Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Another 2110 build *Head Advise Needed*
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 17, 18, 19  Next
Jump to:
Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
carlostam
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 414
Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
carlostam is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Everyone thank your for the input. I'm begging to get a headache on how many choices I do have. Shocked Shocked

John, I wan't something that will have a bit of everything. low end torque and RPM power. I'm not looking for a 7000 rpm engine. But I don't want a tractor. I think I'm saying is I want to have my cake and eat it too. Is this not possible or is it build a tractor or full blown engine. That is where i'm confused. Mostly I'll be cruising at 45 - 50 mph. It will be stock 66 trans with 205/65/15 tires so rpms 2500 or so right now. But I do want something when I drop the hammer it will pull nicely. I'm sorry don't have a engine vocabulary so bare with me.

RC, your input also please and of course the Samba
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
[email protected]
Samba Member


Joined: August 03, 2002
Posts: 12785
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
john@aircooled.net is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:56 am    Post subject: Re: Another 2110 build****HEAD ADVISE NEEDED***** Reply with quote

http://vwparts.aircooled.net/ACN-Road-Warrior-Dual-Port-Cylinder-Heads-L5s-p/l5%20heads%20pair.htm

with an Engle 120 or Web 110 with either 1.1s or 1.25s will be an easy to build and powerful engine. If you go the ratio rocker route (86B) it will basically keep pulling, and pull harder, with a longer living valvetrain.

Any cam in the 255-260 duration @ .050" will work well.

This is a textbook "big engine" combo that works very well, Mark Herbert (RIP) promoted this one a lot.
_________________
It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!

Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net

"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Facebook Gallery Classifieds Feedback
carlostam
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 414
Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
carlostam is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Another 2110 build****HEAD ADVISE NEEDED***** Reply with quote

with an Engle 120 or Web 110 with either 1.1s or 1.25s will be an easy to build and powerful engine. If you go the ratio rocker route (86B) it will basically keep pulling, and pull harder, with a longer living valvetrain.

Any cam in the 255-260 duration @ .050" will work well.


Bare with me then an Engle 125 with 1.25 rockers will pull at higher RPMs? Will I have enough torque at the lower RPM range in order to get in and out of traffic for example and also have the engine pull through the higher RPMs?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
[email protected]
Samba Member


Joined: August 03, 2002
Posts: 12785
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
john@aircooled.net is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Another 2110 build****HEAD ADVISE NEEDED***** Reply with quote

the 125 is just harder on the valvetrain.

we have pretty good descriptions for our cams.

http://vwparts.aircooled.net/category-s/957.htm
_________________
It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!

Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net

"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Facebook Gallery Classifieds Feedback
carlostam
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 414
Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
carlostam is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok so going ratio rockers is the way to go. Now is this something that I can learn?? or does it take an engineer by my side?? I'm willing to buy the measuring tools. Now for the other question is 1.25 rockers easier then 1.4 rockers or the same measuring techniques?

Few things has changed now on my build: Changing the stock to ratio rockers, rods are going to be 5.5, push rods are now need for the ratio rockers.

Keep the info coming I'm here and taking notes. Thank you all
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jfats808
Samba Member


Joined: December 10, 2007
Posts: 5022
Location: oahu hawaii
jfats808 is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

carlostam wrote:
Ok so going ratio rockers is the way to go. Now is this something that I can learn?? or does it take an engineer by my side?? I'm willing to buy the measuring tools. Now for the other question is 1.25 rockers easier then 1.4 rockers or the same measuring techniques?

Few things has changed now on my build: Changing the stock to ratio rockers, rods are going to be 5.5, push rods are now need for the ratio rockers.

Keep the info coming I'm here and taking notes. Thank you all


Same measuring techniques. Get the 1.4 rockers and cam combo and call it good.
_________________
2276 IDA's 86C 11-1 DD !
2017 48 Trijet DRLA's W125

Rockstar Suzuki wrote:

You might as well put 10 year build in your bullshit sig, as it will NEVER run. Also your a dick

You can always learn something new, even from a fool.
Check your oil levels routinely!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
miketheblur
Samba Member


Joined: February 21, 2008
Posts: 148
Location: carlisle pa.
miketheblur is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:41 pm    Post subject: cylinder heads Reply with quote

The ACN road warrior heads look and sound like nice street heads.I would think they would also work well with a web 86a for a little better bottom end.
_________________
56 oval sunroof 78 Westy


Last edited by miketheblur on Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:51 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Bill271
Samba Member


Joined: July 06, 2008
Posts: 761
Location: escondido
Bill271 is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try running street eliminators and a fk 10 or 87 and bump the comp to 10.5 or 11.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
VIN
Samba Member


Joined: June 01, 2006
Posts: 941
Location: phoenix
VIN is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

with a 5.5 rod. wont you have like a positive .200" deck height. wont that get into your engine width issues, you dont want to encounter?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
carlostam
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 414
Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
carlostam is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

VIN wrote:
with a 5.5 rod. wont you have like a positive .200" deck height. wont that get into your engine width issues, you dont want to encounter?


My understanding is that using 5.5 rods will eliminate problems with clearance at the case area and would be easier to determine deck height with shims under the cylinder... I'm I right in thinking this way?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Bill271
Samba Member


Joined: July 06, 2008
Posts: 761
Location: escondido
Bill271 is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes depending on the bearing style you run i:e chevy porsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
[email protected]
Samba Member


Joined: August 03, 2002
Posts: 12785
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
john@aircooled.net is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would not run 5.5 rods with an 82 crank, you run 5.5 rods with a 78 crank. Rod length should be selected to keep the deck height and engine width in mind.

The L5s are good for over 180hp with an FK-8 or 86B. With a 120, 125, or 109 you are still looking at 150-160.

And don't let people scare you with "no low end" garbage. It is true there will be "no low end" compared to the top end, but if you overlayed the HP/Torque curves along with a stock 1600DP, you'd see you had more low end than stock. So it will still be quite easy to drive. The milder the cam the easier to putt putt around. A 120 is a pretty mild cam if you have a 2275 with some L5s/Dual 44s/1 5/8" Exhaust, for example.

If you want to play it safe, either get

L5s, 120 and 1.1s or 1.25s
or
L5s, FK-8 or 86B, and 1.4s.

Both require dual springs, and both will haul @$$.

The ratio rocker one will cost $150 more, but I think that's well spent.
_________________
It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!

Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net

"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Facebook Gallery Classifieds Feedback
carlostam
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 414
Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
carlostam is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John: Thanks for the feed back. What lenth connecting rods do you recomend then?

It seems that going with 1.4 rocker is the way to go. Even though my concern is my ability of getting the geometry right Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
fivelugshortaxle
Samba Member


Joined: May 13, 2011
Posts: 4254
Location: Aumsville, Oregon
fivelugshortaxle is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

carlostam wrote:
John: Thanks for the feed back. What lenth connecting rods do you recomend then?

It seems that going with 1.4 rocker is the way to go. Even though my concern is my ability of getting the geometry right Shocked



Check this out.....

http://www.lunatipower.com/Tech/Valvetrain/HowToVerifyValvetrainGeometry.aspx
_________________
Good things come to those who wait.
2332 with lots of goodies....
Rotating assembly balanced by Brothers VW
4340 84mm crank
AA 94mm p&c' s
Total seal 2nd ring, rest are Grants
5.5 h beams
Magnum straight cuts
Steve Long XR310 on a 106
CB 1.4 rockers
CB Magnaspark 2 distributor
NGK D7ea plugs
A1 lowdown 1 3/4 with single muffler
Dellorto 48's with 40 venturies
Kennedy Stage 2 with Daiken disc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Gallery Classifieds Feedback
RockCrusher
Samba Member


Joined: August 03, 2010
Posts: 4596
Location: Parkesburg, PA
RockCrusher is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[email protected] wrote:
I would not run 5.5 rods with an 82 crank, you run 5.5 rods with a 78 crank. Rod length should be selected to keep the deck height and engine width in mind.
I'm afraid I was was responsible for putting that in Carlo's ear. I was walking around the shop talking to Carlo because the reception in the back room was horrible today and not good out front either and I was distracted because of it and not being able to hear too well. Even had to shut all the doors due to traffic noise so I could hear a bit better. Anyway...we were talking at length about rod length and Carlo even said 5.4 but in my brain fade of distraction I was telling him 5.5's were the rods he needed. Went so far as to say you need the rod that will make your life easier rather than some theoretically correct length. No excuse really for that mistake. So Carlo is not the fool here...I am. My humble apologies to Carlo.

RC
_________________
[email protected] Please use email for all general inquiries.

I will be happy to speak to anyone who has a serious inquiry (meaning real potential business for RC enterprises) or a parts order. Due to machining noise causing missed calls all calls will be returned promptly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
carlostam
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 414
Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
carlostam is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FiveLug: Thanks but will that also relate to VW heads?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
carlostam
Samba Member


Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 414
Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
carlostam is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RockCrusher wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
I would not run 5.5 rods with an 82 crank, you run 5.5 rods with a 78 crank. Rod length should be selected to keep the deck height and engine width in mind.
I'm afraid I was was responsible for putting that in Carlo's ear. I was walking around the shop talking to Carlo because the reception in the back room was horrible today and not good out front either and I was distracted because of it and not being able to hear too well. Even had to shut all the doors due to traffic noise so I could hear a bit better. Anyway...we were talking at length about rod length and Carlo even said 5.4 but in my brain fade of distraction I was telling him 5.5's were the rods he needed. Went so far as to say you need the rod that will make your life easier rather than some theoretically correct length. No excuse really for that mistake. So Carlo is not the fool here...I am. My humble apologies to Carlo.

RC


RC: No apologies needed we are all human, Don't worry did not metion your name I took the hit Laughing Laughing ....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
VIN
Samba Member


Joined: June 01, 2006
Posts: 941
Location: phoenix
VIN is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i was pretty much asking questions as well, i encountered a .031" positive deck, with 82 stroke and 5.4 rods. cant imagine having to deal with a .130" positive deck. i ordered some custom cylinder shims from rimco, 75$..ouch!!!

Last edited by VIN on Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:06 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
RockCrusher
Samba Member


Joined: August 03, 2010
Posts: 4596
Location: Parkesburg, PA
RockCrusher is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah I noticed you kept your mouth shut but I'm not one to let others take my lumps. All of us are human and I'm not one of the engine God's who refuse to ever admit making a mistake. I may post a lot here but it isn't about ego or superiority in any way for me....it's about helping others and promoting business and I never hid that fact from my very first post. Post enough and you're going to make a mistake sometimes. Try to be chief cook and bottle washer and quoter and machinist and builder and receptionist and tech line and you will make a mistake sometimes.....today was one of those times. That's why I don't take calls in the middle of machining or assembly.

RC
_________________
[email protected] Please use email for all general inquiries.

I will be happy to speak to anyone who has a serious inquiry (meaning real potential business for RC enterprises) or a parts order. Due to machining noise causing missed calls all calls will be returned promptly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
fivelugshortaxle
Samba Member


Joined: May 13, 2011
Posts: 4254
Location: Aumsville, Oregon
fivelugshortaxle is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

carlostam wrote:
FiveLug: Thanks but will that also relate to VW heads?


yes....rocker geometry is rocker geometry
_________________
Good things come to those who wait.
2332 with lots of goodies....
Rotating assembly balanced by Brothers VW
4340 84mm crank
AA 94mm p&c' s
Total seal 2nd ring, rest are Grants
5.5 h beams
Magnum straight cuts
Steve Long XR310 on a 106
CB 1.4 rockers
CB Magnaspark 2 distributor
NGK D7ea plugs
A1 lowdown 1 3/4 with single muffler
Dellorto 48's with 40 venturies
Kennedy Stage 2 with Daiken disc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 17, 18, 19  Next
Jump to:
Page 3 of 19

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.