Author |
Message |
deezelcaddy Samba Member
Joined: March 29, 2011 Posts: 15 Location: ligonier, pa
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:56 am Post subject: Insulated engine cover on a diesel? |
|
|
I grabbed the engine cover out of my parts van, a round headlight water cooled. It has some kind of foam on the bottom. I would like to use it on my diesel as my latches are broken and i am hoping to cut down on some major engine noise but I want to make sure the foam lid is legal first. Thanx for the advice [/b] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phishman068 Samba Member
Joined: February 19, 2007 Posts: 1868 Location: Pittsburgh PA (ish)
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
all north american engine hatches after 1983 were made of fiberglass and had that foam insulation in place. Plenty of people have run these with diesels.
In some ways your steel one is more desirable. It's massively heavier but the belief is that it's better at containing flames in the advent of a fire. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
presslab Samba Member
Joined: September 29, 2008 Posts: 1730 Location: Sonoma County
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I put the steel one in my '86. I wouldn't say it makes things any louder or quieter. The steel one has some kind of fabric batting for insulation.
I guess with the broken latches your old one would be pretty loud. _________________ 1986 Vanagon Westfalia EJ25
1988 Subaru GL-10 EJ20G --- 2000 Honda XR650L
2010 Titus El Guapo --- 2011 On-One 456 Ti |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MarkWard Samba Member
Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 17155 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am running the plastic cover on my 82 diesel. It was easier to modify for the TDI engine clearance. Can't speak to the noise. I don't think diesels are as prone to fire as gassers, so that may not be a consideration for you. _________________ ☮️ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crazyvwvanman Samba Member
Joined: January 28, 2008 Posts: 9939 Location: Orbiting San Diego
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think the metal lid is better for fires. I have seen at least as many vans burned up from engine fires with the steel lid as the fiberglass one. The hot sheet metal transfers the heat to the fabric and cushion resting on it and those catch fire inside the van. The fiberglass one doesn't do that. But since there is sheet metal all around the opening the fabric and cushion can burst into flame no matter which lid is covering the engine.
Mark
rsxsr wrote: |
I am running the plastic cover on my 82 diesel. It was easier to modify for the TDI engine clearance. Can't speak to the noise. I don't think diesels are as prone to fire as gassers, so that may not be a consideration for you. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
deezelcaddy Samba Member
Joined: March 29, 2011 Posts: 15 Location: ligonier, pa
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanx all for the advice i will try the fiberglass one to see if there is any sound difference. on the topic of engine noise does anything help? I know it is a diesel and they are loud, but my kids complain about the noise in the back. I just have bare steel back there so I am thinking maybe a heavy mat or possibly the cushion for a z bed i am currently looking for. i am also considering phat mat or dyna mat but the testing on the other posts seem less than encouraging. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
presslab Samba Member
Joined: September 29, 2008 Posts: 1730 Location: Sonoma County
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I picked one of these up and put it between my Westy mattress and the body. I can't say it's much quieter but that wasn't the point for me - I wanted something I could lay on the ground if need be. But if you have no mattress I think it would certainly help. I know in the past when I removed my mattress the engine was much louder.
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=531320 _________________ 1986 Vanagon Westfalia EJ25
1988 Subaru GL-10 EJ20G --- 2000 Honda XR650L
2010 Titus El Guapo --- 2011 On-One 456 Ti |
|
Back to top |
|
|
boof1306 Samba Member
Joined: July 10, 2010 Posts: 304 Location: MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There was a factory rubber mat available for oil burners. It went over the entire rear deck and down the slope to the floor. It made a difference. You could easily make one. You will find pictures of one on MG's Limey thread. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crazyvwvanman Samba Member
Joined: January 28, 2008 Posts: 9939 Location: Orbiting San Diego
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The diesel metal engine lid seemed twice as heavy as the aircooled metal lid, due to some heavy sound deadening material on the diesel lid. I have used very thick very heavy truck bed liner rubber sheet, cut for the entire area under the rear cushion over the engine. That makes a noticeable improvement with a diesel engine.
Mark
deezelcaddy wrote: |
thanx all for the advice i will try the fiberglass one to see if there is any sound difference. on the topic of engine noise does anything help? I know it is a diesel and they are loud, but my kids complain about the noise in the back. I just have bare steel back there so I am thinking maybe a heavy mat or possibly the cushion for a z bed i am currently looking for. i am also considering phat mat or dyna mat but the testing on the other posts seem less than encouraging. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brickwerks Samba Member
Joined: April 11, 2010 Posts: 214 Location: West Yorkshire - UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The engine lid material is a age thing, not a fuel thing.
All later vans have plastic/glass lid.
All the flat surfaces around the engine bay had a bitumastic sound deadening covering which was then painted over.
The sloping face going from the load area floor up to the level of the engine bay also had thick foam/card insulation on the underside [above the gearbox]
Passenger carrying Diesel T3s also had a "comfort mount" on the elft engine bearer, it has a rubber bushing in it.
The other thing that makes a massive difference is the factory undertray as fitted to all Diesel when it left the factory [but often left off as they are a pain in the ring piece to remove] _________________
whynotvw wrote: |
I see you wanna start some shit. whats your fuckin probelm? your selling your measly shitty products. bloody brit |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
deezelcaddy Samba Member
Joined: March 29, 2011 Posts: 15 Location: ligonier, pa
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanx all for the info. My insulation above the gearbox is long gone. I will definitely try the rubber mat. I also got the rubber seal for the lid so I hope that helps. I am not clear about the "comfort mount" or the "under tray " is the comfort mount an engine mount? And is the under tray the tin tray under the motor? Thanx again |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crazyvwvanman Samba Member
Joined: January 28, 2008 Posts: 9939 Location: Orbiting San Diego
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
What we call the carrier bars changed a few times over the years. Others call them bearers. Either way, at first they had rubber isolator bushings at both ends of both bars. In 83 models the bars were changed and the rubber isolator ends were dropped. Later the left side bar end isolators were brought back for some models and markets.
In US market models there were only 2 types of carrier bars:
82 with isolator ends on all 4 ends. (engine mounted forward for short early 4 speeds)
83 without isolator ends. (engine moved back for longer 5 speed)
In other markets there was more variety in the bars after 83:
4wd Syncro bars, no isolator ends. (engine mounted lower from raised Syncro body)
2wd left side bar isolator mount added on some models.
2wd right side bar contour changed to clear additional pulleys on some models.
Mark
deezelcaddy wrote: |
..... I am not clear about the "comfort mount" ......is the comfort mount an engine mount?.... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|