Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts  See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
Making sense of bump/rebound settings
Forum Index -> Vintage Speed Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Samba Member

Joined: May 08, 2004
Posts: 1385
Location: San Carlos, CA
gimmesomeshelter is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:13 pm    Post subject: Making sense of bump/rebound settings Reply with quote


Iíve stumbled across come bump/rebound data for various Koni shocks, but I'm having trouble understanding what it means.

First, I've posted a link to a chart displaying rebound/bump data for Koni shocks meant for a 356. In general the trend was to have a softer shock. The final ones left the factory with rebound/bump settings of 140/20 (front) & 80/20 (rear).


Here is a link to a page on RatWell's site:


If you look at the settings for the 80-1349 and 80-1350's you will notice two things. First, the ratio of rebound/bump is much lower. Second, the rear shocks are, unlike the shocks for a 356, stiffer than the front.

I contacted Koni and asked them for the valve settings of these four shocks. While they were very helpful, they weren't quite ready to hand over all their valving data to just anyone with an email account. Wink They confirmed that the 356 front shocks have softer bump settings than a comparable front VW shock. They also confirmed that the rear shocks for a 356 are softer than the rear shocks for a VW.

So what does this all mean? I suspect that a shock with a softer bump setting will provide a softer ride...but why would Koni have such stiff settings on a 'people mover' type car like a VW? Did Porsche get all the R&D time and VW get a quick once over? If I want my VW to drive like a 356, should I try to mimic the Koni shock settings used on a 356?


My dog's vet has all my car money (http://sagecenters.com/)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
henry roberts
Samba Member

Joined: February 24, 2003
Posts: 1179
Location: australia
henry roberts is online now 

PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i'm only taking a stab in the dark but...

wouldn't both the sprung to unsprung weight ratio and the front to rear weight bias be different between a beetle and a 356 hence different settings, plus the intended speed range of each vehicle.

from memory i've read that you can run a softer shock on a car with a higher ratio of sprung to unsprung weight while retaining the same road surface tracking. (no idea if a 356's has a higher ratio than a beetle though)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Vintage Speed All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2018, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB