Author |
Message |
erdonline Samba Member
Joined: September 26, 2004 Posts: 943 Location: CT
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:24 pm Post subject: Will I be happy with an automatic? |
|
|
I'm replacing my wrecked '85 Vanagon Westfalia, manual trans, no a/c which I've had for six years. I wanted to replace it with something close to what I had, and I've found a few candidates, but also just missed out on a few, and am now considering an automatic.
I've got used to a manual trans (also have one in my '87, which I've had for eight years). I like that I can pop the clutch if the battery or starter is dead.
I don't think I'd mind an automatic, in fact, it might be nice not to have to shift all the time. But I've only ever had an automatic for a few months ('88 Quantum wagon several years ago). I have to wonder how different an automatic Vanagon is going to be than my manual. I'm used to driving my Westfalia on the highway at up 75 miles an hour, with 70 sustained driving, and I always was happy with the engine RPMs. How differently is the automatic geared? What RPMs can I expect at 70 mph?
Anything else I should think about when considering an automatic?
Thanks,
Ed in CT _________________ '85 Vanagon Westfalia
'84 Vanagon 7-passenger
'98 Mexican air-cooled Beetle |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OilNBolts Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2007 Posts: 438 Location: Kentucky
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have one four-speed and two automatics. I bought the second auto because my wife is more comfortable and confident when she doesn't have to shift.
They both have strong attributes. The stick is more fun to drive (subjective) and the autos are nicer in traffic, or on a grade, for instance, at a stop light. As it turns out, the Vanagon's automatic is a particularly high quality transmission. With casual servicing, very high miles are common.
It is true that the rpms are lower at cruising speed with the standard, but that does not keep the autos from running along just fine at 75. My typical cruising speed is 4000 rpm, which is 67mph on the GPS. This nets 18. something miles per gallon, barring crazy winds or mountainous terrain.
I like'm both. _________________ Current fleet: Vanagons, two '88 GLs and an 89 Bluestar. Beetles, '63, '64, '72 convertible. Plus, four Subarus and three Prius. Too many cars. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Captain Pike Samba Member
Joined: December 30, 2003 Posts: 3341 Location: Talos IV, Piedmont Arizona
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I drive a converted 86 stick I4 and a 90 auto wasser.
I'll use any excuse to drive the auto. I get 19mph on a bearing/ring/head job. As far as South east Pa hills the auto can't buy a thrill compared to the I4(unless you select 2nd and FLOOR it) but in normal traffic she is a peach.
As OilNBolts sez:
"It is true that the rpms are lower at cruising speed with the standard, but that does not keep the autos from running along just fine at 75. My typical cruising speed is 4000 rpm, which is 67mph on the GPS. This nets 18. something miles per gallon, barring crazy winds or mountainous terrain.
I like'm both."
Me too. _________________ LEARN TO SELF RESCUE
59 Panel bus, 1966 Single cab. 73' 181. 73 Westy. 91' H6 Vanagon 3.3L.
.....................All Current.......................
Last edited by Captain Pike on Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pete000 Samba Member
Joined: July 29, 2004 Posts: 642 Location: Ocala FL
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here in LA the traffic is so bad I love my auto shifter ! _________________ 1990 Vanagon RS 2.1
1967 Deluxe 21 window
--------------------
Koni Shocks
H & R Red Springs
Addco Sway Bars Front-Rear
18 X 7.5 and 18 X 8 OEM Porsche Wheels
Recaro Power-Heated seats |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wvukidsdoc Samba Member
Joined: April 29, 2005 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ed, I think you will be pleasantly surprised with the auto. I would object a bit to the "reliability" comment as I've replaced 6-7 in the 75-125k range over the years, but a late Vanagon with the 2.1 and the oil cooler for the tranny will do pretty well, certainly will last about the same as a set of heads at least, and will probably do better with a bit more aux cooling, but don't discount the heating function of the oil/water cooler if you live in a cold climate.
Driving them is great, I've had an '87 and '90 (and well a '83) personally as drivers, the torque multiplication of a converter makes for wonderful from the stop acceleration, probably quicker (we are talking tortise and snail here of course) off the line than a stick, and great in stop and go. I drove the '90 back to WV from TX in '96 or so when I bought it and made 21mpg average, and did an indicated 70-mph most of the way without issue.
A couple cautions, I'd probably stick with a 2.1 van in general with an autobox, I like 1.9s, but for the auto up at cruising you do need everything you got. And stock size tires only, I had a set of 27x8.5s off one of my syncros on my '87 for a while and it was hard pressed to spin em, but conversely actually did OK on WV forest service roads with them. And as cautions go, I don't think it sounds like you would, but if a real snazzy, super clean, 2.0 air cooled passed your way with an auto, like even the nicest most incredible clean, whatever (I bought a '83 camper with 55k original miles for $1000 in '98 that way) no matter how clean, if you aren't a flatlander just say no. That '83 was on its 3rd (blown) OEM factory engine, it isn't a good combination. Took a big built engine and a big oil cooler on the engine to ever really work.
Oh final consideration, don't discount a nice '93 EV with an auto tranny as well of course, a bit less reliable tranny, but newer, more powerful, cheaper?, etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kayakwesty Samba Member
Joined: February 15, 2007 Posts: 687 Location: East Tennessee
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I took my stick out and installed an automatic...its that good.... _________________ 1984 Westy 2.0 Jetta ABA Motor/1.8 head converted to auto tranny, with 180,000 on body, 55K on engine and transmission
B.5.5 Passat Wagen with 30v V6-67000 Miles
DAS AUTO
CHANGE YOUR FUEL LINES!
A post without pictures is useless
http://www.kayakwesty.com
http://www.waldensridgewhitewater.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Electric Wizard Samba Member
Joined: August 07, 2003 Posts: 2846 Location: Smyrna, TN
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have an '88 auto.
I like it.
But, like you, I was hesitant to buy an auto.
Turns out I really like it.
_________________ "Saying what we think gives us a wider conversational range than saying what we know."
~ Cullen Hightower
(T)exas (C)oalition (B)uses
(H)eidenhammer (B)ully (B)oyz
--1966 De Luxe Camper |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bjrogers86auto Samba Member
Joined: March 26, 2009 Posts: 1375 Location: Halifax, N.S.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:42 am Post subject: Auto |
|
|
86 auto with just over 200k. We just put 14000 on it this summer. It worked great. I rarely went 65...usually cruised at 60. That kept the rpms at 3800 or less. The mileage varied but besides a couple of crazy wind days I was around 20 mpg or a bit better.
After test driving a few manuals I liked the idea of not shifting. I must be getting old...now, has anyone figured out how to stop that annoying little vibration at the shiter yet...I spent alot of highway miles with my fingertips on the stick to stop it...and it's hard to troubleshoot at 60 m/hr!
Brian. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rockfish Samba Member
Joined: February 13, 2007 Posts: 740 Location: Palo Alto, Calif.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Our Westy is manual --- just upgraded to 5-speed (overdrive). Our other two vehicles (Audi A6, Suburban) our automatic.
I really enjoy driving a manual transmission as an alternative to the usual day-to-day stuff. But if you're going to be driving in a lot of stop/go traffic, then auto may be your best choice. In late July we were heading out for a weekend trip in the Westy and the traffic was horrible...going and coming home.
My Westy is my mid-life crisis 5-speed sports car.... _________________ 89 Westy
GW 2.5 5-speed trans
"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts."
- John Wooden |
|
Back to top |
|
|
laterPeter Samba Member
Joined: May 03, 2008 Posts: 136 Location: Central Oregon
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like mine ('85 Westfalia)
later,
Peter _________________ "anyone have a screen for the window in the sliding door for an '85 Westfalia?"
1985 Westfalia 1.9 Automatic |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tomasz Samba Member
Joined: September 08, 2005 Posts: 1096 Location: in a van down by the river
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
laterPeter wrote: |
I like mine ('85 Westfalia)
later,
Peter |
had both, for daily driver I would go with auto, for weekend trips stick for me, at the end it's all matter of yor personal prefrence, late auto trannys seem to be bullet proof where pre 03/89 sticks have 3rd/4th syncro issues |
|
Back to top |
|
|
erdonline Samba Member
Joined: September 26, 2004 Posts: 943 Location: CT
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:43 am Post subject: auto vs. manual trans. |
|
|
Thanks for all the replies so far. I only drove one auto trans Vanagon. It was an '82 air-cooled, and over six years ago.
To address a few of the comments so far:
Yes, the auto trans would be nice in stop-and-go traffic. My prospective auto-trans Westfalia would be to replace my '85 manual trans, which I would use almost exclusively for ten to twelve camping trips a year, and a lot of those trips are at least half highway driving, and the rest mostly rural roads, so I wouldn't be taking full advantage of not having to shift in city driving. My daily driver is an '87 Wolfsburg Vanagon with manual trans- it would be nice if that one had an auto trans.
Someone mentioned the auto trans being better mated to a 2.1 instead of a 1.9. Most of the ones I'm interested in are 1.9's. Is there much of a difference- does the 1.9 not have a trans cooler? I know my 2.1 manual has an oil cooler and my 1.9 manual doesn't, but does only the 2.1 auto have a trans cooler?
My daily driver is an '87; my camper I'm replacing was an '85. I test drove another '85 last week. It reminded me just how different the feel was between the two. I'm not sure if it was just because it reminded me of how much I missed my '85 Westfalia, or something else, but when I drive the '84 last week, I really enjoyed it so much more than my '87. It just felt better somehow. I felt a little more "connnected" to it, like it was somehow more responsive. It's hard to describe. But I wonder if I'll feel the same about the auto.
Ed _________________ '85 Vanagon Westfalia
'84 Vanagon 7-passenger
'98 Mexican air-cooled Beetle |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JPrato Samba Member
Joined: December 15, 2006 Posts: 791 Location: Livonia, NY
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
rockfish wrote: |
Our Westy is manual --- just upgraded to 5-speed (overdrive). Our other two vehicles (Audi A6, Suburban) our automatic.
|
Rockfish, what 5 speed upgrade did you do, European 5 spd, go-westy 5 speed, other? _________________ Joe
87 Syncro Tin Top project
84 Westy, 2.5L Subaru power
06 Subaru 2.5 turbo in waiting
46 Cessna 140 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
deprivation Samba Member
Joined: September 14, 2006 Posts: 1220 Location: Austin, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I loves me auto. _________________ 1986 Westy 2WD auto a.k.a. "The Old Girl"
www.kittenfart.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
madspaniard Samba Member
Joined: August 18, 2008 Posts: 3795 Location: Alameda, CA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
deprivation wrote: |
I loves me auto. |
x2 _________________ 1991 Westy auto w/ Peloquin TBD
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad” - Salvador Dali |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wvukidsdoc Samba Member
Joined: April 29, 2005 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I mentioned the 2.1 bit, don't get me wrong, I'd buy the best cleanest van I could buy, particularly with a camper, looking more at the camper attributes and body, than at the driveline so much. But, the 2.1 is a bit better with the auto. I've seen autobox 1.9s with and without the tranny oil cooler, perhaps it was a year thing, anyone know? It was probably a '85 I saw with, and a late '83.5 without.
The whole 1.9 thing has other incidental issues of course, they are obviously older, more and more complicated cooling hoses, but probably about same $$ to replace all of them, though I haven't followed that for a couple of years. Are all the 1.9 hoses still even available? The steel front to rear pipes that rust, but don't explode, so if you find a clean set, maybe actually better, etc.
It is probably 6 to one, 1/2 a dozen...
Buy the cleanest one you can. But like I said, if a Westy, don't make it an air cooled auto, unless you live in KS.
YMMV
John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vw7266 Samba Member
Joined: April 28, 2004 Posts: 3038 Location: the point, ohio
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
come to ohio and bring money I have an 85 westy I'll put you in and you can feel like your in your old one |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rockfish Samba Member
Joined: February 13, 2007 Posts: 740 Location: Palo Alto, Calif.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JPrato wrote: |
rockfish wrote: |
Our Westy is manual --- just upgraded to 5-speed (overdrive). Our other two vehicles (Audi A6, Suburban) our automatic.
|
Rockfish, what 5 speed upgrade did you do, European 5 spd, go-westy 5 speed, other? |
I had GW do the install at their shop...a GW2.5 and the 5-speed. _________________ 89 Westy
GW 2.5 5-speed trans
"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts."
- John Wooden |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Terry Kay Banned
Joined: June 22, 2003 Posts: 13331
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There isn't one iota of a difference in and 1.9, or 2.1 Automatic.
They cruise at the same tach sped, get the same fuel economy, and one combination isn't any better than the other.
I flogged my 85 GL automatic for 5 years, and it gave me excellent service, and I suspect it's giving the current owner the same.
It is one tough trans regardless of what engine is powering it.
Less headaches in the long run with the automatic than the 4 speed. _________________ T.K. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
timbo Samba Member
Joined: April 20, 2006 Posts: 194 Location: Port Moody BC Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:34 am Post subject: Re: Auto |
|
|
bjrogers86auto wrote: |
ld...now, has anyone figured out how to stop that annoying little vibration at the shiter yet...I spent alot of highway miles with my fingertips on the stick to stop it...and it's hard to troubleshoot at 60 m/hr!
Brian. |
my 88 auto had the same buzz/vibration.I stretched a rubber chicken over it..............basically rammed the shifter up it's apple ...............looks cool...........sound is gone..............so far the chicken hasn't complained!!! _________________ 1988 Vanagon GL/ 1991 2.2 Subie power
"Never tell a lie and you'll never have to play dumb" Anthony Kiedis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|