Author |
Message |
germanlove Samba Member
Joined: April 26, 2008 Posts: 33 Location: just turn around slowly....
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:49 pm Post subject: small nut daily drivers input needed... |
|
|
So I need to replace a tranny in a 61' project bus. I havent driven a small nut before. I really want to get it on the road and need to decide if I should stick with a small nut or find something else. I plan on running a stock 1600 in it. i would like to make it more than a weekend driver. So here are some questions;
what is top end speed on a stock small nut?
has anyone converted theirs to a FF? if so, do you like it?
any suggestions for mods, gearing, etc?
If I go big nut, should it be kept stock or ff?
if i restore the bus will the big nut kill the value?
thanks in advance! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VolksFire Samba Member
Joined: July 24, 2006 Posts: 901 Location: NorCal
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
my 60 panel is small nut (all stock gearing) with a 1600dp. top speed is 60mph and its screaming. if you are looking to keep the bus all stock and correct, I would suggest you stay with small nut. If youre gonna drive long distances, I would suggest the big nut. I had never driven a small nut either. If i had known before I had it rebuilt, I wouldve gone with a big nut. I'm not sure how the FF setup works on a small nut.
My 63 sc is big nut (stock gearing) with 1600sp. I cruise 60-65 comfortably. can get it to 70 if i want.
My 67 kombi is big nut with FF but still has the stock 1.26 RGBs, and 1776 engine. I cruise 70 easily, can get it up faster but havent yet cuz i had to pull the engine for head replacement. _________________ Jahnai Pearson - VW Restoration Technician
60 Double Door Panel
63 Double Cab
63 Single Cab
67 SO42 Westfalia
73 Thing
76 Kombi
82 Westfalia Deluxe
82 Quantum Coupe
85 Quantum Sedan
85 Quantum Syncro Wagon
96 Golf GL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ollie W Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2004 Posts: 801 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My daily driver is a small nut tranny with a 1600 sp. I cruise the highway between 50-55 mph. I've had my truck for 6 years now. I just learn to add 15% to the estimated time mapquest suggests it'll take to get somewhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eric&Barb Samba Member
Joined: September 19, 2004 Posts: 24764 Location: Olympia Wash Rinse & Repeat
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We used to do 55 MPH @ 3,800 RPM with stock small nut 1960-63 gearing.
Went to FF late RGB transaxle doing 60 MPH @ 3,000 RPM.
Before with stock transaxle was getting 18-19 MPG, and had cooling problems. With same big bore 40 HP engine went to 27 MPG, and most of the cooling problems went away.
Plus the brakes on the large nut RGBs are 20% bigger, so better stopping.
If you or anyone else wants to Pmail us, will be happy to send back our "Modified Tranny History". _________________ In Stereo, Where Available! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mastajusty Samba Member
Joined: August 22, 2006 Posts: 167 Location: Chattavegas
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My 58 has the stock trans and a 1600 single port with dual webbers. 55mph all day long, up hill, down hill, with a load, with just me, head wind, tail wind... As long as your cool with 55 it's a great setup!!! When you hit the back roads it's a total dream to drive.
I don't know much about ff setups but I've found if you want a bus to drive and not worry about messing with bits all the time, stock(ish) is the way to go |
|
Back to top |
|
|
candyman Samba Trout Slayer
Joined: December 20, 2003 Posts: 2694 Location: Missoula MT
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eric&Barb wrote: |
We used to do 55 MPH @ 3,800 RPM with stock small nut 1960-63 gearing.
Went to FF late RGB transaxle doing 60 MPH @ 3,000 RPM.
Before with stock transaxle was getting 18-19 MPG, and had cooling problems. With same big bore 40 HP engine went to 27 MPG, and most of the cooling problems went away.
Plus the brakes on the large nut RGBs are 20% bigger, so better stopping.
If you or anyone else wants to Pmail us, will be happy to send back our "Modified Tranny History". |
I would like to have you pm me your tranny history please! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
deepseeman Samba Member
Joined: January 13, 2004 Posts: 435 Location: san diego
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sounds like you get know where fast with a small nut. Im kinda in the same boat. Im pulling out a bad IRS on my 61 D/C and trying to decide which way to go small (original) or big. Im running the same motor too. maybe a small freeway flyer with later rgb? does that even go together? _________________ in the barn:
61' Double Cab-restored driver
91 SYNCRO |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AlteWagen Troll
Joined: February 23, 2007 Posts: 8503 Location: PNW
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stock small nut trans in my 63 has
4.12 r&p
.82 4th
If I cruise at 50mph I get 29 mpg. The faster I go the less I get
Current engine
1699cc
dual icts
1 3/8 header
I just picked up a rebuilt big nut with 4.12, hopfully I will pick up a few mph/mpg. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
germanlove Samba Member
Joined: April 26, 2008 Posts: 33 Location: just turn around slowly....
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I appreciate everybodies input so far. I am still undecided. I know I cant afford to build a ff in any variation at the moment. i have heard equal from both sides about small and big. i am kinda leaning toward the big nut so far. its only a d/c. they dont fetch big dollars restored and the increased braking would help under a load. i dont think it will kill the resale value with that upgrade. i am a purist, but seeing that this is a commercial to be driven daily, i think some upgrades are called for. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mr white Samba Member
Joined: October 02, 2005 Posts: 1193 Location: beautiful Oregon & Mohave County, AZ
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Germanlove,
Rock the stock small nut. I run a full synchro in my 58 15 all day,no issues. Just make sure your grease seals are good and oil levels are good. You should have no issues,just keep in mind,it wont be fast like a beetle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AlteWagen Troll
Joined: February 23, 2007 Posts: 8503 Location: PNW
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mr white wrote: |
it wont be fast like a beetle. |
Never heard that before!!!
I guess like everything, its relative. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eric&Barb Samba Member
Joined: September 19, 2004 Posts: 24764 Location: Olympia Wash Rinse & Repeat
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
germanlove wrote: |
I appreciate everybodies input so far. I am still undecided. I know I cant afford to build a ff in any variation at the moment. |
Yes, but you will use more fuel $$$ in the not so long run without a higher geared transaxle if you are going to do the freeway speeds.
Figured we payed off our first FF of $800.00 at 80,000 miles back when fuel was $1.35 per gallon! At today's $3.00 per gallon it does not take so many miles....
Yes, one can install a FF tranny with small nut RGBs, but do not expect to do more than about 55 MPH @ 3,000 RPM. _________________ In Stereo, Where Available! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ollie W Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2004 Posts: 801 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eric&Barb wrote: |
germanlove wrote: |
I appreciate everybodies input so far. I am still undecided. I know I cant afford to build a ff in any variation at the moment. |
Yes, but you will use more fuel $$$ in the not so long run without a higher geared transaxle if you are going to do the freeway speeds.
Figured we payed off our first FF of $800.00 at 80,000 miles back when fuel was $1.35 per gallon! At today's $3.00 per gallon it does not take so many miles....
Yes, one can install a FF tranny with small nut RGBs, but do not expect to do more than about 55 MPH @ 3,000 RPM. |
What kind of gas mileage do you think a 1600 sp w/small nut freeway flier would get? That's what I'm considering for my 61 dual cab. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clara Samba Member
Joined: June 14, 2003 Posts: 12401
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eric&Barb wrote: |
germanlove wrote: |
I appreciate everybodies input so far. I am still undecided. I know I cant afford to build a ff in any variation at the moment. |
Yes, but you will use more fuel $$$ in the not so long run without a higher geared transaxle if you are going to do the freeway speeds.
Figured we payed off our first FF of $800.00 at 80,000 miles back when fuel was $1.35 per gallon! At today's $3.00 per gallon it does not take so many miles....
Yes, one can install a FF tranny with small nut RGBs, but do not expect to do more than about 55 MPH @ 3,000 RPM. |
The funny thing is the best milage I ever got was with a small nut boxed split case tranny and a 1500 sp. I got 31mpg.
I wrote down every time I got gas. And even if my speedo was off, well the odometer seemed to fit with the mile markers on the freeway. I drove that bus across country and back. Up and down the west coast. I revved the piss out of it driving 60mph. Once I was late, and drove 70mph for an hour.
Not just once, but for the whole three years that bus was my daily driver, it was 31mpg,
except twice:
Once going UP the Sierras it was 40mpg, with me, two friends, their baby, and a pile of camping gear.
Then at one fill-up the milage was only 16, so I did a compression check, which said only 3 cylinders made oomph, so I swapped another motor in.
It must have been that little 28 pict carb giving the good milage. That and dumb beginners luck. I have never had milage so good as when I didn't know much about buses. _________________ The Obsolete Air-Cooled Documentation Project http://oacdp.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
deepseeman Samba Member
Joined: January 13, 2004 Posts: 435 Location: san diego
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with your big nut theory. I dont think it will kill the value, it will give you the extra mph's for freeway driving. if you were running a bigger motor, then I would consider a ff. _________________ in the barn:
61' Double Cab-restored driver
91 SYNCRO |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eric&Barb Samba Member
Joined: September 19, 2004 Posts: 24764 Location: Olympia Wash Rinse & Repeat
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the freeway we are getting 22-23 MPG @ 60 MPH with slightly larger rear tires than the 205/75R15 on the front. Engine has CW crank, 1641cc slip ins, 7.1 CR, H-30 Brazilian carb with cable choke.
Before FF transaxle was running big bore 40 HP engine. MPG was in the 18-19 range @ 55 MPH & 3,800 RPM. When we dropped to 47 MPH @ 3,000 RPM went to 27 MPG. Got the FF and MPG went down to 25 MPG doing 58 MPH @ 3,000 RPM.
Clara, sure wish you still had that engine for autopsy!! Best guess is it had pretty high CR and was running pretty lean... _________________ In Stereo, Where Available! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clara Samba Member
Joined: June 14, 2003 Posts: 12401
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eric&Barb wrote: |
On the freeway we are getting 22-23 MPG @ 60 MPH with slightly larger rear tires than the 205/75R15 on the front. Engine has CW crank, 1641cc slip ins, 7.1 CR, H-30 Brazilian carb with cable choke.
Before FF transaxle was running big bore 40 HP engine. MPG was in the 18-19 range @ 55 MPH & 3,800 RPM. When we dropped to 47 MPH @ 3,000 RPM went to 27 MPG. Got the FF and MPG went down to 25 MPG doing 58 MPH @ 3,000 RPM.
Clara, sure wish you still had that engine for autopsy!! Best guess is it had pretty high CR and was running pretty lean... |
The next motor got exactly the same milage. (I dressed it with with the same parts) It had terrible carb icing issues, that I didn't know about at the time, just that it ran really badly in the am if I didn't let it warm up with a chunk of wood on the gas pedal while I ate my breakfast. (choke didn't stay on long enough to warm it up, hence the chunk of wood 'manual choke') Of course, it had one of those silly air cleaners, not the stock oil bath, it had no pre-heat and no thermostat.
Later I did go through the old motor. I did a top end rebuild and replaced the heads with rebuildt ones. The old heads were cracked. Which is a pretty bad sign, cause single port heads usually don't get cracked. The bottom end was fine. Then I put the engine in something else and who knows where it is now.
That bus was the aqua colored on the outside with SWR dash 59 panel with windows cut in, and diamond pattern naugahyde interior I was driving when I met you guys. You did some welding on the windows ledges IIRC, and I installed new window seals cause it had been leaking pretty badly in the rain. _________________ The Obsolete Air-Cooled Documentation Project http://oacdp.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|