Author |
Message |
Ghia72 Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2011 Posts: 24 Location: Dillon, MT
|
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 7:42 pm Post subject: Building a Stroker, what should I build? |
|
|
So I'm new to building engines in general however I've enlisted my uncle who's built a few and been doing some research so I have some ideas.
First off:
My main concern is heat as this will be my daily driver of about 60 miles at least both ways (mostly freeway miles, I live in SoCal). I want this engine to last 100k+ and get decent gas mileage. I want more torque/hp then the 1600 dual ports provides but I don't need to leave tracks of fire behind me or anything.
I want to build a stroker, I know its more expensive then but it creates more power with less boring(so I've been told and read).
I'm thinking either stroking using the stock 85.5mm cylinders or 92mm thick walls as I read they are even thicker then the 85.5mm. maybe going with a 78mm crank 92mm thicks resulting in a 2074cc engine! I plan to throw on an additional oil cooling system to keep the heat down as well.
I know 2074 is a lot of CCs for a daily driver so if moving down to a 1745 or even a 1699 makes more sense then i'm down!
Feedback is appreciated!
THx! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anthracitedub Samba Member
Joined: June 20, 2007 Posts: 3241 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I had the money, I would build an engine as square as possible using 85mm pistons and let it breath real good, also use all stock German sheet metal with the T-stat/flaps. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghia72 Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2011 Posts: 24 Location: Dillon, MT
|
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you talking stalk? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rcooled Samba Member
Joined: September 20, 2008 Posts: 2506 Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've built mild 2007cc motors for daily drivers with very good results. These were built using a 78mm stroker crankshaft along with 95.5mm pistons/cylinders. The 78mm crank is the longest stroke that can be used with the stock VW connecting rods (which will help keep costs down) and the 90.5 mm cylinders have the thick walls needed for durability. I add some mildly-ported D/P heads w/stock-size valves, HD springs, solid rocker shafts and swivel adjusters. For breathing, I go with dual Weber 40 IDF or Dellorto carbs, a 110 cam and 1 3/8" street headers. I run a lightened, 8-doweled flywheel, a Bosch 010 distributor and a full-flow oil filter. I also balance all rotating/reciprocating parts. This motor will idle smoothly, be very "driveable" around town and pull hard to 5500 RPM when you get on it. Gas mileage will depend on how heavy your foot is.
If you haven't already done so, check out the link for some excellent advice on building high-performance VW engines. Be sure to use good quality parts and always remember: Cheap - Fast - Reliable...choose any two.
http://www.aircooled.net/gnrlsite/resource/articles/t1hpeng.htm _________________ '63 Ragtop (current)
'65 Ghia coupe (totaled)
'67 Ghia convertible (current)
'69.5 Ghia convertible and
'62, '63, '65, '69 Bugs (all long gone)
Last edited by rcooled on Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:05 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anthracitedub Samba Member
Joined: June 20, 2007 Posts: 3241 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Square just means having a stroke that is close to the bore size. I can't remember for sure, but I think Hot Vw built a 78mm X 85mm and it was just great engine that produced good low end torque. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vgajames Samba Member
Joined: June 13, 2002 Posts: 805 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rcooled wrote: |
I've built mild 2007cc motors for daily drivers with very good results. These were built using a 78mm stroker crankshaft along with 95.5mm pistons/cylinders. The 78mm crank is the longest stroke that can be used with the stock VW connecting rods (which will help keep costs down) and the 90.5 mm cylinders have the thick walls needed for durability. I add some mildly-ported D/P heads w/stock-size valves, HD springs, solid rocker shafts and swivel adjusters. For breathing, I go with dual Weber 40 IDF or Dellorto carbs, a 110 cam and 1 3/8" street headers. I also run a lightened, 8-doweled flywheel, a Bosch 010 distributor and a full-flow oil filtering system. I also balance all rotating/reciprocating parts. This motor will idle smoothly, be very "driveable" around town and pull hard to 5500 RPM when you get on it. Gas mileage will depend on how heavy your foot is.
If you haven't already done so, check out the link for some excellent advice on building high-performance VW engines. Be sure to use good quality parts and always remember: Cheap - Fast - Reliable...choose any two.
http://www.aircooled.net/gnrlsite/resource/articles/t1hpeng.htm |
I fixing to turn my 1776 dual dell 40 motor into a 2007...Got my CB 78.4
crank, the 1776 already has CB 5.400 H-Beams,the way my 1776 runs its bound to get me some tickets for sure... Wish i could get my hands on some 90.5 B mahles though... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ian Godfrey Samba Member
Joined: September 25, 2006 Posts: 1137 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I second the 78 / 90.5. Once you start clearancing the case for counterweights, 78 stroke is no harder than 76 or 74. Stock rods with 90.5's give you a close to stock width engine. Tin fits well, and it fits in the car easily. You can go as mild or as wild on the heads carbies and cam as you can afford of feel comfortable with. Well built, it probably won't even need an extra oil cooler.
Most after market heads have valve size, porting and chambers to suit 90.5, 92 and 94 bores not the older 88's or 85.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anthracitedub Samba Member
Joined: June 20, 2007 Posts: 3241 Location: Michigan
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce Amacker Samba Member
Joined: December 26, 2007 Posts: 1786 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
My 2180 with a single carb works great and almost held good oil temps, but adding a Type 4 oil cooler completed the picture and keeps oil temps fine even at 75-80MPH on a warm day. I'd suggest as many CC's as possible with thick walls, like 92x82 or 92x84. Dual carbs aren't necessary for a DD, your goal should be torque and not HP.
A well tuned big CC engine with a single carb would be a great DD and still easy to work on with a low level of complexity.
Good Luck! _________________ '66 Deluxe Bus
'65 Standard Bus
Build threads:
'66- http://www.leakoil.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2888&sid=54d8dedfb3822f99c7f2ea430cb4e856
'65- http://leakoil.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=4263 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sactojesse Samba Member
Joined: November 21, 2006 Posts: 2655 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^
IMO, the complexity of trying to get a single two-barrel carburetor to work far outweighs the minimal complexity of getting a pair of DRLAs or IDFs dialed in. Unless you're willing to fabricate a heat riser, the use of single center-mount carb limits you to stock heater boxes and 1 3/8" exhaust systems with heat risers, which would also limit your exhaust valve size to stock (32 mm) without the risk of cracking your heads. (Believe me, I've done that running stock heater boxes w/ ported and polished 40 x 35.5 valve heads on a mere 1776.) Besides, using duals will allow one to take advantage of the aftermarket 1 1/2" heater box merged exhaust systems, run appropriately sized 35.5 mm exhaust valves, and your cylinder heads will thank you!
IMO, either stay w/ stock stroke and build a counterweighted 1776 w/ an Engle W110 or similar cam, ported and polished 40 x 35.5 valve heads, dual 36 DRLAs or 40 IDFs or build a 90.5 mm bore stroker, like a 2007 (90.5 x 78 ), 2017 (90.5 x 78.4), or a 2110 (90.5 x 82). _________________ 1966 Karmann-Ghia convertible |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Suicidesplit51 Samba Member
Joined: September 11, 2008 Posts: 85 Location: Alingsas, Sweden
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
anthracitedub Samba Member
Joined: June 20, 2007 Posts: 3241 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^ Yep, thats the one….I'd love to build that long block….maybe with some different heads, just slightly a bump above what they used. Sweet little engine…pretty sure they used 85mm pistons. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwracerdave Samba Member
Joined: November 11, 2004 Posts: 15309 Location: Deep in the 405
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
The hell with that Hot Vw's milage engine. It will be much cheaper and eaiser to build a 1776 then a bastard 76 X 85.5
If this were my challange and the fact that $3.50 gas is here to stay I would build a 1776 with ported and polished stock valve heads, Engle W-100 cam, dual 40 IDF's, and use a Bosch SVDA. That will get you 80-85 HP, 30+ MPG, and 100,000 miles if quality parts are used.
If you choose to step up to a 78X90.5 = 2007 then you will have to use the aftermarket 1 1/2" heater boxes.
anthracitedub wrote: |
If I had the money, I would build an engine as square as possible using 85mm pistons and let it breath real good..... |
The 'square' engine theroy is just a bullshit myth from the 30's that never died. Build 2 engines with different stroke/bore combinations and you will get the same amount of power. _________________ 2017 Street Comp Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble, OK
2010 Sportsman ET Champion - Mid-America Dragway - Arkansas City, KS
1997 Sportsman ET Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble ,OK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sactojesse Samba Member
Joined: November 21, 2006 Posts: 2655 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
vwracerdave wrote: |
The hell with that Hot Vw's milage engine. It will be much cheaper and eaiser to build a 1776 then a bastard 76 X 85.5
If this were my challange and the fact that $3.50 gas is here to stay I would build a 1776 with ported and polished stock valve heads, Engle W-100 cam, dual 40 IDF's, and use a Bosch SVDA. That will get you 80-85 HP, 30+ MPG, and 100,000 miles if quality parts are used.
If you choose to step up to a 78X90.5 = 2007 then you will have to use the aftermarket 1 1/2" heater boxes. |
Agreed. The Hot VWs 1745 cc mileage motor was a cost-no-object exercise.
I put over 100k miles on a counterweighted 1776 similar to what you suggested, except that it had a W110 cam, ported and polished 40 x 35.5 valved heads, an older 009, and dual 36 DRLAs. I'd get over 30 mpg cruising at 75+ mph in my ghia. _________________ 1966 Karmann-Ghia convertible |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anthracitedub Samba Member
Joined: June 20, 2007 Posts: 3241 Location: Michigan
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
c21darrel Samba Member
Joined: January 22, 2009 Posts: 8211 Location: San Dimas
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I vote for the 2007, 78X90.5, 120 cam, 40 Dells, steve tims heads and its so cal no need for a heater, j tubes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghia72 Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2011 Posts: 24 Location: Dillon, MT
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well i figured 92 thicks over 90.5s because the material is thicker:
.179" = 92mm thickwall
.177" = 88mm machine-in
.163" = 85.5mm
.148" = 90.5mm
.140" = 94mm
.118" = 92mm thinwall
I have family that lives in Bakersfield that I visit and last thing I want is for my Ghia to be a black spot on the side of the grapevine from burning down!!!!!!! This is why I'm trying to be as careful as possible. Do the 92 thickwalls pose a space problem in the Ghia? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anthracitedub Samba Member
Joined: June 20, 2007 Posts: 3241 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The longer the stroke, the engine grows in width. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sactojesse Samba Member
Joined: November 21, 2006 Posts: 2655 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
anthracitedub wrote: |
The longer the stroke, the engine grows in width. |
That's only assuming that the wrist pin height stays constant w/ increasing stroke. However, Cima/Mahle piston and cylinder sets come in two types: 1) stock stroke (A), for use w/ 69-76 strokes and 2) stroker (B), for use w/ 76 and longer strokes. The cylinders are the same length for A and B sets, but the wrist pin heights are different. B pistons have a pin height closer to the top of the piston, which allows for more stroke without increased width. That's why 78 mm strokes w/ B pistons are so popular because it gets you close to the desired deck height without the need for spacers under the cylinders/barrels. _________________ 1966 Karmann-Ghia convertible |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghia72 Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2011 Posts: 24 Location: Dillon, MT
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So does a 2074cc with B pistons sound like a good choice apposed to the 2007? Seems to me that the 2074 would provide a little more torque/hp while still retaining a bit more reliability with the thickwall 92s instead of 90.5s, and close to how reliable the 1600s provides.
Thanks for all the advice! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|