Author |
Message |
J Charlton Samba Member
Joined: August 24, 2007 Posts: 1546 Location: The True North Strong and Free
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:54 pm Post subject: tire codes - can anyone explain them? |
|
|
I don't think that I'm the only one (maybe I am) who does not understand the logic behind the size codes for tires.
EG - 225/75/15 well the 15 is obvious, but what do the other two numbers actually represent?
Someone gave me this link to a neat tire calculator
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
Its great to play around with and gives me dimensions but the more I use it, the less I understand about what the first two numbers of the tire size represent or their relationship to each other.
Thanks folks - I'm sure that I speak for many.
JC _________________ NAHT hightop availability May 18 2023 -
Bend Oregon - for Oregon, California- (7 tot , 3 available), Kennewick Wa (6 tot, 1 available), Small Car Performance Fife Wa. (7 tot 4 avail ), Fairbanks Alaska (1 tot 0 avail)
Future availability TBD : Springfield Mass. Staunton Va, Florida, Colorado, Grand Junction Co., SLC probably late 2024 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JunkYarDog Samba Member
Joined: March 11, 2007 Posts: 676 Location: New Mexico
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
225/75/15=
225=mm wide
75= height is 75% of the width
So 75% of 225 mm gives you 168.75mm sidewall height
15=as stated is rim size _________________ I have never owned a VW I didn't like, but there have been a few Fords and Chevy's.
85' GL Sunroof
68' Beetle sedan
72' Chevy C10 (LWB Step)
(67' Volvo 122S pending) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
J Charlton Samba Member
Joined: August 24, 2007 Posts: 1546 Location: The True North Strong and Free
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:14 pm Post subject: thanks |
|
|
Thank you for the succinct explanation. I guess the confusion is partly due to the mixing of measurement units for the same object.
Well, we have a size - the width in mm, the next number is a ratio, and the last is a measurement in inches. Who thought this one up?
Anyway - thanks again - I guess we can work with anything as long as we know what it is. _________________ NAHT hightop availability May 18 2023 -
Bend Oregon - for Oregon, California- (7 tot , 3 available), Kennewick Wa (6 tot, 1 available), Small Car Performance Fife Wa. (7 tot 4 avail ), Fairbanks Alaska (1 tot 0 avail)
Future availability TBD : Springfield Mass. Staunton Va, Florida, Colorado, Grand Junction Co., SLC probably late 2024 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Amskeptic Samba Member
Joined: October 18, 2002 Posts: 8568 Location: All Across The Country
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:43 pm Post subject: Re: thanks |
|
|
J Charlton wrote: |
I guess the confusion is partly due to the mixing of measurement units for the same object.
Well, we have a size - the width in mm, the next number is a ratio, and the last is a measurement in inches. Who thought this one up?
|
Right old chap, and be sure not to motor in excess of 80 furlongs per fortnight on the carriageway.
Carry on. _________________ www.itinerant-air-cooled.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
buildyourown Samba Member
Joined: March 01, 2009 Posts: 1668 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, it is archaic and confusing, but that's the system we got.
That's why we use a calculator.
It's not that hard. Your wheel size is fixed, assuming your not buying new wheels.
Your width is a bit flexible based on what fits. 205-225 is the norm.
Pick an aspect ratio that gives you the dia you want. Remember, if you go too big with a stock motor, your van will feel very slow. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50353
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I now run a set of 235/75R15LTs on a vehicle that I once ran H78-15s on. Over the decades it has also had 8.55-15s, 7.00-15s truck tires and originally came 7.60-15 tires when new. These are all essentially the same size tire which supersede one another. So what's so complicated about the metric designation system? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|