Author |
Message |
insyncro Banned
Joined: March 07, 2002 Posts: 15086 Location: New York
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yup.
I bought old stock of Gates, even better stock IMHO, with the different colored core.
Still the new stuff is very good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadetreetim Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2011 Posts: 1994 Location: Riverside, California
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whew, that was a close call debbiej. Glad that officer was observant. _________________ Tim Potts
Doing my best every time I drive it to dispel the myth these Vanagons have to be slow!
'89 Vanagon Bluestar/Country Homes 1.8T & .77 4th
'74 Jeep CJ5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DAV!D Samba Member
Joined: September 10, 2013 Posts: 979 Location: EL CAMINO
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just replaced about 90% of the lines on my van. All but the two sections that go from the firewall to the gas tank and the line to the fuel pump. Before anyone says it, yes I plan to replace the rest very soon. I'm dropping the tank to resell it and instal a new sender, and will do the rest then.
Looking at the lines I replaced so far and the crimps, I'm almost 100% certain that most of the lines I replaced were factory originals.
Pretty crazy to think this van being a 86 was still using the original lines, when it's a very well known issue and one of the lines coming from the tank was leaking. Personally I intend to get in the habit of inspecting my lines every time I change the oil and think I'll change the lines every two years. Honestly it's less then $100 to replace the lines if you do it yourself. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djkeev Samba Moderator
Joined: September 30, 2007 Posts: 32638 Location: Reading Pennsylvania
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JudoJeff Samba Member
Joined: May 24, 2013 Posts: 1179 Location: Near Springfield, MA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
It might sound crazy to replace fuel lines more often, but the new fuels are tough on the rubber components. E20 is around the corner, and even the E10 is causing problems with my old two cycle boat engine.
Not going to get into an in-depth discussion on the effects of E20, but it's a good idea to stay on top of your fuel lines,and plan on more frequent replacement with the best you can find. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50353
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DAV!D Samba Member
Joined: September 10, 2013 Posts: 979 Location: EL CAMINO
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
JudoJeff wrote: |
It might sound crazy to replace fuel lines more often, but the new fuels are tough on the rubber components. E20 is around the corner, and even the E10 is causing problems with my old two cycle boat engine.
Not going to get into an in-depth discussion on the effects of E20, but it's a good idea to stay on top of your fuel lines,and plan on more frequent replacement with the best you can find. |
This is the reason I stated above, that I'm planning to do it every 2 years. The new gas with ethanol is very hard on the rubber and it's not like the old days, where a rubber hose would last for years. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SCM Samba Member
Joined: January 26, 2011 Posts: 3119 Location: Bozeman MT
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
DAV!D wrote: |
This is the reason I stated above, that I'm planning to do it every 2 years. The new gas with ethanol is very hard on the rubber and it's not like the old days, where a rubber hose would last for years. |
Granted they don't have AS MUCH rubber fuel hose but don't you think fuel line replacement would be listed as routine maintanance for more modern cars if a 2-year replacement schedule was necessary? My wife's 01 Jetta is doing just fine as is my 94 Pathfinder and they have never seen new fuel hoses.
To each their own but I plan to look over my (new) lines every now and then, give a sniff for gas fumes, and not worry much more about it for the next 10 years. The last ones held up for 20 years and were exposed to E10 for a fair bit of time before I swapped them. They showed no signs of cracks or splits when I pulled them off. I expect my R90 hoses to do at least as well. _________________ '91 Westfalia GL Automatic (GTA "Turbo" Rebuild w/Peloquin) and 2.3L GoWesty Engine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DAV!D Samba Member
Joined: September 10, 2013 Posts: 979 Location: EL CAMINO
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
SCM wrote: |
Granted they don't have AS MUCH rubber fuel hose but don't you think fuel line replacement would be listed as routine maintanance for more modern cars if a 2-year replacement schedule was necessary? My wife's 01 Jetta is doing just fine as is my 94 Pathfinder and they have never seen new fuel hoses.
To each their own but I plan to look over my (new) lines every now and then, give a sniff for gas fumes, and not worry much more about it for the next 10 years. The last ones held up for 20 years and were exposed to E10 for a fair bit of time before I swapped them. They showed no signs of cracks or splits when I pulled them off. I expect my R90 hoses to do at least as well. |
Modern cars usually don't have a lot of rubber hose and are usually mostly metal lines with a few limited areas that are rubber. It's not quite the same as what we have in our vans.
Honestly, it took me about 2hrs and a little over $60 for quality German fuel line to replace just about every line in my engine compartment. So why not replace them? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50353
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
The whole Vanagon system is fire prone. Lots of rubber in the engine compartment with rubber and plastic running forward that can carry a fire to the tank, coupled with a tank with dual bottom ports that will easily feed a fire by gravity once a fire reaches it. The boxer engine design also lets fuel accumulate on the top of the engine should a leak occur instead of just running onto the ground as would happen on many cars. The Vanagon isn't as bad as a Bus but it is pretty bad.
On both my '91 Multivan and 83 1/2 POS I now have steel line running fore and aft for both the supply and return lines. The junctions between the steel and the rubber in the engine compartment are as high as I can reasonably make them. On the 83 1/2 I also have a spring loaded check valve in the return to prevent back flow by gravity should there be a fire. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brickwerks Samba Member
Joined: April 11, 2010 Posts: 214 Location: West Yorkshire - UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
5.5mm and 7.3mm NBR/CR is what we use, no issues.
For diesel we use FPM/ECO, again with no issues.
I don't understand this fascination people have with replacing the polyamide tube with rubber either, the more poly the better. _________________
whynotvw wrote: |
I see you wanna start some shit. whats your fuckin probelm? your selling your measly shitty products. bloody brit |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
insyncro Banned
Joined: March 07, 2002 Posts: 15086 Location: New York
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm with Wild....metal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
debbiej Samba Member
Joined: December 14, 2008 Posts: 1556 Location: las cruces, nm
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steam clouds from gas hitting hot engine and exhaust is a frightening sight. Likewise the enormous puddle of gasoline running out from under the van. I've had problematic leaks from where hose connects to fuel rail, this was not like that. I was nervous about fine spray type leaks, as we all should be.
This was a BIG failure! The deterioration of the line was horrifying. The amount of gas was nothing like previous leaks. The whole hose was fill of cracks and fissures.
I have no idea how I was so fortunate.
And I have really and truly been initiated into the group that chants "change your fuel lines!"
There may be extenuating circumstances that caused such a failure, and we will be very, very careful about the type of line we use to replace these and the heat and abrasion resistant sheathing put on the lines. But blasé about fuel lines? Never again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
debbiej Samba Member
Joined: December 14, 2008 Posts: 1556 Location: las cruces, nm
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hit submit twice |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildthings Samba Member
Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 50353
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Debbie, the difference between 30r9 and 30r14 (high pressure variant) hose is the amount of fuel which permeates through the hose over a set period of time. By specification the 30r14 hose passes far less fuel than the 30r9 fuel. When used with the old OEM sheaths the 30r9 hose will sometimes sweat a goo like substance for a while, I have not heard of this happening with 30r14 hose, but the 30r14 hose is fairly new on the market and any problems it has may not be all that well documented as of yet.
On my 83 1/2 I recently used 30r9 hose and some braided sheathing I got from my local NAPA. So far so good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CampWesty Samba Member
Joined: September 05, 2012 Posts: 70 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
singler3360 wrote: |
Anyone know the life expectancy of the high quality hose like the GW deluxe kit? |
I purchased GoWesty's high quality kit earlier this year and they said to "Have your mechanic check after 7 years." _________________ Eric
1985 Wolfsburg Westy Weekender, Bostig RG5
Bostig Facebook Group
Vanagon Nation Facebook Group
Instrument Cluster Foil Repair Kits - Fix your faulty blue foil for good! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
randywebb Samba Member
Joined: February 15, 2005 Posts: 3815 Location: Greater Metropolitan Nimrod, Orygun
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
debbiej - you need to take that fuel hose over to the shop and describe what happened
if for no other reason, they need to be alert to not put that low pressure (and maybe really old) fuel hose on someone else's car and kill them
if I was you, I'd find another shop too _________________ 1986 2.1L Westy 2wd Auto Trans. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
debbiej Samba Member
Joined: December 14, 2008 Posts: 1556 Location: las cruces, nm
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah to both. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Crankey Samba Member
Joined: July 11, 2004 Posts: 2659
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sounds to me like it's worth bending up hard line for as much of it as can be done. it's not that difficult to bend up some pieces of stainless steel tube this small.
I agree about some heat shield too...although covering up the hose...well out of sight, out of mind.
a well made kit of fitted hard fuel lines for our vehicles should be a good seller.
even at an inflated price it's still cheap insurance agents fire. let alone the hassle of re working the fuel lines time and time again.
I know I've dumped a tre-frekin mendous amount of cash into my rig and some kind of better than average fuel line is on my short list of things to do.
glad to hear you escaped the grim reaper of fire this time debbiej.
happy thanksgiving to you and hope your post motivates and save some more vans ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luVWagn Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2008 Posts: 1340 Location: Snoqualmie (WA)
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 5:48 pm Post subject: EJ25 fuel line almost came off |
|
|
In a related issue, albeit not about type of fuel line, I found this in my EJ25 conversion the other day:
Try as I might, after loosening the hose-clamp and wrangling the hose with all my might, I only got to here:
Anybody have tips for getting that line seated further?
At least now, it is about 1cm displaced, and I have an eyeball gauge based on the clamp on the line above it.
There's more to checking your FI system than just the lines _________________ '91 Syncro 16 Reimo Hightop Conversion, eTDI |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|