Author |
Message |
cmayna Samba Member
Joined: August 18, 2014 Posts: 1148 Location: SF Bay area, CA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:03 pm Post subject: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
Which is better? I would think a switch to the coil would prevent the motor from turning over versus if to the pump, the motor might be able to turn over via the key but will not fire up.
Yes I'm getting all fired up with the current number of Westy's being stolen and have decided to do something to my rig to help prevent theft, or at least to help make theft more difficult.
Yes, I'm also looking into a tracker. _________________ '90 Westy / automatic.
If I'm not working on the camper or my '50 Chebbie truck, I'm either fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
Craig |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ahwahnee Samba Member
Joined: June 05, 2010 Posts: 9810 Location: Mt Lemmon, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:35 pm Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
I think either way the engine will crank but not start.
The fuel pump cut-off is also useful when doing some other work on the van that requires switching the ignition on & off -- keeps the pump from cycling each time.
You might also be able to wire the switch to ground the coil rather than cut power to it. I have done that on some of my vehicles with points. Simpler to hook up as it only involves running one wire to the switch location (other pole of the switch is just grounded). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dobryan Samba Member
Joined: March 24, 2006 Posts: 16505 Location: Brookeville, MD
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dhaavers Samba Member
Joined: March 19, 2010 Posts: 7757 Location: NE MN (tinyurl.com/dhaaverslocation)
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:56 pm Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
OTOH, if you switch the FP you can also disable it when preparing to start after a long
sitting spell (every winter; Nov-Mar for me) to build oil pressure before starting.
Disabling only the coil for such purpose has the unfortunate consequence of
washing the cylinders with unburned fuel...counterproductive, as they say...<shrug>
- Dave _________________ 86 White Wolfsburg Westy Weekender
"The WonderVan"
<EDITED TO PROTECT INNOCENT PIXELS> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dobryan Samba Member
Joined: March 24, 2006 Posts: 16505 Location: Brookeville, MD
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
0to60in6min Samba Member
Joined: November 27, 2006 Posts: 3417 Location: OR & CA (Oregon/California)
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:03 pm Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
how about put a kill switch on one of the wires from the ignition switch? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dobryan Samba Member
Joined: March 24, 2006 Posts: 16505 Location: Brookeville, MD
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
0to60in6min Samba Member
Joined: November 27, 2006 Posts: 3417 Location: OR & CA (Oregon/California)
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:28 pm Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
yup... the advantage is you don't have to run under the van a long wire from fuel pump or a very long wire from the coil.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50352
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:48 pm Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
dhaavers wrote: |
OTOH, if you switch the FP you can also disable it when preparing to start after a long
sitting spell (every winter; Nov-Mar for me) to build oil pressure before starting.
Disabling only the coil for such purpose has the unfortunate consequence of
washing the cylinders with unburned fuel...counterproductive, as they say...<shrug>
- Dave |
Hmm, doesn't the ECU needs a signal from the ignition to spray fuel?
It doesn't take much wire to break either the #15 ignition wire or the #50 starter wire. The fuel pump does take at least one long run of wire. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmayna Samba Member
Joined: August 18, 2014 Posts: 1148 Location: SF Bay area, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 7:55 am Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
dobryan wrote: |
0to60in6min wrote: |
how about put a kill switch on one of the wires from the ignition switch? |
Maybe the one to the solenoid? |
This prevents the motor from being turned over? If so, I likey likey.
Another idea to consider.
Thanks to all for the ideas. The sooner I get this done and behind me the better I will feel.
Oh and morning to all. Coffee on me.
Craig _________________ '90 Westy / automatic.
If I'm not working on the camper or my '50 Chebbie truck, I'm either fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
Craig |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dyldebus Samba Member
Joined: August 11, 2015 Posts: 171
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:25 am Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
I went with the fuel pump because my relays are under the back bench and I already had a wire loom going from there to wear my switch is. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Terry Kay Banned
Joined: June 22, 2003 Posts: 13331
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:32 am Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
There is a red wire from the battery to the neutral safely switch.
On the side of the base of the passenger seat install a Caterpillar keyed power switch.
Odd ball key, very few folks have a Cat key handy.
It breaks the power to the starter, it's a flat faced tumbler, nobody will know what it is.
Turn it on to start the Van, turn it off when you get out.
Simple, easy to mount, and effective.
Go to any Cat dealer and pick one up very reasonable.
Every Caterpillar has this power ,on & off switch, they do work well. _________________ T.K. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ahwahnee Samba Member
Joined: June 05, 2010 Posts: 9810 Location: Mt Lemmon, AZ
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:54 am Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
Lots of ideas here - all are better than doing nothing at all.
I like the idea that the engine will crank but not start. Gives the thief some hope and visibility - shoot, if I saw him doing that with someone's van I would probably go over and offer to help.
Wouldn't disabling the starter solenoid still allow the van to start with a push or down-hill roll?
The Caterpillar gadget would be effective - but don't lose that key (or at least hide a spare somewhere). Also handy if you ever want to borrow a 777 Haul Truck from your local copper pit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmayna Samba Member
Joined: August 18, 2014 Posts: 1148 Location: SF Bay area, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:56 am Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
Terry,
Are you referring to Caterpillar's split (two leg) key such as:
http://tornadoparts.com/644-thickbox_default/cater...7n0718.jpg
Yes, another great idea, especially if the key is flat. Getting way too many keys on the ring. _________________ '90 Westy / automatic.
If I'm not working on the camper or my '50 Chebbie truck, I'm either fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
Craig |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dobryan Samba Member
Joined: March 24, 2006 Posts: 16505 Location: Brookeville, MD
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:06 am Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
Ahwahnee wrote: |
Lots of ideas here - all are better than doing nothing at all.
Wouldn't disabling the starter solenoid still allow the van to start with a push or down-hill roll?
|
Yes, you could still bump start it if a manual. It would take a determined thief to decide to try to bump start it if he could not get the engine to turn over...... _________________ Dave O
'87 Westy w/ 2002 Subaru EJ25 and Peloquin TBD
"To travel hopefully is a better thing than to arrive." Robert Louis Stevenson
MD>Canada>AK>WA>OR>CA>AZ>UT>WY>SD
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=620646
Building a bus for travel in Europe (euroBus)
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=695371
The Western Syncro build
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=746794 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmayna Samba Member
Joined: August 18, 2014 Posts: 1148 Location: SF Bay area, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:49 am Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
dobryan wrote: |
Ahwahnee wrote: |
Lots of ideas here - all are better than doing nothing at all.
Wouldn't disabling the starter solenoid still allow the van to start with a push or down-hill roll?
|
Yes, you could still bump start it if a manual. It would take a determined thief to decide to try to bump start it if he could not get the engine to turn over...... |
Well, since ours is a AT _________________ '90 Westy / automatic.
If I'm not working on the camper or my '50 Chebbie truck, I'm either fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
Craig |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Terry Kay Banned
Joined: June 22, 2003 Posts: 13331
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:24 am Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
That's it.
Pretty simple, easy solution.
Got one in my 87. _________________ T.K. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AndyBees Samba Member
Joined: January 31, 2008 Posts: 2332 Location: Southeast Kentucky
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 3:24 pm Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
If the kill switch is via the coil, positive side, while cranking the engine, the Injectors will not be activated.
The coil positive circuit, provides power to the Digifant Control Unit Relay and Fuel Pump Relay.
The power to be "relayed" by Digifant Relay and Fuel Pump Relay comes directly from the battery.
The Digifant Relay powers both low and 12 volts to the ECU. The Fuel Pump relay powers (12 volts) the Injectors and Fuel Pump.
Anyway, cranking the engine with no current to the coil will not result in fuel being injected .... at least two reasons, as reasoned above: no current to the Fuel Pump and no current to the injectors.
So, for a "kill switch " (and start preventer), I'd use the positive circuit to the coil. It "kills" both the ignition (fire) and fuel pump.
For a "no start", I might do as Terry K. suggested. When the ignition is turned to start (or hot wired under the steering wheel/dash) nothing will happen, just as if there is no battery!...... assuming I am understanding how TK is doing it. _________________ '84 Vanagon Tin-top, ALH TDI. 1989 Tin-top
1983 Air-cool, 225k miles, 180k miles mine. Seven trips to Alaska from 1986 thru 2003.
Last edited by AndyBees on Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ahwahnee Samba Member
Joined: June 05, 2010 Posts: 9810 Location: Mt Lemmon, AZ
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:08 pm Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
Well, whatever you do - don't explain it in great detail on a public forum. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmayna Samba Member
Joined: August 18, 2014 Posts: 1148 Location: SF Bay area, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:10 pm Post subject: Re: Kill switch to the coil vs fuel pump |
|
|
I started to investigate Terry's idea by looking at the battery wires and the NSS wires. I do have a solid red wire at the battery but it does not go to the NSS. I assume it must go to the starter. With the red wire, there is a Red/white wire but haven't studied where it might go to.
At the NSS there are two Red/Blk heavy duty wires.
The more I snoop around the rig, the more I'm leaning towards killing the power at the coil (+), but it is still very early in the ball game. Taking the rig to bURNING vAN this weekend so can't take a chance in digging too deep. _________________ '90 Westy / automatic.
If I'm not working on the camper or my '50 Chebbie truck, I'm either fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
Craig |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|