Author |
Message |
brently88 Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 25 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:39 pm Post subject: 1835cc and 6rib tranny in a 68 baywindow |
|
|
Hi there,
Just purchased a 68 bay window that came with a 3rib tranny and no motor. I'm planning on getting a 1835cc motor and a 6rib tranny. My question is would it take any extra supports other than the moustache bar since everything is bigger, and has anyone had any experience with this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian Samba Moderator
Joined: May 28, 2012 Posts: 8340 Location: Oceanside
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Weld in some supports on the frame for the "ears"
The transmission is the only thing that will be heavier. _________________ Wash your hands
'69 Bug
'68 Baja Truck
'71 Bug
'68 Camper
Only losers litter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
airschooled Air-Schooled
Joined: April 04, 2012 Posts: 12722 Location: on a bike ride somewhere
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The weight of the engine is nothing compared to the force of the torque that the engine/transaxle assembly applies to the wheels and rear mounts. Think about Newton's third law; every force has an equal and opposite force. Consider the strength required to accelerate a bus from a dead stop? That amount of force, (more or less depending on gear selection,) is working on whatever mounting system is holding your power-train in place.
The shift rod length might have to be compensated for due to the engine/trans combo being a different length that what either the bus or transaxle came with.
Robbie _________________ Learn how your vintage VW works. And why it doesn't!
One-on-one tech help for your Volkswagen:
www.airschooled.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brently88 Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 25 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm completely new to the air-cooled scene, thank you guys for your input. Would it be a bad idea to run a 3rib with the 1835cc? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeff Geisen Samba Chaplain
Joined: December 21, 2004 Posts: 1882 Location: N.W. Georgia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Late transaxle into upright engine - don't neglect the input shaft length, the late one is too long and will eliminate crankshaft end play in the upright engine if not exchanged/shortened.
IMHO, the weight difference between the two transaxles is negligable, the weight difference between T I/T IV engines is the reason for the bell housing's "ears". _________________ I Corinthians 4: 1 thru 5
‘63 ragtop - ‘68 single cab |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tcash Samba Member
Joined: July 20, 2011 Posts: 12844 Location: San Jose, California, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
richparker Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2011 Posts: 6982 Location: Durango, CO
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
brently88 wrote: |
I'm completely new to the air-cooled scene, thank you guys for your input. Would it be a bad idea to run a 3rib with the 1835cc? |
IMO the 3rib 002 would be a better match for an 1835. The lower gear ratio will keep your engine spinning at a higher rpm then an 091. This will allow the fan to spin at the same rpm and keep your engine cool. The 091 will give you a taller 4th gear and will cruse at a higher speed then the 002. But...your driving a T2a without the increased front end crash protection of an T2b. You are also running four non-powered drum brakes. Don't wanta go to fast, stoping will be difficult. There are many other reasons the 002 is better for that engine, that's just a few. I run a stock 002 with my 2109cc with no problems. The lower gear ratio allows me to fly up the mountains on SW colorado. Good luck. _________________ __________
’71 Westy build
Adventure thread
’65 Deluxe Build
’63 Deluxe Build |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Randy in Maine Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2003 Posts: 34890 Location: The Beach
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would also keep the stock transmission. A 091 will gear you up too much and you won't have the torque to make it work well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brently88 Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 25 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Would I need anymore support other than the mustache bar since the engine is larger, or since I'm not upgrading the tranny would it suffice? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Randy in Maine Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2003 Posts: 34890 Location: The Beach
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just make sure the moustache bar is helping support the engine in the rear and you will be fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aeromech Samba Member
Joined: January 24, 2006 Posts: 16970 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I installed a 091 into a 1968 bus but it was matched to a 2007cc engine which is very close to what VW did originally with the 091. If you want to do it here's some pics and just read the link that was posted above. Ask if you have any questions.
_________________ Lead Mechanic: San Diego Air and Space Museum
Licensed Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic
Licensed Pilot (Single engine Land)
Boeing 727,737-200-300-400,757,767
Airbus A319,320,321
DC9/MD80
BAe146
Fokker F28/F100
VW type 1 1962,63,65,69,72
VW Type 2 1971 (3 ea.) 1978, 1969
VW Jetta
VW Passat
Capable of leaping tall buildings in a single bound |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aeromech Samba Member
Joined: January 24, 2006 Posts: 16970 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Swap the bell housing from the 091 to the 002
Swap the input shaft from the 091 to the 002 (or cut it like I did)
Swap the nose cone so you can use the old style forward mount _________________ Lead Mechanic: San Diego Air and Space Museum
Licensed Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic
Licensed Pilot (Single engine Land)
Boeing 727,737-200-300-400,757,767
Airbus A319,320,321
DC9/MD80
BAe146
Fokker F28/F100
VW type 1 1962,63,65,69,72
VW Type 2 1971 (3 ea.) 1978, 1969
VW Jetta
VW Passat
Capable of leaping tall buildings in a single bound |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sodbuster Samba Member
Joined: August 08, 2004 Posts: 1086 Location: wherever my baywindow takes me.
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My school of thought on all this is that VW put allot of time and money figuring out gear ratios for these buses. they must have been doing something right.
For the bay window buses VW offered three basic ring and pinion ratios over it's production lifespan. the 002 3 and 5 rib transaxles came with 5.375 to 1 for the 3 rib and 4.86 to 1 for the 5 rib. The 6 rib 091 came with a 4.57 to 1 ring and pinion ratio.
these changes reflected the increases in engine type, size and displacement through the years. Buses with the 1600cc single and duel port motors and the early 1700cc type IV motors used the three rib 002 with the 5.375 to 1 ratio. once the horsepower and displacement started going up room for improvement was needed.
This led to the new and improved 002 transaxle also known as the "5 rib" or "pyramid" transaxle. It came with the 4.86 to 1 ring and pinion ratio. along with the new ratio came improvements to the shafts gears and case. these transaxles came in buses with the 1700cc and 1800cc solid lifter motors but mainly designed to handle the 1800cc motor.
but the larger displacements kept coming as wel as body safety improvements and added options that kept adding weight to these puppies.
VW had the 2000cc hydraulic lifter motor coming down the pipeline but was still using the 1800cc fuel injected motors when it introduced the 091 transaxle with the 4.57 to 1 ring and pinion ratio. though used in models with the 1800cc motors it was ultimately designed for the 2000cc motor.
I know I know. Whats my point? My point it this. VW took the time to carefully match the ratios of it's transaxles to the displacement of it motors. when I went through my bus I did so too. I couldn't be happier with the results. All of the ratios I have been talking about are all available in the aftermarket for the 002 transaxles. IMO your early 002 in it's stock form will have no problem handleing the 1835cc motor but the motor itself would be mutch happier in it's powerband with the 4.86 to 1 ratio as opposed to the stock 5.375 or the 091 with it's 4.57 to 1 ratio.
Mi dos centavos.
P.S. for the record, 71 westy 1776cc 002 transaxle 4.86 R+P.
Last edited by sodbuster on Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:55 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sambabus Samba Member
Joined: December 02, 2009 Posts: 324 Location: N. Cal
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 3 rib 002 is good for about 200 hp. The 1835 usually makes less than 100 hp. Why are you going with an 1835, because that's what you have? _________________ 1971 Westy, 2017cc 78.4 x 90.5 Tims Stage 1 plus 42x37, CB 44IDF's, 135 mains, 175 airs, F111, 50 idles, Engle 110, 30mm, 009, single QP, DD CHT 300*f, VDO oil always 180* Build: http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=541370
1970 convertible bug, 1835cc, single 40IDF, disks.
Symptoms Solved and Fixed http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=551358 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skills@eurocarsplus Samba Peckerhead
Joined: January 01, 2007 Posts: 16878 Location: sticksville, ct.
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aeromech wrote: |
Swap the bell housing from the 091 to the 002
Swap the input shaft from the 091 to the 002 (or cut it like I did)
Swap the nose cone so you can use the old style forward mount |
you can use the 091 nose cone, just swap the studs _________________
gprudenciop wrote: |
my reason for switching to subaru is my german car was turning chinese so i said fuck it and went japanese....... |
Jake Raby wrote: |
Thanks for the correction. I used to be a nice guy, then I ruined it by exposing myself to the public. |
Brian wrote: |
Also the fact that people are agreeing with Skills, it's a turn of events for samba history |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
brently88 Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 25 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The guy who I'm getting the rebuilt longblock from said he could do a 1835 for the same price as a 1776 so I figured I might as well get a little extra power. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dawie Samba Member
Joined: July 27, 2008 Posts: 217 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do not forget that there are differences in 4th gear ratios as well.
Generally, the 3 rib boxes have 0.82:1 4th gear. (Wide gap between 3rd and 4th).
The 5-rib and 6-rib usually came with 0.89:1 4th gear. However there were some conflicting info published by VW on these ratios.
"Vanagon" 2L had 0.85:1 4th.
In simple terms:
3-Rib ring & pinion is 10% shorter than that of 5-rib. (Roughly). But:
3-Rib also has 8% taller 4th gear. (Compared to 5 & 6 rib).
So 3 rib's overall gearing in 4th gear is only 2% shorter than 5 rib, but it's first 3 gears are 10 % shorter overall.
2L bay's 6-Rib 091 have roughly 6% taller gearing in all gears compared to 1800- "5-rib". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brently88 Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 25 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Decided to stick with the 3 rib tranny and go with an 1835cc. I even went and got the tranny checked out, and he said the tranny looked like it was in great condition after sticking a wire camera through it. Let's hope it shifts just as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian Samba Moderator
Joined: May 28, 2012 Posts: 8340 Location: Oceanside
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
screw it get a 2110
But good choice. 1835 isn't a stroker so a 002 with a 5.375 I imagine is ideal. _________________ Wash your hands
'69 Bug
'68 Baja Truck
'71 Bug
'68 Camper
Only losers litter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tcash Samba Member
Joined: July 20, 2011 Posts: 12844 Location: San Jose, California, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|