Author |
Message |
regis101 Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2005 Posts: 2078 Location: Livermore, Ca
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:02 pm Post subject: 72 - 79 differences |
|
|
I tried the search. Maybe I didn't word my query properly. I did read a few threads, though.
I'm on the prowl for a 73-75 Bus. I can swap over the drivetrain from our 78 if needed to make a driver out of it so I can garage the 78 for some much needed love. Planned on dropping it anyway for seals and whatnot.
IIRC, there are some chassis or mount differences in the 72 that will not allow the 78's drivetrain to be swapped? I think there was a thread about this. If not here then somewhere else?
Thanks, _________________ Peace, Regis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VDubTech Samba Member
Joined: December 29, 2002 Posts: 9142 Location: Syracuse, NY
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Drivetrain will swap between any 72-79 Bus just fine. _________________ First Trip in the RustyBus:
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=279077&highlight=
borninabus wrote: |
a measurement of your rod would be extremely useful. |
notchboy wrote: |
my dad wasnt a belittling cock when he tought me how to wrench on cars. |
EverettB wrote: |
One photo = good for reference.
10 photos = douchebaggery |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
regis101 Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2005 Posts: 2078 Location: Livermore, Ca
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cool. Thanks. I've been browsing around on the Type2 and Ratwell's site(s)
also. _________________ Peace, Regis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Amskeptic Samba Member
Joined: October 18, 2002 Posts: 8568 Location: All Across The Country
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VDubTech wrote: |
Drivetrain will swap between any 72-79 Bus just fine. |
With the '72 One Year Only articulated rear gearshift rod, are there any dimensional issues, Vdubtech? _________________ www.itinerant-air-cooled.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
regis101 Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2005 Posts: 2078 Location: Livermore, Ca
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Amskeptic wrote: |
With the '72 One Year Only articulated rear gearshift rod, are there any dimensional issues |
Maybe this is what I was trying to think of. I'll see if BusBoys has an exploded view or part numbers or something.
As for my deal, I'd feel more comfy with a 73-75 just to avoid any one year only items. _________________ Peace, Regis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
regis101 Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2005 Posts: 2078 Location: Livermore, Ca
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More subtleties than I would've thought. Copied from Bus Boys. Item K may be an issue.
Perhaps the frame is similar enough that one would be able to make things work if using a 72 Bus with the later drive train.. Nothing is usually a straight swap.
A. 141-711-141D Shift Knob, Black $4.80
B. 111-711-115A Shifter Boot, Black $5.70
C. 211-798-121 Shifter Assembly, New (Approximately 2 inches shorter than the original) $29.00
D. 211-711-149 Shifter Stop Plate $3.65
E. 211-711-197 Front Shift Rod Bushing, 1968 to 1973 (Only Available in Kit 211-711-211 $16.30)
F. 211-711-182 Front Shift Rod Bushing, 1974 to 1979 $12.70
G. 211-711-155EU Front Shift Rod, Used, 1968 to 1972 (To Chassis #212 2300 000) CALL
G. 211-711-155GU Front Shift Rod, Used, 1973 (Chassis #213 2000 001 to 213 2300 000) CALL
G. 211-711-155FU Front Shift Rod, Used, 1974 to 1975 (Chassis #214 2000 001 to 215 2300 000) CALL
G. 211-711-155HU Front Shift Rod, Used, 1976 to 1979 (From Chassis #216 2000 001) CALL
H. 211-711-169A Front Shift Rod Coupler $12.50
J. 211-711-189A Coupler Screw $1.85
K. 211-711-171DU Rear Shift Rod, Used, 1968 to 1972 (To Chassis #212 2300 000) CALL
K. 211-711-171LU Rear Shift Rod, Used, 1973 to 1979 (From Chassis #213 2000 001) CALL
L. 211-711-185B Bushing, Front of Rear Shift Rod (Only Available in Kit 211-711-211 $16.30)
M. 211-711-179 Bushing, Rear of Rear Shift Rod, 1968 to 1977 (To Chassis #217 2053 838) (Only Available in Kit 211-711-211 $16.30)
M. 211-711-185B Bushing, Rear of Rear Shift Rod, 1977 to 1979 (From Chassis #217 2053 839) (Only Available in Kit 211-711-211 $16.30)
N. 211-711-183B Rear Shift Rod Boot $7.50
P. 311-798-211 Rear Shift Rod Coupler, $15.40
P. 311-798-211 HD Rear Shift Rod Coupler, Heavy Duty Urethane $10.30
R. 211-711-189A Coupler Screw $1.60
- 211-711-211 Complete Shift Rod Bushing Kit, 1968 to 1979 $16.30
NOTE: Complete Shift Rod Bushing Kit includes shift rod bushings only. Boots, couplers and other hardware are not included. _________________ Peace, Regis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
busdaddy Samba Member
Joined: February 12, 2004 Posts: 51131 Location: Surrey B.C. Canada, but thinking of Ukraine
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the shift rod/nosecone length changed a bit in 75, the 72 cutoff is for the style of bushing at the front, 68-72 uses the pin on the body, 73+ uses the big tubular one on the shift rod.
None of it's going to be impossible to work around though. _________________ Rust NEVER sleeps and stock never goes out of style.
Please don't PM technical questions, ask your problem in public so everyone can play along. If you think it's too stupid post it here
Stop dead photo links! Post your photos to The Samba Gallery!
Слава Україні! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
regis101 Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2005 Posts: 2078 Location: Livermore, Ca
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well at least I feel calm that the 78 drive train will at least fit a 72. Making the shift rods work would be minor. _________________ Peace, Regis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
atmellovw Samba Member
Joined: September 05, 2006 Posts: 1652 Location: Minnesota
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
regis101 wrote: |
...Making the shift rods work would be minor. |
Famous last words... _________________ 1972 Westy ("Bubbles") - Pastel White - 1700(1974 MT) - Dual Solex |
|
Back to top |
|
|
regis101 Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2005 Posts: 2078 Location: Livermore, Ca
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aw man. Trying to be optimistic here. Actually the 72 Bus doesn't turn me on. I've found a couple of 75's in my area. Price(s) are right. _________________ Peace, Regis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Loaf Samba Member
Joined: March 30, 2005 Posts: 2098 Location: Okra, Oklahoma
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
^^^The 72 doesnt turn me on^^^. My 72 was a hard-on waiting to happen. _________________ Never drive faster than your Angel can fly
$24,100 was too hard to resist................. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cdub1971 Samba Member
Joined: October 30, 2008 Posts: 24 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Loaf wrote: |
^^^The 72 doesnt turn me on^^^. My 72 was a hard-on waiting to happen. |
X2 _________________ '71 Super Beetle
'72 Deluxe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
regis101 Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2005 Posts: 2078 Location: Livermore, Ca
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I googled 74 Bus transaxle and it led to an old TS thread. This is copied from that thread
Facts:
- the 002 trans was used up until 1975
- the 091 was used from 76-79 and had a different bellhousing
- the 72-73 transmission had a 210mm clutch
- the 74-75 had a 215mm clutch
- the 76-79 had a 228mm clutch
- the starter has to match the bellhousing.
- the 210mm and 215mm flywheels fit all 72-79 bellhousings _________________ Peace, Regis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50338
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 091 is about 1/2" longer than the earlier transaxle and this length must be taken into account. Using the shift rod off the later bus with an 091 will make that part easy, but the transmission will still interfere with the flange on the cross member in front of the nose cone. A little cutting or bending will take care of this. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
regis101 Samba Member
Joined: July 28, 2005 Posts: 2078 Location: Livermore, Ca
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the clarification. Item K from the Bus Boys link shows the rear shift rod as fitting the 73-79. So that's a relief.
Maybe there was a frame change when the 091's were installed. _________________ Peace, Regis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alyachtman Samba Member
Joined: August 26, 2009 Posts: 12 Location: The house of the rising sun.
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
regis101 wrote: |
Thanks for the clarification. Item K from the Bus Boys link shows the rear shift rod as fitting the 73-79. So that's a relief.
Maybe there was a frame change when the 091's were installed. |
OK guys, I just put a 2 liter engine in my 75, seems as though the clutch cable is too long now, even with 1 1/2 inches of lug nut spacers between the wing nut and throwout bearing lever. Any suggestions? clutch pedal goes right to the floor with 2 fingers, and tough to get into gear,and NO free play after any adjustments to wing nut location, and Getting real frustrated!! HELP Mr Wizard!! _________________ I'm not the man I once was, but once, I'm the man I always was.
"75 Riviera camper, "The Fridge" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Amskeptic Samba Member
Joined: October 18, 2002 Posts: 8568 Location: All Across The Country
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wildthings wrote: |
The 091 is about 1/2" longer than the earlier transaxle and this length must be taken into account. Using the shift rod off the later bus with an 091 will make that part easy, but the transmission will still interfere with the flange on the cross member in front of the nose cone. A little cutting or bending will take care of this. |
When I put the 091 in my '73 with its original 002 bell housing, there were no issues at all with the shift rod or nose cone mount. I think all dimensional issues occur at the bell housing. The earlier 210 and 215 pressure plates inserted into the flywheel. The 228 fitted only to the outside of the flywheel, therefore, the flywheel/pressure plate dimensions increased by 1/4" or so. With this in mind, the revised 091 bell housing has the cross shaft axis slightly further towards the front of the car. With this in mind, the clutch cable needs to be slightly shorter than the earlier ones.
Volkswagen - because subtle annual changes makes it more fun!
Colin _________________ www.itinerant-air-cooled.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joey Samba Member
Joined: August 12, 2005 Posts: 5366 Location: Nova Scotia - Canada
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
When I put a 091 in my '74 I had to bend up the cross member Wildthings mentions.
The 1/2" difference also put my shifter at an odd angle so I re drilled the hole for the grub screw where the front shift rod connects to the rear shift rod to get it close to the normal position. I now use a '68-'71 clutch cable as well. _________________ Joey
‘60 Kombi - '74 Bus - '79 Panel - '65 Beetle |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joey Samba Member
Joined: August 12, 2005 Posts: 5366 Location: Nova Scotia - Canada
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
alyachtman wrote: |
OK guys, I just put a 2 liter engine in my 75, seems as though the clutch cable is too long now, even with 1 1/2 inches of lug nut spacers between the wing nut and throwout bearing lever. |
You shouldn't put anything between the wing nut and the throwout bearing lever (arm). The wing nut is designed to pivot in the arm. With no pivoting action the cable will break in short time. Use a '68-'71 clutch cable. _________________ Joey
‘60 Kombi - '74 Bus - '79 Panel - '65 Beetle |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|