Author |
Message |
IdahoDoug Samba Member
Joined: June 12, 2010 Posts: 10251 Location: N. Idaho
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I was with Lexus, we went to great lengths on soundproofing to achieve industry records for ambient noise levels in the interior. I didn't do the engineering on this but I remember studying the drawings and what they did and here's what I remember.
They found putting foam plugs in all the roof pillars was worth doing as they transmitted wind roar through essentially hollow steel tubes into the interior. A can of that expanding foam carefully used through a screw hole in each pillar might work. Just a tiny pffft as some of it expands greatly and you don't want it coming out every hole. Heh, getting a visual on that.
Also, foam plugs in the rocker panels. I'd also consider any hollow floorpan sections leading from the engine bay also for a foam plug. I'd definitely get some guidance on using a product that would not absorb moisture after it has cured, and also study the sections to be sure that VW did not design them to drain water from the body. Look for slit drains. This would be especially important to look for if you have a factory sunroof which usually has 4 drain tubes down roof pillars.
On the floor, the greatest benefit was on the firewall, the front seat floor and the rear seat floor where they used double walled sheetmetal with a visco layer between. I'd guess the only way you could duplicate that would be a layer that dampens vibrations but I couldn't guide you as to apply it on the outside or interior side but my suspicion is it does not matter for acoustics but may matter for corrosion potential with moisture (favoring the interior).
They also lined the outside of the wheel wells with a tarlike substance to absorb gravel/road debris sounds.
HTH,
DougM _________________ 1987 2WD Wolfsburg Vanagon Weekender "Mango", two fully locked 80 Series LandCruisers. 2017 Subaru Outback boxer. 1990 Audi 90 Quattro 20V with rear locking differential, 1990 burgundy parts Vanagon. 1984 Porsche 944, 1988 Toyota Supra 5 speed targa, 2002 BMW 325iX, 1982 Toyota Sunrader |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PIRATE Samba Member
Joined: May 05, 2005 Posts: 253 Location: San clemente CA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
two things that spectrum stuff blows!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and buy peel and stick!!!
I also put spectrum in my van I had it in my van for 2 years. it took me a week to install all of it because of the dry times. you need at minimum 4 coats i did 6 and I cleaned everything then used paint degrease to clean all the panels and floor before I installed it.
I put everything back together and it did a pretty good job but then i went to pull a door panel and it had started peeling i was pretty bummed. I talked to the manufacture and they said that it must have been greasy before I put it on so it was my fault. I did more prep then the instructions required and I wiped it down with degreaser.
Its to hard to install
It takes lots of time to install
One 12x12 piece of B- quite from ebay does the exact same thing for the same price and I could of been done in a day
I cant believe they say you can use it as an under coating
Dont buy!!
mas _________________ 2003 jetta wagon
1987 westfalia 2wd
1987 Syncro GL
1964 vespa vbb 150
1973 vespa sprint
2005 toyota tacoma Ole reliable |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jamos Samba Member
Joined: July 08, 2005 Posts: 762 Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
1621 Samba Member
Joined: May 15, 2006 Posts: 2174
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
FWIW, I've had the Spectrum in my wheel wells for a couple years and probably 20K+ miles now - no peeling, flaking or chipping yet. Good stuff.
I really appreciate IdahoDoug's comments on this, nice to hear from someone with genuine auto design and manufacturing experience. I've always wondered what they did with the Lexus to make it so quiet.
As for sound deadening, I think there are good and better options available. I think it's important to point out that many only place the vibration dampener, often more than required, and expect to cut a lot of road noise. I too have done this, and stopped short of adding a sound barrier over the vibration dampener. If I do this again on another vehicle I'll do things a bit differently using less dampener and focus more on sound barriers. It would be nice to see someone record the differences using vibration dampener only versus a dampener and sound absorber together. _________________ '85 Westy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IdahoDoug Samba Member
Joined: June 12, 2010 Posts: 10251 Location: N. Idaho
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. We were so meticulous on the Lexus models that even the different reflective acoustics of a leather interior vs cloth were taken into consideration. The audio systems that went into the cloth models had a different initial bass/mid/treble and other factors vs the leather systems. Incredible detailing. When you changed from AM to FM the power antenna shortened itself to be closer to the ideal length. And when you changed from one side of the frequency to the other, it also changed. Window tints were different for the grey vs tan interiors. They were enormously expensive to build and that's why you'll see the original generation of LS400s on the street for decades. Kinda like the pre-92 Mercedes S class beasts will too.
DougM _________________ 1987 2WD Wolfsburg Vanagon Weekender "Mango", two fully locked 80 Series LandCruisers. 2017 Subaru Outback boxer. 1990 Audi 90 Quattro 20V with rear locking differential, 1990 burgundy parts Vanagon. 1984 Porsche 944, 1988 Toyota Supra 5 speed targa, 2002 BMW 325iX, 1982 Toyota Sunrader |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EvilDNA Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2006 Posts: 116 Location: Salt Lake City, UT
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Man John, I thought I had projects. I also second the Peel N Seal from Lowes or HD. Basically roofing flashing. I did my entire MV in FatMat, but ran out and finished up with Peel N Seal. I couldn't tell the difference at all. No smells and no off gassing that I could perceive.
Needless to say, HUGE difference. If the paint on stuff is better, I can't imagine it being so much so that it would negate the ease and simplicity of the Peel N Seal. Anything with paint sucks because the prep sucks and the cleanup sucks.
I'm doing a buddy's 88 Wolfsburg as we have time and it's minimal prep, really no cleanup to speak of. We'll do a roll when we have time and come back later for more. The flexibility and ease of install of the peel and stick stuff, to me, trump a few dB's.
As a note, however, don't do it in the dead of winter. I had to use a hair dryer to really get it pliable. This current install is MUCH simpler. _________________ 1990 4 Speed Orly Blue Multivan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
madspaniard Samba Member
Joined: August 18, 2008 Posts: 3795 Location: Alameda, CA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two things that I've read here called my attention.
Using recycled denim material and on a different post, using expandable foam in a can. I believe both of these materials retain moisture, bad if you care about rust. _________________ 1991 Westy auto w/ Peloquin TBD
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad” - Salvador Dali |
|
Back to top |
|
|
insyncro Banned
Joined: March 07, 2002 Posts: 15086 Location: New York
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
madspaniard wrote: |
Two things that I've read here called my attention.
Using recycled denim material and on a different post, using expandable foam in a can. I believe both of these materials retain moisture, bad if you care about rust. |
Both are rust magnets!!!
Steer clear.
Wurth makes an excellent foam for cavities and pillars.
It is used in new Ford F-150 front pillars.
This 2 part foam needs a special tool to be applied.
I have it in the pneumatic version, costly.
The manual version is about $75. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JPrato Samba Member
Joined: December 15, 2006 Posts: 791 Location: Livonia, NY
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
excellent reference site: http://www.sounddeadenershowdown.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi
mass loaded vinyl after application of dampener pads is the way to go to keep sound out of the interior. I think this material is only practical on the floor of the van but that has to be where the majority of road noise is coming from, especially around the front wheels. _________________ Joe
87 Syncro Tin Top project
84 Westy, 2.5L Subaru power
06 Subaru 2.5 turbo in waiting
46 Cessna 140 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
randywebb Samba Member
Joined: February 15, 2005 Posts: 3815 Location: Greater Metropolitan Nimrod, Orygun
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find the 'showdown' URL to be of limited usefulness because of methodology - or lack thereof.
This thread has a bit different focus, and never really went too far (yet) but it might be helpful to some...
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technic...ost4019432 _________________ 1986 2.1L Westy 2wd Auto Trans. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Classicvibe Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2009 Posts: 743 Location: Salt Lake City
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is the first comparison data taken for analysis. For this I performed two tests on the right rear panel section. The first with the mic outside the van (6") and the source 4' from the van (and 4' off the ground as well), and the second with the mic centered on the back seat (source in the same position).
I used a full spectrum audio test for this (http://www.audiocheck.net/testtones_sinesweep20-200.php - Logarithmic). I will use other sounds as well, but I am wondering, is this data useful? I can see the results, but I don't understand this enough to recognize if this data will be useful. It appears that I am recording decibel level at different frequencies which I like. Who knows if it is accurate enough to show a few decibels in reduction. Perhaps that sound file is unrealistic in measuring real world sounds? I dunno Yo! But my new mic is pretty cool. It takes two people to do these tests so I gotta rustle up a neighbor kid and pay him a couple of bucks. More tonight if this is all a go, lemme know.
_________________ On a mission, the destination is just an excuse.
Syncro Solstice 2022...see you there!
1986.5 Wolfsburg Syncro Westfalia Poptop Weekender Transporter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Classicvibe Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2009 Posts: 743 Location: Salt Lake City
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is that your thready Randy? That was a great read. Mostly intelligent thoughts and comments from everyone, and I thought it was spot on for what I am trying to achieve, but where did it all lead? It gave me some ideas on combining products, and definitely spoke to Doug's comments on sealing tunnels and other sound amplifiers. I will say I am not going to try to let the sound of the failing PS pump to come through, but I love that attention to detail. I actually considered that for like 10 seconds a few months ago, but (for once) realized that was entirely to awesome for my means. Multiple sound arguments for the micro bead product, so I am still pretty confident in the first layer I will lay down (the Spectrum Visco). I can definitely see a couple of different products in other places, like the firewall, inside panels and floor and beams. A client of mine shoots a common Icynene-type home insulation product, and they have offered to shoot the excess from a job wherever I like. It is an expanding open cell, so I am guessing this may be a great option for tunnels in the van, wherever they may be. _________________ On a mission, the destination is just an excuse.
Syncro Solstice 2022...see you there!
1986.5 Wolfsburg Syncro Westfalia Poptop Weekender Transporter
Last edited by Classicvibe on Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:06 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
randywebb Samba Member
Joined: February 15, 2005 Posts: 3815 Location: Greater Metropolitan Nimrod, Orygun
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes, I started it - not sure where it all leads...
it is not hard to make a signif. improvement, esp. if you are rel. unconcerned about added wt. (Vanagon) _________________ 1986 2.1L Westy 2wd Auto Trans. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Classicvibe Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2009 Posts: 743 Location: Salt Lake City
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
randywebb wrote: |
yes, I started it - not sure where it all leads...
it is not hard to make a signif. improvement, esp. if you are rel. unconcerned about added wt. (Vanagon) |
Yes, when you have few requirements, everything is a potential solution, and ironically it is difficult to find the correct product. My clients are always asking me for the "solution" and I respond by telling them that you don't hire me to find your solution, you hire me to find out what the question is. Once you have a specific question, the solution is usually pretty easy to find.
A note on the Blue Jean insulation: The company boasts that the product is saturated in some anti-moisture solution. They have a really generic claim about this stuff:
Will mold and pests affect UltraTouch?
The fire retardant used in making UltraTouch also acts as an excellent pest, mold and mildew inhibitor.
and
What happens when UltraTouch gets wet?
UltraTouch is manufactured to breathe or accept and release the moisture it receives in a timely manner. UltraTouch also contains active mold inhibitors as well.
Anyway, yes, it is obvious that cotton can hold moisture, but does anyone actually know if the Blue Jeans holds, say, more or less moisture than fiberglass or any other thermal insulation? The sound deadening properties of the product are outstanding IMO. I used it is my home theater and it is pretty cool.
Look at these animations on the Icynene product. This will get you thinking about cold weather camping, and using that a/c unit...
http://www.icynene.com/moisture-transfer-animation-2/
On another note I just spent the last hour finding an environmentally friendly blasting product, and I found success with 2 x 100 pound bags of something (forgot the name). When it stops raining I have all the tools in place now to bust out this entire job, aside from a few last selections for thermal and firewaill. Very excited. The testing I can see is going to hold me back. Really have to find a sound engineer to help sort all this out. _________________ On a mission, the destination is just an excuse.
Syncro Solstice 2022...see you there!
1986.5 Wolfsburg Syncro Westfalia Poptop Weekender Transporter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a914622 Samba Member
Joined: July 29, 2004 Posts: 840 Location: Westend of HWY2 , Wash
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used the peel and stick from Master Mccarr. It was 16.00 for a 32x54 sheet. I used it on the inside of cnc milling machines to keep the sheetmetal from howling.
They also sell the "slug" stuff and the foild back closed foam stuff as well.
Do you have any noise numers yet? Im really intrested in the level at freeway speed.
Keep up the good work
jcl _________________ 87 gl powerd buy 2.5subaru
75 914 getting 2.2t subaru scratch that SVX subaru |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pinealservo Samba Member
Joined: March 08, 2010 Posts: 155 Location: Lehi, UT
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The sounddeadenershowdown site is very different than it used to be. When he first started it, it was a comparison of a whole bunch of different CLD-type materials (Dynamat, FatMat, Peel-n-Seal, etc.) and there was much more methodology. Later he figured out that coating the entire interior with that stuff is not the best way to go, and sought out the right kinds of materials.
Pretty much all of the high-end automotive acoustic management vendors sell the same basic set of products now, sounddeadendershowdown just sells fairly generic versions without hype or excessive markup. He doesn't carry any of the viscoelastic dampener liquids, but the CLD tiles do the same thing, just through a different physical mechanism.
Basically there are three types of sound control mechanisms you can introduce: sound transmission barriers (measured by STC, sound transmission coefficient), sound absorption materials (measured by NRC, noise reduction coefficient), and vibration dampeners (measured by CLF, composite loss factor). They all do different things, and so you would have to target their uses to the noise sources you're trying to eliminate.
If you're hoping for light weight sound reduction, you'll be limited to sound absorption (generally through thick, lightweight open-cell materials) and viscoelastic-style dampening material. Sound transmission barriers rely on an unbroken layer of massive material to block sound transmission (think lead sheeting, mass-loaded-vinyl, etc.), and so their usefulness drops as their weight decreases. The mass law that governs non-rigid barriers states that every doubling of the mass will produce a 6db drop in sound transmission through it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
randywebb Samba Member
Joined: February 15, 2005 Posts: 3815 Location: Greater Metropolitan Nimrod, Orygun
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BTW - I sent the sounddeadendershowdown guy an Email about a month ago with no response, so... _________________ 1986 2.1L Westy 2wd Auto Trans. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|