Author |
Message |
74 Thing Samba Member
Joined: September 02, 2004 Posts: 7393
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 4:56 pm Post subject: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" and if so did you encounter any problems? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
67rustavenger Samba Member
Joined: February 24, 2015 Posts: 9772 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 5:24 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
Nope!
You could get some "Play-Doh" from the Dollar Store and place some on top of a piston. Then install a head and valve train bits and cycle through a full revolution.
See just how close the valves are to the piston tops. Depending on the cam and lifters, You could be ok. Or find out that all hell is gonna break loose if you run that tight. _________________ I have learned over the years.
Cheap parts are gonna disappoint you.
Buy Once, Cry Once!
There's never enough time to do it right the first time. But there's always enough time to do it thrice.
GFY's Xevin and VW_Jimbo! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
txoval Samba Member
Joined: January 23, 2004 Posts: 3552 Location: The Woodlands, TX
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 5:25 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
I ran a .037 deck on my Okrasa engine, but that’s closer to .040
Valve clearance shouldn’t be an issue |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oprn Samba Member
Joined: November 13, 2016 Posts: 12740 Location: Western Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 5:58 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
My last engine came out at .037" deck, I don't normally use them but I put the paper gaskets under the cylinders to gain a wee bit more. So far so good! _________________ We had the stone age, the bronze age, the industrial age and now we are in the age of mass deception and mind control for corporate profit. (The mass media age) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tattooed_pariah Samba Member
Joined: April 24, 2006 Posts: 2047 Location: El Cajon, CA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:01 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
So due to a series of mistakes while rebuilding my 1776 like 10 years ago.. i wound up only putting like 700 miles on it before rebuilding it again about 5 years ago.. I was living in an area where i couldn't find a machine shop that i trusted with VW heads, so I put it together the best I could..
IIRC I am currently running with a deck of about .021
I know you should never run anything less than like .026, but I did it anyway, and so far I haven't had any issues.. I am just VERY careful when adjusting timing because I know if i go too far either direction I will probably smack a valve.. :/ _________________ -pariah (just a novice from "that other VW site")
'72 Volksrod "Effigy"
"Never worry about stepping on people's toes. People who get their toes stepped on are either sitting down, or standing still on the job."
-Admiral Arleigh Burke, USN(ret.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vanapplebomb Samba Member
Joined: November 03, 2010 Posts: 5417 Location: Holland, MI
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:24 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
74 Thing wrote: |
Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030” |
Always. I shoot for 0.030 every time.
74 Thing wrote: |
… and if so did you encounter any problems? |
Nope.
With a good case and nice fitting set of bearings, it is no problem.
Always set compression ratio with the chamber volume (and piston crown if dished/domed pistons)… I cringe every time someone builds an engine with a big deck just to get compression down to where they want it.
If you have loose bearing clearance, or a questionable case, or are not confident in your measuring skills, go for 0.040 just to be safe. This is the largest deck I have ever used. Beyond 0.040, things seem less efficient, and I often find that big decks tend to run hotter and like more advance.
Everyone has their own way of doing things. This is just me. _________________ 1800 Type 4 Berrien 295
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=487021 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tattooed_pariah Samba Member
Joined: April 24, 2006 Posts: 2047 Location: El Cajon, CA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
Vanapplebomb wrote: |
74 Thing wrote: |
Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" and if so did you encounter any problems? |
I cringe every time someone builds an engine with a big deck just to get compression down to where they want it.
|
I forgot to mention in my other post... pre-first-rebuild, my engine was set for 10:1CR.. i cracked a head due to an exhaust leak, and so was aiming for 10:1 again, that's why i didn't want to shim it to increase deck height for safety.. At .021 I was able to get like 8.9:1... not what I wanted, but it runs strong enough for now.. _________________ -pariah (just a novice from "that other VW site")
'72 Volksrod "Effigy"
"Never worry about stepping on people's toes. People who get their toes stepped on are either sitting down, or standing still on the job."
-Admiral Arleigh Burke, USN(ret.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nsracing Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2003 Posts: 9480 Location: NOVA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:36 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
For race-only engines, I have run 0.028- 0.030" deck.
But for street engines, I stick to 0.038- 0.040" -rule. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian_e Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2009 Posts: 3293 Location: Rapid City, SD
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:07 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
I think a lot of it has to do with measuring skills, and how it was done.
One guys .028 might be another guys .040. Is everyone measuring at the center of the piston? Rings or no rings, feeler gauges or depth mic, torqued or not......
I have .038 on an 1835cc, and it’s great.
Brian _________________ www.type-emotorsports.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pruneman99 Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2012 Posts: 5013 Location: Oceanside
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:40 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
tattooed_pariah wrote: |
I know you should never run anything less than like .026, but I did it anyway, and so far I haven't had any issues.. I am just VERY careful when adjusting timing because I know if i go too far either direction I will probably smack a valve.. :/ |
Valve timing and ignition timing are not related. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bugguy1967 Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2008 Posts: 4343 Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:07 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
.038" in my 96 bore Type 1. _________________ "A petrol engine can start readily, run smoothly and give every appearance of being in good order, without necessarily being in good tune." - Colin Campbell, "The Sportscar Engine" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jpaull Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3466 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:05 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
Brian_e wrote: |
I think a lot of it has to do with measuring skills, and how it was done.
One guys .028 might be another guys .040. Is everyone measuring at the center of the piston? Rings or no rings, feeler gauges or depth mic, torqued or not......
I have .038 on an 1835cc, and it’s great.
Brian |
Thats the real scoop right there!
There has been so many times people post a thread saying "Im getting different reading between cylinders, what should i do". And people give advice like swapping rods/cylinders, and the frustration continues only to find out the engine was perfect all along, and the only problem was within the person measuring. _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evanfrucht Samba Member
Joined: July 24, 2016 Posts: 2180 Location: Laurel Canyon, CA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:18 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
I'm running 0.038 too Nothing's happened yet... _________________ 1967 Bug ( the daily rod )
1964 Fury Wagon ( the pavement shredder ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wreck Samba Member
Joined: July 19, 2014 Posts: 1218 Location: Brisbane
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:36 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
You don’t need expensive tools either . I just use a piece of aluminium billet bolted diagonally across the bore and loose feeler gauges .
A little fiddly any not the best with dished pistons but it is accurate .
I’ve 0.003 deck with a 1mm copper gasket , they have been annealed and reused at least 4 times so would be well under 0.040 now . Last time I pulled a head off there was no evidence of contact . Considering a fair coating of carbon as well .
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
FreeBug Samba Member
Joined: March 12, 2012 Posts: 4278 Location: deepest, darkest Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:13 am Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
Are you guy seeing the shape of the combustion chamber printed in carbon on the piston top? Like ALL the combustion is happening in the chamber? with the edges of the piston top very clean...?
I have a very nice tool for measuring., and will run 0.97-0.96 in my latest build, so, not much lower than 38... I have street engines, tens of thousands of miles expected from the builds, My ability to measure things was pretty bad for toooo long.... and I'm chicken.
And at some point, why? The desired squish/quench needs are met.....why go looking for trouble trying to get the piston to kiss the head? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FreeBug Samba Member
Joined: March 12, 2012 Posts: 4278 Location: deepest, darkest Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:25 am Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
When I saw those jugs, something happened in my pants. Seriously. I want those. To hold them and fell how much they weigh. they must be very light. Do we have any info on the cylinder/head cooling ratio? I imagine, if you use those cylinders, you would want to direct more air to them? Although, it makes sense not to, just let them do what the iron cylinders do, which the alloys will just inherently do better simply due to their nature...Beautiful just beautiful, a lot of work to get porky cylinders on a flat 4. My envy is beginning to tip towards jealousy.
and now back to scheduled programming... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wreck Samba Member
Joined: July 19, 2014 Posts: 1218 Location: Brisbane
|
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:42 am Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
FreeBug wrote: |
When I saw those jugs, something happened in my pants. Seriously. I want those. To hold them and fell how much they weigh. they must be very light. Do we have any info on the cylinder/head cooling ratio? I imagine, if you use those cylinders, you would want to direct more air to them? Although, it makes sense not to, just let them do what the iron cylinders do, which the alloys will just inherently do better simply due to their nature...Beautiful just beautiful, a lot of work to get porky cylinders on a flat 4. My envy is beginning to tip towards jealousy.
and now back to scheduled programming... |
just 912 Deutz diesel cylinders, very common in the performance Type 4 world . The pistons are upside down in this photo though |
|
Back to top |
|
|
slayer61 Samba Member
Joined: June 01, 2021 Posts: 1018 Location: CA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2021 7:33 am Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
Wreck wrote: |
FreeBug wrote: |
When I saw those jugs, something happened in my pants. Seriously. I want those. To hold them and fell how much they weigh. they must be very light. Do we have any info on the cylinder/head cooling ratio? I imagine, if you use those cylinders, you would want to direct more air to them? Although, it makes sense not to, just let them do what the iron cylinders do, which the alloys will just inherently do better simply due to their nature...Beautiful just beautiful, a lot of work to get porky cylinders on a flat 4. My envy is beginning to tip towards jealousy.
and now back to scheduled programming... |
just 912 Deutz diesel cylinders, very common in the performance Type 4 world . The pistons are upside down in this photo though |
Of course they're "up-side-down"! Your location is a dead give-away!
I have never heard of a 912 diesel. I was expecting to see a European Porsche of some kind.... It's a tractor for gawd's sake! How cool is that! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alstrup Samba Member
Joined: July 12, 2007 Posts: 7219 Location: Videbaek Denmark
|
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2021 7:57 am Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
When we are talking super tight decks the subject becomes a little diffuse, because then we really need to know 2 things. 1. Which type of piston. And 2. Where do you measure.
Almost all cheaper pistons, even regular Mahle are a hairswidth domed. So if you measue dead in the middle of the piston you will get one reading. If you measure in the sides above the piston pin you will get another reading, which is higher. A true 0,030" measured at the cylinderwalls is at the very limit. 0,030" measured at the center of the piston you can probably get away with. True forged pistons are usually flat. So there the numbers should equall each other, +/- the inaccuracy in the rod bushings.
It is also somewhat bore related as Wreck mentioned (I thinK) The larger the bore the more deck you need in order to prevent the pistons from "tilting" into touching the heads.
In an all out dragrace engine you would find the perfect deck by trial & error. You will keep lowering it until the you can see that the pistons juuuust touches the cylinderheads in the squish areas, - or at least knocks the soot away so you have a clear shape or "drawing "of the combustion chamber on the piston top.
On a street engine you would naturally not go that tight. I have experimented a little in that direction, and I have found no real gain in anything by going lower than 1 mm (0,039") unless you go all out to race specs. You can see a slight improvement on the HC and noX, but it is minor. _________________ https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=435993 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M. Notary Samba Member
Joined: February 19, 2004 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:11 pm Post subject: Re: Have you ever run a really tight deck height like .030" |
|
|
OK.. I can't. But I had to leave something.
Anything less than 0.037 will leave a mark. You can go less but everything takes a beating.
Does anyone here have an assembly manual and read it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|