| Author |
Message |
vwmattm Samba Member
Joined: August 16, 2015 Posts: 17 Location: Western NC
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 8:02 pm Post subject: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
Hey all-
I'm in the midst of replacing the fuel lines on a new to me '84 1.9L Vanagon using the GoWesty kit (GVW-FUELLINE). Going fine, but I'm a bit confused at seeing the return lines from the fuel rails go into a regulator mounted to a bracket on the engine, which then goes to another regulator before going back to the tank. I haven't seen such a thing in any diagrams, is this stock or something the PO did?
Here's what I'm looking at, the regulator at the front (top) is what has me confused:
Thanks! _________________ 70 FI M/T Squareback - SOLD
84 1.9 Vanagon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SGKent  Samba Member

Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 42917 Location: at the beach in Northern Wokistan
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:44 pm Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
don't own a vanagon but to me that looks like a vacuum device. The bus FPR have a fuel in, a fuel out and a vacuum source. If you look at it, you will see one side of it goes over to what appears to be a brake booster check valve. Might start looking for that in the manual. _________________
Canned Water - the new California approved parts cleaner (except in a drought in which case rub it with sand).
George Carlin:
"Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it."
Skills@EuroCarsPlus:
"never time to do it right but always time to do it twice"  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tjet Samba Member

Joined: June 10, 2014 Posts: 3727 Location: Az
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:54 pm Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
| Those clamps on the fuel lines are not OEM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kamzcab86 Samba Moderator

Joined: July 26, 2008 Posts: 8589 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:55 pm Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
| SGKent wrote: |
| If you look at it, you will see one side of it goes over to what appears to be a brake booster check valve. Might start looking for that in the manual. |
If you look even closer, you'll see the vacuum line goes a T-fitting, which connects with the original FPR; from the T, the vacuum hose goes to the stock location, which is next to the brake boost hose.
The secondary FPR is on the return (to the tank) line for some reason. This second FPR is not factory, AFAIK. _________________ 1986 Cabriolet: www.Cabby-Info.com
1990 Vanagon Westfalia: Old Blue's Blog
2016 Golf GTI S
"Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance." - εε |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hdenter Samba Member
Joined: October 14, 2008 Posts: 2961 Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 12:50 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
Secondary FPR might have been installed to increase fuel pressure at wide open throttle. In discussions about how to get more fuel into the motor with stock injection and a turbo, it was suggested to add a secondary FPR that would raise FP an additional 5 or more PSI and flow more fuel under boost. This may have been an attempt to do something similar.
Hans _________________ '79 triple white convertible bug
'84 sunroof vanagon
'85 weekender |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZsZ Samba Member

Joined: December 11, 2010 Posts: 1743 Location: Budapest Hungary, Europe
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 2:21 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
or probably the OE 4 port regulator gone bad and it was easier to add a good 3 port one than searching for an OE style _________________ Zoltan
1.9 MTdi 2wd Multivan (ex Caravelle)
Van since 2006, engine since 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
djkeev Samba Moderator

Joined: September 30, 2007 Posts: 32988 Location: Reading Pennsylvania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZsZ Samba Member

Joined: December 11, 2010 Posts: 1743 Location: Budapest Hungary, Europe
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 3:10 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
| djkeev wrote: |
| ZsZ wrote: |
| or probably the OE 4 port regulator gone bad and it was easier to add a good 3 port one than searching for an OE style |
Say what?
The 1.9 had a three port regulator, I guess four if you count the vacuum port, but only three fuel connections.
Dave |
Yes I meant 3 fuel port + 1 vacuum = 4 port, and 2 fuel port + 1 vacuum = 3 port _________________ Zoltan
1.9 MTdi 2wd Multivan (ex Caravelle)
Van since 2006, engine since 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MarkWard Samba Member

Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 19072 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 3:41 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
| Definitely not stock. If the original regulator had failed and was not maintaining system pressure, this would have been a quick and easy solution to get the fuel pressure back up to spec. Iβll need to remember that fix. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vwmattm Samba Member
Joined: August 16, 2015 Posts: 17 Location: Western NC
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 6:14 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
| djkeev wrote: |
I don't see the fuel Tee from the tank, or is it under that paper towel?
Did the PO replumb the fuel flow and eliminate the Tee?
Dave |
The T is right on top of the paper towel, but 2 of the 3 fuel lines are disconnected from it in this picture.
Other then this regular situation, it seems like everything else is correct.
I was afraid this was done to compensate for something abnormal. I hadn't planned to replace the FPR, but maybe I should order one and try and go back to using just one.
What else would cause a low fuel pressure; insufficient flow out of the fuel pump? That thing is noisy, and has both the big canister style and pre-filter before the pump right now. Also something I'm replacing in this project. _________________ 70 FI M/T Squareback - SOLD
84 1.9 Vanagon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MarkWard Samba Member

Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 19072 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:15 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
First step would be to put a fuel pressure gauge on the rail. There should be a T at the base of the oil breather stand with a tiny bolt sealing it. Don't drop the bolt. You can measure your current pressure with the rig, and then bypass the secondary regulator and test again. To test full system pressure, you can carefully crimp the return to the tank from either regulator and that will peg the system pressure.
Without testing fuel pressure you have no idea whats going on. You should also do a fuel volume test described in the factory manual.
Pumps make noise when they wear out, but also when they are cavitating due to a restriction on the inlet side. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 52685
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:19 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
I would go with the theory that the OEM pressure regulator went bad but was left in the system as a "T" when the other regulator was added. Not the way I would probably do it but effective.
Yes check your fuel pressure so you know what is going on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Arndt Samba Member
Joined: August 01, 2005 Posts: 1798 Location: Boise, Idaho
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:49 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
Belt and suspenders lol. _________________ Steve
Steve's 87 Syncro project |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vwmattm Samba Member
Joined: August 16, 2015 Posts: 17 Location: Western NC
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 7:05 pm Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
Finally coming back to this. Back a few months ago I ordered a new FPR as it seemed prudent given the comments and its (assumed) age. But the new one, an Intermotor brand one from O'reilly's has a raised area where it meets the mounting bracket causing it to not sit flush against the bracket.
Are others seeing this as well? Do I just need to take it to the hardware store and find a big washer or something to make it wide enough to rest fully against the bracket?
From another thread this https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000CB01NI/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me= was linked as replacement, which from the image there, has the same raised area below the threads.
Here's what I'm talking about, the raised area below the threads for the nut:
_________________ 70 FI M/T Squareback - SOLD
84 1.9 Vanagon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jlrftype7 Samba Member
Joined: July 24, 2018 Posts: 4764 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 7:26 pm Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
| vwmattm wrote: |
Finally coming back to this. Back a few months ago I ordered a new FPR as it seemed prudent given the comments and its (assumed) age. But the new one, an Intermotor brand one from O'reilly's has a raised area where it meets the mounting bracket causing it to not sit flush against the bracket.
Are others seeing this as well? Do I just need to take it to the hardware store and find a big washer or something to make it wide enough to rest fully against the bracket?
From another thread this https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000CB01NI/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me= was linked as replacement, which from the image there, has the same raised area below the threads.
Here's what I'm talking about, the raised area below the threads for the nut:
|
I think the big washer as as shim would work fine. You don't need a large amount of torque on that nut to keep the Regulator in its bracket. _________________ '68 Westy- my first VW and vehicle/Bus- long gone.- sold it to a traveling Swiss couple....
'67 Type 3 Fastback, my 2nd car- gone
'69 Semi-Auto Stick Shift Beetle-gone
2017 MINI Coopers, our current DDs
β84 Tin Top - Hilga....Auto |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MarkWard Samba Member

Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 19072 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:48 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
| A shim sounds fine. Can the hole in the bracket be enlarged? I would verify the engine runs with the new regulator before you go to any extra trouble. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Abscate Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 24356 Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:36 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
| vwmattm wrote: |
Finally coming back to this. Back a few months ago I ordered a new FPR as it seemed prudent given the comments and its (assumed) age. But the new one, an Intermotor brand one from O'reilly's has a raised area where it meets the mounting bracket causing it to not sit flush against the bracket.
Are others seeing this as well? Do I just need to take it to the hardware store and find a big washer or something to make it wide enough to rest fully against the bracket?
From another thread this https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000CB01NI/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me= was linked as replacement, which from the image there, has the same raised area below the threads.
Here's what I'm talking about, the raised area below the threads for the nut:
|
The OOO Oreillys as an O for each time yohave to repeat work for crappy parts _________________ πΊπΈ πΊπΈ πΊπΈ πΊπΈ πΊπΈ πΊπΈ πΊπΈ π π π |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jake de Villiers Samba Member

Joined: October 24, 2007 Posts: 5938 Location: Tsawwassen, BC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vwmattm Samba Member
Joined: August 16, 2015 Posts: 17 Location: Western NC
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:14 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
| Jake de Villiers wrote: |
| MarkWard wrote: |
| I would verify the engine runs with the new regulator before you go to any extra trouble. |
The voice of experience!  |
Indeed!
I'll definitely verify the pressure readings with a temp setup, just need to get some screw clamps instead of using ear clamps and cursing myself if I have to take them off again!  _________________ 70 FI M/T Squareback - SOLD
84 1.9 Vanagon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vwmattm Samba Member
Joined: August 16, 2015 Posts: 17 Location: Western NC
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:27 am Post subject: Re: Multiple fuel regulators? |
|
|
As I've been comparing my setup to the Bentley, I'm noticing my vacuum hoses are not routed correctly. As you can see in my first post's picture, the line coming off the retard on the vac can doesn't go to the circuit with the FPR and intake manifold. But the Bentley doesn't call out what sizes or types of lines these should be. I understand there are both rubber and hard plastic lines involved here, but its not clear to me which is which. I've read here that folks say to use a better quality hose off of the FPR in case is fails, what are folks using?
I have some length of 3.5mm hose from VanCafe, is that ok to use for all the circuits on both the advance and retard sides of the house? It seems like the nipples on the vancuum can and the various tee's etc are different diameters; are there supposed to be convertors at the end of them?
I'd love to see any 1.9 engine bays if someone has a clear pic of the whole thing. Searching for engine pictures is tough on here. _________________ 70 FI M/T Squareback - SOLD
84 1.9 Vanagon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|