Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs
Page: Previous  1, 2
Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bugguy1967
Samba Member


Joined: January 16, 2008
Posts: 4343
Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
bugguy1967 is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 11:07 pm    Post subject: Re: Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs Reply with quote

Funny that this topic has popped back up, as I'm currently working on three projects which are all using less spring pressure than the norm. My client's 2276cc had Norris HD aluminum pushrods, standard CB dual springs, and a Engle V26, which is like a 86A. The pushrods were flexing at the centers and rubbing inside the JayCee tubes, so they were flexing a TON! We now have the last set of 3-groove Norris titanium retainers and CB 650 outers for the new combo. Hopefully the valvetrain will be much happier. CB outer has about 235 lbs at .500".

I have another client who planned on using the FK 45 with CB 650s, but that's a ton of pressure for that cam. I think part of the reason those 40-series cams wear out the bores is because of the spring pressure put on them. So I'ma set up some Stateside springs on it instead. 270 lbs with a soft inner. There are specific machining instructions for the inners.

Then my engine will have the lightest valvetrain ever...
_________________
"A petrol engine can start readily, run smoothly and give every appearance of being in good order, without necessarily being in good tune." - Colin Campbell, "The Sportscar Engine"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
slalombuggy
Samba Member


Joined: July 17, 2010
Posts: 9147
Location: Canada
slalombuggy is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 6:58 am    Post subject: Re: Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs Reply with quote

I really want to go back to a set of comp eliminator heads but really don't want the chevy springs they come with. they are crazy stiff. We bent a Duetz diesel spring compressor trying to take them off. I now run as light a valve train as possible Pieper TS lifters, CB HD aluminum pushrods, Pauter rockers, Ti retainers so I don't need huge springs to control the valves at 8000rpm. Would be nice if they made these heads so you could use the VW650 springs, like I have been using for the past 6 years.

I ran Bugpack HD singles in my autocross car, that saw 6000+ rpms a lot and I never had a problem with them and I ran the same set for 13 years. 110 cam, 1.25 rockers on solid shafts with elephant feet adjusters, CroMo pushrods. The came never showed any signs of valve float, nor the lifters.

I'm also using HD singles on my new 1904 with the same valve train, but aluminum pushrods (shortened stockers)

brad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
[email protected]
Samba Member


Joined: August 15, 2002
Posts: 4394
Location: Brew City
roy@mofoco.com is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:12 am    Post subject: Re: Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs Reply with quote

jester_icarus wrote:
How can you tell the difference between a stock springs and a HD Hi Rev single springs?


Stock springs are progressively wound. What this means is that the coils are closer on one end of the spring compared to the other end. This end is typically installed towards the head, not the retainer. HD springs look the same end to end.
_________________
Please "LIKE" us on facebook to see what we are working on.

https://www.facebook.com/mofoco?ref=ts&fref=ts

www.mofoco.com

Cylinder Head Reference Sheet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
[email protected]
Samba Member


Joined: August 15, 2002
Posts: 4394
Location: Brew City
roy@mofoco.com is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:18 am    Post subject: Re: Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs Reply with quote

bugguy1967 wrote:
Funny that this topic has popped back up, as I'm currently working on three projects which are all using less spring pressure than the norm. My client's 2276cc had Norris HD aluminum pushrods, standard CB dual springs, and a Engle V26, which is like a 86A. The pushrods were flexing at the centers and rubbing inside the JayCee tubes, so they were flexing a TON! We now have the last set of 3-groove Norris titanium retainers and CB 650 outers for the new combo. Hopefully the valvetrain will be much happier. CB outer has about 235 lbs at .500".

I have another client who planned on using the FK 45 with CB 650s, but that's a ton of pressure for that cam. I think part of the reason those 40-series cams wear out the bores is because of the spring pressure put on them. So I'ma set up some Stateside springs on it instead. 270 lbs with a soft inner. There are specific machining instructions for the inners.

Then my engine will have the lightest valvetrain ever...


This is all exactly what you should be doing. I honestly don't understand the obsession in this industry with using valve springs that can hold up a building. So many people want to jam dual springs into their stock heads with a W100 cam or have 250lbs of spring pressure with their W120 and 1.25's or 86a a 1.4's.

I would personally go with even less spring pressure than you are aiming for but that's just me.....
_________________
Please "LIKE" us on facebook to see what we are working on.

https://www.facebook.com/mofoco?ref=ts&fref=ts

www.mofoco.com

Cylinder Head Reference Sheet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
bugguy1967
Samba Member


Joined: January 16, 2008
Posts: 4343
Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
bugguy1967 is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 10:01 am    Post subject: Re: Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs Reply with quote

slalombuggy wrote:
I really want to go back to a set of comp eliminator heads but really don't want the chevy springs they come with. they are crazy stiff. We bent a Duetz diesel spring compressor trying to take them off. I now run as light a valve train as possible Pieper TS lifters, CB HD aluminum pushrods, Pauter rockers, Ti retainers so I don't need huge springs to control the valves at 8000rpm. Would be nice if they made these heads so you could use the VW650 springs, like I have been using for the past 6 years.

I ran Bugpack HD singles in my autocross car, that saw 6000+ rpms a lot and I never had a problem with them and I ran the same set for 13 years. 110 cam, 1.25 rockers on solid shafts with elephant feet adjusters, CroMo pushrods. The came never showed any signs of valve float, nor the lifters.

I'm also using HD singles on my new 1904 with the same valve train, but aluminum pushrods (shortened stockers)

brad


As far as I know, your options are regular RevMaster springs and Comp Cams beehives. There's a size that will work well with your Comp Es.
_________________
"A petrol engine can start readily, run smoothly and give every appearance of being in good order, without necessarily being in good tune." - Colin Campbell, "The Sportscar Engine"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
KROC
Samba Member


Joined: February 20, 2006
Posts: 359
Location: Vancouver B.C.
KROC is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 11:13 am    Post subject: Re: Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs Reply with quote

Ever since I worked at Mondello engines I have always used the biggest springs I can, I have seen the harmonics a single spring develops on a spintron, it's not pretty, at least use a single spring with a damper if you want to stick to singles, If you "think" your single springs are holding up I bet if you pull a retainer off at look at your keeper grooves they have fretting and unless the guide is worn out and oversize you will have to file off the burrs on the valve stem just to get the valve to slide through the guide...
That my friends is caused by harmonics and float....
A great single spring with damper is the Isky V-005D


More.....

By David Reher, Reher-Morrison Racing Engines

“We learned some shocking truths about valvetrains.”

In the last two months, I have discovered a new kind of power: the power of the press. I’ve worked with mills, lathes, and hones for thirty years, so it was a real challenge for me to sit down at a word processor and begin my second career as a writer. I genuinely appreciate the comments and compliments I have received since I joined the ranks of National DRAGSTER’s back-page columnists.

My sense of humor is no match for Bob Frey’s, and I can’t offer any insights into the human condition like Rev. Owen and Dr. Torstveit. I do know a little about building engines, however, and that is going to be my subject. I promise that I won’t deluge you with theory and analysis; my intention is to offer practical advice and real-world recommendations based on my own experience.

I don’t make any claim that my word is gospel – I’ll leave that to the good reverend. Other engine builders may not agree with my opinions about particular parts and procedures, but I know what works for us at Reher-Morrison Racing Engines.

I always advise racers to consider the long-term costs and consequences when they are buying engine components. Parts that are initially inexpensive can be very costly to maintain over the course of a season. For example, a flat tappet camshaft is much cheaper than a roller cam and lifters – but in the long run, a flat tappet cam can be a black hole that sucks up dollars.

Flat tappets may be fine for street engines, but I don’t recommend them for any serious racing application. Sure, NASCAR Winston Cup engines have flat tappets, but that is because the rulebook requires them. We have built several NASCAR motors, and the extra work it takes to make flat tappets live in a racing environment is a real pain. The tappets must be precisely positioned on the tapered cam lobes in order to make the lifters rotate. If the tappets don’t spin properly, they will wear the lobes flat almost instantly. A flat tappet cam must be broken in with light-tension springs, which involves the extra expense and effort of switching to heavy springs after the break-in period. Finally, there is an absolute limit to how much spring pressure a flat tappet can withstand before it galls the camshaft and turns itself blue.

The odds are against any production block having every lifter bore in the right position and at the correct angle. NASCAR engine builders use elaborate fixtures to machine the lifter bores perpendicular to the camshaft centerline and to position the lifters accurately on the lobes. Many also install jets in the oil galleries that spray oil directly on the cam lobes.

It simply does not make economic sense for a bracket racer to prepare a block to NASCAR standards in order to use a cheap flat tappet cam. And if a flat tappet fails or the cam goes flat, the cost of repairing the engine would have paid for a roller cam and lifters in the first place. For anyone racing a hard-running bracket car every weekend, I believe that a roller cam is the only way to go. The money you save in the long run makes the roller cam an excellent investment.

The most common mistake I see in engine building is to use valve springs with inadequate pressure. Not all springs are created equal; just because a set of coils is described as “roller springs” in a catalog or advertisement does not mean that the springs will produce enough pressure to do their job.

There are several misconceptions about valve springs that influence racers to make poor decisions. A customer who says, “I don’t need good springs because I’m running stock valves,” is badly mistaken. Steel valves are heavy, and adequate spring pressure is absolutely essential to control their motion. A valve’s inertia increases with the square of the engine speed, so even a small increase in rpm requires significantly more spring pressure to maintain valvetrain stability.

It is a myth that stiff springs will pop the heads off valves or cause valve tuliping. The only time that the valve head is subject to spring tension is when the valve is closed and resting on its seat. At all other times, the valve sees only a compressive load between the tip of the valve stem and the groove for the valve locks. In our Pro Stock engines, we use 7-inch long titanium valves with tiny 7-millimeter stems and springs that exert more than 1,000 pounds of open pressure – and we’ve never broken or tuliped a valve due to high spring pressure.

In fact, too little spring pressure is almost always the root cause of valvetrain failures. We spent a year studying valve springs using an Optron, a sophisticated electronic device that can precisely record valve motion and reveal valve float. We learned some shocking truths about valvetrain behavior at high rpm. Even with a relatively mild camshaft profile, the valves bounce on their seats before they close. If the spring is too light, the valve bounces uncontrollably. The valve hits the seat, rebounds, hangs in the chamber awhile, and the bounces erratically several more times. Imagine how hard this is on the valve and the rest of the valvetrain!

Even with high-pressure springs, the valves still bounce when they close. The crucial difference is that the bounce is controlled and predictable, like dropping a basketball. The valve bounce diminishes progressively, and generally on the third bounce the valve stays closed until the next cycle.

The evidence is unmistakable when we tear down an engine that has been run with weak springs: The valve seats are usually beaten up, the valve job is wiped out, and there is fretting on the valve faces. It’s fortunate when we catch these problems early because weak springs will almost certainly cause a catastrophic failure.

Another excuse I’ve heard for not using stiff valve springs is that they take more horsepower to compress. My reply is that each spring stores energy, and for every valve that is opening another one is closing. Anyone who has been whacked by a torque wrench while turning a crankshaft can testify that the valve springs exert considerable force on the closing ramps!

have never installed stiffer valve springs on an engine and lost power; the improvement in valvetrain dynamics more than offsets whatever additional power is required to overcome the springs’ resistance.

I think that any serious big-block drag racing engine should have at least 220 pounds of seat pressure after it has been run. While 1.550-inch diameter chrome-silicon springs may have adequate pressure when they are first installed, they eventually fatigue and lose their tension. We use 1.625-inch diameter Vasco Jet springs exclusively on our Super Series engines and big-block cylinder head packages. These are the same springs that we used in Pro Stock engines just a few years ago; we have virtually eliminated valvetrain breakage in our bracket racing engines by installing these high-pressure springs.

For my money, peace of mind is worth the cost of premium valve springs in any drag racing engine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
[email protected]
Samba Member


Joined: August 15, 2002
Posts: 4394
Location: Brew City
roy@mofoco.com is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 11:24 am    Post subject: Re: Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs Reply with quote

[quote="KROC"]Ever since I worked at Mondello engines I have always used the biggest springs I can, I have seen the harmonics a single spring develops on a spintron, it's not pretty, at least use a single spring with a damper if you want to stick to singles, If you "think" your single springs are holding up I bet if you pull a retainer off at look at your keeper grooves they have fretting and unless the guide is worn out and oversize you will have to file off the burrs on the valve stem just to get the valve to slide through the guide...
That my friends is caused by harmonics and float....
A great single spring with damper is the Isky V-005D


More.....

By David Reher, Reher-Morrison Racing Engines

“We learned some shocking truths about valvetrains.”

In the last two months, I have discovered a new kind of power: the power of the press. I’ve worked with mills, lathes, and hones for thirty years, so it was a real challenge for me to sit down at a word processor and begin my second career as a writer. I genuinely appreciate the comments and compliments I have received since I joined the ranks of National DRAGSTER’s back-page columnists.

My sense of humor is no match for Bob Frey’s, and I can’t offer any insights into the human condition like Rev. Owen and Dr. Torstveit. I do know a little about building engines, however, and that is going to be my subject. I promise that I won’t deluge you with theory and analysis; my intention is to offer practical advice and real-world recommendations based on my own experience.

I don’t make any claim that my word is gospel – I’ll leave that to the good reverend. Other engine builders may not agree with my opinions about particular parts and procedures, but I know what works for us at Reher-Morrison Racing Engines.

I always advise racers to consider the long-term costs and consequences when they are buying engine components. Parts that are initially inexpensive can be very costly to maintain over the course of a season. For example, a flat tappet camshaft is much cheaper than a roller cam and lifters – but in the long run, a flat tappet cam can be a black hole that sucks up dollars.

Flat tappets may be fine for street engines, but I don’t recommend them for any serious racing application. Sure, NASCAR Winston Cup engines have flat tappets, but that is because the rulebook requires them. We have built several NASCAR motors, and the extra work it takes to make flat tappets live in a racing environment is a real pain. The tappets must be precisely positioned on the tapered cam lobes in order to make the lifters rotate. If the tappets don’t spin properly, they will wear the lobes flat almost instantly. A flat tappet cam must be broken in with light-tension springs, which involves the extra expense and effort of switching to heavy springs after the break-in period. Finally, there is an absolute limit to how much spring pressure a flat tappet can withstand before it galls the camshaft and turns itself blue.

The odds are against any production block having every lifter bore in the right position and at the correct angle. NASCAR engine builders use elaborate fixtures to machine the lifter bores perpendicular to the camshaft centerline and to position the lifters accurately on the lobes. Many also install jets in the oil galleries that spray oil directly on the cam lobes.

It simply does not make economic sense for a bracket racer to prepare a block to NASCAR standards in order to use a cheap flat tappet cam. And if a flat tappet fails or the cam goes flat, the cost of repairing the engine would have paid for a roller cam and lifters in the first place. For anyone racing a hard-running bracket car every weekend, I believe that a roller cam is the only way to go. The money you save in the long run makes the roller cam an excellent investment.

The most common mistake I see in engine building is to use valve springs with inadequate pressure. Not all springs are created equal; just because a set of coils is described as “roller springs” in a catalog or advertisement does not mean that the springs will produce enough pressure to do their job.

There are several misconceptions about valve springs that influence racers to make poor decisions. A customer who says, “I don’t need good springs because I’m running stock valves,” is badly mistaken. Steel valves are heavy, and adequate spring pressure is absolutely essential to control their motion. A valve’s inertia increases with the square of the engine speed, so even a small increase in rpm requires significantly more spring pressure to maintain valvetrain stability.

It is a myth that stiff springs will pop the heads off valves or cause valve tuliping. The only time that the valve head is subject to spring tension is when the valve is closed and resting on its seat. At all other times, the valve sees only a compressive load between the tip of the valve stem and the groove for the valve locks. In our Pro Stock engines, we use 7-inch long titanium valves with tiny 7-millimeter stems and springs that exert more than 1,000 pounds of open pressure – and we’ve never broken or tuliped a valve due to high spring pressure.

In fact, too little spring pressure is almost always the root cause of valvetrain failures. We spent a year studying valve springs using an Optron, a sophisticated electronic device that can precisely record valve motion and reveal valve float. We learned some shocking truths about valvetrain behavior at high rpm. Even with a relatively mild camshaft profile, the valves bounce on their seats before they close. If the spring is too light, the valve bounces uncontrollably. The valve hits the seat, rebounds, hangs in the chamber awhile, and the bounces erratically several more times. Imagine how hard this is on the valve and the rest of the valvetrain!

Even with high-pressure springs, the valves still bounce when they close. The crucial difference is that the bounce is controlled and predictable, like dropping a basketball. The valve bounce diminishes progressively, and generally on the third bounce the valve stays closed until the next cycle.

The evidence is unmistakable when we tear down an engine that has been run with weak springs: The valve seats are usually beaten up, the valve job is wiped out, and there is fretting on the valve faces. It’s fortunate when we catch these problems early because weak springs will almost certainly cause a catastrophic failure.

Another excuse I’ve heard for not using stiff valve springs is that they take more horsepower to compress. My reply is that each spring stores energy, and for every valve that is opening another one is closing. Anyone who has been whacked by a torque wrench while turning a crankshaft can testify that the valve springs exert considerable force on the closing ramps!

have never installed stiffer valve springs on an engine and lost power; the improvement in valvetrain dynamics more than offsets whatever additional power is required to overcome the springs’ resistance.

I think that any serious big-block drag racing engine should have at least 220 pounds of seat pressure after it has been run. While 1.550-inch diameter chrome-silicon springs may have adequate pressure when they are first installed, they eventually fatigue and lose their tension. We use 1.625-inch diameter Vasco Jet springs exclusively on our Super Series engines and big-block cylinder head packages. These are the same springs that we used in Pro Stock engines just a few years ago; we have virtually eliminated valvetrain breakage in our bracket racing engines by installing these high-pressure springs.

For my money, peace of mind is worth the cost of premium valve springs in any drag racing engine.[/quote]

That advice is all 100% spot on.......for racing applications.

My advice on the forum is all based on street performance for non racing applications.
_________________
Please "LIKE" us on facebook to see what we are working on.

https://www.facebook.com/mofoco?ref=ts&fref=ts

www.mofoco.com

Cylinder Head Reference Sheet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Spike0180
Samba Member


Joined: June 06, 2015
Posts: 2269
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Spike0180 is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 12:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs Reply with quote

yeah, any combination of cam, pushrods, lifters, rockers, or anything else adding/removing weight to the valvetrain and possibly slight adjustments (though I would bet negligible) for engine air flow/combustion would change when your engine will experience valve float.

Personally I have a 1776cc with an engle w110, duel weber 40 idf's, stock valvetrain but HD springs (unsure of the exact HD springs), and I have my redline set at 6k. I have only gotten up to about 5.2k maybe 5.5k rpm. No negative effects yet. I have no reason to believe that I couldn't at least rev to 6k if not 6.5k. But I have a stock crank, so I keep my rpm's from getting crazy too often. My bearings thank me I'm sure.
_________________
Brutis Patches Izabich: 1970 VW Transporter - 1776cc DP
Current State: Projects never truly end...
Location: Grosse Pointe, Michigan
Other cars: 2003 F150, 2003 Jetta GLI vr6-6sp

Sambastic: adj; the quality of being nit picky, elitist, expecting everyone to do things the way they believe is best with no regard to situation, "sambastic"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jester_icarus
Samba Member


Joined: July 20, 2017
Posts: 11

jester_icarus is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Limits Of Single High Rev/HD Springs Reply with quote

[email protected] wrote:
jester_icarus wrote:
How can you tell the difference between a stock springs and a HD Hi Rev single springs?


Stock springs are progressively wound. What this means is that the coils are closer on one end of the spring compared to the other end. This end is typically installed towards the head, not the retainer. HD springs look the same end to end.



Thank you Roy@mofoco
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.