Author |
Message |
Sigurd Samba Member
Joined: April 18, 2006 Posts: 2639 Location: Rockford, IL
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:21 pm Post subject: Is 8.6:1 too low for a W120? |
|
|
Just a quick issue I'd like to get some confirmation on. I have L5 heads with 55cc chambers. If I set the deck to 0.045" without touching the heads, how's my CR sound? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gerg a.k.a. 6volt65
Joined: April 25, 2003 Posts: 5454 Location: Monroe, LA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Need to know bore and stroke . . . _________________ Gerg
. . . I got 99 problems and my bus ain't one . . .
'65 Sunroof Beetle
'65 Vert
'60 Singlecab |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dubkrzy Samba Member
Joined: July 02, 2006 Posts: 485 Location: One step behind
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like Gerg said, but no, 8.6:1 is not too low for a w120 _________________
vwracerdave wrote: |
always modify the cheapest part and never modify the most expensive part. |
Glenn wrote: |
Sure... you can take a grinder to them. You can also use an adjustable wrench to assemble it. |
Jake Raby wrote: |
That looks like Tom Jones |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sigurd Samba Member
Joined: April 18, 2006 Posts: 2639 Location: Rockford, IL
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Duh, sorry. 1915...69 x 94. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gerg a.k.a. 6volt65
Joined: April 25, 2003 Posts: 5454 Location: Monroe, LA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
8.6 sounds nice and cool especially if it is in a bus.
What is it going in? _________________ Gerg
. . . I got 99 problems and my bus ain't one . . .
'65 Sunroof Beetle
'65 Vert
'60 Singlecab |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sigurd Samba Member
Joined: April 18, 2006 Posts: 2639 Location: Rockford, IL
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's going in my '66 Bug. Can I close the deck down to 0.040" with Mahles and Unitech rods? That would be 8.7:1. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
madmike Samba Member
Joined: July 11, 2005 Posts: 5292 Location: Atlanta,Michigan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a cpl engines with that cam and the higher the cr the better they run,I'm thinking there O'school when the Gas was a better grade??? My 2332 is around 10.5 to 1 or 11:1 I cant' remember Runs way better on Race fuel,and the 1915 is about 8.5 to 1 just not as snappy as i wanted so I'm tairing it down someday,madmike _________________ 'Black Ice'Drag Buggy 'Turbo'
Rail Buggy 1915 turbo
76 Drag/Street bug 2180cc 'Turbo' 11:85 @113 mph"If I go any faster I'll burn up the Hamster" ,gets 28 mpg. also 10/09/22 11.90 @115 mph
"If I'm ever on Life Support,UNPLUG Me, Then Plug me back In see if that Works" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joescoolcustoms Samba Member
Joined: August 08, 2006 Posts: 9054 Location: West By God Virginia
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Can I close the deck down to 0.040 |
That is very tight for a street engine. I little wear and the piston and head could be "kissin cuzens".
If it is a race engine that gets regular maintenace teardowns, OK.
I would go with 0.060 minimum. Just my opinion.
BTW, I ran a W120 in a 1915 from 1986 to 1989 putting about 108,000 miles on it with 7.8 compression. Would outrun a '85 vette from 0 to 60. ('85 vettes sucked on power, but still impressive for a bug in 1986) _________________ Bad News Racing 2018 NORRA 1000 3rd in Class
Best Day Ever Racing 2022 NORRA 1000 2nd in Class and first All Female team to complete the race
Everyone is gifted. Some just do not open the package.
Looks like it was painted with a live chicken,polished with a brick and buffed with a pine cone |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sigurd Samba Member
Joined: April 18, 2006 Posts: 2639 Location: Rockford, IL
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, well maybe I'll keep it at 0.050" then and get the heads cut a bit. Darn. I was hoping for 9:1. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cal63look Samba Member
Joined: January 14, 2006 Posts: 1027 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I run the Engle 120 and my CR is at 8.9 with a deck of .040, also engine is turbo charged. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sigurd Samba Member
Joined: April 18, 2006 Posts: 2639 Location: Rockford, IL
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the comments guys. Maybe a better question to ask is, is the power vs. heat difference between 8.5 and 9 worth it? Or does that cam just need more? This is for a street car that sees weekend use and won't be raced. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cal63look Samba Member
Joined: January 14, 2006 Posts: 1027 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With a higher CR motor you will need to run premium fuel. I do not have any heat issues with my CR and turbo setup (and the motor is fully chromed out). I run an oil pressure gauge, oil temp gauge, tach, electronic fuel pressure gauge and boost gauge. Of course you wouldnt need the last two But I have driven my car daily and as a weekend warrior with no issues of heat. I have never checked the head temps but the car runs great (and no signs of extreme head temps). The cam will use the CR properly because you'll be running it in its intended range of CR. Before my motor was turbo'd I ran a 2020cc and the CR was at 9.1, no issues of heat with that setup either. Car was well mannered and was a Daily driver with that setting also. I have driven my bug from drag strip to home, aswell as driven it to vw shows that are about 100miles away from my city (one way). Also driven it to different mountain areas here in colorado.
My car will idle great at about 800-900 rpms. Very well mannered. I still find it funny that some people will run such low CR's with turbo setups, but that a whole other story of Boost versus CR (dont really apply to your question)
Just make sure you have a doghouse oil/fan setup, fan belt is properly tightened (run all the proper cooling tin, dont use a power pulley), full flow your motor, and run a deep sump. Also you'll want to also tweek your timing for the increase in CR. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cal63look Samba Member
Joined: January 14, 2006 Posts: 1027 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also i forgot to add, you'll have to run the numbers and measure everything for deck height and the cc's of your heads (which is sounds like you have). You dont want to try and acheive a high'er CR with a super tight deck height, then you may be asking for trouble. Oh and as a side note I run 1.25 ratio rockers with the W120 along with the deck of .040 which further increases my lift. Also you need to run chromoly pushrods with those dual valve springs that are hopefully in your heads. Set the lash on those to a loose zero, where you can just spin them with your finger. The motor will expand around those to achieve the lash you need.
You may already know this stuff, but just throwing things out here as I think of them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sigurd Samba Member
Joined: April 18, 2006 Posts: 2639 Location: Rockford, IL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am running oil temp., oil pressure, and a compensated head temp. gauge. The engine is full-flowed and will use full tin and thermostat, all of which I have in boxes waiting for me. I have a sump, but am thinking of not using it because I am lowered and this isn't a race engine. Still on the fence about it though. Pushrods are chromoly and rockers are 1.25.
I hae checked everything, and the parts are fine, except for the case. Current values are 0.058", 0.054", 0.060", 0.052". I did measure the cc, deck, piston height, rod length, cylinder length, all that. I can't even switch pistons and rods because they are all dead nuts on! The head ccs are 53/53 in one head and 54.2/53 in the other. All said, each cylinder is only 0.1 difference, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7. But I can't have uneven cylinders because the heads won't seal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|