Author |
Message |
wayne1230cars Samba Member
Joined: April 05, 2010 Posts: 2685 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:26 pm Post subject: Carb return spring - early style |
|
|
I rebuilt my 36 hp engine this past winter. While the motor was out, I had the engine tin powdercoated and detailed the engine. The old carb return spring for my 28 PCI was not looking so great, so I decided to order a new one. When, I got the motor back in I noticed that the accelerator cable(new) was sticking and often would not return to the idle position. I adjusted and lubricated but the problem persisted. Finally, I removed the new spring and compared it to the old(which fortunately I had kept.) They measured identical but the tension strength of the old spring was susbstantially stronger than the new one. Cleaned the old one up and reinstalled. Problem solved. Moral of the story - don't throw the old part away until you are sure the new one is going to work.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
KTPhil Samba Member
Joined: April 06, 2006 Posts: 34009 Location: Conejo Valley, CA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:37 pm Post subject: Re: carb return spring - early style |
|
|
wayne1230cars wrote: |
Moral of the story - don't throw the old part away until you are sure the new one is going to work. |
... and is going to LAST! I keep all old parts, given the lack of quality in most replacements. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
my59 Samba Member
Joined: August 13, 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: connecting the dots
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh so true!
FYI the bolt holding the accel. cable barrel nut tight originally was a set screw. I found mine stuck in the engine tin where someone dropped it decades ago. _________________ my59: Well son, my grandfather died before I got to drive it, so does that answer your question?
our79: sunroof bus w/camper interior and 2.0 FI
Other:'12 Jetta, '77 Benz 300D, and a 74 MG Midget. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wayne1230cars Samba Member
Joined: April 05, 2010 Posts: 2685 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good point. I went through my container of assorted VW parts and found the original set screw barrel. Installed it and adjusted the cable so there is the correct clearance on the carb when the accelerator pedal is pushed to the floor( a frequent occurence on a 36 hp).
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
glutamodo The Android
Joined: July 13, 2004 Posts: 26320 Location: Douglas, WY
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Me too, I'm still using an old set screw type on my 62 - although I did change the throttle arm out for one that was not nearly as ovalled-out in wear where it sits after this photo was taken:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HRVW Samba Member
Joined: May 01, 2011 Posts: 2531 Location: Rosarito, Mexico
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Decades ago would use a 90 degree metal corner brace...drill a 8mm stud size hole in one end and a 1/8 drill size hole in the other end.
Installed the larger hole part under the carb stud with it's holding nut. Connected a spring to the small hole and to the carb throttle arm. Never had any problems with the idle not returning. Did this on customers early 36hp and the early 40hp cars. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wayne1230cars Samba Member
Joined: April 05, 2010 Posts: 2685 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
When did they change from set screw to bolt? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
glutamodo The Android
Joined: July 13, 2004 Posts: 26320 Location: Douglas, WY
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
that one, I don't know offhand. The newest illustration in the various Bentely manuals shows a 30PICT2 and it has the slotted style. So that would be 1968-69 they were still using it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HRVW Samba Member
Joined: May 01, 2011 Posts: 2531 Location: Rosarito, Mexico
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What had/has happened with the early carbs is people over tightening the nuts on the stud and as a result stripping the threads in the carb base thus the bolt repair. Tis a shame but that is what happened...saw many over the yrs.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
|
glutamodo The Android
Joined: July 13, 2004 Posts: 26320 Location: Douglas, WY
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought by set screw, he meant the style of barrel clamp, not the rear stud changed to a bolt on the carb. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wayne1230cars Samba Member
Joined: April 05, 2010 Posts: 2685 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did mean the style of barrel clamp. The other explanation is interesting. My 28 PCI carb has had an insert installed on the front stud. So, very likely a victim of overtightening as suggested above. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
glutamodo The Android
Joined: July 13, 2004 Posts: 26320 Location: Douglas, WY
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Overtightening is one reason, for sure, but I think sometimes it's simply metal fatigue. My 28PICT in that photo above, they just plain wore out - and they were fine when I was given that carb 20 years ago. But both of the bottom studs eventually pulled out on that - and I don't overtighten. One of the screws that holds the top on also pulled the threads not too long ago.
-Andy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HRVW Samba Member
Joined: May 01, 2011 Posts: 2531 Location: Rosarito, Mexico
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do have a few barrell screws left over from my parts house days. Ordered some and they came w/o the tiny bolt (useless to say the least) Do have some bolts so nothing completly lost if anyone is interested in one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
glutamodo The Android
Joined: July 13, 2004 Posts: 26320 Location: Douglas, WY
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was just leafing through the old Car of the Century book and found that it says the bolt style barrel clamp came around when the throttle return spring change happened in mid 1966. BUT, then why do the factory books still show it the old style with the later 30PICT-2 carb?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
herbie1200 Samba Member
Joined: April 27, 2006 Posts: 833 Location: Rome - Italy
|
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
The spring can be horizontal (old style) or vertical (new style).
The two configurations are not mixable, because old style works well only with:
- "no wheel" accelerator pedal assembly
- solid type cable
- "no spring" carburetor
The 1st solution, the old with horizontal spring on cable, has an advantage: throttle bushing is not intersted by the retaining force to return to idle, so throttle bushing are not stressed.
The 2nd solution, cable free and spring vertical on carburetor, suffers for a rapid erasure of throttle axle bushing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jzjames Samba Member
Joined: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1921 Location: Windy Point, WA
|
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
herbie1200 wrote: |
The 2nd solution, cable free and spring vertical on carburetor, suffers for a rapid erasure of throttle axle bushing. |
is this why the later carbs suffer this problem so much? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
herbie1200 Samba Member
Joined: April 27, 2006 Posts: 833 Location: Rome - Italy
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
jzjames wrote: |
herbie1200 wrote: |
The 2nd solution, cable free and spring vertical on carburetor, suffers for a rapid erasure of throttle axle bushing. |
is this why the later carbs suffer this problem so much? |
This is my thought. And, as a confirm, often in "vertical spring" carburetors the more erased bushing is the one on the left, where the spring is operating.
Moreover, newer carburetors have the idle subsystem based on a bypass duct, that works well only if main throttle perfectly closes venturi throat, so every air flow through a worn bushing does effect on idle rpms, i.e. low rpm idle is no more possible.
In older carburetors idle speed is set by a not fully closed throttle, so every air escape can be balanced with a further throttle closure. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jzjames Samba Member
Joined: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1921 Location: Windy Point, WA
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That makes sense! And Ive never heard that reasoning before. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
glutamodo The Android
Joined: July 13, 2004 Posts: 26320 Location: Douglas, WY
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And then there's the final few 34PICT series carbs that had a radial return spring in that worked along with the throttle arm spring... I don't know why they made that change, and if it made any difference in wear.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
herbie1200 Samba Member
Joined: April 27, 2006 Posts: 833 Location: Rome - Italy
|
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
glutamodo wrote: |
And then there's the final few 34PICT series carbs that had a radial return spring in that worked along with the throttle arm spring... I don't know why they made that change, and if it made any difference in wear.
|
Intersting, I've never seen a dual-spring command like this.
Continuing with my thinking, answer is not: the bushing should be worn also in this type of return.
The force we are discussing is an horizontal vector along the cable, directed to the front of the engine.
The 'horizontal spring' old system is doing the pedal recall force exactly among the force direction, and the recall force is supported by the fan housing, where the spring is loaded.
Every different position of the spring: vertical, circular, etc. has an effect (in physics: a "component") directly on the bushing to "re-round" the vector to the horizontal direction. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|