Author |
Message |
angelchild Samba Member
Joined: July 06, 2004 Posts: 223 Location: Newfoundland, CANADA
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:03 pm Post subject: 1.9 Manual vs. 2.1 Automatic |
|
|
...looking at an '85 1.9 w/ Manual 4 speed
VS. '86 2.1 w/ Automatic 3 speed
...which has more get up and go power
& highway cruzing (how does the 3 speed auto do on our 65 mph min. speed limit freeways) capability?
and any problems encountered more on one or the other..? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Towel Rail Horizontally Opposed
Joined: April 15, 2005 Posts: 4622 Location: SE CR IA US NA PE
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd pick the manual on general principle.
- Scott _________________ 1974 Thing -- under the knife
1967 Beetle -- spring/summer/fall driver
1996 Subaru OBW (EJ22, 5-speed, AWD) -- winter car, 3-seasons "don't feel like biking today" car
049 > 070 > 053 > 009 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: July 14, 2003 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:55 pm Post subject: Re: 1.9 Manual vs. 2.1 Automatic |
|
|
[quote="angelchild"]...looking at an '85 1.9 w/ Manual 4 speed
VS. '86 2.1 w/ Automatic 3 speed
...which has more get up and go power
& highway cruzing (how does the 3 speed auto do on our 65 mph min. speed limit freeways) capability?
I would go with the 2.1 automatic.
I have a 84 1.9 Westy automatic and a 87 syncro.
The 1.9 Westy only does 65 downhill.
Synco did (right now the engine is apart) 70 mph comfortably according to gps.
Neal |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|