Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS
Page: 1, 2  Next
Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BJ1
Samba Member


Joined: July 15, 2011
Posts: 17
Location: UK
BJ1 is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 9:06 am    Post subject: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

This topic comes up from time to time, but I thought I would share some experience with you. I'm currently rebuilding a 1776 using a Rimco crank reground to take 0.75 OS bearings. The regrind was perfect in every respect.

I normally fit Silverline mains and rod bearings and find the standard and 0.25 bearings pretty well spot on. I fitted Silverline mains to this engine and as usual they were a perfect fit. Then I trial fitted the rods with the 0.75 OS Silverline bearings. The rods were super tight on the journals with these bearings fitted. So I miked up the rods again - all to spec and perfectly round. Then I fitted the bearings and miked it again - big surprise! The bearings appeared to be over a thou too thick, making the bearing an interference fit on the journal! Weird or what?

So I ordered a set of 0.75 OS Kolbenschmit rod bearings and compared them. Firstly the KS bearings were, unlike the Silverlines, nicely chamfered at the edges and had better tangs. When I fitted them to the rods they were exactly correct, giving a 2 thou clearance on the journals. Now I've used STD and 0.25 Silverlines before with no problems, so it may be that only the larger sizes are too thick, but I would be interested if anyone else has found this problem recently.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
uglyduck
Samba Member


Joined: June 03, 2007
Posts: 59
Location: Mountains of Northern Cali.
uglyduck is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 8:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

Just tried 2 sets of Silverline rod bearings (std.) on a 2007 build and both have been tight, it seems that the tangs aren't correct.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
modok
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2009
Posts: 26785
Location: Colorado Springs
modok is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 8:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

I have heard nothing good about silverline rod bearings.
Still wondering where they come from. There does not seem to be any company of that name.
What type of bearing are they?

If you are looking for aluminum type, in addition to Mahle, there is also King & Moresa

KS is the only tri metal bearing left far as I know, besides old stock FM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
BJ1
Samba Member


Joined: July 15, 2011
Posts: 17
Location: UK
BJ1 is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:22 am    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

modok wrote:
I have heard nothing good about silverline rod bearings.
Still wondering where they come from. There does not seem to be any company of that name.
What type of bearing are they?

If you are looking for aluminum type, in addition to Mahle, there is also King & Moresa

KS is the only tri metal bearing left far as I know, besides old stock FM


I think the Silverline rod bearings are steel backed and used to be made in Mexico. Whoever is producing them needs some feedback on quality control! Strange that they produce really good main bearings and some of their rod bearings are good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
BJ1
Samba Member


Joined: July 15, 2011
Posts: 17
Location: UK
BJ1 is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:49 am    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

There is a Silverline factory in Mexico City. Ermita Iztapalapa 1999-2, Los Ángeles, Iztapalapa, 09830 Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico.

Can one of our Mexican members let them know that some of their rod bearings are oversized and need the sides chamfered to accommodate the radius on the crank journal?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Chickensoup
Samba Member


Joined: January 06, 2018
Posts: 5368
Location: Good Hope, GA
Chickensoup is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 5:09 am    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

Sorry, I didnt take the time to read all the comments so mark this as irrelevant if it is.

But have you considered new mahle rod bearings? I know many builders use them and quality seems to be good from the 5 sets I've bough although I have measured all of them torqued down in the con rods.
_________________
-'85 c10 5.3 LS, 222 cam, long tubes, x pipe, 3 inch spin tech's
-'05 B5.5 TDI Wagon 17in sport rims ;EGR + BSM + ASV Delete, Stage-2 Tune, straight pipe
'65 Tourist Delivery Build
'66 RIP
'69 RIP
Hosea 4:6 "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
BJ1
Samba Member


Joined: July 15, 2011
Posts: 17
Location: UK
BJ1 is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 11:02 am    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

Chickensoup wrote:
Sorry, I didnt take the time to read all the comments so mark this as irrelevant if it is.

But have you considered new mahle rod bearings? I know many builders use them and quality seems to be good from the 5 sets I've bough although I have measured all of them torqued down in the con rods.


Thanks - yes I have used Mahle in the past and they are good. Problem is that all suppliers in the UK have run out of stock! I bought what looks like the last .75 OS non-Silverline rod bearings in the UK. We are having problems with stocks of lots of parts here - combination of Brexit and the Suez canal blockage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
ekacpuc
Samba Member


Joined: December 08, 2010
Posts: 1414
Location: ketchikan alaska
ekacpuc is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

I ordered sliverline without knowing and they were too tight. I don't recall the clearance but I ended up getting mahle.


Off subject but I did the same with double thrust cam bearings. The mahle were way too tight but the silverline were much better. Just hear about how terrible the silverline is for everything but mains...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
c77owen
Samba Member


Joined: July 07, 2017
Posts: 454
Location: Kansas City, MO
c77owen is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

I typically run Clevite/Mahle rod bearings after having a problem with a set of Silverlines. They measured out fine, but the material delaminated in shortly after cam break in. I have also run Sealed Power rod bearings on stock or near stock engines with good luck. I did run into a situation where I had several sets of Clevite bearings, all manufactured the same date and all were too tight. That is the only issue I have had with them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
esde
Samba Member


Joined: October 20, 2007
Posts: 5966
Location: central rust belt
esde is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 5:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

The silverline rod bearings have a purpose: when you have a slightly scored rod journal, and don't want to grind it to the next full oversize, polish it till you get the right clearance with the silverline bearings. I have done it once, and it worked well to get the oil clearance back to within stock specs.
_________________
modok wrote:
Bent cranks are silent but gather no moss. I mean, ah, something like that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
modok
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2009
Posts: 26785
Location: Colorado Springs
modok is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 5:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

Without having a catalog there are no specifications to check, no instructions, no part numbers, and no complaint department.
it might be a .002" oversize bearing. I'd check the crush.
Most "parts sellers" don't even know the difference between undersize and oversize so the only way it works is with a catalog and order the right part number.
No catalog, no company IMO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
BJ1
Samba Member


Joined: July 15, 2011
Posts: 17
Location: UK
BJ1 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2021 6:00 am    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

modok wrote:
Without having a catalog there are no specifications to check, no instructions, no part numbers, and no complaint department.
it might be a .002" oversize bearing. I'd check the crush.
Most "parts sellers" don't even know the difference between undersize and oversize so the only way it works is with a catalog and order the right part number.
No catalog, no company IMO


The bearings were the correct part number. Silverline use VW part numbers on their boxes. These were 113 105 719T at 0.75 OS. Installing them with the rods torqued up would have locked up the engine. I've been looking again at why this happened and there are at least two issues with these

- the tangs are pushing the bearing outwards towards the journal. I am wondering if the tang tooling they used did not compensate for the increased thickness of the bearing.

- there is virtually no chamfer on the edges of the bearings. This means that the radius on the journal edges is touching the bearing.

As I said I have not had these problems with std and 0.25 Silverline rod bearings over the past 20 years of building engines. When I installed KS bearings on this engine they fitted perfectly giving 0.002 oil clearances and no interference with the edges. I've emailed Silverline in Mexico but I doubt if they will reply! You never know though.....................
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
VWporscheGT3
Samba Member


Joined: September 01, 2006
Posts: 2076
Location: Gardnerville, NV
VWporscheGT3 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2021 7:07 am    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

BJ1 wrote:
modok wrote:
Without having a catalog there are no specifications to check, no instructions, no part numbers, and no complaint department.
it might be a .002" oversize bearing. I'd check the crush.
Most "parts sellers" don't even know the difference between undersize and oversize so the only way it works is with a catalog and order the right part number.
No catalog, no company IMO


The bearings were the correct part number. Silverline use VW part numbers on their boxes. These were 113 105 719T at 0.75 OS. Installing them with the rods torqued up would have locked up the engine. I've been looking again at why this happened and there are at least two issues with these

- the tangs are pushing the bearing outwards towards the journal. I am wondering if the tang tooling they used did not compensate for the increased thickness of the bearing.

- there is virtually no chamfer on the edges of the bearings. This means that the radius on the journal edges is touching the bearing.

As I said I have not had these problems with std and 0.25 Silverline rod bearings over the past 20 years of building engines. When I installed KS bearings on this engine they fitted perfectly giving 0.002 oil clearances and no interference with the edges. I've emailed Silverline in Mexico but I doubt if they will reply! You never know though.....................


I work for UEM (Silvo-lite) and ironically got a call from someone the other day asking about Silverline bearings... I had to say sorry , we are a piston manufacturer and not a bearing manufacturer. I wanted to ask more but.... couldn't
_________________
Schnell, SCHNELL!

I like being wrong, Because, it is another opportunity to learn. If you stop learning from your mistakes than what is the point?

If you have any questions about Forged ICON 4032 VW pistons just shoot me a line.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
modok
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2009
Posts: 26785
Location: Colorado Springs
modok is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

the part number has a T at the end
What does the T stand for?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Zundfolge1432 Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: June 13, 2004
Posts: 12467

Zundfolge1432 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

Tight😀
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
modok
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2009
Posts: 26785
Location: Colorado Springs
modok is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
67rustavenger Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: February 24, 2015
Posts: 9762
Location: Oregon
67rustavenger is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2022 5:54 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

I have had good results using Sliverline con rod bearings in the past. Until last night.

Installed a set and three of the rods move freely on the journal. But one rod has a sticky point that loosens up at two points when I rotate the rod all the way around the journal.
Measuring the rod bearings (with a dial bore gauge), I get a consistent .0025 bearing clearance.

I moved the rod from #1 to the #2 journal and the results were the same. A sticky point when rotating the rod around the journal, just not as sticky as #1.

I'm gonna switch the bearings from one rod to another and see if it's the rod, or the bearing. I suspect the bearing.
The rods are Scat Scat H beam, with ARP 3/8 bolts.

In the mean time, I placed an order for a set of Mahle rod bearings this morning.

Like I said above. I have had good results with Silverline bearings in the past.
This time, the mains measured all over the place and the rod bearings are giving me problems too.
I don't even bother with Silverline cam bearings.

Sorry for dragging up an old thread. But I thought it better to contribute to this, than start a new one on the same subject.
_________________
I have learned over the years.
Cheap parts are gonna disappoint you.
Buy Once, Cry Once!

There's never enough time to do it right the first time. But there's always enough time to do it thrice.
GFY's Xevin and VW_Jimbo!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
67rustavenger Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: February 24, 2015
Posts: 9762
Location: Oregon
67rustavenger is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2022 9:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

Well, Yeah. No matter what rod I placed the questionable bearing on.
The selected, rod was still a bit sticky in rotation.

Welcome new Mahle bearings! Wink

Never again will accept Silverline bearings of any sort! Twisted Evil
Fn money down the drain.

Live and learn!
_________________
I have learned over the years.
Cheap parts are gonna disappoint you.
Buy Once, Cry Once!

There's never enough time to do it right the first time. But there's always enough time to do it thrice.
GFY's Xevin and VW_Jimbo!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
toomanytoys
Samba Member


Joined: June 14, 2007
Posts: 82
Location: West Texas
toomanytoys is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2022 9:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

Tried using a set of Silverline std. rod bearings last week. They were very tight. I had a set of Mahles and they fit perfectly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
toomanytoys
Samba Member


Joined: June 14, 2007
Posts: 82
Location: West Texas
toomanytoys is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2022 9:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Con rod bearings - Silverline vs KS Reply with quote

Tried using a set of Silverline std. rod bearings last week. They were very tight. I had a set of Mahles and they fit perfectly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.