Author |
Message |
sactojesse Samba Member
Joined: November 21, 2006 Posts: 2655 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ghia72 wrote: |
So does a 2074cc with B pistons sound like a good choice apposed to the 2007? Seems to me that the 2074 would provide a little more torque/hp while still retaining a bit more reliability with the thickwall 92s instead of 90.5s, and close to how reliable the 1600s provides.
Thanks for all the advice! |
I've never owned an engine that's been bored out for 94s or thickwall 92s, but I'd personally rather have a tad more material left around my case savers and studs than is afforded by a case that's been bored out to fit 94s/thickwall 92s. However, 94s have proven themselves to be quite reliable, so I would suspect thickwall 92s to be even more so. _________________ 1966 Karmann-Ghia convertible |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghia72 Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2011 Posts: 24 Location: Dillon, MT
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read something about that, what material is being removed? making the hole larger for the cylinder to sit? taking material out so the cylinder can sit deeper? I'm not familiar with this process. In your opinion, is this less desirable then having the cylinders bored out leaving less wall material? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sactojesse Samba Member
Joined: November 21, 2006 Posts: 2655 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not my picture, just something I found in the gallery here, but you can see, with a case cut for 94 mm/92 mm thickwalls, how close the case savers for the studs are getting to the bore where the cylinders are inserted into the case:
Stock 85.5 mm and slip-in 87 mm pistons and cylinders require a 90 mm opening in the case. 90.5 mm and thinwall 92 mm cylinders require a 96 mm case opening. 94 mm and thickwall 92 mm cylinders require a 97.25 mm opening. That said, there's not much difference on the case end between 94/92 thickwalls and 90.5/92 thinwalls. The real difference is at the head end, where 94/92 thickwalls require a 3.1 mm larger cut. _________________ 1966 Karmann-Ghia convertible |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwracerdave Samba Member
Joined: November 11, 2004 Posts: 15309 Location: Deep in the 405
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
If I were building an engine that was expected to go 100,000 miles or more I would not use anything larger then 90.5mm pistons. The larger pistons will run hotter and they will not last as long. DO NOT get sucked into the 'bigger is better' crowd or the Internet crew chiefs that say '94's cost the same as 90.5's so why not go bigger'. You will not notice of feel a HP difference between a 78X90.5=2007 and a 78X92=2074. Just remember bigger gets less fuel mileage and with a 60 mile daily commute that can start adding up quickly.
Take a few days and read all the technical material from www.geneberg.com _________________ 2017 Street Comp Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble, OK
2010 Sportsman ET Champion - Mid-America Dragway - Arkansas City, KS
1997 Sportsman ET Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble ,OK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghia72 Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2011 Posts: 24 Location: Dillon, MT
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
this has a lot of good info, I had no idea those lower priced gauges where so far off (almost bought some). So lets say I do go with the 2007, living in an area with hills and temps up to 120 in the summer, should the .148" = 90.5mm compared to .163" = 85.5mm stock not be a heat concern?
GBSKIT-1-78 -- 2006CC
http://www.geneberg.com/cat.php?name=Engine%20Kit%20Deals&cPath=551
is this a 2007???
Still reading tech info, thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
c21darrel Samba Member
Joined: January 22, 2009 Posts: 8211 Location: San Dimas
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree w/ racerdave and sactojesse...2007...
Another great source of quick learning are the tech articles john at aircooled.net. wrote. Breaks everything down starting at square one. Teaches you about how to budget, what to do first, how to plan your build, how as you change one engine part what other parts are affected.
Good luck. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghia72 Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2011 Posts: 24 Location: Dillon, MT
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've actually gone through that site a few times for information, good site. any answers on the questions i sent in before? I'm almost sold on the 2007 just making sure its not going to be more prone to overheating then my stock 1600 because of the thinner cylinder walls. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwracerdave Samba Member
Joined: November 11, 2004 Posts: 15309 Location: Deep in the 405
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can assure you there are thousands and thousands of people that have gotten 100,000 miles out of 1776, 2007, and 2110 engines with 90.5mm pistons the last 40 years. The 90.5's have proven to be just as durable as the 85.5's Keep your compression ratio moderate around 8 to 8.5 and you will not have overheating problems. _________________ 2017 Street Comp Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble, OK
2010 Sportsman ET Champion - Mid-America Dragway - Arkansas City, KS
1997 Sportsman ET Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble ,OK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DET Samba Member
Joined: May 05, 2010 Posts: 3 Location: Germantown, MD
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2021 2:42 pm Post subject: Re: Building a Stroker, what should I build? |
|
|
Hi all, I am a newbie here. Great information here. Please excuse me if I hijack the thread. But could someone comment on what rod lengths are good for 74 x 90.5 and 78 x 90.5 and what type (A or B) piston for each (Mahle)? for each? Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ian Godfrey Samba Member
Joined: September 25, 2006 Posts: 1137 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2021 8:13 pm Post subject: Re: Building a Stroker, what should I build? |
|
|
I would suggest VW length with either cylinder. Or in an aftermarket rod say 5.4 or 5.5"
with a 78 stroke use B pistons, goes together fairly easily, but the case needs more work
74 is trickier, you could use A pistons and spacers under the cylinders, or B pistons 5.5 rods and shorten the cylinder length. either way there is more work making cylinder tin fit and getting push rods the right length.
I suggest either counterweighted/balanced 69 crank and A pistons or
78 crank and B pistons.
either way you will need to build and measure it to add cylinder shims or flycut heads to get the compression you need.
have a look at the CB kits which take a lot of the guesswork out
https://www.cbperformance.com/Builder-s-Choice-Engine-Kits-s/116.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DET Samba Member
Joined: May 05, 2010 Posts: 3 Location: Germantown, MD
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2021 8:44 pm Post subject: Re: Building a Stroker, what should I build? |
|
|
@Ian Godfrey ... Thank you for the feedback. It's greatly appreciated. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|