Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Stronger than stock trans mount for 74
Forum Index -> Beetle - Late Model/Super - 1968-up Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
donmurray
Samba Member


Joined: December 30, 2008
Posts: 841
Location: Frisco Texas
donmurray is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:49 am    Post subject: Stronger than stock trans mount for 74 Reply with quote

Need HD transmission mounts for a 74 (Ghia). I believe the standard ones are 3 bolt mounts, and probably the same as 73-74 Beetle. It looks like the online stores only have HD mounts for earlier 2 bolt setups. One of the vendors suggested I convert to use the earlier 2 bolt mount. What's involved in making this converstion? If one of the special braces (Berg?) is an easier solution than a mount conversion, I would like to hear about it. Seeing some stories about the polyurethane mounts breaking, or too noisy for street. If there are some proven, 3 bolt, poly mounts avaiable then would like to know about those also.

This is a street car with a 2110 engine, but no drag race starts or speed shifts. Still, I would like to have some confidence that the trans will stay put and shift OK.
_________________
74 Ghia, with 2110 engine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
dirtkeeper
Samba Member


Joined: February 19, 2008
Posts: 3200
Location: Left of everywhere
dirtkeeper is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have urethane motor mounts , a stock 2 bolt front mount, and i use a nose cone strap..on a baja and has worked fine for years. I wouldn't convert the mount just get a front tranny strap. easy install
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Glenn Premium Member
Mr. 010


Joined: December 25, 2001
Posts: 76939
Location: Sneaking up behind you
Glenn is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can convert the rear mounts to the earlier style but the front you can not convert.

Berg HD rear mounts
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


Berg mid mount
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"

Member #1009

#BlueSquare
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Joel
Samba Member


Joined: September 04, 2006
Posts: 11099
Location: NSW Australia
Joel is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i swapped out mine
the late model design is absolutely hopeless
blatantly obvious cost cutting on VWs part thats for sure

its a straight swap if you have the cradel and the mounts

the later one at the top is so much thinner and prone to bending as you can see by my old one, rubber mounts are crap too

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
Quick little bug, you got a Porsche motor in that?
1974 Germanlook 1303 2.5 Suba-Beetle


Last edited by Joel on Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:14 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
vw_hank
Samba Member


Joined: February 07, 2001
Posts: 5371
Location: Everett WA
vw_hank is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did the swap on A friends 74 baja, it was A straight swap just got the early type from A parts car went and got some polyurethane bushings and it was all good..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
chiprodriguez
Samba Member


Joined: June 10, 2007
Posts: 273

chiprodriguez is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The later model trans mount set up is far from cost cutting on VW's part. VW has done nothing but improve year after year from the split window era. The late model/super beetle years being the best from the quiet .93 4th gear, long soft torsions and spongy trans mounts giving the car a ride that is smoother than most new cars built today. However, when extra horsepower and built transmissions are added which VW never anticipated, these stock components may come up short. A stock early two bolt nosecone mount or a Berg padded midmount would be much stronger without sacrificing ride or cabin noise/vibration as well as the earlier cradle mount bell house setup.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Joel
Samba Member


Joined: September 04, 2006
Posts: 11099
Location: NSW Australia
Joel is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i can find plenty of examples of cost cutting on late bugs

just look at all the stuff that was metal originally and was made from plastic towards the end like inside door handles and surrounds, window winder handles, hood and decklid handles, rear numberplate light housing, steering column housing etc etc

and late model front tranny mounts, those are just nasty
but i do agree with you though they maintained quality where they could
especially compared with other manufactureres at the time
_________________
Quick little bug, you got a Porsche motor in that?
1974 Germanlook 1303 2.5 Suba-Beetle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
donmurray
Samba Member


Joined: December 30, 2008
Posts: 841
Location: Frisco Texas
donmurray is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some helpful stuff coming up here. My Ghia is not on stands right now, so can't look to see what I have. Are the front mount piece and the rear cradle just bolt in, or will some cutting and welding be needed? If bolt in, that sounds like the way to go. Then I can buy some HD or Rhino mounts.

What about the down load stress at the rear of the frame horns? With the above mods, and easy street use can I leave this stock? If some bracing is advisable, then what's the easiest method for a little help at the horns? The Berg traction bar looks like an easy install. Will it clear the A-1 sidewinder type exhaust?
_________________
74 Ghia, with 2110 engine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
donmurray
Samba Member


Joined: December 30, 2008
Posts: 841
Location: Frisco Texas
donmurray is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like limited solutions available for a 74 Ghia. No one is making a bolt in mid mount. Strap kits are available that have a front and rear strap, but I hear opinions from "worthless" to "they are better than nothing".

So, here's the configuration I'm now thinking about.

1. A new stock, 3 bolt, front mount. HD if available. Think Berg has them.

2. Front strap to secure the nose. There are doubts about how effective these straps are, but surely it would help as long as there was some tension maintained on the cushioned top strap. CIP1 also sells a front brace that bolts in under the nose, but not sure it will fit the 74. I've asked CIP1 about that.
http://www2.cip1.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=C26-311-204

3. Convert to the earlier (pre 73) version metal cradle and use early version HD (Rhino?) mounts. CIP1 sells this cradle with a strap, although I don't see how a strap at that point does much to keep the tranny from rotating down in the rear.
http://www2.cip1.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=C13%2D9543

4. Kafer brace for the horns. Bugpack has one. About $160 I think.
http://www.bugpack.com/content.php?id=561
I'm thinking that bracing those rear mount points so they are less prone to bending down will also provide some resistance to lifting at the nose. It will move the rotation point aft which should require more torque to lift the nose. Any opinions on this theory/speculation/conjecture? Think I will avoid the Berg type traction bar under the rear of the engine. Afraid of interferrence with a Sidewinder exhaust, and possibly other pieces.

Then, if we're going that far, may as well take the trans somewhere and get 3rd & 4th gears welded. Anything else I should do to make a 74 transmission street durable?
_________________
74 Ghia, with 2110 engine


Last edited by donmurray on Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Joel
Samba Member


Joined: September 04, 2006
Posts: 11099
Location: NSW Australia
Joel is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you should be able to run a berg style mid mount like this

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


and either leave the stock front mount or remove it all together
thats all most of the guys here with 200hp+ WRX engines use with a kafer brace

ive only got 150hp but with stock early rear cradel and mounts and a stock mount with a 5 bar kafer brace its tight as
_________________
Quick little bug, you got a Porsche motor in that?
1974 Germanlook 1303 2.5 Suba-Beetle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
donmurray
Samba Member


Joined: December 30, 2008
Posts: 841
Location: Frisco Texas
donmurray is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joel,

I asked Berg about a bolt in mid mount and they said it was not available for my model. Said there was one that required some welding. I'm a little confused about this, as it looks like the one pictured would fit. Is the nose cone bolt pattern different from 73 on?

So you don't have the pictured mid mount, or anything but a stock mount on the nose?
_________________
74 Ghia, with 2110 engine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Joel
Samba Member


Joined: September 04, 2006
Posts: 11099
Location: NSW Australia
Joel is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the nose cone bolt pattern is the same and so are the chassis forks etc, thats why i cant understand why they're saying it wont fit

yep thats right, my earlier rear cradle pictured above that i fitted actually came from an early 60s splitty and i just use OEM german rubber mounts

tried the pretty red poly ones and dont like them

i want to fit a mid mount but i'll probably just make my own
i havent at this stage as my coolant lines run where the tabs weld to the forks but i need to rework that so my swaybar fits as well

i also have one of the aussie made 5 bar kafer braces

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
Quick little bug, you got a Porsche motor in that?
1974 Germanlook 1303 2.5 Suba-Beetle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Bruce
Samba Member


Joined: May 16, 2003
Posts: 17290
Location: Left coast, Canada
Bruce is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Buggin_74 wrote:

the later one at the top is so much thinner and prone to bending as you can see by my old one, rubber mounts are crap too

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.



The late bracket is only prone to bending when some MORON puts his floor jack under it and lifts the whole car. Put the jack in the correct location and the stock rear mounting system works just fine.

Buggin_74 wrote:
you should be able to run a berg style mid mount like this

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


and either leave the stock front mount or remove it all together

You will still need the stock front mount with that setup. Otherwise there's nothing to stop the engine from moving front to rear.
_________________
overheard at the portland Swap Meet... wrote:
..... a steering wheel made from a mastadon tusk.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Joel
Samba Member


Joined: September 04, 2006
Posts: 11099
Location: NSW Australia
Joel is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 12:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

actually they're perfectly fine without the front mount

i can show you plenty of bugs where the stock mount has been removed and just a berg style mid mount run, and been fine for years with more than 200hp at the wheels
_________________
Quick little bug, you got a Porsche motor in that?
1974 Germanlook 1303 2.5 Suba-Beetle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
gooser
Samba Member


Joined: February 21, 2008
Posts: 766
Location: danville virginia
gooser is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bruce wrote:
Buggin_74 wrote:

the later one at the top is so much thinner and prone to bending as you can see by my old one, rubber mounts are crap too

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.



The late bracket is only prone to bending when some MORON puts his floor jack under it and lifts the whole car. Put the jack in the correct location and the stock rear mounting system works just fine.
oops, i'm a moron.

Buggin_74 wrote:
you should be able to run a berg style mid mount like this

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


and either leave the stock front mount or remove it all together

You will still need the stock front mount with that setup. Otherwise there's nothing to stop the engine from moving front to rear.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
dan macmillan
Samba Member


Joined: October 19, 2003
Posts: 3110
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
dan macmillan is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bruce wrote:
Buggin_74 wrote:

the later one at the top is so much thinner and prone to bending as you can see by my old one, rubber mounts are crap too

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.



The late bracket is only prone to bending when some MORON puts his floor jack under it and lifts the whole car. Put the jack in the correct location and the stock rear mounting system works just fine.

Buggin_74 wrote:
you should be able to run a berg style mid mount like this

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


and either leave the stock front mount or remove it all together

You will still need the stock front mount with that setup. Otherwise there's nothing to stop the engine from moving front to rear.


I have to agree, in the top picture,showing 2 rear trans mounts.{the lower mount} is commonly sold as a HD design.This is a misconception. As you can see the one on the left has started separating the rubber from the steel. This is a bonded joint and subjected to a lot of shearing forces as the engine torques. The mount shown in the upper part of the picture is by far one of the strongest mounts VW offered. It is for the 73-79 Beetle/ 73/74 Ghia but will work on any VW 12 V Beetle/Ghia. The rubber is much wider giving a larger surface are to bond the rubber to the steel components.
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


Also if you look at the way the steel portions of the mount are constructed you will notice that it is designed to be interlocking. What this does is greatly limit the amount of travel within the mount and should the rubber separate from the steel you still have a physical connection between the trans and the frame. The steel used is more than twice the thickness of the earlier design mounts.

Also the 73 and up front mount is the strongest VW offered and can be adapted to fit most frames.

If you need more strength in the front mount {high HP engine or like dumping the clutch} you should use the Berg style mid mount as seen in the lower picture, or something similar. Keep in mind that all forces generated to move the car forward are sent through this mount. When you see a car lifting the front wheels, it is the front mount that is supporting that weight.
_________________
Licensed Automotive Service Technician
Licensed Truck and Coach Technician
Licensed Heavy Duty Equipment Technician
CFC/HCFC/HFC A/C handling and installation license
Alignment specialist
66 Modified Manx,68 Kyote,74 Thing,74 Beetle, 76 Transporter,75 self made Double Cab,65 Meyers Manx,78Westy,68 Ghia, 79 Bradley GT2
Current projects:
Built for others:69 Manx Clone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
donmurray
Samba Member


Joined: December 30, 2008
Posts: 841
Location: Frisco Texas
donmurray is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:36 am    Post subject: My transmission mount solution Reply with quote

After much forum reading and some vendor feedback:

This is for a 74 Ghia with 2110 engine. Easy on the clutch driving, but do like some hard acceleration in 2nd and up. No big increase in noise or vibration.

1. Good quality standard front mount. $30 est.

2. EMPI 9531 padded front strap kit. Like this strap because it's has a more direct tension load on the top strap and bracket. Some other straps look like they would give more. $55

3. EMPI 9541 cradle and padded strap kit. Uses earlier mounts. The strap should keep some HD mounts together, and snub the transmission up a little more. $60 This cradle is supposed to be a mounting point for the Bugpack Kafer style truss which I may add later.

So far we're at less than $200, and I think there's a good chance that this will be all that needed for me.

The Bugpack truss is a lighter version of a Kafer setup, and if I see signs of too much movement back there, I'll add it for $160.

Don't give me any noise about EMPI quality. All their stuff can't be bad, so let's don't fall victim to pattern thinking and miss out on a resonably priced appropriate solution.
_________________
74 Ghia, with 2110 engine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
vwsteve
Samba Member


Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1047
Location: Virginia
vwsteve is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2019 3:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Stronger than stock trans mount for 74 Reply with quote

On the newer style, do you even need the cross piece? I am replacing an older style setup but I don't have the cross piece. I could find one but just wondering what the purpose even is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Glenn Premium Member
Mr. 010


Joined: December 25, 2001
Posts: 76939
Location: Sneaking up behind you
Glenn is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Stronger than stock trans mount for 74 Reply with quote

Yes, it ties the frame horns together.
_________________
Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"

Member #1009

#BlueSquare
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Beetle - Late Model/Super - 1968-up All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.