Author |
Message |
Dan2973 Samba Member
Joined: April 12, 2019 Posts: 436 Location: NJ
|
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:35 pm Post subject: Engine question |
|
|
Hey guys. I’m new to forum and I’m in the middle of restoring a 66 beetle. Trying to gather info and advice on the engine choice. I posted the numbers here on the samba and according to the charts I have a 1964 40 hp 1200 motor in a 1966. Numbers are 8999799. The body is off and I’m doing body work. Was thinking of pulling the motor and doing a big bore kit because after reading a ton of threads I don’t think I will be satisfied. I’m also thinking do it once ya know. Question is what is a P&C kit mean? Is it worth putting money into the 1200 or just by a rebuilt 1600? Not sure what the cost would be. Not looking to go 100 mph but just cruise nice with a little pep. After reading threads I see some people say that there is not much gain with a big bore kit? Is rebuilding the motor something novice could do. I’m pretty mechanically inclined but never rebuilt a bug motor. Sorry so many questions. Thanks in advance. Here are some pics of the project
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: June 24, 2015 Posts: 719 Location: Rialto. CA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:40 pm Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
Go with a 69mm crank and 83mm bores will give you 1500cc dual solex 28 pci carbs you should be fine ...if you go 69mm crank there's 3 ways you can go 69mm crank with 1500/1600 rods or 69mm crank with 40hp rods . I would go with the 69mm crank with 1500/1600 311A or 311B rods but if you go this way you would have to get 1500 type 3 83mm cylinders/ pistons 22mmpins ...if you go with 69mm crank with 40hp rods you would have to use spacers under big bore 83mm cylinders the rod jounals need to be cut down to fit the 69mm crank with 40hp rods 20mm pins which is more work ..whatever works best for you. you can also go with a 69mm crank with 36hp rods which gives you a stroke of 74mm with 83mm pistons which gives you a 1600cc you could use the 40hp big bore 83mm pistons and cylinders I would go with aapistons 36hp h beam rods than the stock 36hp rods with this set up ..yes complicated but really aint..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan2973 Samba Member
Joined: April 12, 2019 Posts: 436 Location: NJ
|
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 2:51 am Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
[email protected] wrote: |
Go with a 69mm crank and 83mm bores will give you 1500cc dual solex 28 pci carbs you should be fine ...if you go 69mm crank there's 3 ways you can go 69mm crank with 1500/1600 rods or 69mm crank with 40hp rods . I would go with the 69mm crank with 1500/1600 311A or 311B rods but if you go this way you would have to get 1500 type 3 83mm cylinders/ pistons 22mmpins ...if you go with 69mm crank with 40hp rods you would have to use spacers under big bore 83mm cylinders the rod jounals need to be cut down to fit the 69mm crank with 40hp rods 20mm pins which is more work ..whatever works best for you. you can also go with a 69mm crank with 36hp rods which gives you a stroke of 74mm with 83mm pistons which gives you a 1600cc you could use the 40hp big bore 83mm pistons and cylinders I would go with aapistons 36hp h beam rods than the stock 36hp rods with this set up ..yes complicated but really aint..... |
. Thanks Jerry. I forgot to mention I would like to keep it as stock looking as possible so I wasn’t looking into dual carbs. Also wasn’t looking to split the case if I didn’t have to. I was just thinking of bolt on rebuild. Basically wanted to keep it as simple as possible being it is my first time. Is this possible? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
glutamodo The Android
Joined: July 13, 2004 Posts: 26325 Location: Douglas, WY
|
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:12 am Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
Big Bore 40HP (1385cc) is a very good upgrade, and it's often already been done to many old 1200s! I know that's all I've ever had in my 62 since I got it in 1989... every other engine I've put in there to date has been such.
Now the Big Bore Kits sold these days may have interference issues with the crankcase... so they may not be "easy bolt-on" style of upgrade. _________________ Andy T.
IMAGE NOTE: It has been noted that Chrome based browsers may have issues in displaying my vast image library, which use non-secure links and are on an FTP server. Images should still be viewable if the link is clicked though.
I do not know how to fix this. All I can say is it all works fine for me with what I use, Firefox. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kjell Roar Samba Member
Joined: December 08, 2008 Posts: 1326 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:42 pm Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
glutamodo wrote: |
Now the Big Bore Kits sold these days may have interference issues with the crankcase... so they may not be "easy bolt-on" style of upgrade. |
A friend needed to clearance a little on the piston skirts on his 1200, it was a quite easy job for him.
It is cyl #3 that need work, but you should do the same modification on all due to weight. _________________ I got a historic car, every scratch got a history...
My car, Aug. 4th, 1955 / an early 56: http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/album_page.php?pic_id=610438 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alstrup Samba Member
Joined: July 12, 2007 Posts: 7221 Location: Videbaek Denmark
|
Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 4:55 am Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
If all you do is lump around town within the city limits and occasionally go on a regular highway the 1385 BB kit on a 1200 is okay. It gives you more lower rpm pulling power. You can basicly floor it in 4rth from just over idle.
Anything more than that and the engine needs more air, meaning a dual carb set up. It will still be very forgiving down low, but give you back the rpm range a stock 1200 has + a little more.
I´d put it this way. If you see a challenge or have a quest for keeping the stock 1200 case and internals by all means do it. If that is not an issue, but you would like to retain a reasonably stock engine look, go with a 1600 sgl port.
My 02c.
PS. The Flintstone pic is a classic, but still holds water |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PEPPE Samba Member
Joined: August 24, 2003 Posts: 1068 Location: Roma Italy
|
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:23 am Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
1385 is good but you will not obtain a good "punch". i do often the 1470cc increase and also 1650cc, and both will give a good difference in behaviour.
these are based on cut down 85.5 and 90.5mm barrels. goind more than that is excessive for 1200 heads and the engine will not rev past 3000. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WickedWagens Samba Member
Joined: April 09, 2004 Posts: 190 Location: Carson City, NV
|
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 7:29 am Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
[email protected] wrote: |
You can also go with a 69mm crank with 36hp rods which gives you a stroke of 74mm with 83mm pistons which gives you a 1600cc. |
This is not correct. If you have a 69mm crank your stroke is 69mm no matter what rods you use.
I would go with a 1600 single port for the best power and still look close to stock.
1966 US Beetles were 1300cc, so you could still go to 1500 or 1600 and keep them looking close to stock. _________________ 1968 Ghia Land Speed Car
G/CFALT 106.643 MPH
G/CGALT 113.131 MPH
G/CBGALT 134.606 MPH
G/CBFALT 146.715 MPH
G/CBGC 158.242 MPH
H/CPRO 93.383 MPH
H/CBGC 94.33 MPH
H/CBGALT 101.282 MPH
H/CBFALT 120.591 MPH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: June 24, 2015 Posts: 719 Location: Rialto. CA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 1:48 pm Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
WickedWagens wrote: |
[email protected] wrote: |
You can also go with a 69mm crank with 36hp rods which gives you a stroke of 74mm with 83mm pistons which gives you a 1600cc. |
This is not correct. If you have a 69mm crank your stroke is 69mm no matter what rods you use.
I would go with a 1600 single port for the best power and still look close to stock.
1966 US Beetles were 1300cc, so you could still go to 1500 or 1600 and keep them looking close to stock. |
Have you ever looked in the book ..".how to hotrod volkswagen engine" by Bill Fisher??? He Clearly states in his book a 1500cc 69mm crank with 36hp journals gives it a stroke of 74mm ...how am I wrong ???? Look it up I aint wrong .... he even talks how to use 40hp rods with a 1500 crank 69mm crank ... your gonna learn new things today 😂🤣😂 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bulli Klinik Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2005 Posts: 2079 Location: Bulli Klinik, Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:09 pm Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
You'e talking about an offset ground crank. The journals are ground smaller further out on the throws of the crank.
It was a pretty common combination to offset grind a stock crank to Rabbit journals and run Rabbit rods. I think you could get 74-76mm stroke without welding the journal. _________________ I've never met a Bus I didn't like.
Mike K
Bulli Klinik
Colorado Springs |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[email protected] Samba Member
Joined: June 24, 2015 Posts: 719 Location: Rialto. CA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:25 pm Post subject: Re: Engine question |
|
|
Bulli Klinik wrote: |
You'e talking about an offset ground crank. The journals are ground smaller further out on the throws of the crank.
It was a pretty common combination to offset grind a stock crank to Rabbit journals and run Rabbit rods. I think you could get 74-76mm stroke without welding the journal. |
👏👏👏 about time someone understands me ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|