Author |
Message |
RocketRod Samba Member
Joined: July 19, 2007 Posts: 641 Location: Colorado Springs, CO
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My ? is if it is causing the enrichment at al times. Read your plugs. Do a fuel pressure test. _________________ Why Yes it is a Magic bus!
Common Sense isn't so common. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
airkooledchris Samba Member
Joined: January 25, 2005 Posts: 2713
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Westfabulous wrote: |
That wasn't there on later models. Do you have the original engine? Perhaps a throttle body replacement at some point? It does not belong on your bus as original 1979 equipment, unless it was part of the Cali package? |
I have all the rest of the Cali specific bits, coil, electronic ignition, AFM, o2 sensor, CAT, etc.
what has me stumped is that the Cali wiring harness is unique, so if it was eliminated at some point, why would it have the wiring for it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Westfabulous Samba Member
Joined: January 07, 2007 Posts: 4207 Location: The tropic of Canada, dodging the giant flying moose of Surrey!
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That wasn't there on later models. Do you have the original engine? Perhaps a throttle body replacement at some point? It does not belong on your bus as original 1979 equipment, unless it was part of the Cali package? _________________ *****************
"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
airkooledchris Samba Member
Joined: January 25, 2005 Posts: 2713
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:25 pm Post subject: have microswitch for full enrichment - but don't use it? |
|
|
the bus is a California model 79
I am doing a bunch of random testing trying to hunt down why im getting barely 11 MPG and in doing so, I tested the 'microswitch'
this thing:
it failed the Bentley test, which is when I then read on and noted the following:
If this was eliminated from 1977 models onward, why do I have one?
Did they leave it there and it just doesn't do anything?
Or did the PO hack it in during a previous rebuild and it just shouldn't be there?
Im not sure if I should bother testing it further or replacing it, if it's not supposed to be there in the first place. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|