Author |
Message |
busdaddy Samba Member
Joined: February 12, 2004 Posts: 51130 Location: Surrey B.C. Canada, but thinking of Ukraine
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:38 pm Post subject: Re: Early vs late bay beam tube distance |
|
|
Splits sit ~1.5" higher on the nose when a bay balljoint beam is installed so lets assume a bay would drop a similar amount with a split beam.
But as already mentioned why downgrade? _________________ Rust NEVER sleeps and stock never goes out of style.
Please don't PM technical questions, ask your problem in public so everyone can play along. If you think it's too stupid post it here
Stop dead photo links! Post your photos to The Samba Gallery!
Слава Україні! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lightice Samba Member
Joined: December 14, 2012 Posts: 599
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:45 pm Post subject: Re: Early vs late bay beam tube distance |
|
|
With the cost to King and link pins, better off staying balljoint.
At least that's what I'm trying to do anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TDCTDI Samba Advocatus Diaboli
Joined: August 31, 2013 Posts: 12850 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 3:51 pm Post subject: Re: Early vs late bay beam tube distance |
|
|
busman78 wrote: |
Yes, it is called a downgrade to handling, for 68-69 as a bolt on, have no idea how much lower it would be, maybe somebody that has done it will pop in. |
Not that any of the people that are dropping their busses really care about handling anyway. _________________ Everybody born before 1975 has a story, good, bad, or indifferent, about a VW.
GOFUNDYOURSELF, quit asking everyone to do it for you!
An air cooled VW will make you a hoarder.
Do something, anything, to your project every day, and you will eventually complete it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|