Author |
Message |
74ThingMike Samba Member
Joined: April 09, 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:03 pm Post subject: ATTN THING OWNERS: re: gas milage |
|
|
hey guys looking to buy a 74 with a single port 1500cc does anyone know about what my gas milage will be? thanks for your help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edgy Samba Member
Joined: January 22, 2003 Posts: 424 Location: Bel Air, Maryland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1600 dp is stock. Not sure what you will get. We get around 23. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bljones Resident Wit
Joined: February 08, 2002 Posts: 2377 Location: ontario canada
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1500 single port? that's a lot of car to be pushing around with that engine.
Keith Seume's research pegs a 67 beetle with a 1500 at about 32 mpg. In a Thing, with the different gearing of the tranny and the heavier weight as well as all the aerodynamic efficiency of a concrete block, i think you're more likely to see 19-22 mpg, in an absolutely perfect state of tune. _________________ OG JHC
Author of Original Rant #1
"It stingd itself to dead... now that is control on you"
2%
Last edited by bljones on Fri Apr 09, 2004 4:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
74ThingMike Samba Member
Joined: April 09, 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:39 pm Post subject: hill... |
|
|
hey one more question i live on a very big hill, will this 1500cc sp be able to handle hill driving every day? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Targus Samba Member
Joined: March 20, 2004 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is just one opinion, but I honestly believe that because of the weight a Thing will honestly do MUCH better with the stock 1600 DP engine.
They weigh alot more than a beetle and the 1600cc get's pretty good mileage regardless. I'm not sure, but wouldn't the 1500cc SP get worse mileage beacuse it had to work harder? I don't know...Maybe not.
JMO. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bljones Resident Wit
Joined: February 08, 2002 Posts: 2377 Location: ontario canada
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree, a 1600 would be a bare minimum for a Thing. Not only will gas mileage suffer with a 1500, but longevity will suffer as well. additionally, a 1600 case is far more suitable for "growing" an engine. _________________ OG JHC
Author of Original Rant #1
"It stingd itself to dead... now that is control on you"
2% |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nthang Sambassador
Joined: February 05, 2003 Posts: 158 Location: Up Stream
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The stock 1600 dp was enough fun to drive to make me spring for a 130 hp 1915cc engine. Seriously, Things are very under-powered with the 1600 dp. I doubt that you will like the hills with 100 fewer cc's than stock. I get about 22 mph.
But you can always upgrade the 1500. Just get into the swing of Things and get the car and you'll be on your way!
Richard Myers
74 Thing Lover _________________ NTHANG, LLC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edgy Samba Member
Joined: January 22, 2003 Posts: 424 Location: Bel Air, Maryland
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think you are mistaken about weight being a problem. Things weigh no more and probably a bit less than a Beetle. No sound deadener, no double panels, etc. The loss of mileage is likely due to the absence of any aerodynamics, like the flat fron end. Things are geared a bit lower but that would mean the 1500 would be better. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bljones Resident Wit
Joined: February 08, 2002 Posts: 2377 Location: ontario canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Things do weigh more than a beetle- at least with the doors on. A Thing has a wet weight of 2290 lbs, while a beetle is anywhere between 1800 and 1980 lbs. _________________ OG JHC
Author of Original Rant #1
"It stingd itself to dead... now that is control on you"
2% |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TimGud Samba Member
Joined: March 03, 2002 Posts: 6459 Location: Rio Rico Arizona
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you are willing to drop it down a gear the 1500sp will get you up the hill but just alot slower. With a 1776 a Thing seems to have just aboout as much power up to about 60 as my beatle with a 1600 does. Look at the sticker by the drivers door and you will be surprised how heavy it is. The thing weighs almost as much as my Westfalia. You may want to spring for a bigger motor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
74ThingMike Samba Member
Joined: April 09, 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 12:24 am Post subject: thanks |
|
|
ok so it sounds like in the future i will want to get a bigger engine how much money am i looking at, considering i will have it instaled buy someone else?
does anyone have prices for a 1600cc - 1915cc
thank you for all your help |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Targus Samba Member
Joined: March 20, 2004 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kinda hard to say without knowing where you live, and what you plan to put in there. In California you could probably get a longblock 1600cc installed for under $1500 if you look around, but if you live in Burma and want a turnkey 1915 depending on the builder and mods, it could run over 7 grand easy after shipping and installation. I'd guess a turnkey 1776 in the midwest delivered and installed would probably run around $3200 depending on the builder and the installer. For a longblock it would probably be less depending on the installer.
With a little homework and some mechanical ability you could do it for a lot less, and have the almost intoxicating satisfaction of knowing that YOU built it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Luni Samba Member
Joined: December 29, 2003 Posts: 427 Location: Hartford, CT
|
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2004 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Even though the 1600 is bigger & dual port and everything, I was always under the impression that the 1500 actually had more horsepower than a later 1600, thanks to a complete lack of emmissions equipment. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bljones Resident Wit
Joined: February 08, 2002 Posts: 2377 Location: ontario canada
|
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2004 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Magically, the published HP numbers are the same for the 1500 or 1600-
53 hp @ 4000 rpm. The torque on a brand new 1500 is actually a little higher- 78 ft/lbs. @ 2600 rpm vs. 72 ft/lbs. on a 1600. I suspect both figures may be a little fudged, as the acceleration and top speeds are improved on the 1600 beetles with the same gearing as the earlier 1500.
The key phrase is "brand new." The 1500 engine is not as durable as a 1600.
I like the single port design for better torque- i think the perfect low-budget Thing engine would be a kadron'd 1776 single port. _________________ OG JHC
Author of Original Rant #1
"It stingd itself to dead... now that is control on you"
2% |
|
Back to top |
|
|
74ThingMike Samba Member
Joined: April 09, 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2004 8:59 am Post subject: Thankyou |
|
|
thanks guys i will keep you all posted. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|