close to the type 3 in power to weight and is factually about 300 lbs heavier.
Having driven both a type 3 with D-jet and a 411/412 with D-jet, I can tell you that the type 4 spanks the type 3 and the reviewer would have had a better time with the later fuel injected or even higher compression engine,
I have had my 1.7L tuned out to 90hp and I would say that about 25 lbs per hp is kind of the adequate sweet spot minimum. It drove as well as my Golf mk 6 does and does about 10 seconds 0-60.
The US models with 80-82 HP did 12-13 seconds. A little slow but better than what this test 411 did in the video.
The top speed of 147 kn/hr = 91 mph. Not bad for its day.
5. I can agree that the 411/412 is a very good winter car! With winter tires and in good tune, it starts well and handles very good on ice and snow. It also has very good heat and reasonable defrost compared to beetles.
6. Yes, the cross wind characteristics are poor. BUT, his comment that this is because of short wheelbase and high rear end load….is only partially correct in my experience.
I can tell you that the high front end and the very small castor angle are easily 8/10ths of the issue. Perhaps the high front end is what he was referring to in the “rear load” comment. When you lower the front end to even just level (whether you do it with weight in the trunk or modified castor angle or both) it GREATLY improves wind wandering.
7. YES…the comment that “ This chassis can tolerate high lateral acceleration” …these cars have surprising lateral adhesion for how high they are. They do handle and corner well. You can throw it around so to speak. It is also surprising that they do not generally (as they come from the factory) have the risky “Porsche 911” habit of the heavier rear end trying to pass the front end on braking during deceleration.
HOWEVER…I can tell you that once you lower the front end level which gets rid of some of the cross wind issues/wind wandering, it changes the inertial shift a little on braking from high speed, like on a downhill curve (sweeper), which slightly increases the tendency of the rear wanting to come un-planted…upon braking (the 911 syndrome). This is where wider tires help and where knowing when to downshift on that downhill curve and keep the revs high and power to the wheels…will prevent that.
8. At this point at about 7:30 in the video, when he is throwing the car from lane to lane in a slalom pattern…notice how the rear wheel “tucks under” and it wallows about the rear axis. It still holds the road well.
It wallows and changes roll axis starting from the rear. The rear end drives this car in maneuvers like this.
IMPORTANT NOTE: while the driving and body roll we see from about 7:30 to 8:30 in the video, seems to be well controlled, this is all about how good and grippy your tires are. I can tell you back in that era, most of even the bias ply tires that might have been on these cars were very soft, very grippy and very low miles lifespan.
If you have all of the original struts, springs, bushing and valving….along with slightly more modern or less grippy tires…that type of driving in these cars can easily cause you to spin out.
9. At 8:50 to 9:00 when he is going over the cobblestone at speed….yes….these cars handled bumps and rough pavement very smoothly…ride comfort wise. BUT….only with the tall sidewall tires that were stock. The tall sidewalls flexed a lot and are just as important to smooth ride as were the soft valving.
When I got my first 1972 four door 411, it had 155 or 165 bias ply tires on it and seemed to drive and stick to the road just like the car in this video. I probably got away with murder the first year I drove it due to that fact.
I went to 185sr-15 Michelin ZX tires and while traction was superior, the lower sidewall and tougher tread compound caused the car to ride much more roughly on poor pavement……and that….along with the long suspension arms and high leverage….beat the living crap out of the suspension.
Its worth it to note that this was 1978 and my car was a 1972 411 four door with 55k miles on it. By 70k miles, the rough roads in Oklahoma City and the stiffer radial tires I went to caused the need for bushing replacement in several places on the suspension.
10. At 9:37 talking about brakes, yes, the brakes on this car are excellent.
I only noticed that this car ever required excessive pedal pressure when two things were at play:
A. When the rear drums required adjustment. The rear was out of adjustment constantly on my car PARTLY because I drove a lot of miles. I had to adjust them every 4-6 when I was in high school and college to have the best braking all the time. Or, if you did not care you could ignore the adjustment, pull up a click or two on the E-brake handle and they would always stop anyway.
B. If one were using the wrong brake pads. While I was in high school and college, every FLAPS had poor parts books on most European cars in general and absolutely terrible books on the 411/412.
They always listed the front pads as “organic”. The organic pads were a poor stopping, squealing mess. One day at the VW dealer, the parts guy informed me that VW had NEVER equipped the 411 or 412 with organic pads. They have always been semi-metallic.
Just that change made a huge difference. Years later and a few 411/412’s under my belt, I had long since gone to high end metal-master front pads and Mintex semi-metallic rear shoes…..and I can say that this car no longer required what one would think is “high pedal pressure”.
I think the guy reviewing this 411 either was already primarily used to power brake cars or simply had a lot of brake wear or poor pads on the model he tested.
To finish up….I would have to concur with the narrator that when one looks at the cost vs value (I think the value was high for a VW and what it brought to the table compared to previous VW models)…and compare that to the competition from other manufacturers at the time,….yes….no reason for enthusiasm.
I think other reviews of the 411 and 412 have said it before. Compared to other cars in its class, in Europe at the time, the VW 411 was a little TOO “conservative”.
If they were changing the existing VW dynamic as much as they did (larger, softer, more luxury, struts instead of beam, trailing wishbones, automatic transmission) they should have just bumped it up two more notches.
Why only go up ~10 hp more than the beetle or type 3 with the first type 4 engines and not the ~20hp more than a beetle or type 3 that we got three years later. Or why not just start with the 1.8L with twin carbs from day one.
The body and comfort appointments were fine. It just needed a little more performance. I think that if the first 411’s had started out with the HP and torque that either the late Euro 1.8L had or even the specs of the USA standard 1.7L with D-jet and some better shock valving and a larger rear sway bar…..it would have done better enough to not go away so fast.
Ray |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2025 10:50 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
With the first 411, there was something wrotten in the state of denmark, not to say, very much!
The new top end VW 411 came with an engine and engine case, that did not really fit the 914.
While Porsche and Bosch had nearly finished the modern 80 hp engine with D-jet (for type 3 D-jet also was already available), the 411 was rather weak and came with two carbs only.
Rather poor was shifting, braking, handling (no rear stabi) and due to mounts of engine and trans, a strong noise inside.
Very many people had thought, the "cyclope" 411 was ugly too.
For those who had payed big money for the new "top model 69", it was rather hard to find out, only one year later, their "new car" was old fashioned, loud and lazy beside the 411 E, which now also came as "variant".
I can remember the early 80´s, on junk yards, there were many early 411´s with low miles, around 50´km.
A pain and challenge was it, to lill engine oil in. It goes on...
That time, there was a lot of trouble at VW and Porsche because of the 914, the D-jet and that 411 carb engine. (and with that EA 266 mid engine prototype)
In 1969 Gunther Artz installed a 911 engine in a 411 type 42. (Panamera idea?)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artz
Also sporty went Ben Pon with the 411 in 1969. (sadly, pics deleted)
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5841503
Many of that early 411had ended up very soon as successful auto cross "stockcars". (last Dudu film, only the first 5 minutes are interesting)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ghAIkhToAg
or at "Autoball" (no pics).
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoball
Nowadays, I guess, there are more original and drivable 1948 beetles around, than early VW 411´s from model year 1969.
(1948 Nordhoff beetle, 1968 Nordhoff (Lotz) 411, 1988 Passat 35i, around 2008 Passat B 6 and so on) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:24 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
| Rome wrote: |
I took this screen shot in my gallery from that video.
I'm glad that US-version 411's (by then, model year '71 & '72) had the quad headlamps instead of those original large single-piece "fish eye" ones- they look so much better, though the final style headlamps with the 412 were so much sleeker. |
Thank you very much for sharing that pic, you have had a very good idea! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23471 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:39 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
| wagen19 wrote: |
With the first 411, there was something wrotten in the state of denmark, not to say, very much!
The new top end VW 411 came with an engine and engine case, that did not really fit the 914.
While Porsche and Bosch had nearly finished the modern 80 hp engine with D-jet (for type 3 D-jet also was already available), the 411 was rather weak and came with two carbs only.
Rather poor was shifting, braking, handling (no rear stabi) and due to mounts of engine and trans, a strong noise inside.
Very many people had thought, the "cyclope" 411 was ugly too.
For those who had payed big money for the new "top model 69", it was rather hard to find out, only one year later, their "new car" was old fashioned, loud and lazy beside the 411 E, which now also came as "variant".
I can remember the early 80´s, on junk yards, there were many early 411´s with low miles, around 50´km.
A pain and challenge was it, to lill engine oil in. It goes on...
That time, there was a lot of trouble at VW and Porsche because of the 914, the D-jet and that 411 carb engine. (and with that EA 266 mid engine prototype)
In 1969 Gunther Artz installed a 911 engine in a 411 type 42. (Panamera idea?)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artz
Also sporty went Ben Pon with the 411 in 1969. (sadly, pics deleted)
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5841503
Many of that early 411had ended up very soon as successful auto cross "stockcars". (last Dudu film, only the first 5 minutes are interesting)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ghAIkhToAg
or at "Autoball" (no pics).
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoball
Nowadays, I guess, there are more original and drivable 1948 beetles around, than early VW 411´s from model year 1969.
(1948 Nordhoff beetle, 1968 Nordhoff (Lotz) 411, 1988 Passat 35i, around 2008 Passat B 6 and so on) |
Agree. Its kind of what I was getting at in the tail end of my "review of the review". Though we have never seen the 1968's here in the US....from the specs and everything I have see and read about them, VW kind of screwed up. If you are making a totally NEW model with virtually every system different than what you have made for 30 years....it had better be...BETTER. It had better be good. It needed to be quicker than the beetles and type 3's before it. It needed to handle better than the beetles and type 3 before it.
Larger and more comfortable it did fine. They should have waited to release it until it was properly outfitted. I think they did the model permanent damage.
Ray |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2025 12:12 pm Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
Does someone know the original color and paint code of the 1969 Ben Pon Monte Carlo car, or color pics?
Is that car still in existence or history known about? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jlrftype7 Samba Member
Joined: July 24, 2018 Posts: 4778 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2025 7:20 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
Very entertaining, and from the period perspective, informative.
If we could only add voice -overs to the piece back then....
BUY all the hard to find parts NOW while they're still available...
Hoard Baby Hoard...  _________________ '68 Westy- my first VW and vehicle/Bus- long gone.- sold it to a traveling Swiss couple....
'67 Type 3 Fastback, my 2nd car- gone
'69 Semi-Auto Stick Shift Beetle-gone
2017 MINI Coopers, our current DDs
‘84 Tin Top - Hilga....Auto |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rome Samba Member
Joined: June 02, 2004 Posts: 10756 Location: Pearl River, NY
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2025 2:09 pm Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
wagen19, have you ever seen the Artz 411/911? In 2001 I spent 12 weeks in Bavaria for an extended business trip. Near the end I drove up to Hanover (spelled with one "n" in English) for the huge Maikaefertreffen VW meet, and that 411 was on display!
* Here you go, from my gallery; the English name of this movie was "The return of Superbug" (1978)-
Us Americans will probably chuckle over the movie's German name/main character "Dudu" because it sounds like "doo doo" which means "Kacke"...! Dog doo means "Hundekacke".  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2025 10:06 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
Thanks rome for your help with pics.
Yes, I was several times at the Maikaefertreffen and also have seen the Artz 411/911.
Maybe you know something about 412 prototypes. I have a model 1974 type 46 with 75 HP. With just that car the "Typpruefung" at Kraftfahrtbundesamt at Flensburg was driven. That info I could get from the first owner, who worked at VW factory. Interesting is, that model 74 has still the older, up to 73 front shocks with 120 degree mounting side panels. No accident repair and first paint. According to spare books, all 1974 models should have new side panels and new front shocks from beginning. Vin is below 464 2 000 030, "AT" engine number is below number AT 000 015. Still having the original title, KFZ Brief and also the car, but up to now, no birth certificate.
Porsche Salzburg had some 411 and 412 Variants as Rally support cars. You or someone else have pics? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rome Samba Member
Joined: June 02, 2004 Posts: 10756 Location: Pearl River, NY
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2025 9:41 pm Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
wagen, you certainly have an unusual '74 412; it could be considered from the "pilot production" in which series cars are assembled per final supplier parts and assembly line logistics, go through quality control final procedures, and may have been kept in company service for a year for short-term evaluation of the new components. This was done prior to the full-scale production start, and could've included Press vehicles. Then such a vehicle could've been sold to VW dealers as used vehicles (e.g., Hotz in Wolfsburg), thereby the introduction to customers.
Does your KFZ-Brief list the date of first registration? It was likely very close to the start of the 1974 model year on Aug. 1, 1973 which was a Wednesday.
I don't have any info on Porsche Salzburg's Type 4s. My direct involvement with Type 4 was when my dad started receiving them as company vehicles as of the '71 model year (first year for the US market), which was a step up from his '70 Type 3 Fastback. He had type 4 for a few years, always the 4-door Sedan; then was able to switch over to Audi Fox (Audi 80 in Europe) and Audi 100 LS. He also obtained at least 2 Type 4 for my mom's use, of which I learned to drive in one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2025 12:00 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
Hello,
EDIT:
Very early first registration: no, just nearly the opposite.
Next thing: the orig. "Brief", title, has a date stamp from Jan 24, 1974, so many months later as the production date of that car.
First registration was Feb 06 1974. I was wondering just about that delay, not going along with the very early 1974 VIN 464 2 000 02x.
So I assume, the decision to bring the car on public roads was made in January 1974. In a german KFZ Brief (title) the number of ABE incl. actual addendums is stamped in. But when the new 74 models had been on their test runs for KBA, (when?), there still was no new ABE written and no Brief could be issued.
That was the main reason why I have tried to contact, finally successful, the first WOB-owner. He had something to do with the VW factory tools there. He was only 23 years old, when he got that marinogelb 412 L Variant. He remembered a holiday trip to scandinavia with his first wife. Inside the housing of airfilter, some small parts are looking like handmade. (engine number AT 000 011)
A GSR steering wheel and 5,5 x 15 ET 40 Lemmerz rims 1563-3 with 185/70 SR 15 tires were TUEV registrated March 18, 1976 (by second owner) and are still installed.
The first owner told me, the car was parked for some months in "Aservatenkammer" of factory, in case of KBA has questions again. He purchased it for rather cheap that times and used the car until Sept 18, 1975. Then he had sold it to a dealer at Nuernberg, Bavaria (Franconia!)
Interesting and the best thing is, that just that car with running and matching original engine and original Brief, document has survived more than 50 years, until today.
My uncle purchased 1971 a new silver 411 LE variant with blue velours seats. It was his first new car and was a great car for his family with 3 children. After the 411, he also got a new Audi 100 (Avant). His very first car was a used indigo blue model 60 ragtop export beetle with overrider bumpers.
To come back to topic, a perugreen 411 type 41 "cyclops" from end of May 1969 with matching V 040 19x engine and original german title is also still here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kgarchivinusa Samba Member

Joined: September 02, 2007 Posts: 194 Location: Wolfsburg, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2025 12:23 pm Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
| wagen19 wrote: |
Does someone know the original color and paint code of the 1969 Ben Pon Monte Carlo car, or color pics?
Is that car still in existence or history known about? |
I probably will say it was „chinchilla“.
_________________ 1958 Ghia Coupe aerosilver/graywhite
1966 Ghia Coupe lotoswhite/black pigalle
1968 sunroof bug savannah beige
1968 VW 411 4-door royal red
1968 VW 411 L 4-door cobaltblue
1988 Porsche 924S Targa alpinweiss
(O = i = O) Karmann Ghia rassig und charmant [hot-blooded and charming] [O o\ i /o O] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 5:44 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
| kgarchivinusa wrote: |
| wagen19 wrote: |
Does someone know the original color and paint code of the 1969 Ben Pon Monte Carlo car, or color pics?
Is that car still in existence or history known about? |
I probably will say it was „chinchilla“.
|
Thank you very much. That pics rule out for sure L 50 B, L 90 C and most probably also L 620.
The winner is: L 70 F |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kgarchivinusa Samba Member

Joined: September 02, 2007 Posts: 194 Location: Wolfsburg, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:38 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
| wagen19 wrote: |
| kgarchivinusa wrote: |
| wagen19 wrote: |
Does someone know the original color and paint code of the 1969 Ben Pon Monte Carlo car, or color pics?
Is that car still in existence or history known about? |
I probably will say it was „chinchilla“.
|
Thank you very much. That pics rule out for sure L 50 B, L 90 C and most probably also L 620.
The winner is: L 70 F |
On the race picture it looks like L620, but in my opinion it is dust and dirt. On the RAI display a savanna beige is close to the Monte Carlo car on stage.
For more early VW 411 info check my blog (in German): http://enzyklopaedie.blogspot.com/ _________________ 1958 Ghia Coupe aerosilver/graywhite
1966 Ghia Coupe lotoswhite/black pigalle
1968 sunroof bug savannah beige
1968 VW 411 4-door royal red
1968 VW 411 L 4-door cobaltblue
1988 Porsche 924S Targa alpinweiss
(O = i = O) Karmann Ghia rassig und charmant [hot-blooded and charming] [O o\ i /o O] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:11 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
Thank you again, I´m thinking the same.
If the three beetles have normal paint colors, they should be toga white L 90 C (type 115), royal red L 30 A and chinchilla L 70 F.
Thinking about history and development of the type 4 DESIGN and IMAGE.
1965 Renault 16 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_16
1965 VW type 3 , 1600 TL https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/VW_Typ_3
1966, 67 Tatra 603 - X prototypes https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&a...p;dpr=1.33
1968 VW type 4, 411 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/VW_Typ_4
1973 VW type 32, Passat B1 (Dasher) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/VW_Passat_B1
1999 VW concept D prototype, > Phaeton https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/VW_Phaeton
2009 Porsche Panamera https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_Panamera
Interesting are the different sizes of tailgates and if there is a rear trunk or not.
Also interesting is the different image of Audi 80 and VW based "Audi" Fox station wagon and german VW Dasher (Passat).
For my understanding, the type 4, 411, 412 was placed above the type 3 and the Audi 80 and VW Dasher replaced the type 3.
The type 4 engines: at least all versions from late 1969 onwards with aluminium case (Si 12) have PORSCHE-DNA, because of the 914 (1,7 l - 2,0 l), (411 = 911?)
The 411 engine compartment was large enough, to accept a complete 911-engine (but then, there was no space left for a rear trunk above the engine)
With that idea it makes sense, that there never was a type 4 "fastback" as the typ3 TL with flat engine and rear trunk layout.
So my idea is, the "411" was consequently planned to become the new "First Class Family Volkswagen" with 911 6 cylinder engine.
The KdF Beetle with around 25 hp, engines 1,0 and 1,1 l and 2 doors made around 100 km/h top speed. I guess, it was planned, the 411 with 4 doors was planned for top speed of around 200 km/h.
The 2,2 l 911 E and S-engines with 155 and 180 hp had enough potential for that idea. We know, the 911 engine had potential also for 250 hp later. Even a 901 trans with deep shift rod was not that hard to install.
Was this Nordhoffs gigantic DREAM? His personal new "Uber-Volkswagen"?
But back to the reality of the video. The question is, was a 411 with that performance still drivable and safe around 200 km/h top speed on windy roads?
And how about fuel consumption and price then? All hardly below 911 S level, I assume.
Still "VOLKSWAGEN-IMAGE" and "DNA", affordable by the public?
(some beers after and about 30 years later, there was a successful (?) 12 cylinder "Volkswagen" started. A rich and very shiny country this must be)
Only the model 1969 "V - engine" with carbs had the "VW-style" and cheaper magnesium case and 68 hp. That early engine had more VW-DNA an no FI. (but till 7´65 the beetle had 34 hp max and it also was an upgrade against the 54 hp of the type 3, with carbs or D-Jet FI)
Body styles:
Station wagons (Variant) was "good" for: type 3, type 32 Dasher and "Audi" Fox, type 4, 411+ 412,
No Station wagons for: german Audi 80 (B1, B2, B3), VW Phaeton and Porsche Panamera (still not).
"Notch-bodies" for the type 3, Audi 80, VW Passat (B2, Santana)
No "Notch-bodies" for: type 4, VW Passat (B1), Porsche Panamera
So finally I think, the 411, type 4 had no rear trunk and no large tailgate, because the type 4 was planned with 6 cylinder engines, most probably from the 911 and not as "Variant", station wagon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2025 11:11 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
| jlrftype7 wrote: |
Very entertaining, and from the period perspective, informative.
If we could only add voice -overs to the piece back then....
BUY all the hard to find parts NOW while they're still available...
Hoard Baby Hoard...  |
Regarding the Ben Pon engagement with the 411 for RMC in 1969 and some other ideas, I ´m thinking a sporty "411 GT", type 41 with a 2,0 l or 2,2 l engine from the 911 or type 4 could have been a lot of fun in the summer of 69.
A car like that can also be seen as a "911 GLS", maybe even as type 42 with 4 doors.
But we must see, that time, mid engined cars like the VW EA 266 and the VW-Porsche 914 had been rather the main topics.
VW had enough "KAOS" that time and many questions about the NSU K 70, NSU Ro 80, Audi 100 C1, Type 3, Type 4 and so on.
I guess, some money was burnt that time.
A "serial 411 / 412 GT" was not, but still can be made.
Around 100 or 120 hp can be interesting enough and not overdone. Engine type 4 2,0 l or 911 T, 2,0 or 2,2 l, maybe also 912 or 912 E.
A 901 5-speed trans is not impossible. Exotic enough?
With luck some not that interesting but usable 911 T-engines (2,0 to 2,4) are lying around somewhere...
Who knows, what cars H. Nordhoff has used privately? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 4:46 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
| wagen19 wrote: |
| kgarchivinusa wrote: |
| wagen19 wrote: |
Does someone know the original color and paint code of the 1969 Ben Pon Monte Carlo car, or color pics?
Is that car still in existence or history known about? |
I probably will say it was „chinchilla“.
|
Thank you very much. That pics rule out for sure L 50 B, L 90 C and most probably also L 620.
The winner is: L 70 F |
Some more pics from RAI, Amsterdam, NL, Feb 1969
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:AutoRA...2-0958.jpg
I guess, it was planned, no sale of the type 4 in the USA, but the K 70 from 1971 onwards. But after they had found out, it was "impossible" to create a K 70 Automatic version, they switched to the type 4, two years later. The K 70 was from another world, without DNA from Audi, Porsche, VW and without modern FI and no Automatic version. That´s "impossible" for the new "top end VW".
I assume, on the one hand, some VW manager wanted new watercooled VW cars already for 1969, but on the other hand, the still rather new and heavier baywindows were in need for a stronger and better engine. (with Porsche DNA) that had to come and was used till end of 1982 in AC vanagons. AND there was the "VW-PORSCHE 914" project.
What was about NSU Ro 80 in the USA and why came the "VW K 70" and the "NSU Ro 80", but not "VW Ro 80"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wagen19 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: germany
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:12 am Post subject: Re: German review of the new 411 |
|
|
| raygreenwood wrote: |
| wagen19 wrote: |
With the first 411, there was something wrotten in the state of denmark, not to say, very much!
The new top end VW 411 came with an engine and engine case, that did not really fit the 914.
While Porsche and Bosch had nearly finished the modern 80 hp engine with D-jet (for type 3 D-jet also was already available), the 411 was rather weak and came with two carbs only.
Rather poor was shifting, braking, handling (no rear stabi) and due to mounts of engine and trans, a strong noise inside.
Very many people had thought, the "cyclope" 411 was ugly too.
For those who had payed big money for the new "top model 69", it was rather hard to find out, only one year later, their "new car" was old fashioned, loud and lazy beside the 411 E, which now also came as "variant".
I can remember the early 80´s, on junk yards, there were many early 411´s with low miles, around 50´km.
A pain and challenge was it, to lill engine oil in. It goes on...
That time, there was a lot of trouble at VW and Porsche because of the 914, the D-jet and that 411 carb engine. (and with that EA 266 mid engine prototype)
In 1969 Gunther Artz installed a 911 engine in a 411 type 42. (Panamera idea?)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artz
Also sporty went Ben Pon with the 411 in 1969. (sadly, pics deleted)
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5841503
Many of that early 411had ended up very soon as successful auto cross "stockcars". (last Dudu film, only the first 5 minutes are interesting)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ghAIkhToAg
or at "Autoball" (no pics).
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoball
Nowadays, I guess, there are more original and drivable 1948 beetles around, than early VW 411´s from model year 1969.
(1948 Nordhoff beetle, 1968 Nordhoff (Lotz) 411, 1988 Passat 35i, around 2008 Passat B 6 and so on) |
Agree. Its kind of what I was getting at in the tail end of my "review of the review". Though we have never seen the 1968's here in the US....from the specs and everything I have see and read about them, VW kind of screwed up. If you are making a totally NEW model with virtually every system different than what you have made for 30 years....it had better be...BETTER. It had better be good. It needed to be quicker than the beetles and type 3's before it. It needed to handle better than the beetles and type 3 before it.
Larger and more comfortable it did fine. They should have waited to release it until it was properly outfitted. I think they did the model permanent damage.
Ray |
Type 4 tests and the development of image.
Rainer Gunzler was (is still) well known for "his" tests.
He was a racing driver and from other VW tests, 34 hp beetle 1965, it seems "he" wanted that VW would create and sell more powerful and faster cars with watercooled engines, installed in the front.
The K 70, planned since 1965 from NSU (only with carb, choke knob, no automatic trans available) probably rather as a successor for the "NSU Prinz-types" and later was never developed by VW for the US- market.
But R. Guenzler "liked" and proposed the K 70, just in the opposite of the 411 before.
Video from "Eifelrennen 1955" with Rainer Guenzler at the wheel, 356 Nr. 82
https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/swr-retro-sport-...zIxNTUzOTI
https://www.racingsportscars.com/results/Nurburgring-1955-05-29a.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_4xlQfhjcg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arA9pL_FOMI
https://www.vw411-412friends.org/geschichte/fahrzeugentwicklung
At WOB, H. Nordhoff knew, L. Kraus at Ingolstadt (Auto Union, AUDI) was developing the F 103, the first Audi 100 and the Audi 80, which appeared in 1972.
So the question is, who "needed" the K 70 (NSU, Audi or VW) in Aug 1968, when the new VW 411 appeared.
The "big flat 4 engines" were planed and needed to be installed in 914 and busses.
More or less old fashioned they had been in 1968, when H. Nordhoff has left the planet, cars with aircooled engines in the rear, but...
Beetle: 1938 till 2003
911: 1963 till ???
What about answers and explenations from KI for that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|