Author |
Message |
live4power Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2012 Posts: 32 Location: Jax, Florida
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:11 am Post subject: "Thick Wall" 92mm and big valves? |
|
|
Sorry in advance if this has been covered, but I tried searching and I haven't found the information I was looking for.
I assume it is because 92mm pistons have had such a bad rep with having such thin cylinder walls and there isn't much info about them. But now that the "Thick Wall" 92mm cylinders are available, it has got me thinking. With the "thick wall" cylinders the heads and case would be cut to a 94mm bore, and there are plenty of big valve heads to choose from with this bore. But the piston would actually be 92mm....so
Can anyone tell me what the largest valve spread is for a 92mm piston without any issues or interference? I would assume 44x37 would be easily doable. But can you stuff 46x37 inside and not have any shrouding? Or even go larger?
Sorry for such a Noob question, but any info would be appreciated. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Glenn Mr. 010
Joined: December 25, 2001 Posts: 76946 Location: Sneaking up behind you
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
You're still limited by the 92mm bore.
The wall thickness won't change that. _________________ Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"
Member #1009
#BlueSquare |
|
Back to top |
|
|
live4power Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2012 Posts: 32 Location: Jax, Florida
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Glenn wrote: |
You're still limited by the 92mm bore.
The wall thickness won't change that. |
Right, so what are the biggest size valves you can fit in a 92 bore? _________________ Current Project: 63' Rag top with 71 IRS pan, for street/strip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NJ John Samba Member
Joined: September 21, 2007 Posts: 2224 Location: HdG, MD & NJ
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know 42x37 fits. Not sure beyond that. _________________ 1973 standard, yellow, lowered, 3” narrowed front, 1600 blo-thru turbo w/single dell 15.4@86, so far
11.41 et buggy. Long gone
Let’s go O’s! Let’s go O’s!
https://www.youtube.com/@AirSpooledGarage |
|
Back to top |
|
|
live4power Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2012 Posts: 32 Location: Jax, Florida
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know CB Comp Elim's can fit a 48x40 in a 94 bore. So would it be possible to run 46x37 in a 92? Only a 2mm difference in the two bores. Unless the Comp Elim's have had their valves moved??? _________________ Current Project: 63' Rag top with 71 IRS pan, for street/strip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stoneloco808 Samba Member
Joined: June 15, 2007 Posts: 658 Location: Pakalolo Country, HI
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IMO the answer would be just about anything is possible, one will have to sacrifice money. I say call a head porter willing to take that challenge, either it be Jeff Denham, Clyde Berg, etc... Explain to them what you want. From the top of my head 46mm valve + 37.5mm valve = to 83.5mm. So that leaves 8.5mm to space out the 2 valves and cylinder wall. If someone could stuff a 48x40 valves in a 94 bore with 2mm between each valve and cylinder wall, I am sure they could stuff a 46x37.5 in a 92 bore. IMO a head porter would have to start with a blank head, and machine it. I would not doubt one of the valve seats would be bored into the other. Like I mentioned earlier it just costs money, how bad do you really want it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lostinbaja Samba Member
Joined: December 19, 2004 Posts: 4036 Location: Frankfort, Illinois
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With the smaller 92mm bore there is a point of diminishing returns when it comes to valve diameter. Larger valves screw up the flow because they are so close to the cylinder wall.
I went through all of this on a flow bench years ago but I don't remember the specifics. I'm sure a current quality head porter can enlighten you. _________________ Jerry...
If it's being towed, it must be a trailer!
"Vee Grow Too Soon Oldt Und Too Late Schmardt"
RIP Morgan
My photos
http://www.manxgallery.org/gallery/album92 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
live4power Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2012 Posts: 32 Location: Jax, Florida
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alright guys, I appreciate your time and info. I will keep this stuff in mind. _________________ Current Project: 63' Rag top with 71 IRS pan, for street/strip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuguboy Samba Member
Joined: December 14, 2004 Posts: 218
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
live4power wrote: |
Alright guys, I appreciate your time and info. I will keep this stuff in mind. |
What is the verdict 42x37 or 44x37 ? or better off with 40x35 ? what did you go with ? and why ? Thanks in advance |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stealth67vw Samba Member
Joined: January 22, 2004 Posts: 1852 Location: Grass Pants, Orygun
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
live4power wrote: |
I know CB Comp Elim's can fit a 48x40 in a 94 bore. So would it be possible to run 46x37 in a 92? Only a 2mm difference in the two bores. Unless the Comp Elim's have had their valves moved??? |
Comp Elims do have the valves spaced farther apart. The exhaust is moved out .100" if I remember correct. _________________ John Bates
JB Machining Services
1967 street Bug 2276 w/ 48 IDAs, 2020lbs with driver
7.76 @ 89.55mph 1/8 mile
12.34 and 108.10 mph 1/4 mile |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuguboy Samba Member
Joined: December 14, 2004 Posts: 218
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is a Super pro 44x37 too much for a 92 bore ? Better with a Tims stage 2 ? Don't want to go too big and shroud valve . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Glenn Mr. 010
Joined: December 25, 2001 Posts: 76946 Location: Sneaking up behind you
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have 92TW with Steve Tims Stage 2 42x37. _________________ Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"
Member #1009
#BlueSquare |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
as has been the case for 100 years, the port job is more important than the valve size. _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bugguy1967 Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2008 Posts: 4343 Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess that depends on what you want to build. Like mentioned, a 44x37 would fit, but you'll have to make power in a 2180 to 7500-8000 rpm to take full advantage. You could do a 2213 and rev a bit lower, but with the added problems of assembling a 2213 (84x92). _________________ "A petrol engine can start readily, run smoothly and give every appearance of being in good order, without necessarily being in good tune." - Colin Campbell, "The Sportscar Engine" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuguboy Samba Member
Joined: December 14, 2004 Posts: 218
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking ACN L-5 heads and K-10 cam 84x92 , got a 1 5/8 exhaust and IDAs . Good porting with smaller valves for better control and more port velocity . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bugguy1967 Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2008 Posts: 4343 Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For that much cam, I'd suggest larger valves. Run a 42x37 head or choose a lower RPM cam. _________________ "A petrol engine can start readily, run smoothly and give every appearance of being in good order, without necessarily being in good tune." - Colin Campbell, "The Sportscar Engine" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MURZI Samba Member
Joined: August 25, 2005 Posts: 5063 Location: Madisonville, La
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
K10, IDAS, and Tims stage II's. 9.6:1 compression.....Killer. Just get vw 650 springs. _________________ 62 vert
2276
Tim’s welded heads
45 Dells
A1 sidewinder
Fk44 cam |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:27 pm Post subject: Re: "Thick Wall" 92mm and big valves? |
|
|
do you have your carbs and exhaust yet? If so, what are they? There is no point getting a 7500 RPM cam if you have 6k RPM carbs. _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuguboy Samba Member
Joined: December 14, 2004 Posts: 218
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Got 48 idas and 1 5/8 exhaust , stock gears 3.88 rp 24.5 " tires weekend car .Thanks for replies still learning and planning my build . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FK8 or 86B, and a 42 x 37.5mm head.
More cam than this would require more exhaust than 1 5/8". _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|