Author |
Message |
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50255
|
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am not sure why VW dropped the standard PCV valve they started with. They have tried a halve dozen breather designs over the years and nothing really seems to really shine. I can understand that with D-jet there may have been a problem with the standard valve's pulsing, but virtually everyone else managed to use them with carbs.
I like having some fresh air entering the crankcase to drop the humidity and help flush out contaminants. My 411 with L-jet runs the standard 411/412 PCV valve and vented rocker without problems that I am aware of, and my Bay has its case slightly pressurized by the cooling fan and then vents into the air cleaner, this also seems to work well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SGKent Samba Member
Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 41031 Location: Citrus Heights CA (Near Sacramento)
|
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is a schematic for the 411/412 PCV system in the gallery. I would guess that it is like the 914 system, perhaps the same parts. I see no reason that it wouldn't work on a bus as long as the blowby under load is not any greater than a 914 engine or 422/412 engine. The only difference is that a bus climbing a hill with a load or running into the wind would see greater blowby so 914/411/412 metering might fail under those conditions. But it might be Ok too. _________________ “Most people don’t know what they’re doing, and a lot of them are really good at it.” - George Carlin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
timo78 Samba Member
Joined: July 03, 2009 Posts: 931 Location: Overcast and Loving it
|
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
73kombi wrote: |
Having just read all 4 pages of this excellent thread...I would like your opinions on my ghetto fix for blow by. Yes my engine needs rings, and a few other things, but I was thinking a slight negative crankcase pressure would slow the oil leaks, and it has. |
That's an interesting application of pressure, and suction elements in your fix. The logic works, the physical side ought to. Good luck, no leaks is a good feeling. _________________ > 78Grµn Westfalia `Donkey`
.
It may be bigger than you and it may be bigger than me, but it’s not bigger than you AND me; can you dig it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
73kombi Banned
Joined: April 11, 2006 Posts: 1215 Location: ~The London Bridge, AZ~
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wildthings wrote: |
I like having some fresh air entering the crankcase to drop the humidity and help flush out contaminants. My 411 with L-jet runs the standard 411/412 PCV valve and vented rocker without problems that I am aware of, and my Bay has its case slightly pressurized by the cooling fan and then vents into the air cleaner, this also seems to work well. |
By "vented rocker" do you mean valve cover breathers? And by "having your case slightly pressurized from your cooling fan", is that in regards to the 1/2" nipple on the top left of the fan shroud? I have very little of any stock stuff on this motor, and that hose fitting I have plugged.
SGKent wrote: |
The only difference is that a bus climbing a hill with a load or running into the wind would see greater blowby so 914/411/412 metering might fail under those conditions. But it might be Ok too. |
I am leaning away from a PCV at this point. My test drive yesterday was 30 miles into a 30mph head wind doing about 60 (the colorado river valley gets those nasty N to S winds) coming back from Parker. I am sure I was developing significant blow by, with no apparent issues. I probably should buy a vac tester so I could actually know what is happening...yet my "regulator" metering device, doesn't appear to allow more vacuum to pass even under heavy vac loads...it remains somewhat constant, and appears to be vacuuming the case.
I am using a few copper chore boys in the breather box (like busman78) to keep the oil in the case, and act as a "flame trap" like you say, yet I don't believe anything could get by that push pin...It's a tight one-way piece.
If it continues to work like this...it will remain. If not, I'll order this setup...we had breathers like this on our sand rail.
It's cheap enough, and spare valve covers aren't too hard to find, and I could plug the holes in tin...if it doesn't work out.
Last edited by 73kombi on Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WhirledTraveller Samba Member
Joined: January 09, 2008 Posts: 1399 Location: Cambridge, MA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
The AMC heads I got from HAM have 1/4 NPT ports on top left, apparently for a breather setup. Would make switching to this type of PCV system a breeze without modifying the valve covers. However my breather valve is working properly right now.
Of course this is more complex to do with the FI since you have to account for all the air and whether it's metered or not.
Some corvette engine guys run considerable negative pressure in their case, even going so far as to add vacuum pumps and run 15-20" negative. Supposedly to seal the rings better and increase oil flow. In a VW you will certainly suck in your valve cover seals at those numbers. Other than that, I think the main risk is drying out the main seals. _________________ 1977 Westy, Automatic. Big Valve heads, CS Cam. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50255
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
73kombi wrote: |
By "vented rocker" do you mean valve cover breathers? |
Yep, either a fitting in the valve covers or a fitting in the head itself.
Quote: |
And by "having your case slightly pressurized from your cooling fan", is that in regards to the 1/2" nipple on the top left of the fan shroud? I have very little of any stock stuff on this motor, and that hose fitting I have plugged. |
I just take the air off the nipple on the fan shroud run it through an inline filter and then a small orifice (~1/16-5/64") and dump it into the crankcase. The crankcase is then vented into the air cleaner. This is with a progressive and has run this way for 20+ years. I have had no leak problems and the engine hasn't been apart since 1990. If you do have bad seals or gaskets this would NOT be the way to go. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WhirledTraveller Samba Member
Joined: January 09, 2008 Posts: 1399 Location: Cambridge, MA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wildthings wrote: |
I just take the air off the nipple on the fan shroud run it through an inline filter and then a small orifice (~1/16-5/64") and dump it into the crankcase. The crankcase is then vented into the air cleaner. This is with a progressive and has run this way for 20+ years. I have had no leak problems and the engine hasn't been apart since 1990. If you do have bad seals or gaskets this would NOT be the way to go. |
Although this setup works for you, it does have a theoretical problem. There is some blowby in your crankcase gas, some of which is already burned (inert) and some of which is not. The inert gas going through your carb will slightly richen the mixture. Not necessarily a bad thing since it will occur under high load (high blowby), but something to be aware of. _________________ 1977 Westy, Automatic. Big Valve heads, CS Cam. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50255
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WhirledTraveller wrote: |
Wildthings wrote: |
I just take the air off the nipple on the fan shroud run it through an inline filter and then a small orifice (~1/16-5/64") and dump it into the crankcase. The crankcase is then vented into the air cleaner. This is with a progressive and has run this way for 20+ years. I have had no leak problems and the engine hasn't been apart since 1990. If you do have bad seals or gaskets this would NOT be the way to go. |
Although this setup works for you, it does have a theoretical problem. There is some blowby in your crankcase gas, some of which is already burned (inert) and some of which is not. The inert gas going through your carb will slightly richen the mixture. Not necessarily a bad thing since it will occur under high load (high blowby), but something to be aware of. |
Yes the crankcase gasses will affect mixture, but with my system the amount of blowby entering into the carb is not changed in anyway over the stock carb system. The stock 72-74 and later European carburated systems already dumped the gases into the carb intake just the same as mine. The small amount of extra fresh air going through the crankcase is effectively metered by the carb, just like any other air.
I like this system because it provides good fresh air flow through the crankcase at high RPM/full throttle operation, exactly when a system depend on manifold vacuum won't.
For anyone wanting to copy this system, the air flow from the fan shroud must be metered through a small orifice or you will blow oil out through the breather and other places as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Air_Cooled_Nut Samba Member
Joined: March 27, 2004 Posts: 3040 Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds similar to the late model stock T3 engine, except it fed air into the rocker area of the heads from the air cleaner. Excess case gases then got sucked into the intake.
Trammy is in here now, he can 'splain it better _________________ Toby http://www.aircoolednut.com/
Did I mention that I'm an original Darksider?
'72 VW Squareback, 2007cc, GB 5-speed, rag top; '76 VW Riviera Penthouse Sundowner 2.0L; 2015 Audi S5 Cabby w/Stage II APR; '06 Ducati Sport Classic 1000; '14 Ducati Diavel Strada
The First Invasion |
|
Back to top |
|
|
73kombi Banned
Joined: April 11, 2006 Posts: 1215 Location: ~The London Bridge, AZ~
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wildthings wrote: |
If you do have bad seals or gaskets this would NOT be the way to go. |
Thanx for the input....I don't plan on running the fan air into the case, if anything, I may vent the valve covers. I have replaced every seal and gasket on this road trip. Most recently the dizzy o-ring that I really didn't notice as much of a leaker until I placed some vacuum in the case (1st test without the pushpin regulator)...the howling it made was soooo obvious.
I believe the case mating surface was the last source of the seeping (it needs some dental floss)...and I can't fix that at the Motel6.
I drove another 60 miles today, after re-adjusting the choke, and all seems well. Tomorrow I am headed into CA for some turkey, about a 400 mile round trip, so that will be a real test.
It's only been 2 days, but the bottom of the case is still dry, and there are still no overnight oil stains on the pavement... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SGKent Samba Member
Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 41031 Location: Citrus Heights CA (Near Sacramento)
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Heads up
I just realized that if the breather diaphram perforates outside the center area where it seals the incoming vacuum, that pressure would push the center of the diaphram closed. This would cause pressure to build up and push oil out the engine. The oil breather would only leak vacuum if the center of the diaphram broke. All the pressure would have to go out the small hole on the bottom and the tiny hole on the top. If you went to test it at idle it might show open because there was little pressure but out on the highway underload the blowby could be strong enough to close the opening off.
The arrows show the blowby gasses flow. If that diaphragm perforated anywhere except the center, increased pressure under load would push the diapgram down on the center because the area above the diaphragm is closed off to the outside except for that tiny hole.
_________________ “Most people don’t know what they’re doing, and a lot of them are really good at it.” - George Carlin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50255
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SGKent wrote: |
Heads up
I just realized that if the breather diaphram perforates outside the center area where it seals the incoming vacuum, that pressure would push the center of the diaphram closed. This would cause pressure to build up and push oil out the engine. The oil breather would only leak vacuum if the center of the diaphram broke. All the pressure would have to go out the small hole on the bottom and the tiny hole on the top. If you went to test it at idle it might show open because there was little pressure but out on the highway underload the blowby could be strong enough to close the opening off.
The arrows show the blowby gasses flow. If that diaphragm perforated anywhere except the center, increased pressure under load would push the diapgram down on the center because the area above the diaphragm is closed off to the outside except for that tiny hole.
|
In general I don't think that this is a typical problem. The diagrams usually fall completely apart. I have though seen a Vanagon WBXer unit that only failed on the outside but not in the middle, sealing off the vent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SGKent Samba Member
Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 41031 Location: Citrus Heights CA (Near Sacramento)
|
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I accidently came across an Audi thread tonight that looks like the same device but it is attached differently. The part number is 06A-129-101-F and it is known as a pressure regulating valve. Most likely I will buy one and have someone like Whip618 machine me a base for it that will sit on the stock breather baffle. It would be cheap to have a plate made with a tube welded to it, and a piece of hose then fit one of these that are still sold.
_________________ “Most people don’t know what they’re doing, and a lot of them are really good at it.” - George Carlin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50255
|
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Picked up several similar valves a year or so ago. Haven't gotten around to trying to use one of them yet. Let us know how your set up works. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Amskeptic Samba Member
Joined: October 18, 2002 Posts: 8568 Location: All Across The Country
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wildthings wrote: |
Picked up several similar valves a year or so ago. Haven't gotten around to trying to use one of them yet. Let us know how your set up works. |
Your inline filter breather circuit is a critical part, how is that filter working?
Colin _________________ www.itinerant-air-cooled.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SGKent Samba Member
Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 41031 Location: Citrus Heights CA (Near Sacramento)
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wildthings - our bus is in a smog state so it has to be close to original or we would vent into a catch can like yours. Worse case we would meter into the plenum through a standard PCV valve and then let air draw through the rocker covers from the air cleaner. That would keep the case close to ambient too. Then adjust the AFM to compensate. _________________ “Most people don’t know what they’re doing, and a lot of them are really good at it.” - George Carlin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
busman78 Samba Member
Joined: August 17, 2004 Posts: 4518 Location: Oklahoma City, OK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Changed my set up from drawing into the intake to having the exhaust suck it all out, seems to work good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50255
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Amskeptic wrote: |
Wildthings wrote: |
Picked up several similar valves a year or so ago. Haven't gotten around to trying to use one of them yet. Let us know how your set up works. |
Your inline filter breather circuit is a critical part, how is that filter working?
Colin |
Colin, If you are referring to the system I have on my carburated bus where I take air off the fan shroud, filter it and run it through an orifice before dumping it into the crankcase, it works well and has for years. Never tried that particular system with a FI engine though, in that case it would be introducing some unmetered air after the AFM so it might negatively affect the idle and emissions. At this point I couldn't recommend it for a FI application, I think that Ray Greenwood's system would likely be preferable on a FI engine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 21474 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wildthings wrote: |
Amskeptic wrote: |
Wildthings wrote: |
Picked up several similar valves a year or so ago. Haven't gotten around to trying to use one of them yet. Let us know how your set up works. |
Your inline filter breather circuit is a critical part, how is that filter working?
Colin |
Colin, If you are referring to the system I have on my carburated bus where I take air off the fan shroud, filter it and run it through an orifice before dumping it into the crankcase, it works well and has for years. Never tried that particular system with a FI engine though, in that case it would be introducing some unmetered air after the AFM so it might negatively affect the idle and emissions. At this point I couldn't recommend it for a FI application, I think that Ray Greenwood's system would likely be preferable on a FI engine. |
Yes...thats correct. The system I am speaking of is the exact system that 411/412 with D-jet uses. The problem with using it on L-jet is that is does bypass the AFM...so it gets no fuel metered for it.
Since D-jet has its metering unit (MPS) attached to the plenum where the stock 411/412 oil/crankcase/PVC breather dumps to.....that metering unit can be simply adjusted to compensate at idle...and also compensate at higher rpms.
I can't really think of a perfect way to use that same system on either L-jet or Carbs...not saying it won't work adequately....just not as well as it does with D-jet.....because with D-jet it operates at high vacuum. With L-jet and carbs....just dumping the breather box back into the upstream aircleaner operates at very low vacuum.
It appears that the diaphram used on the later bus and 412's actually is a method of modulating the crankcase exhaust so it has a constant level of low vacuum (like was discussed here already). It really is a way to limit the volume coming out of the crankcase at any one time so that it does not upset the overall fuel mixture.
However.....venting rocker gases straight to the plenum downstream of the AFM (like the 411/412 with D-jet)...CAN work....but I think controlling it may be difficult. In this case...with L-jet....enrichment would happen because any break in the vacuum of the manifold by lareg amounts of crankcase gases....might cause the fuel pressure regulator to spike. Just some thoughts. Ray |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Viande Samba Member
Joined: August 14, 2008 Posts: 1719 Location: GA
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
SGKent wrote: |
Heads up
I just realized that if the breather diaphram perforates outside the center area where it seals the incoming vacuum, that pressure would push the center of the diaphram closed. This would cause pressure to build up and push oil out the engine. The oil breather would only leak vacuum if the center of the diaphram broke. All the pressure would have to go out the small hole on the bottom and the tiny hole on the top. If you went to test it at idle it might show open because there was little pressure but out on the highway underload the blowby could be strong enough to close the opening off.
The arrows show the blowby gasses flow. If that diaphragm perforated anywhere except the center, increased pressure under load would push the diapgram down on the center because the area above the diaphragm is closed off to the outside except for that tiny hole.
|
Did you get a chance to install the new one yet? _________________ Bobby
New Items In Stock, NOS & OEM Seals,Parts and Terminals
My Feedback Here
The bitter taste of poor quality lingers long after the joy of the cheap price fades away. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|