Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Help me plan my bus engine? 78mm x 90.5?
Page: Previous  1, 2
Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
W1K1
Samba Member


Joined: March 04, 2004
Posts: 4921
Location: Southern AB
W1K1 is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is also the link at the bottom of my signature for jim Martins engine build and:
http://www.aircooledtech.com/engine_build/
_________________
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/archives/manuals/jim_martin_engine_build.php

1973 super
1965 squareback 1500E
1971 bay window westy- subi swap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Alstrup
Samba Member


Joined: July 12, 2007
Posts: 7219
Location: Videbaek Denmark
Alstrup is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Web 218 all the way.
A little less peak torque compared to fk65, but a LOT less valve train noise and wear. Also less head temp. You can use single HD springs. I like to shim them 1 mm. ACN ally pushrods would be very nice.
As for heads. If you want massive lower end torque, have a good head guy make you a set of 043“s with 35/32 or 37,5/33 mm valves. Have him make the ports "hi velocity". It - will - kill the upper end performance somewhat though. My 1955 bus version pulls 115 - 117 hp @ 5300 and 170 Nm torque at 3200 with heads that are similar to CNC round port. doing it with smaller valve heads with good ports can pull the torque further down by roughly 250 rpm. and take 5 - 10 hp out on top.
I dont remember the reduction ratio of the big nut boxes for sure. But you should aim for a final ratio that equals 18,6 to 19 M/1000 rpm. No more.
Also, make sure that the engine gets ALL the air that is possible. I often drill a 2½" hole in the front plate just above the starter, to allow more air into the engine compartement. (If you drive a lot of off road this is NOT a good mod, as it will then suck a lot of dust into the engine compartement.)

Living up in the thinner air allows you to up the CR a bit. How much I am not the one to tell. At sea level I set these engines up for 95 octane Euro fuel. (About 91 US) And that is 8,6 - 1. I would buy some of the stuff from John @ ACN and get his angle on that.

T
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Moz'z58
Samba Member


Joined: August 09, 2008
Posts: 45
Location: Near Lake Tahoe in California USA
Moz'z58 is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is just my experience with a heavy camper, often loaded for long travel on and off-road. Lots of opinions around, not sure how many of them have 110,000 heavy Kombi road miles to base them on however. I live @ 3100' elev since '91 and drive snow/cold to hot summer heat in sierra foothills. This is a longish post to give info's-apology if tedious but likely you'll find others with real Camper and bit more HP in concurrence.

My bus is a '65 Kombi (was a westpahalia, now custom camper as it was rotted beyond repair) I've owned since 1986. In '89 I did the Berg recommendation for busses using their kit for a 1.7L 88x69 welded cw crank, 12# flywhl and 1700# clutch p/p/solid disc. The cam they sent is there gb296 = 276 duration and .374" lift, stock 1.1:1 rkrs, solid shafts and dual springs and their retainers , steel P-rods. Stock size valvesx3angle. Sump and full flow and berg relief cover. I use a 96 plate ext cooler in the summer. Disconnect it in winter. 6.9:1 CR.

I used 40 idf's on Berg manifolds w/ 009 for first 33k mi's then switched to Solex 40's. Not really necessary maybe but I felt the IDF's were too much carb for 1.7L and the Solex run smoother - still w/ 009.

This engine configuration has served me very reliably which is all I was/am interested in. My ideal was a 78mm berg crank but was more money than I wanted to spend back then. Still enough torque w/ 69 to do fine Kombi duty IMO/IME.

I have to disagree with the common statements that a 3.88 R&P is bad news in a bus. I use side scoops for CFM increase to the doghouse fan, and temps stay just fine @ Clyheads and oil. Split the diff if you get paranoid and go w/ 4.12, but many use 3.88. My opinion is many are building engines with very high CR into a heavy bus, driving long hot hours, and then blame a 3.88 if it's installed. Whatever.

If your climbing logging roads all day cutting firewood for a living then 4.37 may be best w/ the added HP, but I have no problem pulling uphill out of camp sites with a load. Keep in mind there is not much difference in the lower end gearing as opposed to tallness of 4th between the 4.37 and 3.88. The OG 4.37 was doing duty w/ much less HP and torque - the '65 w/ 1500 SP and Solex30 was considered a big step up in the day.

I went to 3.88 after a side gear went through the circlip and pulled the tube away from the bell flange due to fast mountain cornering driving in a loaded up bus. I bought the center from Transform in LB in 1992, and kept the R-boxes all the same. No problems since and 73,000 mi.

With the OG 4.37 and new 1.7 I was running high rpm's on hiway to reach 60mph and that bugged me. I was OK with that @ 1600 and single solex 34 for the first few years cruising 50-55 to keep the engine sane and safe, and generally took it in stride, but w/ new engine power 300+ mi trips from home to a destination took longer than necessary due to the R&P limitation . But the all new 1.7 it just didn't make sense anymore. I cruise at 2800-32/3400 and whatever that nets in mph relative to tire size. Right now I just put on Wintertraks @ 205/75/15 rears and the speed has jumped up to 65 mph. But I have cut wells and 6" steel spoke rear and 14" bay rims up front on BusBoys conversion disc brakes I added in '88-very worthy in heavy camper mountain driving - I got tired and scared of the fade on steep grades with all that weight. Really long reply but is my direct and still continuing Kombi experience. The trend now is all stock and I love them. But I like disc brack and the added track width I have and better handling result.

Have fun, and don't forget the dual valve springs and steel push rods with your dual carbs in heavy bus. Also pay to have it all balanced together if you can Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Splitdog
Samba Split Personality


Joined: February 16, 2004
Posts: 4125
Location: Planet VW
Splitdog is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With GRB's I'd stick with a small cam. Enjoy the bottom-end torque where you'll be at most of the time anyway. Letting the clutch out and bogging every time is bogus. I have a 1600 with dual kadrons and a 100 cam. I think that cam is too big. It doesn't come on until about 2300 RPM. So between 1500 and 2300 you get the bog. I have 8:1 CR.
_________________
CH³NO²

Z = z² + C

Der Blitzkrieg Kafers

#notacallooker
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Alstrup
Samba Member


Joined: July 12, 2007
Posts: 7219
Location: Videbaek Denmark
Alstrup is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moz'z58 wrote:
This is just my experience with a heavy camper, often loaded for long travel on and off-road. Lots of opinions around, not sure how many of them have 110,000 heavy Kombi road miles to base them on however. I live @ 3100' elev since '91 and drive snow/cold to hot summer heat in sierra foothills. This is a longish post to give info's-apology if tedious but likely you'll find others with real Camper and bit more HP in concurrence.

My bus is a '65 Kombi (was a westpahalia, now custom camper as it was rotted beyond repair) I've owned since 1986. In '89 I did the Berg recommendation for busses using their kit for a 1.7L 88x69 welded cw crank, 12# flywhl and 1700# clutch p/p/solid disc. The cam they sent is there gb296 = 276 duration and .374" lift, stock 1.1:1 rkrs, solid shafts and dual springs and their retainers , steel P-rods. Stock size valvesx3angle. Sump and full flow and berg relief cover. I use a 96 plate ext cooler in the summer. Disconnect it in winter. 6.9:1 CR.

I used 40 idf's on Berg manifolds w/ 009 for first 33k mi's then switched to Solex 40's. Not really necessary maybe but I felt the IDF's were too much carb for 1.7L and the Solex run smoother - still w/ 009.

This engine configuration has served me very reliably which is all I was/am interested in. My ideal was a 78mm berg crank but was more money than I wanted to spend back then. Still enough torque w/ 69 to do fine Kombi duty IMO/IME.

I have to disagree with the common statements that a 3.88 R&P is bad news in a bus. I use side scoops for CFM increase to the doghouse fan, and temps stay just fine @ Clyheads and oil. Split the diff if you get paranoid and go w/ 4.12, but many use 3.88. My opinion is many are building engines with very high CR into a heavy bus, driving long hot hours, and then blame a 3.88 if it's installed. Whatever.

If your climbing logging roads all day cutting firewood for a living then 4.37 may be best w/ the added HP, but I have no problem pulling uphill out of camp sites with a load. Keep in mind there is not much difference in the lower end gearing as opposed to tallness of 4th between the 4.37 and 3.88. The OG 4.37 was doing duty w/ much less HP and torque - the '65 w/ 1500 SP and Solex30 was considered a big step up in the day.

I went to 3.88 after a side gear went through the circlip and pulled the tube away from the bell flange due to fast mountain cornering driving in a loaded up bus. I bought the center from Transform in LB in 1992, and kept the R-boxes all the same. No problems since and 73,000 mi.

With the OG 4.37 and new 1.7 I was running high rpm's on hiway to reach 60mph and that bugged me. I was OK with that @ 1600 and single solex 34 for the first few years cruising 50-55 to keep the engine sane and safe, and generally took it in stride, but w/ new engine power 300+ mi trips from home to a destination took longer than necessary due to the R&P limitation . But the all new 1.7 it just didn't make sense anymore. I cruise at 2800-32/3400 and whatever that nets in mph relative to tire size. Right now I just put on Wintertraks @ 205/75/15 rears and the speed has jumped up to 65 mph. But I have cut wells and 6" steel spoke rear and 14" bay rims up front on BusBoys conversion disc brakes I added in '88-very worthy in heavy camper mountain driving - I got tired and scared of the fade on steep grades with all that weight. Really long reply but is my direct and still continuing Kombi experience. The trend now is all stock and I love them. But I like disc brack and the added track width I have and better handling result.

Have fun, and don't forget the dual valve springs and steel push rods with your dual carbs in heavy bus. Also pay to have it all balanced together if you can Wink

With that cam and 6,9 CR it wohnt make much more than stock torque. Most likely also the reason why the engine did“nt like the Webers. another old Berg saying with the dual springs on that cam. Absolutely not nescessary, as the engine runs out of steam about 5-700 rpms before single HD springs give up. But that“s the way he recomended it back then, so be it.

Your cruise speed/rpm is just about what I recommended earlier, roughly 56 mph @ 3000. Same ratio at 3400 rpm would be 64 mph. A 2 liter will be able to pull even higher ratio“s than that, but you have to take the cooling part into consideration too. If you use LN“Nikasil cylinders I wouldnt be affaid of doing it. but with cast iron jugs it“s better to stay on the safe side.
(For comparison. I have one customer that has a 66 split camper, who is running a 1955 cc. 117 hp type 1 and up until a year ago had a 4,125 freeway frier transmission, straight axle, resulting in 2650 rpm @ 56 mph. Here, in relatively cool climate it always ran slightly elevated head and oil temps, even with Brad Penn oil. Then last year he decided to reduce the ratio to a 0,89 4rth. increasing rpm to 2825 @ 56 mph. Then cylinder head temps dropped with 10 degrees and oil with 5-7 degree“s. And this is more or less across the entire rpm range)
If one WANTS to have a - too high - ratio, it is nescessary to look into different fan ratio“s. ACN and Low Bugget have some solutions to that.

The brake upgrade you made sounds as a VERY good idea, especially in the mountains with a heavy vehichle. Here we mainly do it for speed reduction/safety.

With today“s knowledge/technolgy we do not need to build engines with super low CR to make them live long. Then we can also take advantage of the added torque that higher dynamic compression provides.
(If you look closely at the Berg cams, they have moved the exhaust side compared to the intake which is similar to the Engle W100. The "relocation" of the exhaust side provides for added dynamic compression in order to return some of the lower CR. - Very square explanation. Then why lower the CR that much in the first place (?) )

15 years ago I also built some engines the Berg way. - I had loads of problems with controlling ignition/emission/head temperatures if the engine was to provide some decent power. If I accepted it as a lazy SOB it ran "fine", just low on power. In the end it cost me a set of cracked heads. After that I went back to the "new age" way of doing it. Regained power and torque, and didnt crack anymore heads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
tdubz510
Samba Member


Joined: January 09, 2019
Posts: 54
Location: CA
tdubz510 is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2019 11:59 am    Post subject: Re: Help me plan my bus engine? 78mm x 90.5? Reply with quote

So, I'm thinking of buying a 59 Kombi that lives in flat Florida, that I want to turn into a West Coast camper/tourer.

I live in NorCal and want to be able to get to the mountains and National Parks and hot springs and such....you get the idea..not a flatland cruiser!

I want a very dependable, strong bus that will be moderately loaded down with a SO33 style custom interior for long spring and summer road trips.. Very Happy

Bus as is has been modified to a stock 73 type3 squareback transaxle, a very dependable 1600 beetle engine built on a fuel injected block...
I don't know the ratios in the transaxle..and I don't know crap about engines and transaxle ratios you guys were speaking of earlier to be honest!! lol

I'm thinking of going up in engine size to 1835.

I got a recommendation for an engine upgrade from a builder of engines:
a super street 1835cc full flow engine with 92mm thick walled pistons, a counter crank, stage 1 clutch, and A1 exhaust.

Think this is a good power upgrade with said 73 transaxle for my camper/touring plans for this bus?

Should this transaxle the PO has put in need to be changed to OG for better torque in some mountain roads??

Thanks for you help!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
mark tucker
Samba Member


Joined: April 08, 2009
Posts: 23937
Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
mark tucker is offline 

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2019 1:08 pm    Post subject: Re: Help me plan my bus engine? 78mm x 90.5? Reply with quote

dont. if it runs, leave it alone!! and then start buying all the new peices you need to build a 82mm ~84mm stroke engine with cnc chamber lost pan of cheetos heads & CB uniteck rods to fit the crank. cb probably has the cam you want too. and get the aluminum engine case thats stroked .slot the lifter bores and use a 30 mm oil pump, pumping out to the filter than cooler then back to the case. use the wide glade sump, dont use the filter in the sump, just the extended cb puckup tube into a oe style screen. and use total seal rings too.piston size of your choice. dont short change your self.you will just end up with a mess at the swapmeet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.