Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Panchito question
Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Danny604
Samba Member


Joined: October 09, 2019
Posts: 89
Location: Port Coquitlam BC Canada
Danny604 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 1:36 am    Post subject: Panchito question Reply with quote

I have been debating on different engine plans for my beetle, for what feels like forever. But have finally decided to build a 2054, I have read good things about the panchitos and have decided to go that route.
So far I have:
-AS41 dual relief used case
-74mm cast counterweighted crank
-94mm piston and cylinder set
-5.394 I beam rods
-FK-7 and 1.4:1 rockers, going to swap this for an FK-8
-Engle lifters
-Cromoly push rods
-Weber 44IDF’s
- 1 5/8 sidewinder
-lightweight flywheel
-1700LB pressure plate and new clutch
-All tins and doghouse setup

2 questions:
1- Anyone see any issues with the above setup
2- Running .040 deck height with the panchitos 57cc chamber give a compression ratio of 9:1 (according to online calculator) CB shows 161cfm with this chamber size. They also show it with a 61cc CNC’d chamber which lowers compression to 8.5:1 but increases are volume to 171cfm. So my question is which would make more power, or which is better, Higher compression or higher air volume?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Alstrup
Samba Member


Joined: July 12, 2007
Posts: 7207
Location: Videbaek Denmark
Alstrup is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 3:41 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

DEFINITELY go with the CNC chamber and then have the heads flycut to the volume you need. And I would go 9,5 cr for medium fuel (90 US)
_________________
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=435993
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
madmike
Samba Member


Joined: July 11, 2005
Posts: 5292
Location: Atlanta,Michigan
madmike is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 4:06 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

Cast crank ?
_________________
'Black Ice'Drag Buggy 'Turbo'
Rail Buggy 1915 turbo
76 Drag/Street bug 2180cc 'Turbo' 11:85 @113 mph"If I go any faster I'll burn up the Hamster" ,gets 28 mpg. also 10/09/22 11.90 @115 mph
"If I'm ever on Life Support,UNPLUG Me, Then Plug me back In see if that Works"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Danny604
Samba Member


Joined: October 09, 2019
Posts: 89
Location: Port Coquitlam BC Canada
Danny604 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 4:17 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

madmike wrote:
Cast crank ?


Yes, AA cast 74mm counterweight, they had a sale and I had a hole burning in my pocket, not the ideal way to buy parts, but im learning lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Danny604
Samba Member


Joined: October 09, 2019
Posts: 89
Location: Port Coquitlam BC Canada
Danny604 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 4:19 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

Alstrup wrote:
DEFINITELY go with the CNC chamber and then have the heads flycut to the volume you need. And I would go 9,5 cr for medium fuel (90 US)


I am in canada, we have 94 octane readily available, is 10:1 feasible, I have searched and searched but havent seen anything in stone about CR with FK-8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
txoval
Samba Member


Joined: January 23, 2004
Posts: 3553
Location: The Woodlands, TX
txoval is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 4:49 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

9:1 - 9.5:1 is recommended range for that cam

As Alstrup said, CB will flycut the heads to any cc you want. Go for the CNC chambers and calculate what cc you need to get 9.5:1.

Upgrade to titanium retainers and use HD aluminum pushrods

Also, if you can wait a few weeks, don’t buy the 1.4 rockers. I have a new set from CB that I could make you a deal on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
74 Thing
Samba Member


Joined: September 02, 2004
Posts: 7389

74 Thing is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 5:36 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

txoval wrote:
9:1 - 9.5:1 is recommended range for that cam

As Alstrup said, CB will flycut the heads to any cc you want. Go for the CNC chambers and calculate what cc you need to get 9.5:1.

Upgrade to titanium retainers and use HD aluminum pushrods

Also, if you can wait a few weeks, don’t buy the 1.4 rockers. I have a new set from CB that I could make you a deal on.


Get the CNC ones and have them flycut to the specs you need. They flow better. Get the matchported manifolds as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Alstrup
Samba Member


Joined: July 12, 2007
Posts: 7207
Location: Videbaek Denmark
Alstrup is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 6:41 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

txoval wrote:


Upgrade to titanium retainers and use HD aluminum pushrods


CB sgls, even with ti retainers and Ally pr´s is not enough for that cam and lift. Just go with regular dual Cb springs. But i like aluminium pr´s too.
_________________
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=435993
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
vwracerdave
Samba Member


Joined: November 11, 2004
Posts: 15297
Location: Deep in the 405
vwracerdave is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 9:39 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

With the cast crank I'd leave the FK-7 and run 8.0-8.25 compression.

I feel the limit for cast cranks are about 100 HP. I've built a 1756 & 1835 engines with cast cranks that were under 100 HP and both survived a very long life. I build a 2007 & 2020 engine with cast cranks that were more than 100 HP. I broke both of them.

If you had a forged crank I'd agree with the FK-8 suggestions.
_________________
2017 Street Comp Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble, OK
2010 Sportsman ET Champion - Mid-America Dragway - Arkansas City, KS
1997 Sportsman ET Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble ,OK
Featured in Dec. 2001 HOT VW's Magazine page 63

Watch my racing video's http://www.youtube.com/user/okvwracer/videos


Last edited by vwracerdave on Sat May 22, 2021 9:54 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
mark tucker
Samba Member


Joined: April 08, 2009
Posts: 23937
Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
mark tucker is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 9:53 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

my scat casy 78.8 crank had probably 15000 miles still std, @ 10.4-11. cr in 2 diferent cases&cc'c 1st 1874 with 11.&fk8 then lowered to 10.5,for 3 years of daily fun then into the 2028 @10.4 for 10 years of daily fun. but it was a cheep crank as we were a scat dealer and I didnt even know if I would like driving a vw... Shocked yup my first build. built like a performance V8.NO EFFING VW COMIC BOOK'S INVOLVED!. it was under carbed with the single then duel bugsprays, but the duel 44 hpms's fixed that. I would however if eye were you put a 82mm 4130 crank in yours and go for the 9.5~10.0 cr and the pan of cheetos heads.(and the B pistons too)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Danny604
Samba Member


Joined: October 09, 2019
Posts: 89
Location: Port Coquitlam BC Canada
Danny604 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 4:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

vwracerdave wrote:
With the cast crank I'd leave the FK-7 and run 8.0-8.25 compression.

I feel the limit for cast cranks are about 100 HP. I've built a 1756 & 1835 engines with cast cranks that were under 100 HP and both survived a very long life. I build a 2007 & 2020 engine with cast cranks that were more than 100 HP. I broke both of them.

If you had a forged crank I'd agree with the FK-8 suggestions.



I was worried about the crank, so at this point if I was to replace the crank, rods and pistons (probably a whole P&C set). What is the largest I can go and still use the panchitos as discussed above, 44idf’s and the 1 5/8 exhaust. And for a larger stroke Chevy journals is probably the way to go? How large can I go on venturis in the 44’s? What displacement can they support
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Alstrup
Samba Member


Joined: July 12, 2007
Posts: 7207
Location: Videbaek Denmark
Alstrup is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 5:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

You can go as large as you want, within reason, so 2275 or 2332 are the paractical large sizes.
Stanard 44 IDF´s will support 170 hp without too many fights.
That said. IMHO the Panchito´s have outlived themselves by 2165 cc. If you want power with these heads and more displacement you need ridiculesly high duration cams with moderate lift, such as f.i. the CB 2300 w. 1,25 rockers. Not my cuppa tea.
If you decide to go 2275 which is a "relatively" easy engine to build I would go for at least a set of Tims stage II or maybe a set of CB CNC oval ports which imo is a much overlooked street head. I have pulled very nice power and massive torque with these heads both in the old an especially in the new version. These heads are almost designed for the Web 86b cam.
_________________
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=435993
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
vwracerdave
Samba Member


Joined: November 11, 2004
Posts: 15297
Location: Deep in the 405
vwracerdave is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2021 7:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

44 IDF's
CNC Panchito heads
FK-8 w/1.4 rockers
1 5/8" exhaust.
5.394 I-beam rods

Using all the parts on your list, I'd consider a 2180. The TW 92's will last longer and run cooler then the 94's. That will make an awesome street car in the 165 HP range and will be a blast to drive. You could build a 2276 but I see no point in stretching things to the limit just for 10 more HP.
_________________
2017 Street Comp Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble, OK
2010 Sportsman ET Champion - Mid-America Dragway - Arkansas City, KS
1997 Sportsman ET Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble ,OK
Featured in Dec. 2001 HOT VW's Magazine page 63

Watch my racing video's http://www.youtube.com/user/okvwracer/videos
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Danny604
Samba Member


Joined: October 09, 2019
Posts: 89
Location: Port Coquitlam BC Canada
Danny604 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

Ive been pondering options for the last couple weeks and made an inventory of what I have. The combo below allows me to use the majority of parts I already have, minus heads (which i already needed) and crank

-74MM CB counterweight crank
-94mm AA PC set
-5.394 Chromoly forged rods
-Engle Lifters
-Engle FK8
-Chromoly push rods
-1.4:1 AA rockers
-Tims stage 2 plus, 42x37.5
-44IDF
-1 5/8 sidewinder
-1.5qt sump
-9.5:1 compression

Suggestions or thoughts?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Danny604
Samba Member


Joined: October 09, 2019
Posts: 89
Location: Port Coquitlam BC Canada
Danny604 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

This is going into a beetle that I drive 3-4 days a week including commuting to work. 70% city, 25% short highway trips, 5% longer highway trips. No racing planned, maybe the odd friday night but not looking to build anything geared around that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
FreeBug
Samba Member


Joined: March 12, 2012
Posts: 4278
Location: deepest, darkest Switzerland
FreeBug is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2021 12:58 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

I want to use beehive valve-springs on my next evolution. It would be a cherry on top of yours.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Ohio Tom
Samba Member


Joined: February 09, 2006
Posts: 1660
Location: Marshallville Ohio
Ohio Tom is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 5:00 am    Post subject: Re: Panchito question Reply with quote

With that cam, target 8.0/1 CR.
If you go into the 9's, you may have overheating issues.
The Panchito is a great choice.
Agreed with getting the CNC chambers. Worth the extra flow.
Will more than make up for the loss in compression.

I have built alot of 1776-1915cc motors with Panchito heads and mild cam lately.
They have power everywhere and run cool.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.