Author |
Message |
wyomingresident Samba Member
Joined: April 22, 2007 Posts: 246 Location: Jackson Hole
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 8:20 am Post subject: Custom Aluminum Bumpers??? $$$ in cost for weight reduction? |
|
|
I'm getting ready to get some bumpers for my 1984 Westy.
I see lots of options for steel ones. There are some really nice ones on the net, but they all seem so big and heavy. Engineers: Is the weight savings enough that I should consider a custom aluminum bumper?
What are the thoughts of the collective on getting aluminum bumpers for the Vanagon?
On cowboy rigs here in Wyoming, there are some $pendy options for the front of say, an f-350 or some big Dodge hauler, but not really for something like the Van. Really nice looking stuff, sorta like this, but NOT nearly as heavy duty:
???'s and thoughts? After five VWs (two busses, one Vanagon, a beetle and a bug) the thing that really makes me paraniod is body work. I can fix almost anything, but really want to protect the front and rear of the bus from everyday mishaps. _________________ Don't tell fish stories where the people know you; but particularly, don't tell them where they know the fish.
Mark Twain |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stormforge Samba Member
Joined: May 05, 2009 Posts: 355 Location: Adirondacks NY
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
The fancier aluminum alloys will give you more strength per pound than the run-of-the-mill steel alloys which I suspect most people use for steel bumpers. However, the fancier aluminum alloys can be expensive and also difficult to weld strongly. The total difference in weight is unlikely to be meaningful on a 4000# van or worth the considerable extra cost.
Cheers,
-Bill
'89 Syncro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goffoz Samba Member
Joined: May 09, 2007 Posts: 1486
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alloy bumpers (Roobars) are the standard in Australia...and it does make a huge difference to the way the vehicle drives...not having all that weight up front, especially if you drive marginal roads
I would suggest shopping some of the Oz offroad equipment importers in this country
www.flickr.com/photos/mmbrown/2753675167/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ahwahnee Samba Member
Joined: June 05, 2010 Posts: 9810 Location: Mt Lemmon, AZ
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose there is a weight savings but seems almost pointless when you're already hauling a stove, refrigerator, tank of water, etc.
Handling, too, may improve without lots of weight up front -- but again, this isn't really a well-balanced sports car. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IdahoDoug Samba Member
Joined: June 12, 2010 Posts: 10251 Location: N. Idaho
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I put steel australian ARB full bullbars (the big ones) on my LandCruisers. Just because, I weighed the factory bumper I removed and related hardware and then the new ARB bumper and hardware. I had a net change in weight of 58lbs - or less than adding an extra battery for my vehicle. I'm a trained vehicle developer and could barely detect the difference.
Doing the same for a steel Vanagon bumper such as the well regarded Go Westy bumper would probably add half that (smaller bumper, no upper bull bars, less structure, etc). So let's say it adds 30lbs to a Vanagon for a steel bumper. I'd say you could save 1/3 that by using aluminum but I'll be generous and say 1/2. So going with an aluminum bumper you could save 15lbs, or about the weight of a box of CDs and a pair of hiking boots.
So, if someone's got an attractive alloy Vanagon bumper out there to choose between it and the Go Westy bumper then you would have a way to evaluate it. But if it's going to mean having a custom aluminum bumper fabricated, you'd be hard pressed to justify it.
DougM _________________ 1987 2WD Wolfsburg Vanagon Weekender "Mango", two fully locked 80 Series LandCruisers. 2017 Subaru Outback boxer. 1990 Audi 90 Quattro 20V with rear locking differential, 1990 burgundy parts Vanagon. 1984 Porsche 944, 1988 Toyota Supra 5 speed targa, 2002 BMW 325iX, 1982 Toyota Sunrader |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alaric.H Samba Member
Joined: March 28, 2009 Posts: 2529 Location: Sandy Springs GA
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My bumper is heaver than some of the ones out there and it still handles well with the stiffer spring rate I put in the front. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rocky Mountain Westy Samba Member
Joined: April 17, 2008 Posts: 1031 Location: Fort Collins Colorado
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
levi Samba Member
Joined: February 11, 2005 Posts: 5522 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The extra weight involved is a much bigger deal than some of these folks are suggesting, because of the placement of that weight at the edge of the van.
200 lbs of weight that's in the middle of the van has a much lesser impact than that same weight put out on the ends.
These bars below that are on my van weigh about 100 lbs each, and while I really like them, the effect they had on handling was immediately noticeable and not in a good way.
The guy I bought them from felt the same way, and switched to the gowesty bumpers.
I'm thinking of doing the same.
_________________ One of these days I'm gonna settle down,
but till I do I won't be hangin round.
Going down that long lonesome highway,
gonna see life my way
https://youtu.be/cSrL0BXsO40 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
r.e.wing_fc3s Samba Member
Joined: April 16, 2010 Posts: 591 Location: Vanagon Capitol USA: Bellingham, WA
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simple but light maybe an oem option in za? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IdahoDoug Samba Member
Joined: June 12, 2010 Posts: 10251 Location: N. Idaho
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Those 3 from SA photos look like they'd fall under the category of "damage multipliers". An impact at bumper level that would normally be absorbed by damaging the bumper structure might bend those things back and bash the upper sheetmetal, headlamps and possibly even the radiator. The frame tips will also easily be bent upward - a type of damage alone that often requires an insurance total. So you have light damage all over the place instead of heavier damage down low in a straight back direction where the structure is designed for it.
They need an upper support to be effective, and/or a lot more frame connections.
Bumpers are a tricky business and a lot goes into the design of the front end around the structure that holds them and disburses the impact energy. Tacking on something like that which sticks out the furthest and will take the brunt of an impact requires thought and engineering.
DougM _________________ 1987 2WD Wolfsburg Vanagon Weekender "Mango", two fully locked 80 Series LandCruisers. 2017 Subaru Outback boxer. 1990 Audi 90 Quattro 20V with rear locking differential, 1990 burgundy parts Vanagon. 1984 Porsche 944, 1988 Toyota Supra 5 speed targa, 2002 BMW 325iX, 1982 Toyota Sunrader |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ALIKA T3 Samba Member
Joined: July 30, 2009 Posts: 6360 Location: Honolulu,Hawaii and France
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
noganav Samba Member
Joined: January 06, 2006 Posts: 1236 Location: San Diego CA
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GW bumpers can't weigh more than 35 or 40 pounds each. They are surprisingly light. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VWhead Samba Member
Joined: September 27, 2009 Posts: 337 Location: Pacific Grove,CA
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just installed some GW bumpers that my customer ordered and the whole package including the box weighed 127 lbs. _________________ 81' Single Cab Syncro 1.8T GMW
88' 2wd Westy 1.8T GMW
www.gmwerks.com
--------------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IdahoDoug Samba Member
Joined: June 12, 2010 Posts: 10251 Location: N. Idaho
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Remember it's not just what the new GW bumper weighs, you're taking off some lbs as well when you unbolt the old bumper and rubber strips and any brackets or other parts that may not be needed.
If steel bumpers weigh only 40lbs, then the changeover's likely not even adding 25 net lbs to a Vanagon.
DougM _________________ 1987 2WD Wolfsburg Vanagon Weekender "Mango", two fully locked 80 Series LandCruisers. 2017 Subaru Outback boxer. 1990 Audi 90 Quattro 20V with rear locking differential, 1990 burgundy parts Vanagon. 1984 Porsche 944, 1988 Toyota Supra 5 speed targa, 2002 BMW 325iX, 1982 Toyota Sunrader |
|
Back to top |
|
|
r.e.wing_fc3s Samba Member
Joined: April 16, 2010 Posts: 591 Location: Vanagon Capitol USA: Bellingham, WA
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IdahoDoug wrote: |
Those 3 from SA photos look like they'd fall under the category of "damage multipliers". |
thats what i thought. wonder why so many were fitted in s.a...regulations? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IdahoDoug Samba Member
Joined: June 12, 2010 Posts: 10251 Location: N. Idaho
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Believe it or not, the wacko governments in many countries are requiring front ends on cars be designed "pedestrian friendly" these days. So these structures may have been an early version of something similar. Look closely though and you'll note differences in construction which tells me they are not likely a factory VW option.
DougM _________________ 1987 2WD Wolfsburg Vanagon Weekender "Mango", two fully locked 80 Series LandCruisers. 2017 Subaru Outback boxer. 1990 Audi 90 Quattro 20V with rear locking differential, 1990 burgundy parts Vanagon. 1984 Porsche 944, 1988 Toyota Supra 5 speed targa, 2002 BMW 325iX, 1982 Toyota Sunrader |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ALIKA T3 Samba Member
Joined: July 30, 2009 Posts: 6360 Location: Honolulu,Hawaii and France
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IdahoDoug wrote: |
Believe it or not, the wacko governments in many countries are requiring front ends on cars be designed "pedestrian friendly" these days. So these structures may have been an early version of something similar. Look closely though and you'll note differences in construction which tells me they are not likely a factory VW option.
DougM |
Right.
That's why the front grill as been modified noticeably on Audi a few years back.On all cars sold on Europe actually.
When I see bike carriers on front of city buses here,that makes me laugh pretty good. _________________ Silicone Steering Boots and 930 Cv boots for sale in the classifieds.
Syncro transmission upgrade parts in the Classifieds.
Subaru EJ22+UN1 5 speed transmission
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=416343
Syncro http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4...num+gadget |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MSwart Samba Member
Joined: February 13, 2009 Posts: 49 Location: South Africa
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ALIKA T3 Samba Member
Joined: July 30, 2009 Posts: 6360 Location: Honolulu,Hawaii and France
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
randywebb Samba Member
Joined: February 15, 2005 Posts: 3815 Location: Greater Metropolitan Nimrod, Orygun
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the location of the wt. reduction does matter
wt. removed from high on the vehicle is most important (roll)
wt. added or removed from the ends will affect yaw and the moment of polar inertia
BUT more wt. at the ends will make the vehicle less likely to initiate a spin
OTOH, it will make a spin more difficult to correct, once initiated
the other thing to consider in a vehicular diet, is the cost to reduce the wt.
e.g. replacing all the plywood cabinetry in a Westy with Al hexcell material would be great but not cheap (unless you do a lot of dumpster diving at Boeing or Lockheed) _________________ 1986 2.1L Westy 2wd Auto Trans. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|