Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Too little endplay?
Page: 1, 2  Next
Forum Index -> Vanagon Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tmart
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2017
Posts: 176
Location: CA
tmart is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:57 pm    Post subject: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

I tried searching a bit, but all that ever comes up with regards to end play is when there's too much.

After measuring with two of the three shims in place, I show ~.27 mm of play. (I know this isn't the standard process, I did that too). So is solving this as simple as sanding down the last shim to .~.2 - ~.14 mm? (I can also work on the other shim.) I've actually already started, using some 600 and 1200 grit I had laying around, just like to make sure I'm not doing something blatantly wrong.

This also led me to wonder what would happen if someone had much less endplay. At what point should someone be trying to find why they have so little rather than trying to continue on their build with super skinny shims?
_________________
1990 Vanagon 2.2L Manual
The van that samba built
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Abscate
Samba Member


Joined: October 05, 2014
Posts: 22641
Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
Abscate is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 4:23 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

What's the spec on your engine ?

0.3 mm is 0.012 inches which is too much end play!,
_________________
.ssS!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
DanHoug
Samba Member


Joined: December 05, 2016
Posts: 4775
Location: Bemidji, MN
DanHoug is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:27 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

couple things to watch.... those shims are very hard material, i think it will be hard to remove an appreciable amount by hand. but even more significant, i doubt you can maintain consistent dimensions across the span of the shim.

once you start the sanding process, you may notice that the shims you have are not perfectly flat. i'd wager THAT is more likely your problem. i was driving myself nuts mic'ing shims, assembling, and getting reading that had no relation to the calculated clearance. i had some shims that were less than perfectly flat and my caliper measurement only sampled one tiny wedge of the shim.

so before you sand, if you have other shims just try various sequential combinations regardless of the calculated math. if you don't have more shims, i'd be very tempted to measure with the thrust washer and large shim in place and order what you need to get the necessary clearance.

-dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
T3 Pilot
Samba Member


Joined: January 10, 2011
Posts: 1507
Location: Deep South of the Great White North
T3 Pilot is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:00 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

You need to come to terms with your Bentley manual, specifically pages 13.40 and 13.41

You must have a combination of 3 Shims in place PLUS the thrust washer to achieve the correct end play.

Reference the exploded diagram on 13.41 - Shim B is always included and is a fixed thickness, Shims C are the variables. You need a selection of Shims on hand to swap them in to achieve the desired end play. No sanding required....
There are six different variable Shims C available to achieve this combination.

Here are the Shims listed at Van cafe....

http://www.van-cafe.com/crankshaft-c1664



The dimensions listed in fig. 13 are confusing, they are the outside diameters of the Shims B and C and the 4 sided outer retainer washer D

I think you are generally on the right track, but you need to have a supply of many Shims and a micrometer on hand to adjust the end play.
_________________
1988 Vanagon

The most important part in every vehicle is the nut behind the wheel......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
tmart
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2017
Posts: 176
Location: CA
tmart is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:38 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

Abscate - The spec is .003" - .005". The number I gave was with one of the shims not yet installed. Off the top of my head, the endplay w/o either shim was ~.55mm

Dan - That's actually been my problem and led to me posting here.

T3 - I followed Bentley's procedure exactly. Then after a while I figured I should get a feel for what the third shim needed to be on its own (because of the non-uniformity of the shims as Dan mentioned). That led me to all this because I found it needed to be .27 mm while GW only lists >.3 mm shims available. Where I fell short was checking any other shops. I did see in Bentley that sub .3 mm shims were made before but figured those must not be manufactured anymore. Thanks for the link though, looks like Van Cafe has the shims I need.
_________________
1990 Vanagon 2.2L Manual
The van that samba built
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Wildthings
Samba Member


Joined: March 13, 2005
Posts: 50338

Wildthings is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:44 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

Why are you shimming your end play. If it was once good and the case hasn't been apart it is likely still good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
tmart
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2017
Posts: 176
Location: CA
tmart is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:04 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

The case has been apart. Although based on how I received the engine, I wouldn't be surprised if the endplay was off to begin with.
_________________
1990 Vanagon 2.2L Manual
The van that samba built
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
tmart
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2017
Posts: 176
Location: CA
tmart is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

Dammit, just when I thought I had plans perfectly lined up, Van Cafe is out of stock on .24 mm shims. Of course I need 2 x .24 mm shims for things to line up perfectly...

After some research I found a few options but I don't know if they're compatible. Anybody know if Type 1 shim sare compatible with the waterboxer? Sorry if that's a dumb question, I don't have a firm grasp of what that means. Based on a little research it seems like it should work, butI'm not very confident in that research haha.

These are meant for type 1's and early (80-83) vanagons: http://www.mofoco.com/item/FLYWHEEL_SHIMS_24MM_Type_1_ENGINES_Made_in_Germany_by_FEBI/2507/p2c128

These at bus depot only list as being compatible with 63-71 buses: http://www.busdepot.com/113105281a

This one doesn't list compatibility but sounds like it might be for vanagons (air cooled, not sure if that makes a difference)based on the spec description: https://www.kustom1warehouse.net/Flywheel_end_play_shims_for_VW_p/endplayshims.htm I read their buyer and seller feedback though and it's less than promising. This might be a last resort.

Any input is appreciated, especially if anyone knows of a reliable source for the .24 mm shims.
_________________
1990 Vanagon 2.2L Manual
The van that samba built
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Abscate
Samba Member


Joined: October 05, 2014
Posts: 22641
Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
Abscate is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:15 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

tmart wrote:
Abscate - The spec is .003" - .005". The number I gave was with one of the shims not yet installed. Off the top of my head, the endplay w/o either shim was ~.55mm

Dan - That's actually been my problem and led to me posting here.

T3 - I followed Bentley's procedure exactly. Then after a while I figured I should get a feel for what the third shim needed to be on its own (because of the non-uniformity of the shims as Dan mentioned). That led me to all this because I found it needed to be .27 mm while GW only lists >.3 mm shims available. Where I fell short was checking any other shops. I did see in Bentley that sub .3 mm shims were made before but figured those must not be manufactured anymore. Thanks for the link though, looks like Van Cafe has the shims I need.


Enlightenment bursts upon me. You seek the correct third shim or , worst case, disassembly and machining of your case to fit your available shims.
_________________
.ssS!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
tmart
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2017
Posts: 176
Location: CA
tmart is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:30 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

After doing some research it seems like these shims might have been used on Porsche 911s and 914s too. If tht'sthe case, it the part number, according to AutoAtlanta.com, of the .24 mm shim was changed from 021105291 to 021105292. Part number 021105292 is a little easier to find, but pretty expensive ~$20 a pop. I checked the crankshaft dimensions of a 1974 914 crankshaft (page 26 here: http://bowlsby.net/914/Classic/zMan_1974_TechSpecs.pdf) and it looks like the journal is the same dimension, or at least within .001 mm.

Can anyone confirm if the shims between these engines are compatible?Or even the same part?
_________________
1990 Vanagon 2.2L Manual
The van that samba built
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
djkeev
Samba Moderator


Joined: September 30, 2007
Posts: 32588
Location: Reading Pennsylvania
djkeev is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:10 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

Add a paper gasket between the flywheel and the crank if you cannot gain the play you must have with 3 shims.

Make the gasket yourself, you cannot purchase them. Just use a paper weight varying from thin office paper to card stock. Use two if you must.

Dave
_________________
Stop Dead Photo Links how to post photos

Ghia
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=392473

Vanagon
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6315537#6315537

Beetle
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=482968&highlight=74+super+vert
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
tmart
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2017
Posts: 176
Location: CA
tmart is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:50 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

Oh wow, that's a good idea, really simple too if I'm understanding correctly. Is that known to be reliable?

And to clarify, you mean to put that between in the inner surface of the flywheel, next to the o-ring, right? So the flywheel bolts would be poking through the paper gasket as well?
_________________
1990 Vanagon 2.2L Manual
The van that samba built
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
MarkWard
Samba Member


Joined: February 09, 2005
Posts: 17117
Location: Retired South Florida
MarkWard is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:01 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

I don't have a lot of 2.1 WBX engine experience, but doesn't the main bearing have separate thrust faces?

I ask, because it is not uncommon on inline 4 cylinders that depend on the actual thrust bearing to determine endplay not a stack of shims. When assembling an inline engine with new main bearings, it is not uncommon to gain the clearance needed by "sanding" the thrust surface on some fine sandpaper on a piece of glass. The thrust bearing material is soft enough that you can quickly get the clearance.

If the 2.1 has a separate main bearing thrust surfaces, could you do something similar with the outer thrust washer?

Using a peice of gasket paper is a new idea to me. I think VW on the 6 volt flywheels used a peice of gasket paper instead of a rubber O ring to seal the flywheel to the crank, so I suppose that would work.

I'd be more interested in why you can't get the end play correct with stock shims, but that is me.
_________________
☮️
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
tmart
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2017
Posts: 176
Location: CA
tmart is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:11 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

I was actually considering sanding he thrust washer too. Since I have a spare, it won't hurt to try. The only thing that might get me there is not being able to sand the back evenly and having a slanted thrust surface.


I think I'll be giving both these ideas a test run tonight...

With reagrds to not getting the right endplay, I would be able to get the right clearance, but the shims I need to get there (.24 mm) are in rare supply.
_________________
1990 Vanagon 2.2L Manual
The van that samba built
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
djkeev
Samba Moderator


Joined: September 30, 2007
Posts: 32588
Location: Reading Pennsylvania
djkeev is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:52 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

tmart wrote:
Oh wow, that's a good idea, really simple too if I'm understanding correctly. Is that known to be reliable?

And to clarify, you mean to put that between in the inner surface of the flywheel, next to the o-ring, right? So the flywheel bolts would be poking through the paper gasket as well?


Yes, grease the paper with wheel bearing grease, it seals it from leaking oil.
(Old trick for Air Cooled oil "pan" gaskets)

Dave
_________________
Stop Dead Photo Links how to post photos

Ghia
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=392473

Vanagon
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6315537#6315537

Beetle
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=482968&highlight=74+super+vert
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
MarkWard
Samba Member


Joined: February 09, 2005
Posts: 17117
Location: Retired South Florida
MarkWard is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 11:33 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

What slanted surface are you referring to?
_________________
☮️
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Wildthings
Samba Member


Joined: March 13, 2005
Posts: 50338

Wildthings is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 11:38 am    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

MarkWard wrote:
I don't have a lot of 2.1 WBX engine experience, but doesn't the main bearing have separate thrust faces?

I ask, because it is not uncommon on inline 4 cylinders that depend on the actual thrust bearing to determine endplay not a stack of shims. When assembling an inline engine with new main bearings, it is not uncommon to gain the clearance needed by "sanding" the thrust surface on some fine sandpaper on a piece of glass. The thrust bearing material is soft enough that you can quickly get the clearance.


Check your manual, the 2.1L WBXer is a different animal from other VW pancake engines and other pan cake engine are a different animal from must other engine out there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jberger
Samba Member


Joined: November 17, 2003
Posts: 2476

jberger is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 1:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

Is this the thrust washer that you pinched the case with? If so, make sure it is not deformed which would give you a false tight end play reading.

J
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
MarkWard
Samba Member


Joined: February 09, 2005
Posts: 17117
Location: Retired South Florida
MarkWard is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 1:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

Wildthings wrote:
MarkWard wrote:
I don't have a lot of 2.1 WBX engine experience, but doesn't the main bearing have separate thrust faces?

I ask, because it is not uncommon on inline 4 cylinders that depend on the actual thrust bearing to determine endplay not a stack of shims. When assembling an inline engine with new main bearings, it is not uncommon to gain the clearance needed by "sanding" the thrust surface on some fine sandpaper on a piece of glass. The thrust bearing material is soft enough that you can quickly get the clearance.


Check your manual, the 2.1L WBXer is a different animal from other VW pancake engines and other pan cake engine are a different animal from must other engine out there.


I thought the WBX 2.1 had a 3 piece thrust bearing and that the outer thrust piece was under the shim stack. The the earlier pancake vw engines, I would set the thrust clearance with the crankshaft out of the case. They had a one piece thrust main bearing.
_________________
☮️
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
tmart
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2017
Posts: 176
Location: CA
tmart is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:54 pm    Post subject: Re: Too little endplay? Reply with quote

Mark - Yes, the thrust bearing is 3 piece. The slanted surface I was worried about was if I sanded it an angle by accident, something that might be easy to do because the tab is offset to the side I was sanding. Either way, the thrust washer's pretty hard to sand like the shims. I spent a good while sanding only to recheck and see I'd taken off a few ten thousandths of an inch.

Dave - I think I'm going to give the paper a try. By my measurements, printer paper gives me exactly the spacing I need to be spot on. Quick question about the grease though: Wouldn't that add a little thickness to the paper? Kind of like why Boston Bob checked his endplay with dry shims? What would the proper procedure be to add the paper spacer this way?
_________________
1990 Vanagon 2.2L Manual
The van that samba built
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Vanagon All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.