Author |
Message |
MarkWard Samba Member
Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 17155 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 10:21 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
The inner gear has less teeth, so the marks wouldn’t stay aligned. From memory the marks show the outer face of the gears. _________________ ☮️ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwhammer Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: Boulder CO.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 10:37 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
Mark is correct.
If you look at this animation and try to follow an inner tooth and an outter tooth that are mated together, you will see by the time they open up and get back around where they should mesh again the outer tooth will be behind 3 or 4 teeth
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwhammer Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: Boulder CO.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 2:10 pm Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
Ok I am officially confused.
Here is a diagram that I will be referencing in my statement/questions below.
I am running the Audi forward drum/clutch assembly (554) with the 4 gear Audi planetary(582).
As is necessary, I am also running the Audi sun gear (612) that works with the 4 gear planetary in the forward Assembly.
I got all of that in the transmission.
It comes time to install the VW reverse planetary (584) and it will not go on.
The teeth are different and it will not mesh with the Audi 4 gear sun gear (612).
You can not use the Audi reverse planetary (584) because it will not mate up with the VW Reverse ring gear. (594)
You then can not use the Audi reverse ring gear assembly because the internal splines on it (inner splines on part 604) are bigger and will not mate up with the shaft on the diff.
So how does this actually work?
Some pics for reference.
Audi forward drum and shell installed with Audi forward planet and sun gear.
VW reverse planet (left) and Audi reverse planet (right)
The VW reverse planet with not mate with the sun gear in the previous pic.
I should also note that you can not run the VW forward sun gear in the Audi 4 gear forward Planet because it also does not mate up.
What gives.
How have people been doing this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MarkWard Samba Member
Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 17155 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 3:53 pm Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
I would imagine you have to use all of the Audi parts. At least those parts that mesh with the sun gear top and bottom. _________________ ☮️ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwhammer Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: Boulder CO.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 7:07 pm Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
Well this is the problem.
There is no combination of parts that will allow you to use the upgraded Audi bits (4 gear forward planetary) with the VW trans and diff.
I anxiously await the solution since it seems several people have done it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
h00drat Samba Member
Joined: May 31, 2016 Posts: 881 Location: Hood River
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kourt Samba Member
Joined: August 13, 2013 Posts: 1948 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:12 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
In my case, I used a special reverse ring gear, 090 323 370, to make it work. I had to buy that ring gear special from GTA (as noted in my build on 5)
I hope this helps.
kourt
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MarkWard Samba Member
Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 17155 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:38 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
h00drat wrote: |
I’m not sure what your issue is. I’m running the Audi 4 planet system and it mates up fine. Switching to the Audi 4 planetary system is one the main reasons for this swap, so you shouldn’t try to make the VW 3 planet system work. |
I'm a little lost. Didn't you have some pretty heavy duty failure on your rebuilt automatic due to a possible stacking problem? _________________ ☮️ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gruppe B Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2007 Posts: 1331
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gruppe B wrote: |
kourt wrote: |
Let's build our Vanagon automatic transmission with Audi 5000 Turbo internals.
Step 5: Decide which direct drum you wish to use. On the basis of available replacement parts and future availability, the Vanagon direct drum is most suitable. It accepts 17 tooth steels. The Audi 5000 Turbo direct drum accepts 53 tooth steels that are no longer available. Do not buy the 087 53 tooth steels and think they will fit--they won't. The Audi drum has heat tempered steel ears. It will accept the 17 tooth steels for the Vanagon drum, or you can reuse the original 53 tooth steels if they are in good condition.
kourt |
Correction (When using the LATER Audi 5000T transmission),
If building a 5000T enhanced transmission you must use the Audi 5000T direct drum because the Turbo Shell will not connect to the Vanagon direct drum.
Above is a photo of the Audi 5000T direct drum and 5000T shell connected together
Above is a photo of the Audi 5000T direct drum and the Vanagon shell that cannot connect. The Vanagon direct drum and shell is narrower on the outside preventing using the Vanagon direct drum from being compatible with the Audi upgrade.
None of the Vanagon frictions and steels will work with the later Audi 5000T direct drum as they are larger. I reused the 5000T frictions as I didn't order them.
You will also have to use the Audi 5000T 2nd gear brake band piston as the rod that goes to the brake band is shorter to compensate for the larger direct drum.
Vanagon brake band piston on left 1984 Audi 5000T on right
No criticism Kourt, your 1982 5000T is just different than the 1984 5000T that I am using. This thread is absolutely incredible, I'm just adding addition info where I can. |
VW Hammer,
See my old post above |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwhammer Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: Boulder CO.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 6:59 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
None of what you mentioned is what I am having issues with.
I sat yesterday and reread this whole thread and didn't see anyone having the same issue that I am having.
Perhaps the part that kourt mentioned is the magic piece of this puzzle.
It is a different part number than both the van reverse ring gear hub and the Audi rev ring hub that I have.
Originally it was believed he needed that piece because he was using an early Audi trans but maybe there are just some versions of this trans that require that part.
I will tear it all down and take more pics to properly illustrate the issue I am having.
I may also call german transaxle and see if my issue makes sense to them and if they have a solution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwhammer Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: Boulder CO.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 7:02 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
Kourt,
Is that part number you listed the actual ring gear (part 594 above) or part 604 in the diagram above? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Butcher Samba Member
Joined: December 05, 2015 Posts: 1285 Location: Right Here
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 7:28 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
FYI, there are two different 2nd gear ratio's on these transmissions. I'm certain that is why some work and some do not. I do not believe it's a 4 planet gearset issue but a ratio issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gruppe B Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2007 Posts: 1331
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 8:07 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
Gruppe B wrote: |
vwhammer wrote: |
Then it is a call to German transaxle to see if they have and will sell me the Audi ring gear hub and maybe some of the shims that have been mentioned.
I will try to document everything as much as possible with as many updated part sources as possible.
I also still have to source a good Audi trans so it might be a minute. |
Don't buy the ring gear hub if using the 1984+ Audi 5000T transmission as you won't need it. The Vanagon Hub will fit fine
1984 Audi 5000T Reverse Planetary Ring Gear with Vanagon Ring Gear Hub
1984 Audi 5000T and 1991 Vanagon Reverse Planetary Ring Gears stacked on top of each other (same gear tooth spacing) |
Strange, this is the part number for the ring gear hub I used that came from the 1991 Vanagon transmission. It fit perfectly in the 1984 Audi Turbo reverse planetary ring gear. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
h00drat Samba Member
Joined: May 31, 2016 Posts: 881 Location: Hood River
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 8:40 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
MarkWard wrote: |
h00drat wrote: |
I’m not sure what your issue is. I’m running the Audi 4 planet system and it mates up fine. Switching to the Audi 4 planetary system is one the main reasons for this swap, so you shouldn’t try to make the VW 3 planet system work. |
I'm a little lost. Didn't you have some pretty heavy duty failure on your rebuilt automatic due to a possible stacking problem? |
I had a clutch plate in the Direct Drum break. I do not believe it was a "stacking issue," but as we have narrowed down here, an issue with the piston for the direct drum. I'm going to order a new piston to confirm. _________________ <<Tyler>>
1987.5 Wolfsburg Weekender / CHC / 2.0 ABA
CHC Top Thread
Engine Conversion Thread (2.0 ABA Swap)
ABA Swap - Image Gallery
Auto Trans Rebuild - Image Gallery |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwhammer Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: Boulder CO.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 8:42 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
Butcher wrote: |
FYI, there are two different 2nd gear ratio's on these transmissions. I'm certain that is why some work and some do not. I do not believe it's a 4 planet gearset issue but a ratio issue. |
Hmm you may be on to something here.
I was fairly certain that the high mileage trans that was in my van was one of the later units with the lower gearing (higher numerically)
I also assumed that my Audi trans is one of lower gearing.
However I am using the parts from my new van trans that I purchased that maybe had the higher gearing (lower numerically).
Didn't the early units with the higher gearing not have ports for a trans cooler?
I will have to compare all the parts that I have and see what's what. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kourt Samba Member
Joined: August 13, 2013 Posts: 1948 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 9:11 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
Howdy,
The ring gear I reference in my post was sold as a whole unit (the outer ring gear, part 594, and the inner annulus, part 604).
The annulus is held in place by a circlip and is swappable.
The annulus that came with my GTA ring gear fits the 1982 4-planet Audi internals, while also interfacing with the turbine shaft of the Vanagon. That annulus is also shallower (I think I'm remembering that correctly--don't hold me to it) in its bearing surface.
You can see the original annulus differences here:
The 1982 Audi annulus on the right will not even fit the turbine shaft of a Vanagon, and would also prevent proper endplay when the trans + diff are mated.
Note that neither photo here shows the true 090 323 370 annulus.
GruppeB and Butcher are right, there are two flavors of ratios out there. Here's some numbers.
Audi 5000 turbo automatic through 1983:
1st: 2.55
2nd: 1.44
3rd: 1.00
Audi 5000 turbo automatic from 1984:
1st: 2.71
2nd: 1.5
3rd: 1.00
Vanagon 090 automatic:
1st: 2.71 (late), 2.55 (early)
2nd: 1.5 (late), 1.44 (early)
3rd: 1.00
In my case, I put 1982 Audi internals into a 1985/1991 Vanagon transmission, which may explain why I needed a special ring gear, but GruppeB did not have those same results.
kourt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwhammer Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: Boulder CO.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 11:07 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
I am at work at the moment so I can't really look into anything.
I suspect the issue I am having is because I have parts from the 2 different gear ratios.
The used trans that I bought to rebuild supposedly had been rebuilt by the previous owner.
based on the box of parts that he gave me it was apparent that he had a couple of transmissions that he was getting parts from.
It is very likely that he used the taller geared internals in the later case.
I still have all the parts from the trans that was in my van when I bough it so I should have the right parts. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwhammer Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: Boulder CO.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 7:24 pm Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
Ok everyone can rest easy.
I've sorted it out.
Pretty much it was exactly as I guessed.
Someone at some point put the 2.55/1.44 gear set into this transmission.
Fortunately the box of parts that I got with the trans had the reverse ring gear in it from the 2.71/1.5 gear set.
So these are the three pieces that I have available.
This is part 604 in the diagram I posted earlier.
the first one is the piece from the Audi as evident by the 087 that starts the part number cast in the piece.
This part fits in the ring gear for the Audi and the 2.71 Van gear set but the ID is too big to fit on the Van Diff splines.
This is the 2.55 van reverse ring hub.
You will notice it starts with an 090 instead of the 087.
Well I guess technically it starts with an A but you get my point.
It's a van trans part.
It fits the van diff but does not fit the larger Audi or van 2.71 reverse ring gear
This last one is the part I need.
No "A" at the front and ends in a B but also has the 090 at the beginning.
This is the hub for the 2.71 van reverse ring gear.
It fits the larger Audi reverse ring gear but naturally fits the 2.71 van rev ring gear.
Here is the larger Audi hub in the smaller van ring.
no worky.
Obviously the larger van hub also fits similarly in the smaller van ring.
Here is the smaller van hub in the larger ring.
Here is the difference between the big (2.71) ring and the small (2.55) ring.
So obviously, once again, the big ring and the big van hub fit over the 4 planet Reverse planetary and also fits the splined shaft on the Van diff.
So that's one problem solved.
On to something else.
I noticed in the Bently that there appears to be one extra friction and steel in the 1st/reverse clutch pack that appears to be smaller than the others.
Maybe I did not look hard enough but it seems none of my transmission have this.
What is this?
The last issue that I came across was likely on account of some slightly out of spec pistons that seem to be all over in the van trans rebuild world.
With my old parts you can see that the little relief valve in the 1st/reverse brake piston lines up real nice in the shell
With the new piston it did not line up so well.
I made an executive decision and decided to take a file to the hole to open it up to clear.
It worked a treat but I did not get any pics of the final product.
Well I think that's all I have come across that I have had to sort out.
I hope to get this thing wrapped up tomorrow.
I need to buy a smaller torque wrench so I can adjust the brake band.
Oh speaking of brake band I got my HD kevlar band from Matt Steedle and swapped that out for the plain jane stock piece. (sorry no pic of the part) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
h00drat Samba Member
Joined: May 31, 2016 Posts: 881 Location: Hood River
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwhammer Samba Member
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: Boulder CO.
|
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 8:42 am Post subject: Re: Building a better Vanagon automatic transaxle |
|
|
h00drat wrote: |
I had a clutch plate in the Direct Drum break. I do not believe it was a "stacking issue," but as we have narrowed down here, an issue with the piston for the direct drum. I'm going to order a new piston to confirm. |
I was just rolling back through this thread and noticed something in one of your pictures.
Just looking at this pic I can tell you that the top surface of that piston is way thinner than the one I bought.
I am pretty sure that you have already come to this conclusion but I would feel pretty confident that that piston is the cause of your excessive gap and likely the cause of your failure.
I don't have any pictures of my piston but I am sure you will see a difference once you get the new one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|