| Author |
Message |
kell1968 Samba Member
Joined: June 06, 2009 Posts: 68 Location: Richmond, VA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| When you going on this trip. My brother and I are planning on the same thing. We plan (hope) to do the whole Pan American highway. Would be cool to have a third. If we get tired of each other, well we all have our own vehicles... If we have a problem with one vehicle... Well we may have two more |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bugguy1967 Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2008 Posts: 4368 Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe the compression needs to be a tad lower with a single. Just making sure that you are aware of this. _________________ "A petrol engine can start readily, run smoothly and give every appearance of being in good order, without necessarily being in good tune." - Colin Campbell, "The Sportscar Engine" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
travelvw Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2004 Posts: 916 Location: Ozarks
|
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks,
K |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sactojesse Samba Member

Joined: November 21, 2006 Posts: 2655 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:42 pm Post subject: Re: Bus stroker motor advice based on parts accumulated: 94x |
|
|
| KevinMc wrote: |
| sactojesse wrote: |
| KevinMc wrote: |
I will not be convinced on dual carbs; I've tried it both ways, so I'm not interested in that argument  |
Listen to the experts. I'm no expert, but your Luddite approach, i.e., irrational fear of dual carbs, is compromising your build. If you want all-around driveability, your best bet is with dual IDFs or DRLAs. You will bet better mpg as well. |
This is my build, not theirs. I am not normal, so don't worry about me . Interesting you know all about my fear of duals; I've run them more often than not, for many, many miles.
This will not be a street/strip racer. We will eventually be driving this rig to Alaska and back, often to the middle of nowhere out West, with lots of camping and offroading on a regular basis.
A single carb is somewhat restrictive, yes. It moves the power band lower, duals move it up. One carb means no linkage, half the potential for clogged jets and such, less than half the parts, and a super sweet sheathed cable setup, so no clogged or frozen accelerator cables. Driving rough trails for long periods of time, I have had zero flooding issues with a single center mount... just a clogged idle jet once after months of desert dust conditions. Its the only carb setup in 20k miles I've basically never had to screw with from sea level to 10k feet, cold, hot, doesn't matter: absolute reliability. This is of the utmost importance to me, not power. |
My apologies. I stand corrected. I had thought your insistence on running a centermount IDF was based on ignorance, as is the case with the vast majority of similar threads I see. However, your logic makes sense to me once you explained it, particularly the part about extensive off-road usage. Please carry on with your "abnormal" build.  _________________ 1966 Karmann-Ghia convertible |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stingah2 Samba Member

Joined: March 26, 2005 Posts: 192 Location: High altitude
|
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kevin, if there's one thing about you it's that you are not normal. Normal is boring. I have run duals on everything for 20 years but for what you do I really can see and appreciate that a single is a great choice. I personally like your abnormal build  _________________ 62 Singlecab - I kinda like it
76 wanna be Porsche
Rust never sleeps, Stainless never rusts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
travelvw Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2004 Posts: 916 Location: Ozarks
|
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:31 am Post subject: Re: Bus stroker motor advice based on parts accumulated: 94x |
|
|
| sactojesse wrote: |
| KevinMc wrote: |
I will not be convinced on dual carbs; I've tried it both ways, so I'm not interested in that argument  |
Listen to the experts. I'm no expert, but your Luddite approach, i.e., irrational fear of dual carbs, is compromising your build. If you want all-around driveability, your best bet is with dual IDFs or DRLAs. You will bet better mpg as well. |
This is my build, not theirs. I am not normal, so don't worry about me . Interesting you know all about my fear of duals; I've run them more often than not, for many, many miles.
This will not be a street/strip racer. We will eventually be driving this rig to Alaska and back, often to the middle of nowhere out West, with lots of camping and offroading on a regular basis.
A single carb is somewhat restrictive, yes. It moves the power band lower, duals move it up. One carb means no linkage, half the potential for clogged jets and such, less than half the parts, and a super sweet sheathed cable setup, so no clogged or frozen accelerator cables. Driving rough trails for long periods of time, I have had zero flooding issues with a single center mount... just a clogged idle jet once after months of desert dust conditions. Its the only carb setup in 20k miles I've basically never had to screw with from sea level to 10k feet, cold, hot, doesn't matter: absolute reliability. This is of the utmost importance to me, not power. The following setup is more than enough:
2180cc
*Fan shroud TBD (DTM/Thing)
*Single Weber 44 (32-34 venturi etc)
*DRD 40x35.5 dual spring heads cut 94mm
*CR TBD (8-9:1)
*CB solid shaft rockers stock ratio
*AA 92mm super thick walls
*4340 5.4" VW rods
*Aluminum case, cut 94mm, full flow
*4340 82mm crank
*Cam TBD (-286 adv, -250@50)
*CB forged flywheel, Kennedy stage 1
Appreciate all the good advice from everyone.
K |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sactojesse Samba Member

Joined: November 21, 2006 Posts: 2655 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 9:18 pm Post subject: Re: Bus stroker motor advice based on parts accumulated: 94x |
|
|
| KevinMc wrote: |
I will not be convinced on dual carbs; I've tried it both ways, so I'm not interested in that argument  |
Listen to the experts. I'm no expert, but your Luddite approach, i.e., irrational fear of dual carbs, is compromising your build. If you want all-around driveability, your best bet is with dual IDFs or DRLAs. You will bet better mpg as well. _________________ 1966 Karmann-Ghia convertible |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luckystiff Samba Member
Joined: September 28, 2005 Posts: 2252 Location: hickory,nc
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
they do also offer chevy/buick journal'd but i think only in maybe 5.5, 5.6 or something like that. so yeah all longer choices.
oddly enough i ended up digging those up because CB was out of the unitechs when i was ordering parts. after dealing with them i wish i would have known that before i bought my crank from CB as i probably would have ordered my crank from them also. great folks to deal with, nice products for a reasonable price, and fast shipping. i ordered my rods on a friday and they were here the following monday....ken.... _________________ ITMC
Secret Service |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jfats808 Samba Member

Joined: December 10, 2007 Posts: 5022 Location: oahu hawaii
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| luckystiff wrote: |
| [email protected] wrote: |
SCAT rods are outstanding, all the "no-name" rods try to achieve SCAT's level of quality, and rarely do. They are an excellent choice, for another $20 over the generic versions.
5.4" is the proper length for an 82mm crank and B pistons. You will NOT have a loss of low end with a "big" cam because of the stroke increase. One counters the other.
I'd go with dual 2bbls and an Engle 120, and 9:1 CR. Will run very well. |
i deff don't want to make this seem argumentative but have you seen the Revmaster I Beams? my buddy was building a 1955 for another friend alongside building my 2021. i used revmasters he used scats and everybody that saw them liked the revmastersrods more and the scats needed a bit of work when it came balancing time and the revmasters were dead on out of the box. maybe i got lucky or maybe his were and unusual set for scats but i'd have to say for the price i put the revmasters right there with them. if you haven't seen them they are surely worth checking out...ken.... |
Ive take a look at those rods for a build before but the major limitation is they only list a 5.5 vw journal rod. To complement a wider range of combos, it would be nice if they offered 5.4 /5.5 vw and chevy journal versions. For the price and 4340 quality 125.00 shipped is a decent price. _________________ 2276 IDA's 86C 11-1 DD
| Rockstar Suzuki wrote: |
You might as well put 10 year build in your bullshit sig, as it will NEVER run. Also your a dick |
You can always learn something new, even from a fool.
Check your oil levels routinely! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luckystiff Samba Member
Joined: September 28, 2005 Posts: 2252 Location: hickory,nc
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| [email protected] wrote: |
SCAT rods are outstanding, all the "no-name" rods try to achieve SCAT's level of quality, and rarely do. They are an excellent choice, for another $20 over the generic versions.
5.4" is the proper length for an 82mm crank and B pistons. You will NOT have a loss of low end with a "big" cam because of the stroke increase. One counters the other.
I'd go with dual 2bbls and an Engle 120, and 9:1 CR. Will run very well. |
i deff don't want to make this seem argumentative but have you seen the Revmaster I Beams? my buddy was building a 1955 for another friend alongside building my 2021. i used revmasters he used scats and everybody that saw them liked the revmasters more and the scats needed a bit of work when it came balancing time and the revmasters were dead on out of the box. maybe i got lucky or maybe his were and unusual set for scats but i'd have to say for the price i put the revmasters right there with them. if you haven't seen them they are surely worth checking out...ken.... _________________ ITMC
Secret Service |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
travelvw Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2004 Posts: 916 Location: Ozarks
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks again, great info. I will probably go with a single 44 and drop the venturi.
These are the specs on the cam I was most happy with:
Adv. Duration 274°
Dur. @ .050" 222°
Lift @ cam .359"
Lift w/1.1:1 Rocker Arms .394"
K |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected] Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
With a single IDF do not go bigger than 286 adv duration, which is the Engle W110, or SCAT C35. You need a venturi in the 32-34mm range. The 40 IDF comes with a 28, and the 44 comes with a 36. So in either case you need to make a carb change to optimize everything. _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
travelvw Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2004 Posts: 916 Location: Ozarks
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, sounds like I've already got my rods. Great!
That's kinda what I was thinking about cam choice: what appears "bad" on a small engine, may work great on a larger engine... something I am not familiar with. That said, a 120 looks to be a little on the mid-to high, even in a big engine... also not really what I'm looking for. Might work better with dual carbs, but I'm running a single Weber IDF... so, what size? 44, 48? I am not running duals, even if everyone else in the world would .
C35 was a typo... I actually have the C45, which is not at all where I want to be on this build.
I will consider upping the CR. Curious as to what a typical ratio is with 82 and B's on a new case, no flycut?
I will likely have the case clearanced locally for an 82mm crank. Thanks,
K |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected] Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
SCAT rods are outstanding, all the "no-name" rods try to achieve SCAT's level of quality, and rarely do. They are an excellent choice, for another $20 over the generic versions.
5.4" is the proper length for an 82mm crank and B pistons. You will NOT have a loss of low end with a "big" cam because of the stroke increase. One counters the other.
I'd go with dual 2bbls and an Engle 120, and 9:1 CR. Will run very well. _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luckystiff Samba Member
Joined: September 28, 2005 Posts: 2252 Location: hickory,nc
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
like the guy in the other thread about cam choice don't limit that stroker based on gas thats $0.20 cheaper per gallon. as i said in that thread you're talking $2-3 more per fill up for the ability to bump that cr in the 9:1+ range and use that engine like it can be. i know theres plenty of folks that have and do build low cr strokers. to each their own. theres also guy that build small HIGH compression engines putting out buttloads of power.
the scat c35 is pretty similar is specs to a engle 110. if the objective is to use as much of what you have it may fit into that low cr build range you are talking.
is the case stroker clearanced? if not you'll probably either want to send it to someone to be done so or i've heard several say that 82mm with buick journals and a nice set of H beams puts you in the by hand at home clearance range. cheaper to send the case out for stroker clearancing though...ken.... _________________ ITMC
Secret Service |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
travelvw Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2004 Posts: 916 Location: Ozarks
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you John, I will grab a set of thick 92 B's from you (94x94 cut), and an 82 stroke crank: 2180 it is! Perfect. I'm guessing this takes stock length rods 5.4" for a mild compression motor?...will the 4340 Scat I-beam set I have be a good choice? Does 8:1 compression sound about right to everyone for running cheap gas? My last few engine builds have been 7.8- 8.2:1, and they ran fine on 87. That said, the engine size was much smaller. I don't want to be creating excessive heat.
Any more info on cam choice... particularly valve lift?... what numbers qualify as "low lift", and how does that effect things?
Mark, unlike most folks, I don't need the power band up high. I want it to kick in right away and fade out by 4k or so. I do very limited interstate driving, especially in traffic. Again, not looking to limit myself, but put the power band in the right place for me: very low range to mid-high at most.
K |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23945 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I built a motor for a guys SC ,it tends to see some rpm. as does his bus. do not cut your self off at the knees, it's not any cheeper but it can be disastorious.remember your foot governs the motor.use what you need when you need it. if you need it and dont have it,better hope that big truck has real good brakes&a light load, cause he's fixen to squash the crap out of you.......or pull away from him like he is in reverse.the choice is yours. build it right & it will last. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected] Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
travelvw Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2004 Posts: 916 Location: Ozarks
|
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't plan on needing much power past 3500 rpm... probably won't even rev past 4k.
The j's I have look to measure about 1 3/8". Haven't chose the header/muffler yet. Sounds like I'm going to have to move up in size . I don't need anything fancy, as I'll have to customize for clearance and will probably beat it on rocks anyhow.
It looks like 82mm is the "easy" B piston builld... I originally thought it was 78mm.
92mm thick B's are preferred if it fits my heads. I'm guessing they are 90.5mm case, 94mm head?
Thanks for the cam duration advice. Why ratio rockers? I thought they directly relate to the cam and lift and were a "patch" instead of changing out the cam?
K |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23945 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thick wall 92's and 82 stroke,.040" deck(piston to head clearance) low lift cam around [email protected] & 1.25 ~1.33 ratio rockers. add the extra oil galy&slot the lifter bores.deburr the lobe edges. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|