Author |
Message |
carlostam Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2009 Posts: 414 Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Everyone thank your for the input. I'm begging to get a headache on how many choices I do have.
John, I wan't something that will have a bit of everything. low end torque and RPM power. I'm not looking for a 7000 rpm engine. But I don't want a tractor. I think I'm saying is I want to have my cake and eat it too. Is this not possible or is it build a tractor or full blown engine. That is where i'm confused. Mostly I'll be cruising at 45 - 50 mph. It will be stock 66 trans with 205/65/15 tires so rpms 2500 or so right now. But I do want something when I drop the hammer it will pull nicely. I'm sorry don't have a engine vocabulary so bare with me.
RC, your input also please and of course the Samba |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:56 am Post subject: Re: Another 2110 build****HEAD ADVISE NEEDED***** |
|
|
http://vwparts.aircooled.net/ACN-Road-Warrior-Dual-Port-Cylinder-Heads-L5s-p/l5%20heads%20pair.htm
with an Engle 120 or Web 110 with either 1.1s or 1.25s will be an easy to build and powerful engine. If you go the ratio rocker route (86B) it will basically keep pulling, and pull harder, with a longer living valvetrain.
Any cam in the 255-260 duration @ .050" will work well.
This is a textbook "big engine" combo that works very well, Mark Herbert (RIP) promoted this one a lot. _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlostam Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2009 Posts: 414 Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:44 pm Post subject: Re: Another 2110 build****HEAD ADVISE NEEDED***** |
|
|
with an Engle 120 or Web 110 with either 1.1s or 1.25s will be an easy to build and powerful engine. If you go the ratio rocker route (86B) it will basically keep pulling, and pull harder, with a longer living valvetrain.
Any cam in the 255-260 duration @ .050" will work well.
Bare with me then an Engle 125 with 1.25 rockers will pull at higher RPMs? Will I have enough torque at the lower RPM range in order to get in and out of traffic for example and also have the engine pull through the higher RPMs? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:11 pm Post subject: Re: Another 2110 build****HEAD ADVISE NEEDED***** |
|
|
the 125 is just harder on the valvetrain.
we have pretty good descriptions for our cams.
http://vwparts.aircooled.net/category-s/957.htm _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlostam Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2009 Posts: 414 Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok so going ratio rockers is the way to go. Now is this something that I can learn?? or does it take an engineer by my side?? I'm willing to buy the measuring tools. Now for the other question is 1.25 rockers easier then 1.4 rockers or the same measuring techniques?
Few things has changed now on my build: Changing the stock to ratio rockers, rods are going to be 5.5, push rods are now need for the ratio rockers.
Keep the info coming I'm here and taking notes. Thank you all |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfats808 Samba Member
Joined: December 10, 2007 Posts: 5022 Location: oahu hawaii
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
carlostam wrote: |
Ok so going ratio rockers is the way to go. Now is this something that I can learn?? or does it take an engineer by my side?? I'm willing to buy the measuring tools. Now for the other question is 1.25 rockers easier then 1.4 rockers or the same measuring techniques?
Few things has changed now on my build: Changing the stock to ratio rockers, rods are going to be 5.5, push rods are now need for the ratio rockers.
Keep the info coming I'm here and taking notes. Thank you all |
Same measuring techniques. Get the 1.4 rockers and cam combo and call it good. _________________ 2276 IDA's 86C 11-1 DD !
2017 48 Trijet DRLA's W125
Rockstar Suzuki wrote: |
You might as well put 10 year build in your bullshit sig, as it will NEVER run. Also your a dick |
You can always learn something new, even from a fool.
Check your oil levels routinely! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miketheblur Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2008 Posts: 148 Location: carlisle pa.
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:41 pm Post subject: cylinder heads |
|
|
The ACN road warrior heads look and sound like nice street heads.I would think they would also work well with a web 86a for a little better bottom end. _________________ 56 oval sunroof 78 Westy
Last edited by miketheblur on Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bill271 Samba Member
Joined: July 06, 2008 Posts: 761 Location: escondido
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try running street eliminators and a fk 10 or 87 and bump the comp to 10.5 or 11. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VIN Samba Member
Joined: June 01, 2006 Posts: 941 Location: phoenix
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
with a 5.5 rod. wont you have like a positive .200" deck height. wont that get into your engine width issues, you dont want to encounter? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlostam Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2009 Posts: 414 Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VIN wrote: |
with a 5.5 rod. wont you have like a positive .200" deck height. wont that get into your engine width issues, you dont want to encounter? |
My understanding is that using 5.5 rods will eliminate problems with clearance at the case area and would be easier to determine deck height with shims under the cylinder... I'm I right in thinking this way? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bill271 Samba Member
Joined: July 06, 2008 Posts: 761 Location: escondido
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes depending on the bearing style you run i:e chevy porsche |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would not run 5.5 rods with an 82 crank, you run 5.5 rods with a 78 crank. Rod length should be selected to keep the deck height and engine width in mind.
The L5s are good for over 180hp with an FK-8 or 86B. With a 120, 125, or 109 you are still looking at 150-160.
And don't let people scare you with "no low end" garbage. It is true there will be "no low end" compared to the top end, but if you overlayed the HP/Torque curves along with a stock 1600DP, you'd see you had more low end than stock. So it will still be quite easy to drive. The milder the cam the easier to putt putt around. A 120 is a pretty mild cam if you have a 2275 with some L5s/Dual 44s/1 5/8" Exhaust, for example.
If you want to play it safe, either get
L5s, 120 and 1.1s or 1.25s
or
L5s, FK-8 or 86B, and 1.4s.
Both require dual springs, and both will haul @$$.
The ratio rocker one will cost $150 more, but I think that's well spent. _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlostam Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2009 Posts: 414 Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John: Thanks for the feed back. What lenth connecting rods do you recomend then?
It seems that going with 1.4 rocker is the way to go. Even though my concern is my ability of getting the geometry right |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fivelugshortaxle Samba Member
Joined: May 13, 2011 Posts: 4254 Location: Aumsville, Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
carlostam wrote: |
John: Thanks for the feed back. What lenth connecting rods do you recomend then?
It seems that going with 1.4 rocker is the way to go. Even though my concern is my ability of getting the geometry right |
Check this out.....
http://www.lunatipower.com/Tech/Valvetrain/HowToVerifyValvetrainGeometry.aspx _________________ Good things come to those who wait.
2332 with lots of goodies....
Rotating assembly balanced by Brothers VW
4340 84mm crank
AA 94mm p&c' s
Total seal 2nd ring, rest are Grants
5.5 h beams
Magnum straight cuts
Steve Long XR310 on a 106
CB 1.4 rockers
CB Magnaspark 2 distributor
NGK D7ea plugs
A1 lowdown 1 3/4 with single muffler
Dellorto 48's with 40 venturies
Kennedy Stage 2 with Daiken disc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RockCrusher Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2010 Posts: 4596 Location: Parkesburg, PA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[email protected] wrote: |
I would not run 5.5 rods with an 82 crank, you run 5.5 rods with a 78 crank. Rod length should be selected to keep the deck height and engine width in mind. |
I'm afraid I was was responsible for putting that in Carlo's ear. I was walking around the shop talking to Carlo because the reception in the back room was horrible today and not good out front either and I was distracted because of it and not being able to hear too well. Even had to shut all the doors due to traffic noise so I could hear a bit better. Anyway...we were talking at length about rod length and Carlo even said 5.4 but in my brain fade of distraction I was telling him 5.5's were the rods he needed. Went so far as to say you need the rod that will make your life easier rather than some theoretically correct length. No excuse really for that mistake. So Carlo is not the fool here...I am. My humble apologies to Carlo.
RC _________________ [email protected] Please use email for all general inquiries.
I will be happy to speak to anyone who has a serious inquiry (meaning real potential business for RC enterprises) or a parts order. Due to machining noise causing missed calls all calls will be returned promptly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlostam Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2009 Posts: 414 Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FiveLug: Thanks but will that also relate to VW heads? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlostam Samba Member
Joined: September 16, 2009 Posts: 414 Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RockCrusher wrote: |
[email protected] wrote: |
I would not run 5.5 rods with an 82 crank, you run 5.5 rods with a 78 crank. Rod length should be selected to keep the deck height and engine width in mind. |
I'm afraid I was was responsible for putting that in Carlo's ear. I was walking around the shop talking to Carlo because the reception in the back room was horrible today and not good out front either and I was distracted because of it and not being able to hear too well. Even had to shut all the doors due to traffic noise so I could hear a bit better. Anyway...we were talking at length about rod length and Carlo even said 5.4 but in my brain fade of distraction I was telling him 5.5's were the rods he needed. Went so far as to say you need the rod that will make your life easier rather than some theoretically correct length. No excuse really for that mistake. So Carlo is not the fool here...I am. My humble apologies to Carlo.
RC |
RC: No apologies needed we are all human, Don't worry did not metion your name I took the hit .... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VIN Samba Member
Joined: June 01, 2006 Posts: 941 Location: phoenix
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i was pretty much asking questions as well, i encountered a .031" positive deck, with 82 stroke and 5.4 rods. cant imagine having to deal with a .130" positive deck. i ordered some custom cylinder shims from rimco, 75$..ouch!!!
Last edited by VIN on Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:06 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RockCrusher Samba Member
Joined: August 03, 2010 Posts: 4596 Location: Parkesburg, PA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I noticed you kept your mouth shut but I'm not one to let others take my lumps. All of us are human and I'm not one of the engine God's who refuse to ever admit making a mistake. I may post a lot here but it isn't about ego or superiority in any way for me....it's about helping others and promoting business and I never hid that fact from my very first post. Post enough and you're going to make a mistake sometimes. Try to be chief cook and bottle washer and quoter and machinist and builder and receptionist and tech line and you will make a mistake sometimes.....today was one of those times. That's why I don't take calls in the middle of machining or assembly.
RC _________________ [email protected] Please use email for all general inquiries.
I will be happy to speak to anyone who has a serious inquiry (meaning real potential business for RC enterprises) or a parts order. Due to machining noise causing missed calls all calls will be returned promptly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fivelugshortaxle Samba Member
Joined: May 13, 2011 Posts: 4254 Location: Aumsville, Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
carlostam wrote: |
FiveLug: Thanks but will that also relate to VW heads? |
yes....rocker geometry is rocker geometry _________________ Good things come to those who wait.
2332 with lots of goodies....
Rotating assembly balanced by Brothers VW
4340 84mm crank
AA 94mm p&c' s
Total seal 2nd ring, rest are Grants
5.5 h beams
Magnum straight cuts
Steve Long XR310 on a 106
CB 1.4 rockers
CB Magnaspark 2 distributor
NGK D7ea plugs
A1 lowdown 1 3/4 with single muffler
Dellorto 48's with 40 venturies
Kennedy Stage 2 with Daiken disc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|